Patent Grant
11369859
This application claims priority to European Patent Application No. 18190315.4 filed on Aug. 22, 2018, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The invention concerns a method for the continuous ranking of competitors during a race of a slalom skiing type sports discipline, wherein the competitor is provided with at least one gliding board, such as skis or a snowboard.
The invention also concerns a continuous ranking system for implementing the method.
In a ski or board sports competition, such as a slalom or giant slalom ski race, which may have one or more runs, the race is made more appealing to spectators or television viewers by displaying the intermediates times of the competitor on the piste, in order to rank his or her current position relative to the preceding competitors. The intermediate times are, for example, measured by means of a light gate between two photoelectric cells, which are placed a few metres apart from each other, and which activate the instantaneous recording of the timer value when the competitor crosses the gate. However, the terrain configuration and the risk of untimely activation by members of the organisation restrict its use on the piste.
Another method consists in manually activating the recording of the timer value as the competitor passes, but the accuracy and reliability are not high enough.
To determine the exact time of passage of competitors, there exists a method and a system disclosed in Patent No. WO2016174612, in which magnets are placed along the course, preferably on each gate. The magnets are detected by a magnetometer worn by the competitor, and the data is transmitted so that the time of passage of the competitor at each gate is known. However, implementation is long, since each magnet has to be placed in the snow, which is all the more inconvenient when the course is changed between two runs. Further, the range of the magnets is not always sufficient when a competitor passes at a greater distance from the gate.
In another Patent (WO2010119084), accelerometers are arranged in the slalom gates or poles, to detect passage of the competitor. However, such a device cannot identify the gates in order to differentiate between them, and also does not facilitate replacement of a gate during a race.
It is also to be noted that it is possible to envisage continuously measuring speed by using a receiver of a satellite tracking system of the GPS/GNSS type. Depending on interference due to multiple signal paths, to the sky being blocked by mountains or other objects and to geometric dilution of accuracy, an accuracy of 95% can nonetheless be achieved. On a mountain slope with an inclination of 45°, horizontal speed is 30% lower than three-dimensional speed. In order to work accurately on a racing skier, the GPS receiver must be placed on the skier's helmet, but this represents an unacceptable safety risk during a race. Further, as the sensor is not attached to the ski, there is a lack of precision due to movements between the head and the ski. Although GPS technology normally permits speed measurement in three directions, the user of the GPS device only receives two-dimensional speed horizontally. This may result in a big difference for the skier compared to his actual speed, which is a drawback.
It is thus an object of the invention to overcome the drawbacks of the aforementioned state of the art by proposing a method for the continuous ranking of competitors during a race of a slalom skiing sports discipline, the competitor being provided with at least one gliding board, such as skis or a snowboard, wherein it is possible to rank the competitor with respect to the preceding competitors and regularly update the ranking throughout the race.
To this end, the invention concerns a method for the continuous ranking of competitors during a race of a slalom skiing sports discipline, wherein the competitor is provided with at least one gliding board, such as skis or a snowboard.
The method is remarkable in that it includes the following iterative steps:
Thus, only one parameter is monitored—the lateral orientation of the gliding board, for example a ski or snowboard—to determine the moments when the competitor changes position between two slalom turns. The changes in lateral orientation generally occur between the obstacles that competitors have to zigzag around, for example gates or poles.
Whatever the trajectories of the competitor, the changes in orientation generally occur at the same level of the ski slope between the gates. Consequently, by detecting the moments at which they occur, it is possible to follow the progress of the competitor throughout the slalom and to determine the run times of the competitors between each change in orientation. Thus, run times are recorded progressively throughout the slalom, each recorded time corresponding to a change in orientation of the skis.
The recorded run time is compared to the run times recorded for the preceding competitors for a corresponding detected moment. Thus, the competitor performing the slalom can be ranked with respect to the preceding competitors at that moment. The place that the competitor occupies at that moment in the race is known.
At each new detected moment, the ranking of the competitor is re-evaluated by means of this method. The ranking of the competitor is thus updated very frequently, virtually between each obstacle of the slalom.
As a result of this method, it is sufficient to monitor a single parameter—the angle of lateral rotation of the ski with respect to the plane of the slalom piste—to determine the run time to be recorded and to compare it to the preceding competitors. This is thus a reliable method that is technically simple to implement, which frequently updates the ranking of the competitor and follows the changes of the competitor's position in the ranking throughout the race.
Further, the method does not require any complex equipment on the course or on the slalom obstacles. Further, no external factor is used and relied upon, such as a satellite system, for example.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, in the measuring step, the predefined axis is chosen to be oriented substantially along the longitudinal axis of the gliding board, the lateral angle being measured with respect to the plane of the slope of the course.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, in the detection step, the value of the predefined angle is chosen to be zero, the gliding board being substantially parallel to the plane of the piste.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, in the detection step, the sign of the angle value is detected.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, in the detection step, moments are detected for two angle values, a first type of moment when the angle value changes from a value less than a value greater than or equal to a first predefined value, and a second type of moment when the angle changes from a greater value to a value less than or equal to a second predefined value.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, in the recording step, the first types of moment are associated with a turn in a first direction, substantially orthogonal to the predefined axis, and the second types of moment are associated with a turn in the opposite direction to the first turn, for example right and left.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the first predefined value is comprised in a range of 3° to 30°, preferably of 5° to 15°, for example 10°, and the second predefined value is comprised in a range of −30° to −3°, preferably of −15° to −5°, for example −10°.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, in the comparison step, a mean run time is computed over a series of consecutive detected moments, for example over the last four detected moments.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, in the ranking step, the competitor is ranked with respect to the preceding competitors as a function of the mean run time.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the ranking step is performed after a predefined number of detected moments, for example after the fourth detected moment.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the method includes an additional step of transmitting the recorded time, between the detection step and the recording step.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the method includes an additional step of displaying the competitor's ranking for the detected moment.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, in the display step, the competitor's run time for the detected moment is also displayed.
The invention concerns a method for the continuous ranking of competitors during a race of a slalom skiing type sports discipline, the competitor being provided with at least one gliding board, such as skis or a snowboard, for implementation of the continuous ranking method described above.
To this end, the system includes:
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the system includes a portable transponder module provided with the measurement unit, the detection unit and a transmitter for transmitting the detection signal to the processing unit.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the transponder module is arranged on the competitor's ski boot.
According to a particular embodiment of the invention, the system includes a ranking display unit.
The objects, advantages and features of the ranking method and system according to the invention will appear more clearly in the following description of at least one non-limiting embodiment illustrated by the drawings, in which:
According to the invention, the method is arranged to allow the continuous ranking of a competitor with respect to the preceding competitors during a race of a slalom ski type sports discipline. It concerns, for example, descending a slalom or giant slalom piste with skis or a snowboard. The invention can also be applied to any board sport which requires frequent turns to be made.
The term ‘continuous’ means that the ranking is regularly updated, and that it is frequently repeated during the competitor's run. The competitor is provided with at least one gliding board, such as skis or a snowboard, which allow him to glide over the piste, which is covered with snow.
During a slalom race 13, as represented in
Detecting the moment at which the competitor has changed the lateral position of the skis determines the points of passage 5 on course 13 for which run times are measured, which the competitor's ranking to be updated with respect to the preceding competitors, at each point of passage 5 on course 13.
To this end, method 1, represented in
In a second step 7, the moment at which the angle passes through a predefined value is measured.
According to a first embodiment of method 1, a zero angle value is chosen so that the gliding board is substantially parallel to the plane of the piste when this moment is detected. Thus, when the competitor changes the lateral orientation of his skis between two turns, he necessarily passes through a zero lateral angle value.
According to a second embodiment of method 1, the sign of the angle value is also detected to determine whether the angle has passed through a zero value. Moreover, it is possible to deduce the type of turn from the sign. For example, when the angle becomes negative, a left turn is detected, and when the angle becomes positive, a right turn is detected. Each detection can thus be associated with the orientation of the turn, be it left or right. By associating the type of turn with each detection, it is possible to track whether the competitor is following the same course as the other competitors.
According to a third embodiment of method 1, moments are detected for two angle values, a first type of moment when the angle value changes from a value less than a value greater than or equal to a first predefined value, and a second type of moment when the angle changes from a greater value to a value less than or equal to a second predefined value.
The first types of moment are associated with a turn in a first direction, substantially orthogonal to the predefined axis, and the second types of moment are associated with a turn in the opposite direction to the first turn. For example, a right turn is detected when the angle has a value greater than or equal to the first predefined value and a left turn when the angle has a value less than or equal to a second predefined value.
The first predefined value is comprised in a range of 3° to 30°, preferably of 5° to 15°, and the second predefined value is comprised in a range of −30° to −3°, preferably of −15° to −5°, to count all the turns. For example, an angle of 10° is chosen for the first value and −10° for the second value. In this example, a left turn is detected when the angle reaches −10°, even though it was greater than this value, and a right turn when the angle reaches 10° even though the angle was less than this angle.
In this third embodiment, there is a hysteresis effect in detection, to avoid detecting small turns that the competitor makes, for example, to right himself, and which is not due to avoiding a gate. In the last example, turns are not detected for values less than 10° and more than −10°.
In the example of
Method 1 include a fourth step 9 of recording the competitor's run time corresponding to the detected moment. The competitor's run time is timed from the start by the usual timing means. Thus, as soon as a moment is detected, the current run time is instantaneously recorded to be associated with the detected moment.
In the first embodiment, a run time is associated with each passage of the angle through the zero value.
In the second embodiment, a run time is associated with each change of sign of the angle value. Further, the direction of the turn—right or left—is known. It is thus possible to check whether the competitors have made the same number of left and right turns.
In the third embodiment, a run time is associated as soon as the angle is greater than or equal to the first predefined value, or as soon as the angle is less than or equal to the second predefined value. Further, the direction of the turn—left or right—is known, as in the second embodiment.
The next step is a step 10 of comparing the stored run time with those of the preceding competitors for the corresponding detected moment. Advantageously, the stored run times of the competitor are tallied and the last run time stored is compared with the stored run times of the preceding competitors of the same order.
According to a particular embodiment, during the comparison step, a mean run time is computed over a series of consecutive detected moments. To increase the ranking reliability, the mean value is, for example, computed over the last four detected moments. This thus avoid an erroneous ranking due to an anomaly in the course of the competitor
Using the recorded run time, there is then a step 11 of ranking the competitor with respect to the preceding competitors as a function of the run time of each competitor. In the embodiment wherein a mean run time is computed over several moments, the competitor is ranked with respect to the preceding competitors as a function of the mean run time.
Advantageously, the ranking step is performed after a predefined number of detected moments, for example after the fourth detected moment. This therefore avoids creating a ranking over the first detected moments since there is a risk of error.
In
The continuous ranking method 1 described above is implemented in an iterative manner throughout the competitor's run. Method 1 is repeated in the order of steps described above to update the ranking frequently, here at each turn change of the competitor.
In graph 14 of
An example ranking between several competitors, three in the example, is shown in Table 25 of
Thus, from the computed means [T31], [T32], [T33], [T41], [T42], [T43], the competitors are ranked from the lowest mean to the highest mean for moments G3 and G4. For moment G3, the third competitor is the fastest, ahead of the first and second, while at detected moment G4, the second competitor is faster than the first, with the third still the slowest.
The invention also relates to a system 30 for the continuous ranking of a competitor during a race of a slalom skiing sports discipline. System 30 is, in particular, suitable for implementing the method described above.
System 30 includes one or more transponder modules 31, which are each intended to be worn by a competitor, who wears it to measure, in particular, the variation in lateral angle of the gliding board. Each transponder module 31 for the competition is disposed, for example, on one of the competitor's boots. Transponder module 31 includes a transmitter 32 provided with an antenna for transmitting a data signal, in particular a detection signal of a moment when the angle passes through the predefined value. For data signal transmission, the signal carrier frequency may be comprised between 300 MHz and 3,000 MHz, and especially, for example, at 433 MHz, 868 MHz or 915 MHz. Data modulation is achieved by amplitude modulation or frequency or phase modulation. It may be chosen from several carrier frequencies for transmission of the data signal. Thus, various transmission channels may be selected.
Each transponder module includes a measurement unit 33 for measuring the variation in the lateral angle of the gliding board about the predefined axis. Measurement unit 33 is, for example, an inertial measurement unit, which is a motion sensor generally formed of a 3-axis accelerometer, a 3-axis gyroscope and a 3-axis magnetometer. The gyroscope measures the angle variation about the predefined axis. It is to be noted that a sensor provided simply with a gyroscope is sufficient to measure the angular variation according to the method.
Transponder module 31 also includes a detection unit 34 configured to detect the moment when the measured angle passes through the predefined value or values, and the sign of the angle if necessary. Consequently, as soon as the angle value is detected, the module instantaneously transmits a detection signal.
System 30 also includes one or more base stations 35, 36, 37 which can each receive a signal transmitted by the antenna of transmitter 32 of the transponder module 31 in the race, particularly a detection signal of the moment when the competitor passes through the predefined value or values. Each base station 35, 36, 37 can receive the signal from transponder module 31, separately or together via a receiving antenna 41, 42, 43. It is to be noted that each base station 35, 36, 37 of the device can be placed at a specific location on the racing track. For example, in a ski or snowboard race, base stations 35, 36, 37 could be placed spaced apart from each other by 200 to 400 m between the start and finish of the course. Each base station 35, 36, 37 or at least one base station can receive a data signal from the transponder module 31 worn by the competitor during his run.
System 30 is also equipped with a timing device 38 and a display unit 39. Timing device 38 controls the timing of each competitor's run, and thus measures the run time of the competitors from the start until the competitor finishes. Display unit 39 displays the ranking in real time or continuously on at least one screen for spectators or television viewers via television broadcast devices or on the Internet.
System 30 further includes a processing unit 40 connected to the various base stations 35, 36, 37 and to timing device 38. The various base stations 35, 36, 37 can be connected by cable or also by wireless communication in order to transmit the signal to processing unit 40 by cable or also by wireless transmission. Processing unit 40 is configured to record the competitor's run time when it receives a detection signal from transmitter 32 of transponder module 31, transmitted by bases 35, 36, 37. Processing unit 40 stores the run time for the detected moment and compares the run time with those of the preceding competitors for the corresponding detected moment. Processing unit 40 then performs a ranking of the competitor with respect to the preceding competitors as a function of the run time of each competitor, according to any of the embodiments of the method described above. The ranking is simultaneously transmitted to display unit 39 for the spectators or television viewers.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18190315 | Aug 2018 | EP | regional |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6033227 | Ishige | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6539336 | Vock | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 8616979 | Daniel | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 20070061106 | Vock | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20140257568 | Czaja et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 707 401 | Jun 2014 | CH |
| 103212197 | Jul 2013 | CN |
| 206121120 | Apr 2017 | CN |
| 103959094 | May 2018 | CN |
| 108379809 | Aug 2018 | CN |
| 1 406 066 | Apr 2004 | EP |
| 3 292 894 | Mar 2018 | EP |
| 2005-160533 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 10-2017-0105335 | Sep 2017 | KR |
| Entry |
|---|
| European Search Report dated Jan. 31, 2019 in European Application 18190315.4 filed on Aug. 22, 2018 (with English Translation of Categories of Cited Documents & Written Opinion). |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Aug. 24, 2020 in Patent Application No. 201910771104.5 (English translation of Category of Cited Documents), 7 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200061442 A1 | Feb 2020 | US |
