Method and system for transitioning between lean and stoichiometric operation of a lean-burn engine

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6604504
  • Patent Number
    6,604,504
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 19, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 12, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
An exhaust treatment system for an internal combustion engine includes a catalytic emission control device. When transitioning the engine between a lean operating condition and a stoichiometric operating condition, as when scheduling a purge of the downstream device to thereby release an amount of a selected exhaust gas constituent, such as NOx, that has been stored in the downstream device during the lean operating condition, the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to each cylinder is sequentially stepped from an air-fuel ratio of at least about 18 to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. The purge event is preferably commenced when all but one cylinders has been stepped to stoichiometric operation, with the air-fuel mixture supplied to the last cylinder being stepped immediately to an air-fuel ratio rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Technical Field




The invention relates to methods and systems for controlling transitions of a “lean burn” internal combustion engine between lean and stoichiometric engine operating conditions.




2. Background Art




Generally, the operation of a vehicle's internal combustion engine produces engine exhaust gas that includes a variety of constituents, including carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), and nitrogen oxides (NO


x


). The rates at which the engine generates these constituents are dependent upon a variety of factors, such as engine operating speed and load, engine temperature, spark timing, and EGR. Moreover, such engines often generate increased levels of one or more exhaust gas constituents, such as NO


x


, when the engine is operated in a lean-burn cycle, i.e., when engine operation includes engine operating conditions characterized by a ratio of intake air to injected fuel that is greater than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio (a “lean” engine operating condition), for example, to achieve greater vehicle fuel economy.




In order to control these vehicle tailpipe emissions, the prior art teaches vehicle exhaust treatment systems that employ one or more three-way catalysts, also referred to as emission control devices, in an exhaust passage to store and release select exhaust gas constituents, such as NO


x


, depending upon engine operating conditions. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153 teaches an emission control device which stores exhaust gas NO


x


when the exhaust gas is lean, and releases previously-stored NO


x


when the exhaust gas is either stoichiometric or “rich” of stoichiometric, i.e., when the ratio of intake air to injected fuel is at or below the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. Such systems often employ open-loop control of device storage and release times (also respectively known as device “fill” and “purge” times) so as to maximize the benefits of increased fuel efficiency obtained through lean engine operation without concomitantly increasing tailpipe emissions as the device becomes “filled.”




The timing of each purge event must be controlled so that the device does not otherwise exceed its NO


x


storage capacity, because the selected exhaust gas constituent would then pass through the device and effect an undesired increase in tailpipe emissions. The frequency of the purge is preferably controlled to avoid the purging of only partially filled devices, due to the fuel penalty associated with the purge event's enriched air-fuel mixture.




The prior art has recognized that the storage capacity of a given emission control device for a selected exhaust gas constituent is itself a function of many variables, including device temperature, device history, sulfation level, and the presence of any thermal damage to the device. Moreover, as the device approaches its maximum capacity, the prior art teaches that the incremental rate at which the device continues to store the selected exhaust gas constituent may begin to fall. Accordingly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153 teaches use of a nominal NO


x


-storage capacity for its disclosed device which is significantly less than the actual NO


x


-storage capacity of the device, to thereby provide the device with a perfect instantaneous NO


x


-retaining efficiency, that is, so that the device is able to store all engine-generated NO


x


as long as the cumulative stored NO


x


remains below this nominal capacity. A purge event is scheduled to rejuvenate the device whenever accumulated estimates of engine-generated NO


x


reach the device's nominal capacity.




Significantly, it has been observed that a gasoline-powered internal combustion engine is likely to generate increased levels of certain exhaust gas constituents, such as NO


x


, when transitioning between a lean operating condition and a stoichiometric operating condition. For example, such engines are likely to generate increased levels of NO


x


as each of its cylinders are operated with an air-fuel ratio in the range between about 18 and about 15. Such increased levels of generated NO


x


during lean-to-stoichiometric transitions are likely to precipitate increased tailpipe NO


x


emissions, particularly when the subject transition immediately precedes a scheduled purge event, because of the trap's reduced instantaneous efficiency (i.e., the reduced instantaneous NO


x


-retention rate) and/or a lack of available NO


x


-storage capacity.




In response, U.S. Pat. No. 5,423,181 teaches a method for operating a lean-burn engine wherein the transition from a lean operating condition to operation about stoichiometry is characterized by a brief period during which the engine is operated with an enriched air-fuel mixture, i.e., using an air-fuel ratio that is rich of the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. Under this approach, the excess hydrocarbons flowing through the trap as a result of this “rich pulse” reduce excess NO


x


being simultaneously released from the trap, thereby lowering overall tailpipe NO


x


emissions which might otherwise result from the lean-to-stoichiometric transition.




The inventors herein have recognized that what is still needed, however, is a method of transitioning the engine between a lean operating condition and a stoichiometric operating condition that is itself characterized by reduced levels of a selected engine-generated exhaust gas constituent, such as NO


x


, whereby overall tailpipe emissions of a selected exhaust gas constituent may be advantageously further reduced.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the invention, a method and system for transitioning an engine between a first operating condition and a second operating condition, wherein the first and second operating conditions are characterized by combustion, in each of a plurality of engine cylinders, of a supplied air-fuel mixture having a first and second air-fuel ratio, respectively, and wherein one of the first and second air-fuel ratios is significantly lean of a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio and the other of the first and second air-fuel ratios is an air-fuel ratio at or near stoichiometry (hereinafter “a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio”), the method comprising identifying at least two discrete sets of cylinders supplied with the air-fuel mixture at the first air-fuel ratio; and sequentially stepping the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to each set of cylinders from the first air-fuel ratio to the second air-fuel ratio, includes: identifying at least two discrete sets of cylinders operating at the first air-fuel ratio; and sequentially stepping the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to each set of cylinders between the first air-fuel ratio and the second air-fuel ratio. In this manner, the invention advantageously avoids operating any given cylinder in the range of air-fuel ratios likely to generate excessively large concentration of a selected exhaust gas constituent during such transitions from either a lean operating condition to a stoichiometric operating condition or a stoichiometric operating condition to a lean operating condition. By way of example only, where the selected constituent is NO


x


, the range of air-fuel ratios likely to generate an excessive concentration of NO


x


is between about 18 and the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, in a preferred embodiment, torque fluctuations resulting from the use of different air-fuel mixtures in the several cylinders during transition are minimized by retarding the spark to any set of cylinders operating with a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio until all cylinders are operating at either the first or second operating condition. Thus, when transitioning from a lean operating condition to a stoichiometric operating condition, each set of cylinders is sequentially stepped between operating at a lean air-fuel ratio and operating at a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, with spark being simultaneously retarded as to each set of cylinders whose respective air-fuel mixtures have been stepped to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. Similarly, when transitioning from a stoichiometric operating condition to a lean operating condition, spark is initially retarded to all sets of cylinders (each of which is operating, prior to the transition, with a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio). Then, as the air-fuel mixture supplied to each set of cylinders is stepped to the lean air-fuel ratio, the spark to those cylinders is simultaneously advanced.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, after spark has been retarded to all sets of cylinders transitioned from a lean operating condition to a stoichiometric operating condition, and with all cylinders operating at the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, spark is preferably slowly advanced while air mass flow rate is decreased, either under the direction of an electronic throttle control or the vehicle driver. The spark and air-flow adjustment upon reaching stoichiometric operation in all cylinders ensures maximum fuel economy with little additional perceived torque fluctuation by vehicle occupants.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, where the invention is used in combination with a downstream device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent, such as NO


x


, when the engine's air-fuel ratio is lean and releases previously-stored selected constituent when the engine is operated at an air-fuel ratio at or rich of the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, the method preferably includes enriching the air-fuel mixture to a third air-fuel mixture supplied to at least one cylinder for a predetermined time, whereupon the trap is purged of stored amounts of the selected constituent. In a preferred embodiment, the air-fuel mixture supplied to the last set of cylinders being stepped from a lean air-fuel ratio to a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio is, instead, immediately stepped to a rich air-fuel ratio to begin the purge event. Where desired, the air-fuel mixture supplied to at least one other set of cylinders, each already operating with a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, is simultaneously stepped to the rich air-fuel ratio. Upon completion of the purge event, the enriched air-fuel mixture supplied to each enriched set of cylinders is returned, again in a “step” fashion, to a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.




The above object and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic of an engine system for the preferred embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 2

is graph illustrating a typical concentration of a selected exhaust gas constituent, specifically, NO


x


, in the engine feedgas over a range of air-fuel ratios;





FIG. 3

is an expanded timing diagram illustrating a pair of transitions between a lean operating condition and a stoichiometric operating condition; and





FIG. 4

is an expanded timing diagram illustrating a transition from a lean operating condition, through stoichiometric operation, and immediately into a scheduled purge event.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)




Referring to

FIG. 1

, an exemplary control system


10


for a four-cylinder, direct-injection, spark-ignition, gasoline-powered engine


12


for a motor vehicle includes an electronic engine controller


14


having ROM, RAM and a processor (“CPU”) as indicated. The controller


14


controls the individual operation of each of a set of fuel injectors


16


. The fuel injectors


16


, which are of conventional design, are each positioned to inject fuel into a respective cylinder


18


of the engine


12


in precise quantities as determined by the controller


14


. The controller


14


similarly controls the individual operation, i.e., timing, of the current directed through each of a set of spark plugs


20


in a known manner.




The controller


14


also controls an electronic throttle


22


that regulates the mass flow of air into the engine


12


. During operation of the engine


12


, the controller


14


transmits a control signal to the electronic throttle


22


and to each fuel injector


16


to maintain a target cylinder air-fuel ratio for the resulting air-fuel mixture individually supplied to each cylinder


18


. An air mass flow sensor


24


, positioned at the air intake of engine's intake manifold


26


, provides a signal regarding the air mass flow resulting from positioning of the engine's throttle


22


. The airflow signal from the air mass flow sensor


24


is utilized by the controller


14


to calculate an air mass value which is indicative of a mass of air flowing per unit time into the engine's induction system.




A heated exhaust gas oxygen (HEGO) sensor


28


detects the oxygen content of the exhaust gas generated by the engine and transmits a signal to the controller


14


. The HEGO sensor


28


is used for control of the engine air-fuel ratio, especially during operation of the engine


12


at or near the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio which, for a constructed embodiment, is about 14.65. A plurality of other sensors (not shown) also generate additional electrical signals in response to various engine operations, for use by the controller


14


.




An exhaust system


30


transports exhaust gas produced from combustion of an air-fuel mixture in each cylinder


18


through a pair of emission control devices


32


,


34


.




As illustrated in

FIG. 2

, the concentration of a selected constituent of the exhaust gas generated by any given cylinder


18


, such as NO


x


, is a function of the in-cylinder air-fuel ratio (designated “AIR-FUEL RATIO” in FIG.


2


). In accordance with the invention, the controller


14


regulates the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to each set of cylinders


18


to avoid cylinder operation at air-fuel ratios between about 18 and about 15 (the latter being slightly lean of the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio of 14.65), even when transitioning between a lean operating condition and a stoichiometric operating condition.




More specifically, under the invention, the controller


14


avoids such increased NO


x


emissions at the source by sequentially stepping, i.e., changing in a “step” fashion, the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to each of a plurality of discrete groups or sets of cylinders


18


(in the illustrated embodiment, there are four discrete sets of cylinders


18


, one cylinder


18


to each set) between a lean air-fuel ratio of at least about 18 (illustrated as point A in

FIG. 2

) and a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio of about 15 (illustrated as point B in FIG.


2


). Exemplary transitions from lean-to-stoichiometric operation and from stoichiometric-to-lean operation, as achieved by the proposed system, is illustrated in

FIG. 3

(wherein each of the four sets includes a single cylinder


18


). In this manner, the invention avoids operating of any given cylinder


18


in the range of problematic air-fuel ratios.




In order to minimize torque fluctuations when transitioning from a lean operating condition to a stoichiometric operating condition, or when transitioning from a stoichiometric operating condition to a lean operating condition, the controller


14


retards the spark to any cylinder


18


/set of cylinders


18


which is operating, during transition, with a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. More specifically, because any cylinder


18


operating with a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio will generate greater torque than another cylinder


18


operating “lean,” spark is retarded in only the stoichiometric cylinders


18


to thereby even-out generated torque until all cylinders have been brought either to lean or stoichiometric operation.




Thus, when transitioning from a lean operating condition to a stoichiometric operating condition, each cylinder


18


is sequentially stepped between operating at a lean air-fuel ratio and operating at a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, with spark being simultaneously retarded as to each cylinder whose respective air-fuel mixtures have been stepped to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. Similarly, when transitioning from a stoichiometric operating condition to a lean operating condition, spark is initially retarded to all cylinders


18


(each of which is operating, prior to the transition, with a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio). Then, as the air-fuel mixture supplied to each cylinder


18


is stepped to the lean air-fuel ratio, the spark to the cylinder


18


is simultaneously advanced.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, after spark has been retarded to all cylinders


18


transitioned from a lean operating condition to a stoichiometric operating condition, and with all cylinders


18


operating at the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, spark is preferably slowly advanced over a predetermined time period t


2


while air mass flow rate is decreased, either under the direction of an electronic throttle


22


or the vehicle driver. The adjustment of spark and mass airflow during time period t


2


ensures maximum fuel economy with little additional perceived torque fluctuation by vehicle occupants after the cylinders


18


have been respectively brought to stoichiometric operation.




In accordance with the invention, the relative timing of the step change in air-fuel ratios of the several cylinders


18


is controlled by the controller


14


. Where the engine features injection of fuel directly into each cylinder


18


, changes in cylinder air-fuel ratios are immediate, and there need be a delay or “waiting period t


1


”of only one cylinder event between the stepping of one set of cylinders


18


and the stepping of another set of cylinders


18


. Where the engine features port fuel injection, a longer delay may be necessary so as to ensure that each stepped cylinder


18


has achieved the target air-fuel ratio. It will be appreciated that the controller


14


can alternatively calculate the waiting period t


1


in any suitable manner, for example, as a function of engine operating conditions such as engine load and speed, as through use of a lookup table stored in the controller's memory.




As seen in

FIG. 3

, the step change in the last set of cylinders


18


to either the lean operating condition or the stoichiometric operating condition is preferably followed by a waiting period t


2


during which the electronic throttle


22


adjusts the mass airflow into the engine


12


, or the vehicle driver is otherwise permitted to respond by releasing the accelerator pedal (not shown) by a small amount, while the spark is advanced back to optimal. In this manner, a constant engine torque output is achieved.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, the method is preferably also employed when transitioning from a lean engine operating condition to an enriched engine operating condition suitable for “purging” NO


x


stored in the trap


34


, because of the trap's reduced instantaneous efficiency (i.e., the reduced instantaneous NO


x


-absorption rate) and/or a lack of available NO


x


-storage capacity in the trap


34


which triggered the need for the purge in the first instance. Still further, the last set of cylinders


18


to be stepped to stoichiometric operation is preferably immediately stepped through stoichiometric operation to rich operation, thereby immediately commencing the purge event, as illustrated in FIG.


4


. Of course, the invention contemplates simultaneously switching other cylinders


18


/sets of cylinders


18


, then operating at the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, to the enriched operating condition to thereby enhance the “strength” of the purge event. It will be appreciated that the purge time t


3


, the relative degree to which the at least one cylinder


18


is enriched during the purge, and the number of cylinders


18


operated at an enriched air-fuel ratio, are each a function of the properties of the trap. The enriched operating condition is thereafter maintained for a predetermined “purge time t


3


.” At the end of the purge event, the air-fuel mixture at which each cylinder


18


is operated is nominally returned to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.




Alternatively, under the invention, the controller


14


may enrich the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to one or more cylinder


18


after bringing the last set of cylinder


18


to stoichiometric operation, and after expiration of a suitable predetermined time period t


2


.




While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, while the use of spark timing to normalize torque output during transition has been disclosed, it will be appreciated that the invention contemplates use of other suitable mechanism for controlling the torque output of the several cylinders


18


during transition, including any suitable mechanism for varying mass airflow to each individual cylinder


18


.



Claims
  • 1. A method for transitioning an internal combustion engine between a first operating condition and a second operating condition, wherein the first and second operating conditions are characterized by combustion, in each of a plurality of engine cylinders, of a supplied air-fuel mixture having a first and second air-fuel ratio, respectively, and wherein one of the first and second air-fuel ratios is significantly lean of a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio and the other of the first and second air-fuel ratios is a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, the method comprising:identifying at least two discrete sets of cylinders supplied with the air-fuel mixture at the first air-fuel ratio; sequentially stepping the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to each set of cylinders from the first air-fuel ratio to the second air-fuel ratio; and including retarding the timing of combustion ignition in one set of cylinders with respect to another set of cylinders until all sets of cylinders are operating at the second operating condition; and including decreasing a mass flow of air to all sets of cylinders simultaneous with advancing timing.
  • 2. A method for transitioning an internal combustion engine between a first operating condition and a second operating condition, wherein the first and second operating conditions are characterized by combustion, in each of a plurality of engine cylinders, of a supplied air-fuel mixture having a first and second air-fuel ratio, respectively, and wherein one of the first and second air-fuel ratios is significantly lean of a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio and the other of the first and second air-fuel ratios is a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, the method comprising:identifying at least two discrete sets of cylinders supplied with the air-fuel mixture at the first air-fuel ratio; sequentially stepping the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to each set of cylinders from the first air-fuel ratio to the second air-fuel ratio; and wherein the first air-fuel ratio is the lean air-fuel ratio and the second air-fuel ratio is the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, the method further including: determining when the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to all but one set of cylinders has been stepped to the second air-fuel ratio; and stepping the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to the one set of cylinders to a third air-fuel ratio rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the third air-fuel ratio is maintained in the one set of cylinders for a third predetermined time, and further including changing the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to the one set of cylinders back to the second air-fuel ratio.
  • 4. A system for controlling operation of a lean burn engine having a plurality of cylinders, each cylinder receiving a metered quantity of fuel from a respective fuel injector, and each cylinder receiving an ignition spark from a respective spark plug, the system comprising:a controller including a microprocessor arranged to operate the fuel injector for each cylinder to thereby individually control the air-fuel ratio of an air-fuel mixture supplied to each cylinder, wherein the controller is further arranged to transitioning the engine between a first operating condition and a second operating condition, the first operating condition being characterized by a first air-fuel ratio and second operating conditions being characterized by a second air-fuel ratio, one of the first and second air-fuel ratios being significantly lean of a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio and the other of the first and second air-fuel ratios being a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio; and wherein the controller is arranged to sequentially step the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to each of at least two cylinders from the first air-fuel ratio to the second air-fuel ratio; and wherein the controller is further arranged to determine when the air-fuel mixture supplied to each cylinder has been maintained at the second air-fuel ratio for a second predetermined time, and to change the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to at least one cylinder to a third air-fuel ratio rich of the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the controller is further arranged to maintain the third air-fuel ratio in the at least one cylinder for a third predetermined time.
US Referenced Citations (152)
Number Name Date Kind
3696618 Boyd et al. Oct 1972 A
3969932 Rieger et al. Jul 1976 A
4033122 Masaki et al. Jul 1977 A
4036014 Ariga Jul 1977 A
4167924 Carlson et al. Sep 1979 A
4178883 Herth Dec 1979 A
4186296 Crump, Jr. Jan 1980 A
4251989 Norimatsu et al. Feb 1981 A
4533900 Muhlberger et al. Aug 1985 A
4622809 Abthoff et al. Nov 1986 A
4677955 Takao Jul 1987 A
4854123 Inoue et al. Aug 1989 A
4884066 Miyata et al. Nov 1989 A
4913122 Uchida et al. Apr 1990 A
4964272 Kayanuma Oct 1990 A
5009210 Nakagawa et al. Apr 1991 A
5088281 Izutani et al. Feb 1992 A
5097700 Nakane Mar 1992 A
5165230 Kayanuma et al. Nov 1992 A
5174111 Nomura et al. Dec 1992 A
5189876 Hirota et al. Mar 1993 A
5201802 Hirota et al. Apr 1993 A
5209061 Takeshima May 1993 A
5222471 Stueven Jun 1993 A
5233830 Takeshima et al. Aug 1993 A
5267439 Raff et al. Dec 1993 A
5270024 Kasahara et al. Dec 1993 A
5272871 Oshima et al. Dec 1993 A
5325664 Seki et al. Jul 1994 A
5331809 Takeshima et al. Jul 1994 A
5335538 Blischke et al. Aug 1994 A
5357750 Ito et al. Oct 1994 A
5359852 Curran et al. Nov 1994 A
5377484 Shimizu Jan 1995 A
5402641 Katoh et al. Apr 1995 A
5410873 Tashiro May 1995 A
5412945 Katoh et al. May 1995 A
5412946 Oshima et al. May 1995 A
5414994 Cullen et al. May 1995 A
5419122 Tabe et al. May 1995 A
5423181 Katoh et al. Jun 1995 A
5426934 Hunt et al. Jun 1995 A
5433074 Seto et al. Jul 1995 A
5437153 Takeshima et al. Aug 1995 A
5448886 Toyoda Sep 1995 A
5448887 Takeshima Sep 1995 A
5450722 Takeshima et al. Sep 1995 A
5452576 Hamburg et al. Sep 1995 A
5472673 Goto et al. Dec 1995 A
5473887 Takeshima et al. Dec 1995 A
5473890 Takeshima et al. Dec 1995 A
5483795 Katoh et al. Jan 1996 A
5531972 Rudy Jul 1996 A
5544482 Matsumoto et al. Aug 1996 A
5551231 Tanaka et al. Sep 1996 A
5554269 Joseph et al. Sep 1996 A
5569848 Sharp Oct 1996 A
5577382 Kihara et al. Nov 1996 A
5595060 Togai et al. Jan 1997 A
5598703 Hamburg et al. Feb 1997 A
5617722 Takaku Apr 1997 A
5622047 Yamashita et al. Apr 1997 A
5626014 Hepburn et al. May 1997 A
5626117 Wright et al. May 1997 A
5655363 Ito et al. Aug 1997 A
5657625 Koga et al. Aug 1997 A
5693877 Ohsuga et al. Dec 1997 A
5713199 Takeshima et al. Feb 1998 A
5715679 Asanuma et al. Feb 1998 A
5722236 Cullen et al. Mar 1998 A
5724808 Ito et al. Mar 1998 A
5729971 Matsuno et al. Mar 1998 A
5732554 Sasaki et al. Mar 1998 A
5735119 Asanuma et al. Apr 1998 A
5737917 Nagai Apr 1998 A
5740669 Kinugasa et al. Apr 1998 A
5743084 Hepburn Apr 1998 A
5743086 Nagai Apr 1998 A
5746049 Cullen et al. May 1998 A
5746052 Kinugasa et al. May 1998 A
5752492 Kato et al. May 1998 A
5771685 Hepburn Jun 1998 A
5771686 Pischinger et al. Jun 1998 A
5778666 Cullen et al. Jul 1998 A
5792436 Feeley et al. Aug 1998 A
5802843 Kurihara et al. Sep 1998 A
5803048 Yano et al. Sep 1998 A
5806306 Okamoto et al. Sep 1998 A
5813387 Minowa et al. Sep 1998 A
5831267 Jack et al. Nov 1998 A
5832722 Cullen et al. Nov 1998 A
5842339 Bush et al. Dec 1998 A
5842340 Bush et al. Dec 1998 A
5862661 Zhang et al. Jan 1999 A
5865027 Hanafusa et al. Feb 1999 A
5867983 Otani Feb 1999 A
5877413 Hamburg et al. Mar 1999 A
5910096 Hepburn et al. Jun 1999 A
5929320 Yoo Jul 1999 A
5934072 Hirota et al. Aug 1999 A
5938715 Zhang et al. Aug 1999 A
5953907 Kato et al. Sep 1999 A
5966930 Hatano et al. Oct 1999 A
5970707 Sawada et al. Oct 1999 A
5974788 Hepburn et al. Nov 1999 A
5974791 Hirota et al. Nov 1999 A
5974793 Kinugasa et al. Nov 1999 A
5974794 Gotoh et al. Nov 1999 A
5979161 Hanafusa et al. Nov 1999 A
5979404 Minowa et al. Nov 1999 A
5983627 Asik Nov 1999 A
5992142 Pott Nov 1999 A
5992372 Nakajima Nov 1999 A
5996338 Hirota Dec 1999 A
6003308 Tsutsumi et al. Dec 1999 A
6012282 Kato et al. Jan 2000 A
6012428 Yano et al. Jan 2000 A
6014859 Yoshizaki et al. Jan 2000 A
6023929 Ma Feb 2000 A
6026640 Kato et al. Feb 2000 A
6058700 Yamashita et al. May 2000 A
6073440 Douta et al. Jun 2000 A
6079204 Sun et al. Jun 2000 A
6092021 Ehlbeck et al. Jul 2000 A
6092369 Hosogai et al. Jul 2000 A
6101809 Ishizuka et al. Aug 2000 A
6102019 Brooks Aug 2000 A
6105365 Deeba et al. Aug 2000 A
6119449 Köhler Sep 2000 A
6128899 Oono et al. Oct 2000 A
6134883 Kato et al. Oct 2000 A
6138453 Sawada et al. Oct 2000 A
6145302 Zhang et al. Nov 2000 A
6145305 Itou et al. Nov 2000 A
6148611 Sato Nov 2000 A
6148612 Yamashita et al. Nov 2000 A
6161378 Hanaoka et al. Dec 2000 A
6161428 Esteghlal et al. Dec 2000 A
6164064 Pott Dec 2000 A
6189523 Weisbrod et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199373 Hepburn et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202406 Griffin et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205773 Suzuki Mar 2001 B1
6214207 Miyata et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216448 Schnaibel et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216451 Schnaibel et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233923 Itou et al. May 2001 B1
6237330 Takahashi et al. May 2001 B1
6244046 Yamashita Jun 2001 B1
6324835 Surnilla et al. Dec 2001 B1
6360713 Kolmanovsky et al. Mar 2002 B1
6390054 Yang May 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (21)
Number Date Country
196 07 151 Jul 1997 DE
0 351 197 Jan 1990 EP
0 444 783 Sep 1991 EP
0 503 882 Sep 1992 EP
0 580 389 Jan 1994 EP
2316338 Feb 1998 GB
2355945 May 2001 GB
62-97630 May 1987 JP
62-117620 May 1987 JP
64-53042 Mar 1989 JP
2-30915 Feb 1990 JP
2-33408 Feb 1990 JP
2-207159 Aug 1990 JP
5-26080 Feb 1993 JP
5-106493 Apr 1993 JP
5-106494 Apr 1993 JP
6-58139 Mar 1994 JP
6-264787 Sep 1994 JP
7-97941 Apr 1995 JP
WO 9827322 Jun 1998 WO
0118374 Mar 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (7)
Entry
C. D. De Boer et al., “Engineered Control Strategies for Improved Catalytic Control of NOx in Lean Burn Applications,” SAE Technical Paper No. 881595, Oct. 10-13, 1988.
Y. Kaneko et al., “Effect of Air-Fuel Ratio Modulation on Conversion Efficiency of Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 780607, Jun. 5-9, 1978, pp. 119-127.
W. H. Holl, “Air-Fuel Control to Reduce Emissions I. Engine-Emissions Relationships,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800051, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
A. H. Meitzler, “Application of Exhaust-Gas-Oxygen Sensors to the Study of Storage Effects in Automotive Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800019, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
J. Theis et al., “An Air/Fuel Algorithm to Improve the NOx Conversion of Copper-Based Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 922251, Oct. 19-22, 1992.
W. Wang, “Air-Fuel Control to Reduce Emissions, II. Engine-Catalyst Characterization Under Cyclic Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800052, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
T. Yamamoto et al., “Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Three Way Catalytic Reaction,” JSAE 882072—882166.