This invention relates generally to the field of wireless communications and more specifically to a method and system for using selected bearer channels.
Nodes of a wireless communication system communicate over bearer channels. There are known techniques for using selected bearer channels for transmission. According to a frequency division duplexing (FDD) technique, one channel is used for downlink transmission from a base station node to a remote node, and another channel is used for uplink transmission from the remote node to the base station node. According to a time division duplexing (TDD) technique, a common bearer channel is used for both uplink and downlink transmissions, where uplink and downlink transmissions alternately take turns transmitting on the channel. These known techniques, however, are not suitable for using selected bearer channels in certain situations.
In accordance with the present invention, disadvantages and problems associated with previous techniques for using selected bearer channels for wireless nodes may be reduced or eliminated.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, using bearer channels for wireless nodes includes initiating communication among the wireless nodes that include a node and one or more neighbor nodes. An adaptive channel operable to communicate messages between the node and the neighbor nodes is established. One or more bearer channels are selected. The one or more neighbor nodes are notified of the one or more selected bearer channels using the adaptive channel. The node and the neighbor nodes communicate over the bearer channels.
Certain embodiments of the invention may provide one or more technical advantages. A technical advantage of one embodiment may be that individual nodes are operable to independently select bearer channels used for communication between the nodes. Accordingly, other network nodes do not need to select identical bearer channels.
A technical advantage of another embodiment may be that example methods for using selected bearer channels for wireless nodes are provided. As a first example, a transmission may use the bearer channel of a transmitting node for communication between the transmitting node and a destination node. As a second example, the transmission may use the bearer channel of a destination node. As a third example, each node may use bearer channels selected on a link-by-link basis. As a fourth example, a master node may select a bearer channel for use by the nodes of the network.
Certain embodiments of the invention may include none, some, or all of the above technical advantages. One or more other technical advantages may be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the figures, descriptions, and claims included herein.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and its features and advantages, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Embodiments of the present invention and its advantages are best understood by referring to
Network 10 includes devices. In general, a device may include any suitable arrangement of components operable to perform the operations of the device. Components may include logic, an interface, memory, other component, or any suitable combination of the preceding. “Logic” may refer to hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. Certain logic may manage the operation of a device, and may comprise, for example, a processor. “Processor” may refer to any suitable device operable to execute instructions and manipulate data to perform operations.
“Interface” may refer to logic of a device operable to receive input for the device, send output from the device, perform suitable processing of the input or output or both, or any combination of the preceding, and may comprise one or more ports, conversion software, or both. “Memory” may refer to logic operable to store and facilitate retrieval of information, and may comprise Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), a magnetic drive, a disk drive, a Compact Disk (CD) drive, a Digital Video Disk (DVD) drive, removable media storage, any other suitable data storage medium, or a combination of any of the preceding.
According to the illustrated embodiment, network 10 includes nodes 20. A node 20 represents any suitable device operable to communicate with another node 20. Node 20 may comprise, for example, a personal digital assistant, a computer such as a laptop, a cellular telephone, a mobile handset, or any other device operable to communicate with another node 20. A node 20 may have any suitable mobility capability, for example, be stationary or mobile. Nodes 20 may be organized in a base station/remote network topology, a mobile ad-hoc network topology, or any suitable network topology.
Nodes 20 communicate using signals. A signal may have any suitable modulation format and any suitable bandwidth. Signals communicate information. Information may include voice, data, text, audio, video, multimedia, control, signaling, other information, or any combination of the preceding. The information may be communicated in packets. A packet may comprise a bundle of data organized in a specific way for transmission, and a frame may comprise the payload of one or more packets organized in a specific way for transmission.
According to one embodiment, a network 10 may have one or more bearer channels simultaneously selected by nodes 20. The channel selection may be made according to any suitable method. The bearer channels may be used for communications among nodes 20 according to any suitable method. A procedure according to which a method may be selected from a set of example methods is described in more detail with reference to
Bearer channels selected for use by a node 20 may change independently from the method for using the selected bearer channels. The method uses the current bearer channel that was selected by any suitable means.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to network 10 without departing from the scope of the invention. The components of network 10 may be integrated or separated according to particular needs. Moreover, the operations of network 10 may be performed by more, fewer, or other modules. Additionally, operations of network 10 may be performed using any suitable logic.
The procedure begins at step 110, where information describing network 10 of nodes 20 is established. Time synchronization may be available among nodes 20 at step 114. Time synchronization may refer to highly accurate time synchronization. If time synchronization is available, nodes 20 may utilize a time division multiple access (TDMA) technique, a carrier sense multiple access (CSMA) technique, or other suitable technique. If time synchronization is not available, nodes 20 may utilize a CSMA technique or other suitable technique.
If time synchronization is available at step 114, the procedure proceeds to step 118, where a common logical channel is determined. Nodes 20 may have multiple receivers at step 122. If nodes 20 do not have multiple receivers at step 122, the procedure proceeds to 126, where a method appropriate for single receiver nodes 20 is selected. Single receiver methods may include, for example, a single receiver destination-oriented method, a single receiver transmitter-oriented method, or a group-oriented method. A single receiver transmitter-oriented method is described with reference to
If nodes 20 have multiple receivers at step 122, the procedure proceeds to step 134. The frames of the message traffic may have a variable message length or a fixed method length at step 134. If the message length is variable at step 134, the procedure proceeds to step 138. A method appropriate for a variable message length is selected at step 138. Methods appropriate for a variable message length may include a multiple receiver destination-oriented method, a link-oriented method, or a group-oriented method. A multiple receiver destination-oriented method is described with reference to
If the message length is fixed at step 134, the procedure proceeds to step 142. A method appropriate for a fixed message length is selected at step 142. Methods appropriate for a fixed message length may include, for example, a multiple receiver transmitter-oriented method, a link-oriented method, or a group-oriented method. A multiple receiver transmitter-oriented method is described with reference to
If time synchronization is not available at step 114, the procedure proceeds to step 150, where a common logical channel is determined. Nodes 20 may have multiple receivers at step 154. If nodes 20 have multiple receivers at step 154, the procedure proceeds to step 158, where a selection method is selected in accordance with the design of nodes 20. As an example, a destination-oriented method, a transmitter-oriented method, a link-oriented method, or a group-oriented method may be selected. The procedure then proceeds to step 130.
If nodes 20 do not have multiple receivers at step 154, the procedure proceeds to step 162, where a single receiver method is selected. A single receiver method may include, for example, a single receiver destination-oriented method or a group-oriented method. After a single receiver method is selected, the procedure proceeds to step 130. At step 130, the selected method is reported. After reporting the selected method, the procedure terminates.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the procedure without departing from the scope of the invention. The procedure may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order without departing from the scope of the invention.
According to the illustrated embodiment, each node 20 transmits using its own selected bearer channel. In the example, node 1 transmits over channel f1, node 2 transmits over channel f2, node 3 transmits over channel f3, node 4 transmits over f4, node 5 transmits over channel f5, and node 6 transmits over channel f6. Different nodes 20 may select the same or different bearer channels. As an example, channels f1 and f3 may be equal to each other, and channels f1, f2, f4, and f5 may be different from each other.
According to one embodiment, a frame may be used to organize a collection of consecutive TDMA time slots. The frames may include, for example, one or more network entry slots, one or more control slots, one or more data slots, one or more other slots, or any combination of the preceding. Network entry slots may be used to join a network and indicate selected bearers. Control slots may include information used to designate current and future bearer channels. Data slots may be used for data payload. Slots may go unused when there is no data to send, or dummy payloads may be used to fill unused slots. The frequency of the network entry slot may be determined according to any suitable method. In one embodiment, the frequency may be a pre-assigned fixed channel. In other embodiments, the frequency may be a dynamically changing channel determined according to any suitable procedure.
According to the TDMA technique, a schedule is established according to any suitable method to define the specific time slots that a node 20 uses for transmission. In one embodiment, each node 20 may be assigned a fixed time slot in every repeating frame. In other embodiments, the time slots may be dynamically assigned by a master node or according to any other suitable method. Nodes 20 tune to the bearer channel of a transmitting node 20 for the time slot of the transmitting node 20 as specified by the schedule.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the method without departing from the scope of the invention. The method may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order without departing from the scope of the invention.
According to the key of
Each node 20 receives over two or more bearer channels. A bearer channel may be selected such that each neighbor node 20 that is one hop away from a transmitting node 20 has at least one receiver tuned to the bearer channel of the transmitting node 20. Accordingly, a node 20 has a receiver tuned to the bearer channel in use by its neighbor nodes 20. A hop may refer to a communication link between two nodes 20. In the example, node 1 receives over channels f2 and f6, node 2 receives over channels f1 and f3, node 3 receives over channels f1 and f2, node 4 receives over channels f2 and f3, node 5 transmits receives over channels f1 and f2, and node 6 transmits receives over channels f1 and f3.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the method without departing from the scope of the invention. The method may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order without departing from the scope of the invention.
According to the embodiment, when a node 20 has data to send to a one-hop neighbor destination node 20, the bearer channel of the destination node 20 is used for the handshake and data exchange.
The handshake and data exchange involve data source and destination transmitting, so both nodes 20 transmit and receive on the bearer frequency specified by the destination node 20. A handshake may refer to a CSMA handshake comprising a request to send (RTS) message, a clear to send (CTS) message, a data message, and an acknowledge (ACK) message.
According to the example, nodes 1 and 2 transmit and receive over channels f1 and f2, nodes 2 and 3 transmit and receive over channels f2 and f3, nodes 3 and 4 transmit and receive over channels f3 and f4, nodes 4 and 5 transmit and receive over channels f4 and f5, nodes 3 and 6 transmit and receive over channels f3 and f6, and nodes 5 and 6 transmit and receive over channels f5 and f6. According to the illustrated embodiment, channels f1 and f3 may be equal.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the method without departing from the scope of the invention. The method may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order without departing from the scope of the invention.
According to the embodiment, when a node 20 has data to send to a one-hop neighbor destination node 20, one of the two or more bearer channels of the destination node 20 is used for the handshake and data exchange. The handshake and data exchange involve data source and destination transmitting, so both nodes 20 transmit and receive on the bearer frequencies specified by the destination node 20. The bearer channels may be selected in a manner similar to that described with reference to
According to the illustrated example, nodes 1 and 2 transmit and receive over channels f1a, f1b, f2a, and f2b; nodes 2 and 3 transmit and receive over channels f2a, f2b, f3a; nodes 3 and 4 transmit and receive over channels f3a, f3b, f4a, and f4b; nodes 4 and 5 transmit and receive over channels f4a, f4b, f5a, and f5b; nodes 3 and 6 transmit and receive over channels f3a, f3b, and f6a; and nodes 5 and 6 transmit and receive over channels f5a, f5b, and f6a. According to the illustrated example, frequencies f1a, f3a, and f5b may be equal, frequencies f1b and f4b may be equal, and frequencies f2b, f4a, and f6a may be equal.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the method without departing from the scope of the invention. The method may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order without departing from the scope of the invention.
According to the embodiment, a node 20 may select a bearer channel for use on a link-by-link basis. The bearer channel may be used to both transmit and receive signals between a pair of nodes. In the illustrated embodiment, a frequency fxy may designate the frequency for a bearer channel between nodes x and y. A node 20 may communicate with a neighbor node 20 using the bearer channel specified for the link between them.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the method without departing from the scope of the invention. The method may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order without departing from the scope of the invention.
Nodes 20 may select a common bearer channel for use across nodes 20 of system 10. The nodes 20 transmit on the common bearer channel. When a new common bearer channel is selected, the nodes 20 switch to use the new channel. A master node 20 may notify nodes 20 of the selected bearer channel.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the method without departing from the scope of the invention. The method may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order without departing from the scope of the invention.
Certain embodiments of the invention may provide one or more technical advantages. A technical advantage of one embodiment may be that individual wireless nodes are operable to independently select bearer channels used for communication between the wireless nodes. Accordingly, other network nodes do not need to select identical bearer channels.
A technical advantage of another embodiment may be that example methods for using selected bearer channels for wireless nodes are provided. As a first example, a transmission may use the bearer channel of a transmitting node for communication between the transmitting node and a destination node. As a second example, the transmission may use the bearer channel of a destination node. As a third example, each node may use bearer channels selected on a link-by-link basis. As a fourth example, a master node may select a bearer channel for use by the nodes.
While this disclosure has been described in terms of certain embodiments and generally associated methods, alterations and permutations of the embodiments and methods will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the above description of example embodiments does not constrain this disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure, as defined by the following claims.
The U.S. Government may have certain rights in this invention as provided for by the terms of Contract No. F30602-03-C-0079 awarded by the United States Air Force Research Laboratory as agent for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5742593 | Sharony et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748147 | Bickley et al. | May 1998 | A |
6084919 | Kleider et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6385434 | Chuprun et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6985737 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7239624 | Buchwald et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7787426 | Seidel et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8019018 | Cormier et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8155127 | Seidel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20020012337 | Schmidl et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030050012 | Black et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030174759 | Miyoshi | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198200 | Diener et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203721 | Berezdivin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203735 | Andrus et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206561 | Schmidl et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030210680 | Rao et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040032847 | Cain | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047324 | Diener | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058679 | Dillinger et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040085912 | Xu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092281 | Burchfiel | May 2004 | A1 |
20040110493 | Alvarez et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040132496 | Kim et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172476 | Chapweske | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040220995 | Tsutsumi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040259503 | Ogura | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050020293 | Moore | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031047 | Maltsev et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053032 | Itoh | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070294 | Lyle et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083876 | Vialen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099957 | Soldani et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111383 | Grob et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128998 | Jelitto et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050157678 | Mantha et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050197118 | Mitchell | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050259724 | Bergstrom et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271006 | Chari et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276317 | Jeong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060035641 | Moon et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060084444 | Kossi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060088010 | Buchwald et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104301 | Beyer | May 2006 | A1 |
20060126847 | Ho | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142033 | Wolman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146745 | Cai et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171332 | Barnum | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060198346 | Liu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209762 | Talmola et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215605 | Srikrishna et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215611 | Nakagawa et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060234717 | Pun | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251019 | Dalsgaard et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268791 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268792 | Belcea | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060289650 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070129011 | Lal et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142067 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070211686 | Belcea et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070237092 | Balachandran et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249341 | Chu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080095102 | Meng et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108358 | Patel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090298442 | Adkins | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1178625 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1178625 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1389856 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1528733 | May 2005 | EP |
1585246 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1667372 | Jun 2006 | EP |
2003046595 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003046595 | Feb 2003 | JP |
WO-9939472 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO-2006039800 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006071741 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO2008121161 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2008127420 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2008127421 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2008140566 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2008140566 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2008140566 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2008143695 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2008147447 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2008156498 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2008156498 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2008127421 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO-2008147447 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO-2008121161 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO-2008143695 | Mar 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Seidel, Scott, “IEEE 802 Tutorial: Cognitive Radio”, 21 pages, Jul. 18, 2005. |
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,990 entitled, “Multiple-Transceiver Distributed Dynamic Channel Selection in a Communication Network”, 56 pages specification, claims and abstract, 5 pages of drawings, inventor Stephen P. Hershey, filed Sep. 27, 2005. |
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,719 entitled, “Autonomous Dynamic Spectrum Access”, 38 pages specification, claims and abstract, 16 pages of drawings, inventors Scott Y. Seidel, et al., filed Nov. 10, 2006. |
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,717 entitled, “Method and Apparatus for Adjusting Waveform Parameters for an Adaptive Air Interface Waveform”, 33 pages specification, claims and abstract, 3 pages of drawings, inventors Scott Y. Seidel, et al., filed Nov. 10, 2006. |
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,740 entitled, “Adaptive Control Channel Initialization Operations for Autonomous Dynamic Spectrum Access Systems”, 39 pages specification, claims and abstract, 16 pages of drawings, inventors Scott Y. Seidel, et al., filed Nov. 10, 2006. |
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,716 entitled, “Scheduling for Autonomous Dynamic Spectrum Access Systems”, 40 pages specification, claims and abstract, 16 pages of drawings, inventor Scott Y. Seidel, filed Nov. 10, 2006. |
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,493 entitled, “Bearer Selection and Negotiation in Autonomous Dynamic Spectrum Access Systems”, 39 pages specification, claims and abstract, 16 pages of drawings, inventors Scott Y. Seidel, et al., filed Nov. 10, 2006. |
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,718 entitled, “Interference Avoidance for Autonomous Dynamic Spectrum Access Systems”, 39 pages specification, claims and abstract, 16 pages of drawings, inventors Scott Y. Seidel, et al., filed Nov. 10, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,493, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 29, 2009, 11/595,493 , 18 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,717, Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 20, 2009, , 3 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,719, Non-Final Office Action Jan. 27, 2010, , 29 Pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,719, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 19, 2009, 11/595,719 , 3 Pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,740,Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2009, 11/595,740 , 11. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,716, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 2, 2009, 11/595,716 , 26 Pgs. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/084371, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 16, 2009 , PCT/US2007/084371 , 12. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/084372, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 16, 2009, PCT/US2007/084372 , 14 pgs. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/084376, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 22, 2009, PCT/US2007/084376 , 12 pgs. |
International Serial No. PCT/US2007/021640 mailed Jun. 20, 2008, PCT/US2007/021640 Jun. 20, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,719, NFOA, mailed Mar. 2, 2009, 11/595,719 , all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595/716, NFOA, mailed Mar. 3, 2009, , all. |
Akyildiz, I F. et al., “NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A Survey”, Computer Networks vol. 50. from COGN-0053-PWO ISR/WO of Nov. 20, 2009 May 17, 2009 , 2127-2159. |
Bao, Lichun et al., “Channel Access Scheduling in Ad Hoc Networks with Unidirectional Links”, Computer Science Dept. and Computer Engineering Dept., University of CA, 2001 2001 , 1-10.. |
Bao, Lichun et al., “Hybrid Channel Access Scheduling in Ad Hoc Networks”, Computer Science Dept. and Compuiter Engineering Dept., University of CA . 2002 2002 , 1-12. |
Dimou, K. et al., “Generic Link Layer: A Solution for Multi-Radio Transmission Diversity in Communication Networks beyond 3G”, 2005 62nd Vehicular Technology Conference 25-28, Sep. 2005 , 1672-1676. |
ISR, , “International Search Report”, PCT/US07/84374 Dec. 8, 2008, all. |
ISR, , “PCT/US2007/084370”, Mar. 13, 2009. |
ISR, , “PCT/US2007/084375”, COGN-0017-PWO PCT Search Report Jan. 22, 2009 , all. |
Jorgenson, M. et al., “Operation of the dynamic TDMA subnet relay system with HF bearers”, 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference, vol. 1 Oct. 17-20, 2005 , 338-343. |
Seidel, S. et al., “Autonomous dynamic spectrum access system behavior and performance”, In DySPAN 2005; First IEEE Symposium on new Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks Nov. 2005 , 180-183. |
Zhao, J et al., ““Distributed coordination in dynamic spectrum allocation networks””, Proc. IEEE DySPAN 2005 Nov. 2005 Nov. 2005 , 259-268. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,763, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 23, 2010, , 19. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,740, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 15, 2010, , 16. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,717, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 19, 2010, , 26. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,719, Final Office Action mailed May 14, 2010, , 5. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,493, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 16, 2010, , 22. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,719, Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2010, , 3. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,716, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 6, 2011, , 23. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,493, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 2, 2011, , 17. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,719, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2011, , 32. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,763, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 18, 2010, , 12. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,717, Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 24, 2010, , 23. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,493, Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 22, 2010, , 17. |
Seidel, S. et al., ““Autonomous dynamicspectrum access system behavior andperformance””, 2005 1ST IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, Baltimore, MD, USA, Nov. 8, 2005 , 180-183. |
Zhi Tian, et al., “A Wavelet Approach to Wideband Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radios”, In: IEEE Cognitive Radio.Oriented Wireless Networks and Communicat i ons Jun. 8, 2006. |
Cai Li, Guo et al., “Investigation on Spectrum Sharing Technology Based on Cogni t i ve Radi o”, In: IEEE ChinaCom'06 First International Conference on Comm. and Networking Oct. 25, 2006. |
Lehtmiaki, Janne J. et al., “Spectrum Sensing with Forward Methods”, In: IEEE Milcom 2006, Oct. 23, 2006. |
Scott, D. et al., ““IEEE 802 Tutorial: 1-15 Cognitive Radio”,”, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, [Online] URL :http://www.ieee802.org/802—tutorials/0 5-Jul./IEEE%20802%20CR%20Tutorial%207-18-05%20seidel%20input.pdf scott seidel raytheon tutorial Jul. 18, 2005 , 1-21. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,763, Notice of Allowance mailed May 11, 2011, 14. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,493, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 3, 2011, 7. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,719, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 21, 2011, 5. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,716, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 9, 2011, 17. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,717, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 14, 2011, 24. |
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2007/084373, Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Apr. 14, 2011, , 9. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,717, Non Final Office Action Mailed Aug. 15, 2011, , 26. |
Akyildiz, I F. et al., “Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey”, Computer Networks, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, NL ,vol. 50, No. 13, Sep. 15, 2006 , 2127-2159. |
Ganesan, G et al., “Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks”, 2005 1ST IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, Baltimore, MD , USA, Nov. 8, 2005 , 137-143. |
“European Search Report, Appl No. 07875104.7”, Oct. 11, 2011 , 1-9. |
Jungmin, So et al., “Multi-channel mac for ad hoc networks: handling multi-channel hidden terminals using a single transceiver”, Mobihoc 2004. Proceedings of the 5TH. ACM International Symposium on Mobile AD HOC Networking and Computing, Tokyo, Japan May 24-26, 2004 May 24, 2004 , 222-233. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,717, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 24, 2012, , 11 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,719, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 5, 2011, , 9. |
“EP Appln No. 07839420.2; Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2012”, , 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 07874267.3, Extended European Search Report mailed Apr. 5, 2012, 9 pgs. |
“EP appln No. 07875063.5; EP Search Report dated Apr. 2, 2012”. |
US 8,185,068, May 22, 2012, Seidel, S et al. (withdrawn). |
“European Patent Application No. 07874266.5. Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2013”, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080112341 A1 | May 2008 | US |