The present application is a U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/EP2012/070486, filed on Oct. 16, 2012 and designating the United States of America. This application claims the benefit of the above-identified application which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates generally to the field of liquid analysis methods and systems and particularly to automated maintenance of such systems. More specifically, the invention relates to automated ultrasound cavitation cleaning techniques used in automated optical liquid analysis systems for use at remote locations such as for subsea process control.
Ultrasonic Cleaning Technology is a well-known method for cleaning different surfaces, i.e. glass and metal surfaces. Some vendors/suppliers of online Oil-in-Water (OiW) analyzer systems used this technology or method for cleaning optical sapphire windows in direct contact with produced water. Analyzers are normally installed after a degassing tank and a Compact Flotation Unit (CFU) for monitoring oil discharges to the sea. OiW monitor vendors are continually developing cleaning technologies that can operate and work efficiently at higher water pressures. This is especially important for process applications and for subsea monitoring.
In publication WO-2009/134145-A1, an inline optical probe is shown that can be used for measuring components in a fluid contained in a pipe or container. An acoustic transducer is acoustically coupled to the probe whereby the acoustic vibrations remove fouling from the optical window. The transducer emits an acoustic signal in the range of 20-30 kHz.
Publication WO-2011/128406-A1 discloses an imaging apparatus for the detection of oil droplets and other bodies in a flowing liquid. An ultrasonic transducer can be deployed for the cleaning of the optical window. The imaging system can be used in both inline and side-stream modes but the side-stream mode is only mentioned in passing without technical constructional details defining how the system could be implemented.
The operational pressure ranges for the use of these systems are not given in either of these documents.
New industrial requirements have specified the goal that such subsea analysis methods need to be able to be deployed at pressures exceeding 50 bar (5.0×106 Pa).
In general there are two different OiW monitor systems in operation, side-stream OiW systems that sample from a bypass line from the process line, and inline OiW systems where the measuring probe is placed directly in the process line. These and other similar systems have been tested by the inventor of the present invention at water-test-rigs.
For inline probe OiW monitor systems, the cleaning must be done at the inline process water pressure. For side-stream OiW monitor systems, it is possible to reduce the pressure by using two automatic control valves, so oil monitoring is done at process pressure and cleaning at low pressure, but the spill water released from the pressure reduction was collected in a pressure vessel under controlled operation. The conclusion from these tests was that existing ultrasonic cleaning systems can only operate effectively in lower water pressure applications (pressure below 20-25 bar, 2.0×106 Pa -2.5×106 Pa), and preferably at 10 bar (1.0×106 Pa) or below.
By definition, cavitation cleaning is most effective at lower pressure. Sound waves emitted from an ultrasound transducer are composed of an expansion mode and a compression mode. During the expansion mode the water molecules are pulled apart, and then are pressed together during the compression mode. If the expansion mode has sufficient energy to overcome the binding energy between the water molecules, a cavity, or bubble, is then produced. The compression mode then acts to implode the cavity which yields a gentle cleansing action to remove contaminants from surfaces. Most cleaning applications operate within the 20 kHz-250 kHz range, whereby a 25 kHz signal will produce 25,000 expansion/compression cycles per second. By example, a higher frequency will yield a smaller sized cavity and a more evenly distributed cavitation. Other factors influencing the cavitation efficiency include fluid density, viscosity, static fluid pressure and temperature. In general, if fluid density, viscosity and static fluid pressure are high, more energy is required to induce cavitation. Increasing temperature can be beneficial to point. Depending on the application, raising the temperature of the fluid or of a cleaning fluid to ca. 65-80% of its boiling point can assist in lowering the amount of energy to induce cavitation. Some ultrasound sensor systems may actually be designed to emit in the audible range, for example in the 12-20 kHz range, depending on the desired cleaning effect.
The development of such monitoring systems for subsea applications is very challenging. Although existing systems may be of adequate ability to fulfill the specifications set out for their use in lower pressure environments, of ca. 20-25 bar (2.0×106-2.5×106 Pa) or below, no solutions are given in the prior art that would enable one to solve the technical problem that is solved by the present invention.
Therefore, it is a main objective of the present invention to provide an improved and novel method and system for automated cleaning of optical windows in optics-based liquid analysis systems by way of ultrasonic based cavitation for use in remote, high pressure (up to and exceeding 50 bar, 5.0×106 Pa), subsea environments. In particular the present invention pertains to a technical solution for using ultrasonic cavitation cleaning technology independent of water pressure for an inline or side-stream Oil-in-Water (OiW) Monitoring System for use in subsea process control.
The above mentioned deficiencies and uncertainties associated with the prior art are rectified by way of the following novel improvements.
A first aspect of the present invention relates to a method for ultrasonic cavitation cleaning of an optical window in an analysis system in a process line containing process liquid, comprising the following steps:
A second aspect of the present invention relates to the method of the first aspect, wherein the optical window is isolated from or reconnected to the process line by means of closing or opening a valve in combination with moving tranducer module by means of motors.
A third aspect of the present invention relates to the method of the first or second aspect, wherein the process liquid pressure in the process line is above 2.0×106 Pa, wherein the pressure of the liquid in contact with the optical window is 1.0×106 Pa or below during ultrasonic cavitation cleaning, wherein the said pressure of the liquid in contact with the optical window is reduced or increased by means of a piston.
A fourth aspect of the present invention relates to the method of the first aspect, wherein some of said process liquid is redirected into a side-stream flow arrangement comprising the following steps:
A fifth aspect of the present invention relates to the method of the fourth aspect, wherein the process liquid pressure p1 is above 2.0×106 Pa and the liquid pressure p4 inside the isolated chamber is 1.0×106 Pa or below during ultrasonic cavitation cleaning
A sixth aspect of the present invention relates to the system of the fourth or fifth aspect, wherein a cleaning agent is fed from a container to analysis chamber via the first three-way valve.
A seventh aspect of the present invention relates to the system of the fourth or fifth aspect, wherein a fluid from the analysis chamber is fed to a spill tank or pressure vessel via the first three-way valve.
An eighth aspect of the present invention relates to the method of the first aspect, wherein, some of said process liquid is rediected into a side-stream flow arrangement, wherein the process liquid is isokinetically sampled comprising the following steps:
A ninth aspect of the present invention relates to the method of the eighth aspect, wherein the process liquid pressure is above 2.0×106 Pa and the liquid pressure inside the sealed chamber is 1.0×106 Pa or below during ultrasonic cavitation cleaning
A tenth aspect of the present invention relates to the method of the first to the ninth aspect, wherein the measured optical properties in the process liquid are oil concentration, suspended solids, suspended oil, particulate matter and particle size.
An eleventh aspect of the present invention relates to a system for ultrasonic cavitation cleaning of an optical window in an analysis system in a process line containing process liquid comprising:
A twelfth aspect of the present invention relates to the system of the eleventh aspect, wherein the process liquid pressure in process line is above 2.0×106 Pa and the pressure inside said isolated chamber is 1.0×106 Pa or below during ultrasonic cavitation cleaning.
A thirteenth aspect of the present invention relates to the system of the eleventh aspect, wherein some of said process liquid is redirected by means of a side-stream flow arrangement comprising:
A fourteenth aspect of the present invention relates to the system of the thirteenth aspect, wherein a feed line from a cleaning agent container is connected to the analysis chamber via the first three-way valve.
A fifthteenth aspect of the present invention relates to the system of the thirteenth aspect, wherein a feed line to a spill tank or pressure vessel is connected to the analysis chamber via the first three-way valve.
A sixteenth aspect of the present invention relates to the system of the eleventh aspect, wherein some of said process liquid is redirected by means of an isokinetically sampled side-stream flow arrangement comprising:
A seventeenth aspect of the present invention relates to the system of the sixteenth aspect, wherein a piston system is mechanically coupled to the analysis chamber, is situated directly opposite from the optical window; and
a second two-way valve is situated directly downstream from the analysis chamber.
An eighteenth aspect of the present invention relates to the system of the seventeenth aspect, wherein a pressure gauge is mechanically coupled to the analysis chamber and located between two-way inlet and outlet valves of the analysis chamber.
The invention will be described in detail with reference to the attached figures. It is to be understood that the figures are designed solely for the purpose of illustration and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention, for which reference should be made to the appended claims. It should be further understood that the figures are not necessarily drawn to scale and that, unless otherwise indicated, they are merely intended to schematically show the procedures described therein.
The aim of the present invention to provide an improved and novel method and system for automated cleaning of optical windows in optics-based liquid analysis systems by way of ultrasonic based cavitation for use in remote, high pressure, subsea environments.
In the years preceding 2008/2009, a main focus for OiW sensors had been the measurement of lower oil concentrations (<100 ppm) in produced water discharges from platforms. At present, the assignee of the present invention has ca. 25 installations, but all of these measurement systems are installed in low water pressure applications, less than 10 bar (1.0×106 Pa). In 2008/2009 a project was created targeting the development of OIW measurement systems for subsea applications which included tougher requirements for measurement systems. The key requirements are that the measurement systems must operate “maintenance free” at a process pressure of 50 bar (5.0×106 Pa) at oil-in-water concentrations from 100 to 2000 ppm and of course be robust in difficult and remote locations.
At present these is a lack of OiW measuring systems having the capability of both automatic ultrasonic cleaning that also work at a water pressure of 20 bar (2.0×106 Pa) (present requirements >50 bar, 5.0×106 Pa). In addition there is also a lack of systems that employ other types of automatic cleaning technologies that fulfill these strict requirements.
From development tests conducted in test-rigs, as mentioned briefly in the background art section, a prototype inline OIW analyzer from an established sensor manufacturer was tested. The analyzer was designed and built to perform measurements at process pressure of 50 bar (5.0×106 Pa) and a total pressure limit up to 120 bar (1.2×107 Pa), but automatic ultrasonic purification, cavitation, is performed at low pressure, at 10 bar (1.0×106 Pa) or below. This was accomplished by closing off of the water volume in the measuring chamber by means of two valves, and opening one valve for pressure reduction whereby the water was collected in a pressure vessel. For each cleaning cycle the pressure was increased in the vessel, but it was drained when it reached 20 bar (2.0×106 Pa).
The present invention is thus based on the realization that a reduction in pressure within the measuring chamber could be achieved by volume expansion by automated mechanical means. Specifically, the regulation of pressure, by volume expansion or contraction, could be accomplished by means of a piston pump, screw pump or bellows pump. What is important is that the water pressure is reduced to below 10 bar (1.0×106 Pa) for ultrasonic cavitation cleaning Thus the water pressure remains equal to the process pressure when the pump pushes the piston back into its original position. The invention can thereby use ultrasonic “cavitation” cleaning technology independent of the process water pressure. This innovative method and system encompasses the following advantages and elements compared to the prior art:
As mentioned above, the present invention can be operated in either inline or side-stream mode. Described in the following is the basic principle of the method which is applicable to both modes and their variations.
Basic Method:
The central idea for the invention is to perform controlled pressure regulation by using a pressure piston in a defined closed water sample cell volume, or “analysis chamber” or merely “chamber”:
By using a controllable piston and a pressure controller for increasing/decreasing the water pressure in the chamber, there will be no water spillage, and it can operate independent of the process water pressure. By way of clarity, the use of the term “chamber” relates to a chamber where pressure is varied for the purpose of cavitation cleaning of an optical window at lowered pressure for inline embodiments, according to the present invention. For side-stream embodiments, according to the present invention, the use of the term “chamber” relates to a chamber where pressure is varied for the purpose of cavitation cleaning of an optical window at lowered pressure and for an analysis chamber for the analysis of process liquid at higher pressures. In general the length of time for the cavatition cleaning cycle is based on a standard time, based on previous experience for a given process liquid composition with regards to propensity to fouling of an optical window. And, although a main aspect of the present invention relates to cavitation cleaning of an optical window at low pressure, it should also be understood that it also relates to the sampling and analysis of process liquid at high pressure.
An example of a prior art configuration, as given in
For the purpose of illustration,
An optional fluid container 411 containing chemicals such as cleaner agent, or a spill tank or a pressure vessel can be installed in fluid connection with three-way ball valve 404a.
The optical system (408) of this embodiment can be of the same type as referred to in the previous embodiments as shown in
The further embodiment of the present invention as given in
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in light of the teachings of this invention that certain changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the appended claims. While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive and it is not intended to limit the invention to the disclosed embodiments. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used advantageously. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/070486 | 10/16/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/060023 | 4/24/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6880402 | Couet et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7921739 | Fjerdingstad et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20090032733 | Thabeth et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20120255361 | Thabeth et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102085519 | Jun 2011 | CN |
1480764 | Dec 2004 | EA |
2368391 | May 2002 | GB |
2460668 | Dec 2009 | GB |
H02253137 | Oct 1990 | JP |
H02253137 | Oct 1990 | JP |
2004057306 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2009134145 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2011128406 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012053898 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 13, 2013 (PCT/EP2012/070486); ISA/EP. |
Henriksen, Arne: “Online Oil in Water Analysis, Why, Measuring Principles, Challenges and Experiences”, Sep. 14, 2011. |
http://www.ods-instrumentatie.nl—“ODS Specialist in Samplers * Analytical Systems” (Apr. 26, 2011). |
http://www.oilinwater.com/bilder/filer, ProAnalysis Oil in Water Analyzer Brochure (May 2, 2008). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150285733 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |