This invention relates generally to radar imaging, and more particularly to through-the-wall radar (TWI) imaging.
Through-the-wall-imaging (TWI) can detect objects in a scene behind a wall. In a typical application, a transmitting antenna array emits a radar pulse that propagates through the wall. The pulse is reflected by the objects and propagate back to a receiving antenna array as a set of echoes. The composition of the scene can then be visualized by generating a radar image that represents scene, including the number, locations and shape of the objects and reflectivities of the objects. However, depending on dielectric permittivity and permeability of the walls, the received signal is often corrupted with indirect secondary reflections due to the walls, which result in artifacts, such as ghosts, that clutter the radar image. Therefore, it is desired to reduction artifacts and significantly improve the quality and applicability of TWI.
Signal Model
A TWI radar imaging system typically includes arrays of one or more transmitting antennas and receiving antennas, (Ns), Nr. A time-domain waveform of the pulse transmitted by each source is s(t), and a primary impulse response, excluding multi-path reflections, of the scene is gp (t, nr, ns) at the receiving antenna nr ∈ {1, . . . Nr} as a reflection of a pulse from transmittng antenna ns ∈ {1, . . . Ns}. The impulse response of the multi-path reflections due to the wall clutter is gm(t, nr, ns).
Using a conventional time-domain representation, the received signal can be represented by
r(t, nr, ns)=s(t)*(gp(t, nr, ns)+gm(t, nr, ns)), (1)
where * is a convolution operator.
Without loss of generality, if there are K objects in the scene, each inducing a primary impulse response gk(t, nr, ns) indexed by k ∈ {1 . . . K}. The impulse response can be modeled by a convolution of a delay kernel d(t, nr, ns) with the primary impulse response gk(t, nr, ns) of each object, such that
gp(t, nr, ns)=Σk=1K gk(t, nr, ns), and
gm(t ,nr, ns)=d(t, nr, ns)*(Σk=1Kgk(t ,nr, ns)).
For a particular transmitter-receiver antenna pair (nr, ns), all primary reflections experience the same delay convolution kernel d(t, nr, ns) when generating the clutter. The delay kernel can be regarded as a weighted Dirac delta function
d(t)=Σjw(tj)δ(t−tj),
where tj>0 is the time delay at which the reflections reach the receiving antenna from the jth multi-path source, and w(tj) is an attenuation weight of the jth path.
The definition of the sparse delay kernel d(t, nr, ns) can be extended to that of an activation function that generates both the primary and multiple impulse responses by allowing ti≧0. Consequently, the received signal can be expressed as a superposition of the primary responses of all K objects convolved with an activation function as
r(t, nr, ns)=s(t)*Σk=1Kd(t, nr, ns)*gk(t, nr, ns), (3)
where d(t, nr, ns) is independent of k.
Kaczmarz Method
The Kaczmarz method can be used to determine a solution x of large overdetermined systems of linear equations Ax=r, where A ∈ M×N has full column rank and r ∈
M. The procedure sequentially cycles through the rows of A, orthogonally projecting the solution estimate at iteration j onto the solution space given by a row or block of rows Aj, such that
Randomizing the row selection criteria improves the convergence performance of the Kaczmarz method. A sparse randomized Kaczmarz (SRK) projects the iterate xj−1 onto a subset of rows of A weighted by a diagonal matrix Wj, i.e.
The weighting is based on identifying, in each iteration j, a support estimate Tj for x corresponding to the largest {circumflex over (k)} entries of the iterate xj, where {circumflex over (k)} is some predetermined sparsity level. The weighting gradually scales down the entries of Aj that lie outside of Tj by a weight ωj=1/√{square root over (j)}. As the number of
iterations becomes large, the weight
and the method begins to resemble the randomized Kaczmarz method applied to the reduced system ATxT=r, where AT is a subset of the columns of A at which the sequence of sets Tj converges. The SRK method is capable of determining sparse solutions to both over and under-determined linear systems, and enjoys faster convergence compared to the randomized Kaczmarz method.
Reducing clutter produced by the wall is described for a number of prior methods. Some methods assume a perfect knowledge of the reflective geometry of the scene. For example, Setlur et al. al. developed multi-path signal models to associate multi-path ghosts to the true locations of the targets, thereby improving the radar system performance by reducing false positives in an original synthetic aperature radar (SAR) image, see Setlur et al., “Multipath model and exploitation in through-the-wall and urban radar sensing,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 4021-4034,2011.
One method describes a physics based approach to multi-path exploitation where the imaging kernel of the back-projection method is designed to focus on specific propagation paths of interest, see Chang, “Physics-Based Inverse Processing and Multi-path Exploitation for Through-Wall Radar Imaging,” Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University, 2011.
Another method combines target sparsity with multi-path modeling to achieve further improvements in the quality of TWI, see Leigsnering et al., “Multipath exploitation in through-the-wall radar imaging using sparse reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 920-939, April 2014. Specifically, their approach incorporates sources of multi-path reflections of interest into a sparsifying dictionary and solves a group sparse recovery problem to locate the targets from randomly subsampled, frequency stepped SAR data.
TWI can be formulated as a blind sparse-recovery problem, where scene parameters are unknown. Mansour et al. describe multipath-elimination by a sparse inversion (MESI) algorithm that removes the clutter by iteratively recovering the primary impulse responses of targets followed by estimation of corresponding convolution operators that result in multi-path reflections in the received data, see Mansour et al., “Blind multi-path elimination by sparse inversion in through-the-wall-imaging,” Proc. IEEE 5th Int. Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Process. (CAMSAP), St. Martin, Dec. 15-18, 2013, pp. 256-259.
The embodiments of the invention provide a method and system for through-the-wall radar imaging (TWI). Radar pulses are transmitted by one or more transmitting antennas from a location, travel through a wall, reflect off objects in a scene behind the wall, and return to one or more receiving antennas as a set of echoes.
The method uses a randomized Kaczmarz method that jointly estimates a sparse scene and removes clutter induced by internal wall reflections. The method is memory efficient, especially in the case where the antennas are located randomly.
In one embodiment of the invention, the method is implemented on a handheld or mobile device integrated with one or more antennas and a display screen. To generate an image, the radar pulse is transmitted by one or more of the antennas from a location. Then, the antennas are switched to receiving mode to acquire a set of echoes reflected by the objects. The device continues to send pulses from different locations while updating the current image according to the received echoes until a termination condition is reached. The changes in the locations improve the quality of the final image.
In another embodiment of the invention, a stand alone transmitting antenna is used, and the device includes one or more of the receiving antennas and the display screen. In this case, the transmitting antenna sends radar pulses that propagate through the wall and are reflected by the objects. The device acquires echoes at different locations.
System Setup
As shown in
The system includes an antenna array 10, transceiver 20, and processor 30. The transceiver can tranmit and receive radar pulses. The antenna comprises a set of one or more antenna elements 11. The antenna elements can either transmit or receive as controlled by the processor. The transceiver transmits one or more pulses 14 using one or more of the set of antenna elements 11 of the antenna array at a location in front of the wall. The transmitted pulse propagates through the wall 40 and are reflected by the possible objects 50 in a scene 60 behind the wall 40.
Reflected signals, (impulse responses or set of echoes) 12 corresponding to each pulse, are received by one or more antenna elements of the array 10 as described below. The received signals include primary reflections received via direct paths, and indirect secondary reflections received via multi-paths. It is noted, that in some embodiments, an antenna element can be used to only transmit, or only receive pulses, or to transmit and receive pulses.
The received signals 12 are processed by a method 200 to produce an image 70 that reconstructs the scene 60 including the objects 50. The method can be performed in the processor 30 connected with buses to a memory and input/output interfaces as known in the art.
As shown in
A radar pulse is transmitted through the 40 wall using the transmitting antenna positioned at a known location in front of the wall. A set of echoes, corresponding to the radar pulse, reflected by targets in the scene are received by a set of one or more of the receiving antennas at the location.
An imaging operator A 115 is determined 110 as described in greater detail below. The operator relates the set of echoes to the points in the grid using the location. Using the imaging operator, a sparse delay kernel d 125 that matches a response of a current image to a similar response in the set of echoes is determined.
Based on the set of echoes and the sparse delay kernel, the current image is updated 130. The transmitting, the receiving, the determining, the obtaining,and the updating steps are repeated for different known locations 160, in front of the wall until a termination condition 140 reached, in which case the current image is ouputted 150 as the reconstructed scene 70. The termination condition can be a maximal number of iterations, or the end of an imaging session, i.e., no more data are available. Alternatively or additionally, the termination condition is reached when a difference between the current image before and after the updating is less than a predetermined threshold.
The different locations can be determine using a conventional locator device, such an inertial guidance system, a global positioning system (GPS), acceleromaters, and the like, which are typically found in many modern mobile hand-held computing devices.
The steps can be performd in the processor 30 connected to memory and input/output interfaces as known in the art.
The method and system as described above enables a user to identify the number, locations and shapes of objects behind the wall using one or more devices that can transmit and receive radar signals. The method produces a two dimensional (2D) or three dimensional (3D) image of a scene behind an obstruction, where the locations and shapes of the objects are identified in the image. For a transmitted radar pulse, the method uses a reflection of the pulse, i.e., echoes, from objects behind the wall to construct an image of the objects. Additional transmitted and echoes pulses at the different locations are used to improve the image of the objects. A spacing between the different locations can be non-uniform.
The system can be embedded in a handheld or mobile device with one or more antennas and a display screen. To generate an image on the screen of the scene behind the obstruction, wall, the device is initiated by sending a pulse from one or more of the antennas. The antennas are then switched to receiving mode to measure reflected pulses (a set of echoes) from objects behind the wall. The device continues to send and receive pulses at different locations. The different locations improves the quality of the image of the objects behind the wall.
The system can also have a standalone transmitting antenna with a handheld or mobile device with one or more receiving antennas and a display screen. In this case, the transmitting antenna sends a series of radar pulses that propagate through the wall and reflect off objects behind the wall and are measured by the antennas on the mobile device. The device is moved to measure reflections at different locations. With every new measurement, the device uses the imaging method to improve the image of the shapes and locations of objects behind the wall.
In an alternative embodiment as shown in
Periodically, or on demand, the data, i.e.,the location 331 and echoes 332 stored in the memory are transmitted or otherwise transferred 340 to a processor 320 to produce the reconstructed scene 70 during the off-line phase. The periods can be regular or irregular. In this case, the processor 320 is not co-located with the transceiver. In addition, the data can be transferred in batches when the amount of memory available during the off-line phase is limited. Preferably, the batches are transferred in a random order with respect to the different non-uniform locations 331.
Clutter Removal as a Nonlinear Inverse Problem
In “blind” TWI, the wall parameters and the number of object behind the wall are unknown or unavailable. The objective is to identify the number, locations and shapes of the objects, and to remove ghosts using only received signals r(t, nr, ns), and the source waveform, i.e., the transmitted pulse s(t).
The signals received at transmitter and receiver at different locations (nr, ns) can be expressed as rnN
frequency coefficients beause the remaining coefficients are their complex conjugates. A vectorized time-domain activation function is dnN
Let S: N
N
N
N
Gn
where ω is the frequency in radians, k is a spacial index in Nx×Ny×Nz, c is the speed of the wave in free space, and φ(·) ∈ 3 is the spatial coordinate vector of scene index k, receiver nr, and transmitter ns. The received signal model in equation (3) can now be expressed as a function of the image
x as rn
The combined imaging and clutter removal problem can now be formulated as a nonlinear inverse problem
Clearly, the problem in equation (7) is non-convex and ill-posed in general. However, we are interested in a structured solution that obeys the following conditions:
Sparse Kaczmarz with Clutter Deconvolution
In the context of radar imaging, we define a Nt×NxNyNz matrix AnN
N
In order to enable the estimation of the sparse delay kernel concurrently with the radar image, we extend to a SRK framework that alternates between determining the sparse delay kernel d 125 given an estimate of the current image x, followed by updating x to fit the new measurements.
To that end, we construct a linear operator :
N
N
N
applied to a vector v repeats the entries of
along the anti-diagonal entries of an Nt×Nt matrix.
In light of conditions C1-C3, we express our sparse deconvolution as a nonconvex constrained optimization problem
where j indexes transmitter-receiver pairs (nr, ns) ∈ Nr×Ns, and {circumflex over (p)} and q are predetermined bounds on the sparsities of x and d, respectively.
In the first stage, we fix x=xj−1 and solve for dj that minimizes
In a second stage, we fix d=dj and solve for xj that minimizes
where the sparsity bound pj increases with j up to {circumflex over (p)}. The increasing sequence pj favors including only larger magnitude reflectors in the image x early in the estimation, which helps allocate the multipath and clutter matching to d.
Sparse Kaczmarz with Clutter Deconvolution
This algorithm uses a sparse initial estimate of the image x0=hard(A1Hr1;τ) which we determine as a hard-thresholding of A1Hr1 using some large threshold τ. For example, we set τ=0.9 ∥A1r1∥∞. Notice that the single step image update of SRK is now replaced with a gradient descent loop that deconvolves the estimate dj from the update for xj. Similarly, the update loop of dj deconvolves yj from its update. Moreover, we employ an oblique projection step onto the subspace Ajxj=rj weighted by the diagonal matrix W instead of the orthogonal projection onto AjWxj=rj used in SRK. Finally, we note that we also use diagonal weighting matrices to promote sparsity on the updates dj and xj.
Although the invention has been described by way of examples of preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that various other adaptations and modifications can be made within the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, it is the object of the appended claims to cover all such variations and modifications as come within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7898468 | Samaniego et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8212710 | Samaniego | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8570208 | Sarkis | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20110014869 | Nakajima | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20150077282 | Mohamadi | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
M. G. Amin and F. Ahmad, “Through-the-wall radar imaging: Theory and applications,” Radar Signal Processing Section, E-Reference Signal Processing, Elsevier, 2013. |
T. S. Ralston, G. L. Charvat, and J. E. Peabody, “Real-time through-wall imaging using an ultrawideband multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) phased array radar system,” in IEEE International Symposium on Phased Array Systems and Technology (ARRAY), 2010, pp. 551-558. |
S. Kaczmarz, “Angenäherte Auflösung von Systemen linearer Gleichungen.,” Bull. Int. Acad. Polon. Sci. A, vol. 1937, pp. 355-357, 1937. |
T. Strohmer and R. Vershynin, “A randomized Kaczmarz algorithm with exponential convergence,” Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, vol. 15, pp. 262-278, 2009. |
H. Mansour and O. Yilmaz, “A sparse randomized Kaczmarz algorithm,” in IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (Global-SIP), Dec. 2013, pp. 621-621. |
P. Setlur, M. Amin, and F. Ahmad, “Multipath model and exploitation in through-the-wall and urban radar sensing,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 49, No. 10, pp. 4021-4034, 2011. |
P. Setlur, G. Alli, and L. Nuzzo, “Multipath exploitation in through-wall radar imaging via point spread functions,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 22, 2013. |
P. C. Chang, Physics-Based Inverse Processing and Multi-path Exploitation for Through-Wall Radar Imaging, Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University, 2011. |
M. Leigsnering, F. Ahmad, M. Amin, and A. Zoubir, “Multipath exploitation in through-the-wall radar imaging using sparse reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 920-939, Apr. 2014. |
H. Mansour and D. Liu, “Blind multi-path elimination by sparse inversion in through-the-wall-imaging,” in Proc. IEEE 5th Int. Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Process. (CAMSAP), St. Martin, Dec. 15-18, 2013, pp. 256-259. |
M. Leigsnering, F. Ahmad, M. G Amin, and A. M. Zoubir, “CS based specular multipath exploitation in TWRI under wall position uncertainties,” in Proc. 8th IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop, Coruña, Spain, Jun. 22-25, 2014, pp. 481-484. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170023673 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |