Examples described herein relate to hearing devices, and include particularly hearing devices that are positioned in the ear canal for inconspicuous wear. This application is related to pending patent application Ser. No. 12/878,926, titled CANAL HEARING DEVICE WITH DISPOSABLE BATTERY MODULE, and Ser. No. 13/424,242, titled BATTERY MODULE FOR PERPENDICULAR DOCKING INTO A CANAL HEARING DEVICE, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for any purpose.
This ear canal 10, as illustrated in
The lateral part of the external ear, represented by the ear canal 10, tragus 3, pinna 4 and concha cavity 5, generally comprises flexible cartilaginous tissue that moves in response to pressure, including the motion of the mandible 7 (jaw bone,
Placement of a hearing device inside the ear canal 10 is generally desirable for various electroacoustic advantages such as reduction of the acoustic occlusion effect, improved energy efficiency, reduced distortion, reduced receiver vibrations, and improved high frequency response. Canal placement may also be desirable for cosmetic reasons since the majority of the hearing impaired may prefer to wear an inconspicuous hearing device. A canal hearing device can be inserted entirely or partially inside the ear canal. In the context of this application, any hearing device inserted inside the ear canal, whether partially or completely, may be referred to as a canal hearing device. This includes what is known in the hearing aid industry as Completely In the Canal (CIC), In-The-Canal (ITC), and extended wear deep canal invisible types.
The present disclosure describes examples of systems and methods of proximity wireless control of a canal hearing device by applying a magnetic field across the cartilaginous tissue anterior to the ear. In one example, a magnet is placed non-invasively at the temporomandibular region on the head to control a hearing device placed inside the ear. The canal hearing device may include one or more miniature magnetic sensors, preferably miniature reed switches which are adapted to be activated wirelessly by the magnetic end of the remote controller applied inconspicuously at the condyle region. The activation of a magnetic sensor within the canal hearing device may be decoded by the electronics of the hearing device to implement a specific control command, such as volume change, program setting change, ON, or OFF. In another example, sequential activation of a reed switch, i.e., by a sequence of magnetic field pulses, can be used to wirelessly implement a specific control command to the canal hearing device.
By placing the wireless control anterior of the external ear at the condyle region, wireless control of the canal hearing device is implemented by a natural, comfortable, and inconspicuous manner, instead of reaching back and pointing directly at, or into, the ear canal.
In some embodiments, two or more reed switches may be employed and arranged to selectively respond to magnetic field applied at select locations within the condyle region. The miniature reed switches may be arranged approximately 4 mm apart, and preferably within the range of 3 to 6 mm with respect to their centers. In some examples, the reed switches may be angled relative to each other at an angle within the range of 80-100 degrees, with respect to their longitudinal axes. In this manner, the reed switches may be used to create distinct “hot spot” areas at the condyle region of the head for separate remote control commands. In an example embodiment, the user may implement a specific hearing aid remote control command with minimal effort by pointing the magnetic end of the wireless controller within a specific location within the condyle region anterior of the tragus. In some examples, a first reed switch may be positioned for activation by placement of the magnetic end at a first location, for example the anterior superior region (with respect to the tragus) on the condyle region. Placement of the magnetic end at the first location may cause the first reed switch to be activated for implementing a first control command such as a volume increase for example. A second reed switch may be positioned within the canal hearing device for activation by placement of the magnetic end at a second location (e.g., “hot spot”). The second location, which may be at the anterior inferior region relative to the tragus, may be used to implement a second control command such as a volume decrease for example. Placement of the magnetic end directly on the skin may be valuable in providing tactile feedback for the user to differentiate hot spots. The tactile feedback may be particularly important since visual observation of the side of the head is generally difficult and not practical for the user. In some embodiments in which multiple reed switches are used, “hot spot” centers for controlling each of the respective reed switches may be spaced apart by at least about 6 mm for proper tactile operation.
In addition to selective location placement within the condyle region, different remote control commands may be implemented by varying the duration, or the pattern of magnetic field application. For example, the user can wirelessly select an alternate program setting for the canal hearing device by applying the magnet at the condyle region for a relatively long period of time exceeding about 2 seconds, versus a momentary application of less than about 2 seconds.
In examples, the magnetic sensor used in the present invention may preferably be micro-electro-mechanical (MEM) type reed switch for minimizing the size of the canal hearing devices. The operable control distance between the remote controller and the canal hearing device in situ may be within the range of about 9-22 mm. Other operable distances may be used, in some examples. One or more of the reed switches within the hearing device may be electrically connected to circuitry for detecting the closure and/or opening of the reed switches. Circuitry for decoding the pattern of opening and/or closure may be included and configured to implement specific wireless control commands, or to program the device. In some examples, a permanent magnet, which may be a rare-earth magnet, may be used to generate the magnetic field of the proximity wireless remote controller. However, other methods for generating transient magnetic fields, such as by using a coil magnet (e.g. electromagnet), as is well known in the field of magnetics, hearing aid programming and proximity wireless control, may also be used. Although the preferred magnetic sensor in the present invention is a reed switch, other types of magnetic sensor, such as a hall-effect sensor, may be used without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The above and still further objectives, features, aspects and attendant advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of certain preferred and alternate embodiments and method of manufacture and use thereof constituting the best mode presently contemplated of practicing the invention, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Certain details are set forth below to provide a sufficient understanding of embodiments of the invention. However, it will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that some embodiments may not include all details described. In some instances, well-known structures, hearing aid components, circuits, and controls, have not been shown in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the described embodiments of the invention.
Examples of systems and methods for proximity wireless control of canal hearing devices are described.
In some examples, the hand-held wireless controller 40 may include a magnetic end 42. In some examples, the controller 40 may be a wand having a magnet attached at the medial end of the wand (e.g. the magnetic end). In examples, the magnetic end 42 may include a permanent magnet 41, or in examples, an electromagnet may be used. In examples, the controller 40 may include circuitry as may be needed to operate the controller 40. In some examples, the magnet 41 may be a rare-earth magnet. Any of a variety of magnetic field generation known in the art may be used without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. In some examples and as will be further described, one or more of the reed switches 31 of the canal hearing device 30 may be configured to change the volume of the canal hearing device 30 responsive to the application of the magnetic field 47 at a select location of the temporomandibular joint region (e.g. the condyle region 20). In some examples, one or more of the reed switches 31 of the canal hearing device 30 may be configured to change a program setting of the canal hearing device 30 responsive to the application of the magnetic field at a select location of the temporomandibular joint region.
In some examples, the one or more reed switches may include a first reed switch 31 and a second reed switch 32, wherein a first reed switch 31 is activated at a first position 21 of the wireless controller 40 within the temporomandibular region and a second reed switch 32 is activated at a second position 22 of the wireless controller 40 within the temporomandibular region. In some examples, the first and second positions 21, 22 of the wireless remote controller within the temporomandibular region for activating the first and second reed switches may be at least 6 mm apart (see, e.g.,
The preferred magnetic sensor in the present invention is a reed switch since it is readily available in a highly integrated and well protected package, can be configured directional, consumes no power in the inactive state, and its output can be directly interfaced with a typical hearing aid processor. However, although less desirable in terms of power consumption, other types of magnetic sensor, such as a hall-effect sensor, may be used without departing from the scope of the present invention.
In some examples, the first and second reed switches 31, 32 may be arranged such that a center of the first reed switch is spaced apart from a center of the second reed switch by about 3 mm to 6 mm (e.g. distance D depicted in
In some examples, the one or more of the reed switches 31, 32 may be coupled to the hearing aid (e.g. device 30) to generate a volume change command. Thus as an example, volume may be increased responsive to placement of a magnetic end 41 of the wireless controller 40 at a position anterior superior to tragus 21. In some examples, volume may be decreased responsive to placement of the magnetic end 41 of the wireless controller 40 at a position anterior inferior to the tragus 22. In examples, the remote control command may be a program setting or selection, in which case, the activation of the one or more switches may, responsive to the placement of a magnetic end 41 at a select location of the condyle region, generate a signal from the reed switch to implement the desired command.
In some examples, the one or more of the reed switches 31, 32 may be configured to cause a volume change command in response to placing the wireless controller at the temporomandibular region for a period of less than about 2 seconds. In some examples, one or more of the reed switches 31, 32 may be configured to cause a program setting change command in response to placing the wireless controller at the temporomandibular region for a period of more than about 2 seconds. As will be understood, a different period of time, other than 2 seconds, may be used to delineate the various commands. In some examples, the one or more of the reed switches 31, 32 may be configured to generate an ON or an OFF command in response to placing the wireless controller within the temporomandibular region 22. In examples, the one or more magnetic sensors 31, 32 may be miniaturized micro electromechanical (MEM) type reed switches. In some examples, the wireless controller 40 may be configured to operate by contacting the skin 14 at the temporomandibular region 22.
As will be appreciated in light of the present disclosure, in contrast to conventional canal hearing devices and remote controls, the present disclosure describes systems and a methods for proximity wireless control of a canal hearing device 30 by applying a magnetic field 45 transcutaneously across the cartilaginous tissue 16, which field may be generated by a hand-held control device placed anterior to the ear, as shown in
By placing the wireless remote controller 40 anterior of the external ear at the condyle region 20, wireless control of the canal hearing device 30 may be implemented in a relatively inconspicuous manner. This is partly due to the fact that self-touching the head generally anterior of the ear is part of normal human behavior and thus does not draw attention. For example it is not uncommon for a person to be scratching the temporal bone region of the head by the index finger, or by a writing implement, during thinking. This normal, inconspicuous act is in contrast to prior art remote control methods whereby the user reaches back and points directly at the ear canal, as shown in
Referring to the example shown in
In an example embodiment, a first reed switch 31 may be positioned for activation by a magnetic field at the first hot spot 21 (anterior superior with respect to the tragus and above the tragus line 9) on the condyle region 20 and the device 30 may be configured to implement a first control command, such as a volume increase, upon activation of the first reed switch 31. In the second “hot spot” position 22, which may be anterior with respect to the tragus and inferior relative to the first position 21, a second reed switch 32 may be activated to implement a second control command, such as a volume decrease (as shown in
In addition to selective hot spot placement, additional control commands can be implemented by varying the duration, or the pattern of magnet application on the condyle region 20. For example, the user can select an alternate program setting by applying the magnet 41 at the condyle region for a relatively long period of time exceeding about 2 seconds, versus a momentary application of less than about 2 seconds.
In examples according to the present disclosure, micro-electro-mechanical (MEM) type reed switches may be used to minimize the size of the canal hearing devices 30. The canal hearing device 30 may be configured such that it is responsive to the application of a magnetic field or magnetic field pulse within an operating distance. The operating distance between the reed switch 31 or 32, for example, and the magnetic end 42 of the remote controller 40 when positioned at the condyle region 20, may be within the range of about 9-22 mm, depending on the position of the canal hearing device within the ear canal. In the example embodiment shown in
In examples, the reed switch within the hearing device 30 is normally electrically connected to circuitry (not shown) within the hearing device 30, which is configured for detecting the closure and/or opening of the reeds, and the pattern of closure/opening. As described and as will be appreciated a great of variety of magnetic field, pulse patterns may be generated and detected for implementing a variety of wireless control commands, or for programming the device.
Although examples of the invention have been described herein, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains from a consideration of the foregoing description of presently preferred and alternate embodiments and methods of fabrication and use thereof, and that variations and modifications of this exemplary embodiment and method may be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the above-described embodiments of the invention should not be viewed as exhaustive or as limiting the invention to the precise configurations or techniques disclosed. Rather, it is intended that the invention shall be limited only by the appended claims and the rules and principles of applicable law.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5327500 | Campbell | Jul 1994 | A |
5553152 | Newton | Sep 1996 | A |
5645074 | Shennib et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659621 | Newton | Aug 1997 | A |
5701348 | Shennib et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5785661 | Shennib et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6137889 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6473513 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6546108 | Shennib et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6724902 | Shennib et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6937735 | DeRoo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940988 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7016511 | Shennib | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7113611 | Leedom et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7260232 | Shennib | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7298857 | Shennib et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310426 | Shennib et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321663 | Olsen | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7403629 | Aceti et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7424123 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7424124 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
8467556 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8571247 | Oezer | Oct 2013 | B1 |
20020027996 | Leedom et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20050249370 | Shennib et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259840 | Gable et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283263 | Eaton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060210104 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20100119094 | Sjursen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110058697 | Shennib et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110206225 | Møller et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130243229 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130294631 | Shennib et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9907182 | Feb 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Lyric User Guide” http://www.phonak.com/content/dam/phonak/b2b/C—M—tools/Hearing—Instruments/Lyric/documents/02-gb/Userguide—Lyric—V8—GB—FINAL—WEB.pdf, Jul. 2010. |
“User Manual—2011”, AMP Personal Audio Amplifiers. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140003639 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |