The invention relates to vehicular traffic management, and more particularly to managing such traffic using speed bumps.
Speed bumps are a widespread means for controlling traffic. They are often used in locations where the potential for collisions is greater than normal, such as in construction zones, toll ways, entrance and exit ramps, school zones and residential areas.
A typical speed bump is a permanent structure integrated with a road surface, such as an asphalt, concrete, or steel structure whose shape resembles that of a cylinder sliced longitudinally. The speed bump is placed across a road to encourage drivers of vehicles to slow down when passing thereon lest they suffer a large jolt.
Despite their effectiveness, there is at least one drawback associated with conventional speed bumps. Emergency vehicles, such as ambulances, police cars and fire trucks, are forced to slow down when traversing a speed bump in a roadway, resulting in greater emergency response times.
Thus, there is a need for a method and system that has the benefit of conventional speed bumps for curtailing the speed of vehicles, while at the same time not hampering the motion of emergency vehicles.
An improved traffic management method and system are described herein. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a speed bump system and method are described that provide for gaps to allow an emergency vehicle to pass therethrough. In one embodiment that can be implemented when the tire configuration (e.g., width of tires, number of tires, distance between front tires, distance between rear tires) of the emergency vehicle is substantially different from that of a regular passenger vehicle, the speed bump system is designed to allow an emergency vehicle to pass through the gaps, but to not allow the regular passenger vehicle to pass through the gaps. In another embodiment, both an emergency vehicle and a regular passenger vehicle are physically capable of passing through the gaps of the speed bump system. Effectiveness of the speed bump system could, in part, then stem from prohibiting by law a regular passenger vehicle to pass through the gaps.
The speed bump system can be pre-fabricated or constructed on site. Reflectors can be disposed between the gaps to increase visibility for emergency vehicles at night.
A speed bump system is described below that provides the traditional benefits of speed bumps, viz., reducing speeds of cars, while not impeding the speed of emergency vehicles.
The speed bump system 10 includes an elongate structure 12 having a raised middle portion 14 with two ends 16 and 18. The elongate structure 12 also has a first raised outer portion 20 that is proximal to the one end 16 of the raised middle portion 14, and a second raised outer portion 22 that is proximal to the other end 18 of the raised middle portion 14. The speed bump system 10 also includes affixing means 24 that can include holes 26 and screws 28 threaded therethrough and screwed to the roadway. Any other type of affixing means, such as bolts, nails, spikes, rivets or bonding material can also be used. Tn some instance, as when using concrete, asphalt or tar, the speed bump system may be self-bonding to the roadway when set. Other methods and components for constructing speed bumps, known to those of ordinary skill in the art, may also be used.
The speed bump system 10 also includes a first gap 30 and a second gap 32. The first gap 30 lies between the first raised outer portion 20 and the raised middle portion 14. The second gap 32 lies between the second raised outer portion 22 and the raised middle portion 14.
In the simplest case, the emergency vehicle has two front tires, and two back tires, and the distance between the two front tires and the distance between the two rear tires is substantially the same. The width 34 of the first gap 30 (the “intragap width”) and the width 36 of the second gap 32 are then each chosen to be wider than the width of the widest tire tread of the emergency vehicle. Moreover, the distance 38 between the first and second gaps 30 and 32 (the “intergap width”) is chosen to be substantially the same as the distance between the two rear tires of the emergency vehicle, which in this example is substantially the same as the distance between the two front tires. The intergap width can be measured from the center of the first gap to the center of the second gap, if the width between front (or rear) tires is also measured from the respective centers of the two front (or rear) tire treads.
Some emergency vehicles have two tires at the location of one tire well. For example, certain fire trucks or ambulances have a single front right tire, a single front left tire, but two rear right tires and two rear left tires. In such cases, the width of a left first gap is wider than both left rear tires (i.e., wider than the distance between the outer edge of the tread of the outer left tire, and the inner edge of the tread of the inner left tire), and the width of a right second gap is wider than the two rear right tires. In this last example, it is assumed that the left front tire tread lies between the two left rear front tires if longitudinally projected there. This last assumption ensures that when the emergency vehicle is traveling straight ahead along a roadway, the two front tires can pass the gap if the two rear wheels can. If this assumption is not true, such as when the tire configuration of the emergency vehicle is like that shown in
Generally, where the speed bump is tailored for one or more emergency vehicles, including vehicles where the distance between two front tires and the distance between two rear tires are not equal, and/or where the vehicle has a plurality of wheels at a single wheel well, the width of the individual gaps (the “intragap width or distance”) and the distance between the gaps (the “intergap distance”) should be such as to allow the emergency vehicle to pass the speed bump system through the gaps.
In the embodiment shown in
More generally, provided the wheel geometry of the emergency vehicle and the wheel geometry of the regular passenger vehicle is sufficiently different, then the intragap and intergap distances can be chosen such that a) the emergency vehicle is able to pass the speed bump system through the gaps, avoiding the raised portions, and b) the passenger vehicle is not able to pass the speed bump system through the gaps, but must instead traverse at least one of the raised portions of the system.
For example,
The speed bump system 110 also includes a first gap 130 and a second gap 132. The first gap 130 lies between the first raised outer portion 120 and the raised middle portion 114. The second gap 132 lies between the second raised outer portion 122 and the raised middle portion 114.
Suppose, for simplicity, that the emergency vehicle has two front tires, and two back tires, and the distance between the two front tires and the distance between the two rear tires is substantially the same. The width 134 of the first gap 130 (the “intragap width”) and the width 136 of the second gap 132 are then each chosen to be wider than the width of the widest tire tread of the emergency vehicle. Moreover, the distance 131 between the first and second gaps 130 and 132 (the “intergap width”) is chosen to be substantially the same as the distance between the two rear tires of the emergency vehicle, which in this example is substantially the same as the distance between the two front tires. These dimensions allow the emergency vehicle to pass through the first and second gaps 130 and 132.
The elongate structure 112 includes a plurality of segments 140, 142, 144 and 146 that are connected together.
The SOS lane 200 is reserved for emergency vehicles, for example an ambulance 202 or fire truck 204. A non-emergency vehicle, such as a regular passenger vehicle 206, would not be permitted to travel in the SOS lane. Instead, the passenger vehicle 206 is permitted to pass the speed bump system by going over the raised portions 220 or 222, thus encouraging the driver to slow down. In contrast, an emergency vehicle 202 or 204 can travel in the SOS lane and pass through the gaps 230 and 232, thus traveling unimpeded. In some embodiments, depending on the intragap and intergap distances chosen, and on the geometries of the wheels of a typical emergency vehicle and a typical passenger vehicle, the typical passenger vehicle cannot pass the speed bump system without going over at least one of the three raised portions 213, 220, 222, as described above.
The speed bump system 360 also includes a first gap 380 and a second gap 382. The first gap 380 lies between the first raised outer portion 370 and the raised middle portion 364. The second gap 382 lies between the second raised outer portion 372 and the raised middle portion 364.
Suppose, for simplicity, that the emergency vehicle has two front tires, and two back tires, and the distance between the two front tires and the distance between the two rear tires is substantially the same. The width 384 of the first gap 380 (the “intragap width”) and the width 386 of the second gap 382 are then each chosen to be wider than the width of the widest tire tread of the emergency vehicle. Moreover, the distance 387 between the first and second gaps 380 and 382 (the “intergap width”) is chosen to be substantially the same as the distance between the two rear tires of the emergency vehicle, which in this example is substantially the same as the distance between the two front tires. These dimensions allow the emergency vehicle to pass through the first and second gaps 380 and 382.
In the embodiment shown in
The speed bump system 410 also includes a first gap 430 and a second gap 432. The first gap 430 lies between the first raised outer portion 420 and the raised middle portion 414. The second gap 432 lies between the second raised outer portion 422 and the raised middle portion 414.
Suppose, for simplicity, the emergency vehicle has two front tires, and two back tires, and the distance between the two front tires and the distance between the two rear tires is substantially the same. The transverse width 434 (i.e., the distance along an imaginary axis perpendicular to the roadway) of the first gap 430 and the transverse width 436 of the second gap 432 are then each chosen to be wider than the width of the widest tire tread of the emergency vehicle. Moreover, the distance 437 between the first and second gaps 430 and 432 is chosen to be substantially the same as the distance between the two rear tires of the emergency vehicle, which in this example is substantially the same as the distance between the two front tires. These dimensions allow the emergency vehicle to pass through the first and second gaps 430 and 432.
Unlike the embodiments shown in
Referring to
Referring to
With reference to
It should also be understood that the raised portion need not be any particular shape, again as long as the shape impeded a regular passenger vehicle from passing the speed bump system in any manner except through the gap or gaps.
Also, the height of a raised portion need not be uniform along its longitudinal length. For example, the middle raised portion might be higher near the middle than near the ends thereof. Also, one of the raised portions might have a different height than another one of the raised portions.
While embodiments of this invention have been illustrated in the accompanying drawings and described above, it will be evident to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the essence of this invention. For example, the middle raised portion, and the first and second outer raised portions of the structure of the speed bump system can be connected to each other by material other than the roadway, or they can be unconnected by material other than the roadway. The examples described above are not meant to limit the scope of the invention, which is to be limited by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1843746 | Tibbetts | Feb 1932 | A |
2031396 | Voight | Feb 1936 | A |
4354771 | Dickinson | Oct 1982 | A |
D336524 | White et al. | Jun 1993 | S |
5295759 | Flanders et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
6174103 | Stroman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6259375 | Andras | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6309137 | Hirsch | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6623206 | Blair et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070237579 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60790551 | Apr 2006 | US |