Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to an apparatus for refining operations, and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to delayed coking operations utilizing a heater coil having straight tubes constructed of a first material and return bends constructed of a second material wherein the first material and the second material exhibit differing thermal properties, in particular, but not by way of limitation, design-maximum tube-metal temperatures.
History of the Related Art
Delayed coking refers to a refining process that includes heating a residual oil feed, made up of heavy, long-chain hydrocarbon molecules, to a cracking temperature in a furnace. Typically, furnaces used in the delayed coking process include a plurality of tubes arranged in a multiple-pass configuration. Heating of the residual oil feed cracks the heavy, long-chain hydrocarbon molecules producing gas, lightweight products, and solid coke. The gas and lightweight products are further refined into various liquid fuels and gas fuels. The solid coke is subsequently crushed and sold as a fuel source.
During the delayed coking process, solid coke forms on an inside surface of the plurality of tubes. This phenomenon is known as “fouling.” Solid coke is an insulator and causes a temperature of a material forming the plurality of tubes (referred to herein as a “tube-metal temperature”) to incrementally increase during operation. For example, a clean tube may require a tube-metal temperature of, for example, 945° F. to heat the residual oil feed to 900° F. In contrast, a fouled tube might require a substantially higher tube-metal temperature to heat the residual oil feed to 900° F. Over a period of use, the plurality of tubes eventually reach a design-maximum tube-metal temperature. As used herein, the term “design-maximum tube metal temperature” refers to a maximum safe operating temperature of the plurality of tubes. Above the design-maximum tube metal temperature, thermal stresses can contribute to wear and fatigue of the plurality of tubes thereby rendering the furnace unsafe for operation. Upon reaching the design-maximum tube-metal temperature, the plurality of tubes must be cleaned to remove the solid coke. Cleaning brings the plurality of tubes back to the tube-metal temperature conditions associated with a clean tube.
Cleaning the plurality of tubes typically involves at least one of mechanical cleaning, steam-air decoking, pigging, or online spalling. Online spalling involves removing a fouled pass including a plurality of tubes from service and thermally shocking the plurality of tubes. The plurality of tubes are rapidly heated (expanded) and cooled (contracted) over a set period of time. During cooling, the fouled tube contracts causing a portion of the solid coke accumulated therein to break free. The solid coke is flushed out of the fouled tube and processed in a coke drum. The advantage of online spalling is that only one pass is spalled at a time allowing remaining passes to operate normally. However, the efficacy of online spalling may decrease each time it is performed.
Pigging involves passing a foam or plastic “pig” having metal studs and grit through the tube. As the pig passes through the fouled tube, the pig rotates and scrapes the solid coke from an inside surface of the fouled tube. Steam-air decoking involves circulating a steam-air mixture through the plurality of tubes at elevated temperatures. Air from the steam-air mixture is used to burn the solid coke from the inside surface of the plurality of tubes while steam from the steam-air mixture ensures that the burning temperatures do not exceed the design-maximum tube-metal temperature.
In most cases, during cleaning, at least a pass of the plurality of tubes must be removed from the residual oil feed. In some cases, the entire furnace must be taken out of service. This results in a reduction of productivity and a loss of profits. Thus, it is of great importance to design the furnace to maximize a period of time between cleanings.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,670,462, assigned to Great Southern Independent L.L.C., relates to a system and method for on-line cleaning of black oil heater tubes and delayed coker heater tubes. A high-pressure water charge is injected through the heater tubes during normal process operations to prevent heater tube fouling and downtime. The water charge undergoes intense boiling and evaporation. The intense boiling induces a scrubbing action within the heater tubes. Furthermore, a shocking action is induced by expansion and contraction of the heater tubes resulting from the water charge flowing through the heater tubes followed by a hotter process fluid flowing through the heater tubes.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0158240, assigned to D-COK, LP relates to a system and method for on-line spalling of a coker. An off-line heater pipe is added to on-line coker heater pipes. When an on-line pipe is to be spalled, flow is diverted to the off-line pipe thus allowing for full operation of the coker heater.
The present invention relates generally to refining operations. In one aspect, the present invention relates to a furnace having a heated portion arranged adjacent to an unheated portion. A plurality of straight tubes are formed of a first material and are at least partially disposed in the heated portion. A plurality of return bends are operatively coupled to the plurality of straight tubes. The plurality of return bends are formed of a second material and are at least partially disposed in the unheated portion. The first material exhibits a design-maximum tube-metal temperature greater than the second material thereby facilitating increased run time of the furnace. The second material exhibits wear-resistance properties greater than the first material thereby facilitating wear-resistance of the furnace.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method of manufacturing a heater process coil. The method includes forming a plurality of straight tubes from a first material and forming a plurality of return bends from a second material. The plurality of straight tubes are joined to the plurality of return bends. The plurality of straight tubes and the plurality of return bends are oriented within a furnace such that the plurality of straight tubes are at least partially disposed within a heated portion and the plurality of plug headers are at least partially disposed within an unheated portion. The first material exhibits a design-maximum tube-metal temperature greater than the second material thereby facilitating increased run time of the furnace. The second material exhibits wear-resistance properties greater than the first material thereby facilitating wear-resistance of the furnace.
A more complete understanding of the method and system of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the following Detailed Description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
Various embodiments of the present invention will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings. The invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, the embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.
Still referring to
Still referring to
Still referring to
While cracking of the residual oil feed 126 primarily takes place within the coke drum 110, premature cracking often occurs within portions of the furnace 108. Premature cracking leads to fouling of the furnace 108 thereby necessitating periodic cleaning of the furnace 108. Increased feed rates commonly associated with many refining operations present the potential for rapid fouling of the furnace 108. In many cases, any increase in productivity of the furnace 108 results in increased production throughout the refining system 100.
To this end, efforts have been made to construct the furnace 108 from materials having higher design-maximum tube-metal temperatures. For example, austenitic materials such as, for example, TP347H have a design-maximum tube-metal temperature approximately 200° F. higher than commonly-used ferritic materials such as, for example, 9Cr-1Mo; however, austenitic materials are considerably softer than ferritic materials and often experience excessive wear and erosion. Such wear and erosion can lead to premature failure of the furnace 108 resulting in loss of production and costly repairs. Thus a design of the furnace 108 is needed that utilizes materials of sufficient strength to prevent premature wear of the furnace 108 but allows for a longer operation time between successive cleanings.
Still referring to
Still referring to
The advantages of such an arrangement will be apparent to one skilled in the art. For example, by constructing the plurality of straight tubes 206 of the austenitic material, the furnace 200 can operate for approximately an additional 130 days between cleanings thereby increasing productivity and profit. In addition, constructing the plurality of return bends 208 and the plurality of plug headers 209 from the ferritic material reduces wear and erosion of the plurality of return bends 208 and the plurality of plug headers 209. However, by placing the plurality of return bends 208 and the plurality of plug headers 209 outside of the heated portion 210, an operation of the furnace 200 is not limited by the lower design-maximum tube-metal temperature associated with the ferritic material.
Still referring to
Although various embodiments of the method and system of the present invention have been illustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications and substitutions without departing from the spirit of the invention as set forth herein.
This application claims priority to, and incorporates by reference for any purpose the entire disclosure of, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/774,421, filed Mar. 7, 2013.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2028795 | McKee | Jan 1936 | A |
2791997 | Monkowski | May 1957 | A |
4093816 | Case | Jun 1978 | A |
4297147 | Nunciato et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4444589 | Sugitani et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4444731 | Konoki | Apr 1984 | A |
5985186 | Kasprzyk | Nov 1999 | A |
6187147 | Doerksen | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6237545 | Barnett | May 2001 | B1 |
7670462 | Gibson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7895957 | Inomata | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8733619 | Lalam | May 2014 | B2 |
20040109784 | Arbab et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070158240 | Gregory | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090107888 | Sanchez | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100307429 | Komai et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110316271 | Lalam | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20140041844 | Lindell et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4310538 | Oct 1994 | DE |
1610081 | Dec 2005 | EP |
340876 | Jan 1931 | GB |
733647 | Jul 1955 | GB |
744313 | Feb 1956 | GB |
2100284 | Dec 1982 | GB |
2100405 | Dec 1982 | GB |
WO-2005040439 | May 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Thomas, Shane, “International Search Report” prepared for PCT/US14/21070 dated Jun. 11, 2014, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140251785 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61774421 | Mar 2013 | US |