Patent Grant
10252923
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to systems and methods of providing crop irrigation water as well as potable water and, more particularly, to systems and methods of providing irrigation water and/or potable water from water having unacceptable dissolved solids content.
2. Discussion of Related Art
Desalting or desalination refers to a water treatment process that removes salt from, for example, water. In some cases, the water source is brackish water or seawater and desalting techniques thereof provide at least a portion of municipal requirements for potable, drinking water. Desalination techniques typically include those based on distillation as well as reverse osmosis techniques. The desalted water can also be consumed in commercial and industrial applications as, for example, process feed water, boiler feed water, and irrigation water. Particular examples of industries that may utilize desalted water include the pharmaceutical, mining, paper and pulp, and agricultural industries.
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a water treatment system. The water treatment system comprises a first electrically-driven separation apparatus including one or more monovalent cation selective membranes and having a first inlet in fluid communication with a source of seawater or brackish water, a pressure-driven separation apparatus configured to produce water suitable for use as agricultural irrigation water and having a second inlet in fluid communication with a diluate outlet of the first electrically-driven separation apparatus, a filtrate outlet, and an agricultural irrigation water outlet, and a second electrically-driven separation apparatus configured to produce water suitable for use as potable water and having a third inlet in fluid communication with the filtrate outlet of the pressure-driven separation apparatus and a potable water outlet.
In accordance with some embodiments, the first electrically-driven separation apparatus includes an electrodialysis unit.
In accordance with some embodiments, the second electrically-driven separation apparatus includes an electrodeionization unit.
In accordance with some embodiments, the first electrically-driven separation further includes one or more monovalent anion selective membranes.
In accordance with some embodiments, the second electrically-driven separation apparatus does not include monovalent ion selective membranes.
In accordance with some embodiments, the pressure-driven separation apparatus includes a water softening filtration membrane.
In accordance with some embodiments, the diluate outlet of the first electrically-driven separation apparatus is in direct fluid communication with the agricultural irrigation water outlet of the pressure-driven separation apparatus.
In accordance with some embodiments, the water treatment system further comprises a concentrate outlet of the second electrically-driven separation apparatus in direct fluid communication with a concentrate makeup inlet of the first electrically-driven separation apparatus.
In accordance with some embodiments, the water treatment system further comprises a concentrate outlet of the second electrically driven separation apparatus in direct fluid communication with a diluate makeup inlet of the first electrically-driven separation apparatus.
In accordance with some embodiments, the water treatment system further comprises a concentrate outlet of the second electrically-driven separation apparatus in direct fluid communication with the second inlet of the pressure-driven separation apparatus.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of treating water. The method comprises directing water to be treated having a level of total dissolved solids of greater than about 1,500 mg/L to an inlet of a first electrically-driven separation apparatus, treating the water to be treated in the first electrically-driven separation apparatus to produce a first diluate, directing a first portion of the first diluate to an inlet of a pressure-driven separation apparatus, treating the first portion of the first diluate in the pressure-driven separation apparatus to produce treated water suitable for use as irrigation water, directing the treated water suitable for use as irrigation water through a concentrate outlet of the pressure-driven separation apparatus to an irrigation water point of use, directing a filtrate from a filtrate outlet of the pressure-driven separation apparatus into an inlet of a second electrically-driven separation apparatus, treating the filtrate from the filtrate outlet of the pressure-driven separation apparatus in the second electrically-driven separation apparatus to produce treated water suitable for use as potable water, and directing the treated water suitable for use as potable water through a diluate outlet of the second electrically-driven separation apparatus to a potable water point of use.
In accordance with some embodiments, the method further comprises directing a second portion of the first diluate to the irrigation water point of use.
In accordance with some embodiments, the method further comprises utilizing a first portion of concentrate from a concentrate outlet of the second electrically-driven separation apparatus as concentrate makeup in the first electrically-driven separation apparatus.
In accordance with some embodiments, the method further comprises utilizing a second portion of concentrate from a concentrate outlet of the second electrically-driven separation apparatus as diluate makeup in the first electrically-driven separation apparatus.
In accordance with some embodiments, the method further comprises directing concentrate from a concentrate outlet of the second electrically-driven separation into the second inlet of the pressure-driven separation apparatus.
In accordance with some embodiments, the method further comprises utilizing concentrate from a concentrate outlet of the second electrically-driven separation apparatus as diluate makeup in the first electrically-driven separation apparatus.
In accordance with some embodiments, the method further comprises directing concentrate from a concentrate outlet of the second electrically-driven separation unit into the second inlet of the pressure-driven separation apparatus.
In accordance with some embodiments, producing treated water suitable for use as irrigation water comprises producing treated water having a SAR value of less than about 20.
In accordance with some embodiments, producing treated water suitable for use as potable water comprises producing water with a TDS level of less than about 500 ppm.
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a water treatment system. The water treatment system comprises a first electrically driven separation apparatus including one or more monovalent cation selective membranes and having a first inlet in fluid communication with a source of water to be treated having a level of total dissolved solids of greater than about 1,500 mg/L, a second electrically driven separation apparatus having a second inlet in fluid communication with a diluate outlet of the first electrically driven separation apparatus and a concentrate outlet in direct fluid communication with the inlet of the first electrically driven separation apparatus, and a pressure-driven separation apparatus configured to produce a first treated water suitable for use as potable water and a second treated water suitable for use as agricultural irrigation water and having a third inlet in fluid communication with a diluate outlet of the second electrically-driven separation apparatus, a potable water outlet, and a agricultural water outlet.
The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing. In the drawings:
This invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways beyond those exemplarily presented herein.
One or more aspects of the invention can involve systems and techniques for providing water suitable for agricultural facilities. Other aspects of the invention can provide potable water or water suitable for human use or consumption as well as for livestock and poultry. Some systems and techniques of the invention can convert or otherwise render non-potable water suitable for agricultural, livestock, poultry, and/or human consumption. Still further aspects of the invention can involve systems and techniques that preferentially or selectively remove some species over other species from a fluid to be treated to provide a product having one or more desirable characteristics. In contrast with non-selective techniques, some selective removal aspects of the invention can be more cost effective by avoiding or reducing additional post-treatment processes, for example, blending. Thus, the systems and techniques of the invention economically provide treated water that is more suitable for an intended use.
In some embodiments of the invention, some types of species are retained in a treated fluid stream while other types of species are preferentially removed. The resultant product fluid can be utilized in various applications and/or otherwise satisfy one or more objectives. Other aspects of the invention can involve systems and techniques that provide water having one or more properties or characteristics tailored to satisfy a particular purpose. Some embodiments of the invention can thus involve systems and techniques that provide one or more water streams or bodies that have one or more attributes that have been adjusted based on one or more parameters of the point of use or facility in which the stream or body is to be utilized.
Even further aspects of the invention can involve systems and techniques that economically provide water for agricultural, industrial, commercial, and/or residential service. Further, some particular aspects of the invention can involve providing water to serve a plurality of requirements or levels of purity or quality. Thus in some embodiments, the systems and techniques of the invention can provide one or more water streams or bodies in a mixed use facility. Particularly advantageous aspects of the invention can involve providing the plurality of water streams or bodies, each of which may have differing water quality levels, from a source of water having high solids content, to a plurality of points of use, each of which may have differing requirements. Such aspects of the invention can provide systems and techniques that treat, for example, non-potable water to render it potable and/or suitable for irrigation, for livestock and/or poultry consumption, and/or for human consumption or use.
In some aspects of the invention, water having a high level of one or more objectionable species dissolved therein can be treated to remove or at least reduce the concentration of such species to an acceptable level. The one or more objectionable species can be any species that render the untreated water unsuitable for a particular application. For example, the water may contain a high level or undesirable concentration of monovalent cations and/or anions which adversely or undesirably hinders retention of water in soil or adsorption of other species, including, for example, divalent or even multivalent species. If the requirement is pertinent to crop irrigation, the undesirable condition or characteristic can involve water that contains one or more species that affects the permeability and/or infiltration properties of the soil being irrigated. For example, some aspects of the invention can involve rendering or treating water to preferentially remove monovalent species over non-monovalent species.
In accordance with one or more particular aspects, the invention can involve embodiments directed to systems and/or methods comprising providing or introducing water to be treated into an electrically-driven separation apparatus. Some embodiments of the invention can involve an irrigation system comprising an electrically-driven separation apparatus fluidly connected, or at least connectable, to one or more sources of water to be treated and at least one irrigation water distribution system.
Other aspects of the invention may involve a method of providing potable water. Some aspects of the invention can provide irrigation water and/or potable water without thermally-driven separation techniques or unit operations. For example, a method in accordance with some embodiments of the invention can comprise one or more acts or steps of providing water to be treated and treating at least a portion of the water to be treated in an electrically-driven separation apparatus to produce a first treated water. The method can further comprise one or more acts of treating a portion of the water to be treated, typically a separate portion, in one or more pressure-driven separation apparatus to produce a second treated water. In some cases, the method can further comprise a step of mixing the first treated water and the second treated water to produce the potable water. The potable water typically has a target or desired total dissolved solids (TDS) content.
Aspects of the invention directed to systems that provide potable water can comprise a source of water to be treated and a pressure-driven separation apparatus having an inlet that is fluidly connected, or at least connectable, to the source of water to be treated. The pressure-driven apparatus can also have one or more outlets, typically at least one product outlet as a treated water outlet. The pressure-driven separation apparatus typically also has at least one reject outlet as an outlet for a stream containing one or more species, typically an undesirable species, removed from the treated water. The system for providing potable water can further comprise one or more electrically-driven separation apparatus which can be fluidly connected, or connectable, to the source of water to be treated, to the pressure-driven separation apparatus, or both. For example, as described in further detail below, one or more electrically-driven separation apparatus can be fluidly connected to a reject outlet of the pressure-driven separation apparatus. In accordance with particular embodiments of the invention, the system for providing potable water can further comprise one or more mixers having one or more inlets fluidly connected, or connectable, to the treated water outlet of the pressure-driven apparatus and the product water outlet of the electrically-driven separation apparatus. The mixer can comprise any mixing unit operation that facilitates at least partially blending or combining one or more product streams including, in some cases, a stream from the source of water to be treated to form a final product stream having one or more desirable characteristics.
The water to be treated can comprise seawater having a TDS of greater than about 5,000 mg/L (5,000 ppm) or more, for example, about 35,000 mg/L (35,000 ppm) or a salinity of between about 3.1% and about 3.8%, brackish water having a TDS of between about 1,500 mg/L (1,500 ppm) and about 5,000 mg/L (5,000 ppm), and/or water containing high concentrations of dissolved solids or salts. Other sources of water to be treated can comprise water that would be unsuitable for use in agricultural facilities because of infiltration and/or toxicity considerations.
The systems and techniques of the invention can comprise, where appropriate, pre-treatment subsystems to facilitate one or more operating principles thereof. One or more pre-treatment and/or post-treatment unit operations may be utilized in one or more embodiments of the invention. For example, the systems and techniques of the invention may comprise a pre-treatment subsystem including one or a plurality of filters that separate or remove at least a portion of any suspended solids from the water to be treated. Such pre-treatment subsystems typically remove particulate material that would damage any downstream unit operation of the systems of the invention. Other pre-treatment unit operations may include, for example, microfilters and/or sedimentary-based systems that can remove suspended solids having characteristic dimensions of, for example, one micron or greater.
Further pre-treatment operations may be utilized to improve the effectiveness of one or more unit operations of the invention. For example, a pre-treatment subsystem can comprise coolers or heaters that, respectively, cool or heat the water to be treated prior to separation operations. Cooling of the raw feed stream, or any intermediate process stream may be performed to, for example, facilitate the transport of an undesirable species, or to hinder the transport of a desirable species, from the stream to be treated. Likewise, heating may be performed to raise the temperature of the raw feed stream, or one or more intermediate process streams, to a desired temperature that, for example, facilitates economical or efficient operation of the one or more separation apparatus. Non-limiting examples of heating processes may involve heaters, furnaces, or heat exchangers that may be associated with or be a unit operation of a process or system of the invention. For example, heating may be provided through a heat exchanger of a power plant that is not necessarily associated with the treatment systems of the invention.
Post-treatment unit operations may polish, remove, or reduce the concentration one or more species in the treated water. For example, one or more ion exchange columns may be utilized to remove species that are not readily removed in the electrically-driven separation apparatus and/or the pressure-driven separation apparatus. Non-limiting examples of species that would typically be removed or at least have a reduction in concentration to, preferably, non-toxic and/or non-objectionable levels, in post-treatment operations include those that may affect soil aggregation, water infiltration, and/or would be toxic to plant growth such as aluminum, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, iron, fluoride, lithium, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, selenium, tin, titanium, tungsten, vanadium, boron, and zinc. Other species that may be addressed by one or more post-treatment operations include those that may be toxic or objectionable to humans, poultry, and/or livestock in drinking water such as, but not limited to, nitrates, nitrites, vanadium, and sulfides. Disinfecting processes may also be performed to at least partially inactivate or reduce the concentration of colony-forming microorganisms that may be harmful to human and/or livestock.
Alternatively, or in combination with the one or more polishing unit operations, the systems and techniques of the invention may involve adding one or more species to at least a portion of the treated water. For example, gypsum may be added to adjust the concentration of one or more desirable species or adjust a characteristic of the water. Other additives may include fertilizers or other supplements that facilitate crop growth when the water is used for irrigation.
An electrically-driven apparatus typically utilizes a potential field to create a motive force that induces one or more species, typically the target species, which can include desirable as well as undesirable species, to migrate from the carrier or fluid. The electrically-driven apparatus can utilize one or more components that segregate the target species during migration and/or inhibit the return or reverse process. Non-limiting examples of such devices include electrodialysis (ED) devices, including current reversing electrodialysis (EDR) devices, as well as electrodeionization (EDI) devices. The present invention, however, is not limited to one or a combination of such electrically-driven apparatus and may be practiced in other apparatus that provide a motive force that facilitates the preferential migration of one or more target species over other species in the fluid to be treated.
The electrically-driven separation apparatus of the invention typically utilize ion selective membranes to facilitate separation phenomena. In some cases, the selectively permeable membrane can preferentially or selectively allow transport of some species relative to other species. For example, cation selective membranes may be utilized in some compartments of the electrically-driven separation apparatus. In other cases, anion selective membranes may be utilized in one or more compartments. In still other cases, the electrically-driven separation apparatus of the invention may comprise one or more monovalent ion selective membranes to selectively promote transfer of the monovalent cationic or anionic species. Indeed, in some embodiments of the invention, the separation apparatus of the invention may comprise monovalent cation selective membranes and one or more monovalent anion selective membranes, typically in one or more concentrating compartments of the apparatus. Non-limiting examples of commercially available monovalent selective membranes include NEOSEPTA® cation and anion selective membranes from ASTOM Corporation, Tokyo, Japan or Tokuyama Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
A pressure-driven separation apparatus typically utilizes one or more barriers to inhibit migration of a first species therethrough while allowing penetration of another. The motive force facilitating the separation phenomena typically involve pressurizing fluid to be treated. Non-limiting examples of pressure-driven separation apparatus include microfiltration and nanofiltration (NF) apparatus as well as reverse osmosis (RO) systems.
One or more embodiments of the invention can be directed to a water treatment system 100 as exemplarily shown in
The systems and techniques of the invention may include one or more water distribution systems that facilitate delivery of the treated water to one or more points of use. For example, the distribution system may include an irrigation distribution system that delivers irrigation water to various points of use in an agricultural facility. To facilitate the delivery of the treated water, the distribution system can include one or more storage systems, such as reservoirs, tanks, wells, or other vessels and containers. The irrigation systems of the invention may utilize overhead and/or surface irrigation techniques to convey water to a designated area. The irrigation system components can thus employ non-movable as well as mobile devices.
The one or more storage systems may be considered as part of the distribution system or be an ancillary subsystem of the treatment system. The one or more storage systems may further facilitate providing treated water having desired characteristics. For example, treated water having a first condition or characteristic may be stored in one or more storage companions prior to further treatment or processing, for example, blending, with another treated or untreated water body or stream.
System 200 can include one or more controllers (not shown) to control one or more operating parameters of any component or subsystem of system 200. Like the system exemplarily illustrated in
In accordance with some aspects of the invention, the one or more characteristics of the treated water stream can be any measured or derived attribute of the product stream so as to render it suitable for its intended use at point 114. However, the invention is not limited as such; for example, the characteristic of the water may be an attribute of the treated or product water stream in terms relative to the water stream to be treated. The attribute or parameter can be a singular or a composite or aggregate characteristic of the water. Specific, non-limiting examples of such attributes can include the conductivity or resistivity of the water, the presence, absence, or concentration of one more particular species or kinds of species in the water, as well as combinations thereof.
In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, the systems and techniques of the invention provide water having a desired water attribute can be represented or quantified as a composite character. The composite character can provide an indication of suitability of the treated water for a particular purpose. Consequently, the systems and techniques of the invention can involve operations that seek or at least promote providing water having one or more desired composite characteristics. In irrigation applications, the treated water attribute can be related to its suitability as irrigation water. Thus, some aspects of the invention can be directed to treating non-potable water and rendering the water, as treated water, suitable for irrigation in one or more agricultural facilities by adjusting one or more characteristics thereof. Some aspects of the invention can provide irrigation water tailored to one or more crops grown or cultivated in one or more agricultural facilities. For example, with reference again to
During typical operation, each of the one or more separation apparatus 220 and 230 typically generates one or more secondary streams. Typically, the one or more secondary streams contain an unacceptable level of one or more undesirable species. Any one or more secondary streams can be discharged as waste streams. For example, the waste stream typically containing the one or more species transferred from the stream treated in separation apparatus 230 can be discharged or transferred to the source of water to be treated 202 through conduit or distribution system 236. The waste stream typically containing the one or more species transferred from the stream treated in separation apparatus 220 can be discharged or transferred to the source of water to be treated 202 through conduit or distribution system 226. Likewise, other embodiments of the invention contemplate combining one or more secondary streams, typically from one or more downstream separation apparatus, with a water stream to be treated in one or more upstream separation apparatus. The waste stream can also be discharged with other streams that may or may not be directly associated with the treatment system. For example, the stream to be discharged may be returned to the source of water to be treated after being mixed with one or more blow down streams from, for example, a cooling tower, which may not be a unit operation of the treatment system. In other cases, however, the one or more waste streams may be stored and combined with water having very low salinity to mitigate water infiltration problems that could result in leaching soluble minerals, and salts such as calcium from surface soils.
In some embodiments of the invention, the secondary stream from second separation apparatus 230 contained in conduit 236 can be introduced into first separation apparatus 220, alone or combined, as shown in
The schematically illustrated systems depicted in
Further, one or more unit operations may be utilized to further process one or more of the treated water streams. For example, a polishing bed may further remove one or more species from one or more of the treated streams in distribution systems 224 and 234. Non-limiting examples of such unit operations that can be utilized to remove at least a portion of weakly ionized or ionizable species, such as, but not limited to, boron, selenite, and arsenic, include ion exchange columns.
Further unit operations that facilitate post-treatment of one or more treated water streams of the invention include those that add or otherwise adjust a concentration of one or more desirable species or characteristics of the water stream. Post-treatment operations may be employed to render the one or more waste streams suitable for discharge to the environment.
Accordingly, a mixer may be disposed downstream of one or more separation apparatus of the invention that facilitates incorporation of another treated or untreated water stream, disinfectants, nutrients, and/or desirable salts from one or more sources of such. In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, one or more sources of a salt can be disposed to be introduced into the treated water stream. For example, a separation apparatus may be utilized in the treatment or irrigation system of the invention that selectively removes or reduces the concentration of divalent or other non-monovalent species from a water stream to be treated. Such an optional apparatus would typically provide at least one product stream having a relatively high concentration of non-monovalent species which can be introduced to the treated stream to adjust at least one characteristic thereof so as to provide a stream or body of water with a target or desirable condition. Examples of systems and techniques that advantageously provide beneficial species-rich streams include those disclosed in co-owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,820,024, titled “Electrically-Driven Separation Apparatus,” the substance of which is incorporated herein by reference. In some cases, however, one or more otherwise unconnected or distinct sources of, for example, calcium and/or magnesium salts, may be utilized to adjust one or more characteristics of the treated water stream prior to its use. Additionally, one or more intrinsic and/or extrinsic properties of the water stream may be further adjusted. For example, the water stream may be cooled or heated to adjust the temperature thereof. The pH of the water stream or body may also be adjusted by, for example, adding one or more acids or bases, to achieve a desired pH value. The desired property or characteristic may be dependent on a plurality of factors including, for example, the pH of the soil to be irrigated, the salt tolerance the crops to be irrigated and, in some cases, the moisture content of the soil. Thus, some features of the invention provide further capabilities directed to achieving one or more desired composite characteristics.
The further adjustment of the one or more properties or characteristics may be performed after treatment in the separation apparatus, prior to use or introduction to the point of use, or during storage of the treated water in one or more reservoirs.
However, some aspects of the invention contemplate beneficial or economically attractive attributes of such secondary streams containing high concentrations of one or more dissolved species, relative to the first or treated product stream and/or the stream introduced into the separation apparatus. For example, the secondary product stream may contain high dissolved solids and can serve as a feed stream that may be further processed to obtain additional products or at least provide a product stream having a high concentration of a desirable species.
One or more characteristics of the water utilized in some systems and techniques of the invention can provide an indication of the suitability of the water for agricultural use. For example, the one or more characteristics of the water can be represented as the salinity, as total dissolved salts or solids content, and/or electrical conductivity, as well as or in conjunction with any of the alkalinity, iron content, and pH of the water. In some cases, the level of salinity of the water can become a selective parameter when considered relative to the type of crops to be irrigated by the at least partially treated water. Thus, in accordance with some aspects of the invention, the salinity of the water may be used as a factor to consider when making a determination whether to adjust at least one operating parameter of the systems of the invention. In other embodiments of the system and techniques of the invention, the characteristic value can be represented as a ratio of the concentration of species that tends to render soil as water-impermeable relative to the concentration of species that tends to render soil as aggregating or water-adsorbing.
In accordance with some aspects of the invention, the characteristic value can provide an indication of the suitability of the water for irrigation purposes, for human consumption, and/or for livestock or poultry use. In some embodiments, the characteristic value of a water stream or body can be represented as a ratio of the concentration of monovalent species relative to the concentration of divalent species in the water. For example, the characteristic value can be at least partially expressed as the sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) or exchangeable sodium percentage. Preferably, the SAR value of a stream or body of water can provide an indication as to whether the water may be suitable to irrigate a type or kind of crop. Thus, in accordance with some aspects of the invention, some embodiments thereof relate to systems and techniques that can involve controlling one or more operating parameters based at least partially on a desired characteristic value that is at least partially derived from at least one requirement of a point of use. Where the point of use is, for example, a crop to be irrigated, the desired characteristic value can be based on the salt tolerance of the crop and/or one or more attributes or characteristics of the soil.
The sodium adsorption ratio value is typically determined according to the formula (1),
where [Na] is the sodium species concentration, in mol/m3, in the water, [Ca] is the calcium species concentration, in mol/m3, in the water, and [Mg] is the magnesium species concentration, in mol/m3, in the water. Other characteristic values of the water may be utilized, alone or in conjunction with the SAR value. Thus, in some cases, the characteristic value of the water that can serve as indication of water quality or suitability for its intended purpose involves the total dissolved solids concentration in the water, the pH, and/or the concentration of one or more toxic or hazardous species.
Adjusting the SAR value of the, for example, irrigation water, may be effected by adjusting one or more operating parameters of the water system. For example, the relative ratio of treated water having various associated SAR values may be adjusted to provide a composite or blended mixture of product water having the desired SAR value. Other techniques including reducing the flow rate of the water stream through the one or more separation apparatus or increasing the residence or treatment period can facilitate achieving the desired SAR value. In addition or in conjunction with such techniques, adjusting the applied potential or pressure level through, for example, the electrically-driven or pressure-driven separation apparatus can also facilitate providing treated water having the one or more desired characteristics.
Embodiments of systems of the invention may desalinate seawater and/or brackish water to provide irrigation water that avoids or reduces the extent of any soil permeability and/or infiltration problems.
The one or more characteristic values of the treated water may be a relative correlation between species contained in the water. For example, the characteristic value may be a ratio of dissolved sodium species to dissolved calcium. A preferred desirable sodium to calcium ratio of not more than about 3:1 may avoid or reduce the likelihood of water infiltration problems due to soil dispersion and plugging and soil surface pore sealing. Further, some embodiments of the invention can selectively reduce the concentration of monovalent sodium in irrigation water, so that a source of relatively calcium-rich water can be provided to counteract any sodium-dispersing phenomena in irrigation.
The product water can have an SAR value in a range from about 2 to about 8. The target or desirable SAR value may, however, depend on one or more factors in the agricultural facility. For example, the target SAR value depend on the type of crops grown in the facility, the stage of growth of one or more crops in the facility, and the soil conditions including the water infiltration rate, sodicity, and/or alkalinity of the soil. Particular guidelines that may be used to provide one or more target characteristics of irrigation water include those provided by The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). For example, the exchangeable sodium level, which can be correlated to the SAR value, can serve as a desirable characteristic value of water utilized for irrigation purposes. In particular, sensitive crops such as, but not limited to fruits, nuts, and citrus typically require irrigation water having an SAR value of up to about 8; other sensitive crops such as beans may tolerate irrigation water having an SAR value of up to about 18; moderately tolerant crops such as clover, oats, and rice may tolerate irrigation water having an SAR value of up to about 18 to 46; and tolerant crops such as, but not limited to wheat, barley, tomato, beets, and tall wheat grass, may tolerate irrigation water having an SAR value of up to about 46 to 102.
Infiltration issues typically arise when irrigation water does not enter the soil and becomes unavailable to crops. In contrast to salinity issues, which reduce the availability of water, infiltration problems can effectively reduce the quantity of water available for crop use. Water infiltration can increase with increasing salinity and can decrease with decreasing salinity or increasing sodium content relative to calcium and magnesium. Further, low salinity water having, for example, a conductivity of less than about 0.5 dS/m, is typically corrosive and tends to leach surface soil of soluble minerals and salts, such as calcium, which in turn can reduce soil aggregation and structure. Soil without or having low salt content tends to be dispersive as fine soil particles which fill pore spaces, effectively sealing the soil surface and reducing the rate of water infiltration. The soil would tend to form a crust which reduces the amount of water entering the subsurface and can also prevent crop emergence. Thus, in some embodiments of the invention, the desired water quality may be further based on the salinity of the irrigation water. For example,
Further embodiments of the invention may also provide suitable irrigation water when it has a composite characteristic value such as having an SAR value of less than about 8 while having a TDS level of about 1,500 ppm or more.
Some embodiments of the invention can provide desalination systems and techniques that selectively remove undesirable species which contrasts to non-selective desalination techniques such as those based on thermal and pressure-driven processes. Further, some systems and techniques of the invention can provide a product water stream without requiring the further addition of preferred species. For example, embodiments of the invention can provide irrigation water that does not involve further adjusting characteristic values by the addition of supplemental species.
Further features and aspects of the invention are illustrated in
First separation apparatus 304 may be an electrically-driven separation apparatus or a pressure-driven separation apparatus. Likewise, second separation apparatus 306 may be an electrically-driven separation apparatus or a pressure-driven separation apparatus. In accordance with some aspects of the invention, separation apparatus 304 removes at least a portion of a plurality of undesirable species in water to be treated from source 302. In some cases, first separation apparatus can indiscriminately remove at least a portion of a plurality of undesirable species from the water to be treated. For example, the first separation apparatus can utilize RO and/or NF based techniques to remove, typically without preference or selectivity, at least a portion of any undesirable species. The treated water stream resulting from the pressure-driven separation apparatus preferably exceeds potable water quality requirements.
The second separation apparatus can remove one or more undesirable species from the water stream to be treated. In some cases, the separation apparatus selectively removes at least a portion of one or more undesirable species from the water to produce a product water stream. If the product water stream from the second separation apparatus fails to meet or exceed potable water quality requirements, a portion of the treated water from the first separation apparatus that exceeds the potable water quality requirements may be incorporated or blended therewith. For example, where the first separation apparatus provides product water having a TDS level of about 250 mg/L and the second separation apparatus provides product water having a TDS level of about 1,000 mg/L, the product water streams can be combined in a volumetric ratio of about 2:1 to produce a blended product having a TDS level of about 500 mg/L. The target level may be a concentration that meets or exceeds one or more guidelines suggested by the World Health Organization for potable water in, for example, the WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality, fourth edition, World Health Organization 2011. Other water streams may also be blended with one or more products streams of the separation apparatus of the invention to provide drinking and/or bathing water that meet or exceed guidelines or requirements typically set by government regulatory organizations.
One or more reject streams from the first separation apparatus, typically containing relative high levels of species removed from the first treated product stream may be discharged to drain, directed to one or more ancillary points of use 310, or returned to source 302. Further embodiments of the invention contemplate combining the reject water stream with water from source 302 through conduit 322 so as to be treated in the second separation apparatus. A secondary or reject water stream from second separation apparatus may also be discharged to a drain, directed to one or more ancillary points of use 310 and/or 312, returned to source 302 as shown through conduit 316.
Further features and aspects of the invention are illustrated in
The first separation apparatus 406 may remove a large fraction of contaminants from the water to be treated to produce a first diluent stream. The contaminants removed may include one or more ionic species. The first separation apparatus 406 may remove, for example, about 80% of sodium chloride and potassium chloride from the water supplied through distribution system or conduit 422. The first diluent stream from the first separation apparatus 406 may be supplied to distribution system or conduit 424. The first separation apparatus 406 may also produce a concentrate. Concentrate from the first separation apparatus 406 may be carried through a distribution system or conduit 430 as a waste stream which may be discharged to drain, directed to one or more ancillary points of use 412, for example, for use in the electrochemical production of chlorine or alkali, or returned to the source 402, through, for example, distribution system or conduit 436. The first separation apparatus 406 may operate at very high water recoveries, for example, between about 20% and about 60% or more because monovalent ions may be present in the concentrate delivered through distribution system or conduit 430 at high concentrations without precipitation. The pre-filter 404 and sizing of the intake equipment may be relatively small compared to systems with lower water recoveries, thereby saving capital costs.
The partially desalinated water output as the first diluate stream from the first separation apparatus 406 may remain unacceptably high in monovalent salts and/or high in divalent salts, for example, calcium sulfates and/or magnesium sulfates for some uses. The first diluate stream may thus be further treated in a second separation apparatus 408. The second separation apparatus 408 may remove a large fraction, for example, between about 50% and about 95% of remaining monovalent ions from the influent diluate from the first separation apparatus 406 and produce a second diluate stream with a very low concentration, for example, less than about 1,000 mg/L (1,000 ppm) of monovalent ionic contaminants. This second diluate stream may be output into distribution system or conduit 426. The second separation apparatus 408 may also produce a concentrate. Concentrate from the second separation apparatus may be carried through a distribution system or conduit 432 as a waste stream which may be combined with the concentrate from the first separation apparatus at point of use 412, and/or discharged to drain, directed to one or more ancillary points of use 414, or returned to the source 402, through, for example, conduit or distribution system 438.
Diluate from the second separation apparatus 408 may be conveyed through a distribution system or conduit 426 to a third separation apparatus 410. The third separation apparatus 410 may produce a filtrate suitable for potable use and a retentate. To be suitable for potable use, the filtrate may have characteristics defined in recognizable standards, for example, those provided by the WHO noted above. The filtrate from the third separation apparatus 410 may include, for example, a TDS level of less than about 500 ppm, low amounts of divalent ions, low amount of metals and trace elements, low levels of particulates and/or colloidal or microbiological impurities, and/or a low organic content. The characteristics of the filtrate from the third separation apparatus 410 may meet regulatory requirements for potable water in a jurisdiction in which the system 400 is operated. The filtrate from the third separation apparatus 410 may be output through distribution system or conduit 428 to a point of use 418. A retentate from the third separation apparatus 410 may be high in divalent ions and may be suitable for agricultural use. To be suitable for agricultural use, the retentate from the third separation apparatus 410 may have a SAR value of, for example, less than about 20, less than about 18, less than about 9, less than about 8, or less than about 3, and may have a TDS value of less than about 3,500 ppm and/or greater than about 1,500 ppm. The retentate from the third separation apparatus 410 may be output through a distribution system or conduit 434 to a point of use 416.
The first separation apparatus 406 may include an electrically-driven separation apparatus. The first separation apparatus 406 may include one or more monovalent ion selective membranes to selectively promote transfer of one or more monovalent cationic and/or anionic species. In some embodiments, the first separation apparatus 406 may comprise one or more monovalent cation selective membranes and one or more monovalent anion selective membranes, typically in one or more concentrating compartments of the apparatus. The first separation apparatus 406 may include an electrodialysis system.
Because the nature of electrodialysis is that power costs are inversely related to the level of salinity in water to be treated, high concentrations of ionic contaminants in the water to be treated may reduce power losses in the electrodialysis equipment (albeit at some expense of thermodynamic efficiency.)
The second separation apparatus 408 may include an electrically-driven separation apparatus. The second separation apparatus 408 may, like the first separation apparatus 406, include one or more monovalent ion selective membranes to selectively promote transfer of one or more monovalent cationic or anionic species. The second separation apparatus 408 may include an electrodeionization system.
The third separation apparatus may include a pressure-driven separation apparatus. The third separation apparatus 410 may include a filtration membrane selected to effectively remove contaminants including divalent ionic species from the diluate from the second separation apparatus 408. The third separation apparatus 410 may include a water softening membrane.
In another embodiment, indicated generally at 500 in
A first portion of the diluate from the first separation apparatus 506 may be directed through a distribution system or conduit 524 and a distribution system or conduit 532 to a point of use 514 for agricultural use. A second portion of the diluate from the first separation apparatus 506 may be directed through the distribution system or conduit 524 to a second separation apparatus 510. The relative amounts of the diluate from the first separation apparatus 506 directed to point of use 514 and to the second separation apparatus 510 may be selected in any amount in a range of from about 0% to about 100% as desired. A diverting valve (not shown) may be utilized to vary the amount of diluate from the first separation apparatus 506 directed to point of use 514 and to the second separation apparatus 510 as desired.
Concentrate from the first separation apparatus 506 may be carried through a distribution system or conduit 530 as a waste stream which may be discharged to drain, directed to one or more ancillary points of use 512, for example, for use in the electrochemical production of chlorine or alkali, or returned to the source 502, through, for example, distribution system or conduit 544.
The second separation apparatus 510 may treat water provided through the distribution system or conduit 524 to produce a filtrate and a retentate. Retentate from the second separation apparatus 510 may be directed through distribution system or conduit 536 to point of use 514 where it may be combined with the first portion of the diluate from the first separation apparatus 506 for agricultural use.
Filtrate from the second separation apparatus 510, which may be low in divalent ionic contaminants and/or particulates and/or microbial contaminants, may be directed through a distribution system or conduit 526 to a third separation apparatus 508. The filtrate may have characteristics defined in recognizable standards, for example, those provided by the WHO noted above.
The third separation apparatus 508 may treat water provided through the distribution system or conduit 526 to produce a diluate and a concentrate. Diluate from the third separation apparatus 508 may be suitable for potable use, and may have similar characteristics as the filtrate from the third separation apparatus 410 described above with reference to
In some embodiments a portion of the concentrate from the third separation apparatus 508 may be directed through a distribution system or conduit 540 to be used as diluate makeup for the first separation apparatus 506, or through distribution system or conduit 542 to be used as concentrate makeup for the first separation apparatus 506. The amount or fraction of concentrate from the third separation apparatus 508 utilized as diluate makeup for the first separation apparatus 506, or as concentrate makeup for the first separation apparatus 506 may be selected as desired. The amount of the concentrate from the third separation apparatus used as diluate makeup or concentrate makeup for the first separation apparatus 506 may be selected based on, for example, the quality of the concentrate from the third separation apparatus and the need for the diluate makeup or concentrate makeup. A valve (not shown) may provide for the amount of concentrate from the third separation apparatus 508 utilized as diluate makeup for the first separation apparatus 506, or as concentrate makeup for the first separation apparatus 506 to be adjusted as desired.
The pre-filtration system 504 and first separation apparatus 506 may be similar to the pre-filter 404 and first separation apparatus 406 described above with reference to
In another embodiment, indicated generally at 600 in
The first separation apparatus 606 may treat water provided through the distribution system or conduit 622 to produce a diluate and a concentrate. Diluate from the first separation apparatus 606 may be directed through the distribution system or conduit 624 to a second separation apparatus 610. Concentrate from the first separation apparatus 606 may be carried through a distribution system or conduit 630 as a waste stream which may be discharged to drain, directed to one or more ancillary points of use 612, for example, for use in the electrochemical production of chlorine or alkali, or returned to the source 602 through, for example, distribution system or conduit 638.
The second separation apparatus 610 may treat water provided through the distribution system or conduit 624 to produce a filtrate and a retentate. Retentate from the second separation apparatus 610 may have characteristics, for example, a SAR value and/or TSS level that render it suitable for agricultural use. The retentate from the second separation apparatus 610 may be directed through distribution system or conduit 632 to point of use 614 for agricultural use. Filtrate from the second separation apparatus 610, which may be low in divalent ionic contaminants and/or particulates and/or microbial contaminants may be directed through a distribution system or conduit 626 to a third separation apparatus 608. The filtrate may have characteristics defined in recognizable standards, for example, those provided by the WHO noted above.
The third separation apparatus 608 may treat water provided through the distribution system or conduit 626 to produce a diluate and a concentrate. Diluate from the third separation apparatus 608 may have characteristics making it suitable for potable use, for example, similar characteristics as the filtrate from the third separation apparatus 410 described above with reference to
In some embodiments a portion of the concentrate from the third separation apparatus 608 may be directed through a distribution system or conduit 636 as diluate makeup for the second separation apparatus 610. The amount or fraction of concentrate from the third separation apparatus 608 utilized as diluate makeup for the second separation apparatus 610 may range from about 0% to about 100% of the concentrate produced from the second separation apparatus and may adjusted as desired depending on factors such as, for example, one or more characteristics of the concentrate from the third separation apparatus 608 or of the dilute from the first separation apparatus. A valve (not shown) may provide for the amount of concentrate from the third separation apparatus 608 utilized as diluate makeup for the second separation apparatus 610 to be adjusted as desired.
The pre-filtration system 604 and first separation apparatus 606 may be similar to the pre-filter 404 and first separation apparatus 406 described above with reference to
It is to be understood that the various features of any of the systems disclosed above may be combined or substituted. For example, the first separation unit 406 of
In each of the systems described above, total water recoveries of between about 66% and about 80% or higher may be possible with low processing costs and high energy efficiency, for example, an energy efficiency of about 2.0 kwh/m3 of purified water or less. In some embodiments none of the water purified to a level suitable for agricultural or potable use would need to be used for wastewater makeup. Rather, makeup water for the concentrate or diluate streams for the electrodialysis systems could be made up from downstream electrodeionization or electrodialysis concentrate streams. The provision of this makeup water from these downstream sources may improve the overall electrical efficiency of the disclosed system as compared to systems not including the provision of makeup water as described.
Potable water produced in the above systems may be low in salinity and substantially or completely free of particulates, colloids, or microbes. The potable water may have characteristics defined in recognizable standards, for example, those provided by the WHO noted above. The fraction of purified water produced that is suitable for agricultural use may include high levels of divalent ions and minerals, but have very low concentrations of impurities such as sodium chloride or potassium chloride. The fraction of purified water produced that is suitable for agricultural use may not require processing by softening membranes. Since only a small fraction of the total water influent to the treatment systems described above may be processed by water softening membranes to produce potable water, the size and capital and operational costs of the water softening membrane units may be low relative to other systems where a greater quantity of water would need to be processed through water softening membrane units. Also, in some embodiments, only a small portion of the influent water to be treated would be processed through electrodialysis units including monovalent ion selective membranes or through electrodeionization units, providing further for reduced treatment unit sizes and reduced capital and operational costs.
In some embodiments transport of divalent ions through electrodialysis and/or electrodeionization units including monovalent ion selective membranes may be substantially avoided or eliminated. This may result in a reduced buildup of scale in the electrodialysis and/or electrodeionization units and may reduce pH shifts and high voltages caused by sulfate transport through a typical anion electrodialysis membrane.
Each of the embodiments of treatment systems described above may be used partially within a total system such that combinations of the various embodiments can be used for customized agricultural and potable water production quantities or qualities, depending on the feed water makeup and demand for the water for agricultural or potable uses. The quantities of water suitable for potable or agricultural consumption may be changed based on demand by running more or less water to be treated through each of the various embodiments, changing the relative water recoveries or adjusting based on salinity changes in the water to be treated.
As noted above, ancillary systems may be utilized in the systems and techniques of the invention in post-treatment operations. For example, one or more disinfecting systems such as those that irradiate, oxidize, or otherwise reduce microbiological activity in the water may be disposed to further treat the water. Further, one or more storage systems may be also used as discussed above.
Some features of the invention involve systems and techniques comprising electrically-driven separation apparatus utilizing selective membranes as discussed above. As illustrated in
Further, because some embodiments of the invention can selectively remove monovalent species, any resultant secondary or concentrate streams would be less susceptible to scaling and fouling. This feature advantageously allows some separation embodiments of the invention to operate at higher water recovery rates, compared to non-selective techniques, because the volumetric rate of any secondary streams can be effectively reduced without or with less concern for undesirable precipitation. Thus, some embodiments of the invention directed to utilizing systems and techniques that selectively separate monovalent species can be operated at higher recovery rates compared to non-selective ED and distillation based separation apparatus, and even much higher recovery rates compared RO and NF based separation apparatus. Significantly, because RO and NF based separation systems selectively reduce the concentration of non-monovalent species, these processes cannot effectively provide treated water having low SAR values.
A further advantage of the selective separation systems and techniques of the invention pertains to the reduction or removal of non-ionized species that have little or no influence on crop growth. For example, silica is typically not preferentially removed in the ED-based systems of the invention thereby avoiding any scaling or fouling concerns in secondary streams that typically arise when treating silica-containing water in RO and distillation apparatus. In addition, because secondary streams of some embodiments of the invention typically have reduced scaling tendencies, the recovery rates in the separation systems and techniques of the invention may be greater than the recovery rates of RO and distillation based systems.
Controller 106 of the systems of the invention may be implemented using one or more computer systems. The computer system may be, for example, a general-purpose computer such as those based on an Intel PENTIUM®-type processor, a Motorola PowerPC® processor, a Sun UltraSPARC® processor, a Hewlett-Packard PA-RISC® processor, or any other type of processor or combinations thereof. The computer system may be implemented using specially-programmed, special-purpose hardware, for example, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or controllers intended for water treatment system.
The computer system can include one or more processors typically connected to one or more memory devices, which can comprise, for example, any one or more of a disk drive memory, a flash memory device, a RAM memory device, or other device for storing data. The memory component or subsystem is typically used for storing programs and data during operation of the system 100 and/or the computer system. For example, the memory component may be used for storing historical data relating to the parameters over a period of time, as well as operating data. Software, including programming code that implements embodiments of the invention, can be stored on a computer readable and/or writeable nonvolatile recording medium, and then typically copied into the memory subsystem wherein it can then be executed by one or more processors. Such programming code may be written in any of a plurality of programming languages, for example, Java, Visual Basic, C, C#, or C++, Fortran, Pascal, Eiffel, Basic, or any of a variety of combinations thereof.
Components of the computer system may be coupled by an interconnection mechanism, which may include one or more busses that provide communication between components that are integrated within a same device and/or a network that provide communication or interaction between components that reside on separate discrete devices. The interconnection mechanism typically enables communications, including but not limited to data and instructions to be exchanged between components of the system.
The computer system can also include one or more input devices, for example, a keyboard, mouse, trackball, microphone, touch screen, and one or more output devices, for example, a printing device, display screen, or speaker. In addition, computer system may contain one or more interfaces that can connect the computer system to a communication network, in addition or as an alternative to the network that may be formed by one or more of the components of the system.
According to one or more embodiments of the invention, the one or more input devices may include sensors for measuring parameters. Alternatively, the sensors, the metering valves and/or pumps, or all of these components may be connected to a communication network that is operatively coupled to the computer system. For example, one or more sensors 108 may be configured as input devices that are directly connected to controller 106, metering valves, pumps, and/or components of apparatus 102 may be configured as output devices that are connected to controller 108. Any one or more of such subcomponents or subsystems may be coupled to another computer system or component so as to communicate with the computer system over a communication network. Such a configuration permits one sensor to be located at a significant distance from another sensor or allow any sensor to be located at a significant distance from any subsystem and/or the controller, while still providing data therebetween.
The controller can include one or more computer storage media such as readable and/or writeable nonvolatile recording medium in which signals can be stored that define a program to be executed by the one or more processors. The medium may, for example, be a disk or flash memory. In typical operation, the processor can cause data, such as code that implements one or more embodiments of the invention, to be read from the storage medium into a memory that allows for faster access to the information by the one or more processors than does medium. The memory is typically a volatile, random access memory such as a dynamic random access memory (DRAM) or static memory (SRAM) or other suitable devices that facilitates information transfer to and from the one or more processors.
Although the control system is described by way of example as one type of computer system upon which various aspects of the invention may be practiced, it should be appreciated that the invention is not limited to being implemented in software, or on the computer system as exemplarily shown. Indeed, rather than implemented on, for example, a general purpose computer system, the controller, or components or subsections thereof, may alternatively be implemented as a dedicated system or as a dedicated programmable logic controller (PLC) or in a distributed control system. Further, it should be appreciated that one or more features or aspects of the invention may be implemented in software, hardware or firmware, or any combination thereof. For example, one or more segments of an algorithm executable by controller 106 can be performed in separate computers, which in turn, can be communication through one or more networks.
Although various embodiments exemplarily shown have been described as using sensors, it should be appreciated that the invention is not so limited. The invention contemplates the modification of existing facilities to retrofit one or more systems, subsystems, or components and implement the techniques of the invention. Thus, for example, an existing facility, especially an agricultural or crop-growing facility, can be modified to include one or more systems configured to provide irrigation water, potable water, or both, accordance with any one or more embodiments exemplarily discussed herein. Alternatively, existing systems and/or components or subsystems thereof can be modified to perform any one or more acts of the invention.
The function and advantages of these and other embodiments of the invention can be further understood from the examples below, which illustrate the benefits and/or advantages of the one or more systems and techniques of the invention but do not exemplify the full scope of the invention.
This example describes the expected performance of an ED apparatus when utilized to selectively remove monovalent cations from a stream to be treated and produce treated water having a lower SAR value.
The predicted energy requirement for the ED apparatus is less than the predicted requirement utilizing the RO apparatus. Further, the predicted energy required to treat water in an electrically-driven separation apparatus of the invention is expected to be linearly affected by the salinity of the water to be treated. In some embodiments of the invention, the temperature of the feed stream can be adjusted to reduce the energy required to facilitate cost effective separation in an electrically-driven separation apparatus. For example, increasing the temperature of the feed stream comprising seawater by about 25° C. to provide for a product TDS level of about 1,500 ppm and a recovery of about 50%, can result in a predicted energy reduction of about 6% in an ED module.
This example describes the performance of a system utilizing the techniques of the invention as substantially represented in the schematic illustration of
The ED stack was comprised of ten effective cell pairs of concentrating and diluting compartments, five cell pairs in a downward flow path and five cell pairs in an upward flow path, providing for an overall fluid stream process flow path of about 28 inches. The cell pairs utilized cation selective membranes, CMS monovalent selective homogeneous membranes from Tokuyama Corporation to preferentially remove sodium cations, and heterogeneous ion exchange membranes for the anion selective membrane (IONPURE™ anion membrane, 0.018 inches thick). Spacer gaskets that were 0.020 inches thick and extruded screens about 70% open area and 0.020 inches thick were used to at least partially define the compartments. The ED apparatus was operated at an applied potential of about 2 volts per cell pair, through RuO2-coated titanium electrodes.
The feed water was prepared by dissolving Instant Ocean® synthetic sea salt mixture, available from Spectrum Brands Inc., in deionized water. Sodium chloride was added as needed to provide a feed solution that had an SAR value of seawater (about 54).
The module was operated in a once-through mode wherein both the dilute and concentrate streams were returned to the feed tank. The electrode chambers were constructed as dilute compartments and fed separately. Calcium and magnesium species concentrations in the feed and product streams were determined by standard titration methods. The TDS level was calculated based on the measured conductivity. The sodium concentration was also calculated.
Tables 1 and 2 respectively show the inlet and product water stream characteristics. As shown in Table 2, the systems and techniques of the invention can provide a product water stream having one or more desired characteristics. For example, the systems and techniques of the invention can selectively reduce the concentration of monovalent species to provide water having a desired SAR value.
Further, the data presented in the tables show that coupling two or more electrically-driven separation apparatus can provide treated water having a desired SAR value. That is, a first electrically-driven separation apparatus can lower the SAR value of a water stream to provide an intermediate product stream having an intermediate SAR value. The intermediate product stream can in turn be introduced into a second electrically-driven separation apparatus to provide treated water having the desired SAR value. In particular,
The data further shows that various parameter can be adjusted tailor the SAR value in the product water. For example, the processing flow rate can be increased or decreased to achieve a target SAR value. Alternatively, or in conjunction with adjusting the flow rate, the applied potential and/or overall flow path length can be used as an adjustable operating parameter in one or more aspects of the invention.
This example compares the performance of electrically-driven separation apparatus to the performance of thermally-driven and pressure-driven separation apparatus.
The ED module utilized had ten cell pairs in a folded flow path so that the flow passed through five cell pairs of diluting and concentrating compartments then turned and passed through another five cell pairs. Each cell in the module was comprised of a screen and a 0.020 inch thick spacer. The cells were 14 inches by 1.2 inches. The monovalent cation selective membrane utilized was a CMS membrane from Tokuyama Soda Corporation. The anion selective membrane utilized was an IONPURE™ heterogeneous membrane. The ED module utilized platinum-coated titanium plates. The applied voltages and current, flow rates and feed compositions were varied to obtain various conditions of effective selectivity.
Tables 3 and 4 list the feed and product water stream properties.
where ν is the molarity of ionic species i and Δν is the change in the molarity of ionic species i.
The data in Tables 3 and 4 as well as
Selectivity=0.5905+(5×10−5)(TDS)
This selectivity/TDS relationship was then utilized to characterize the capabilities electrically-driven separation apparatus in accordance with the invention in terms of a composite characteristic as represented in
It is assumed that about 96% of the monovalent cationic species in seawater is sodium and about 4% is potassium. Further, all the cationic species is assumed to constitute about 37% of the TDS content such that the change in TDS can be determined according to the formula (4):
Further assuming that the divalent species calcium and magnesium behave similarly when being removed in the electrically-driven separation apparatus, the following formula can be utilized:
The above assumptions utilizing formulas (2), (3), and (4) were used to predict the product water SAR value relative to TDS level. The results are presented in
The actual distillate water properties were obtained from a publication by the U.S. Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Office, titled “Water Treatment Technology Program Report,” no. 7, 1995. The actual data for non-selective ED product water properties were obtained from a publication by Turek, M., “Cost Effective Electrodialytic Seawater Desalination,” Desalination, no. 153, pp. 371-376, 2002. The actual data for nanofiltered product water properties were obtained from a publication by Tseng, et al., “Optimization of Dual-Staged NF Membranes for Seawater Desalination,” AWWA 2003 CA-NV An. Fall Conf., 2003.
Having now described some illustrative embodiments of the invention, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing is merely illustrative and not limiting. Numerous modifications and other embodiments are within the scope of one of ordinary skill in the art and are contemplated as falling within the scope of the invention. In particular, although many of the examples presented herein involve specific combinations of method acts or system elements, it should be understood that those acts and those elements may be combined in other ways to accomplish the same objectives. For example, ED and EDI apparatus may be combined in a two-stage process wherein the ED apparatus reduces the TDS level in seawater to a range of about 5,000 ppm to about 6,000 ppm and the EDI apparatus subsequently reduces the TDS level to a range of about 1,500 ppm to about 2,000 ppm.
Further, acts, elements, and features discussed only in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from a similar role in other embodiments.
It is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements can readily occur to those skilled in the art and that such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of the disclosure and within the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the sodium adsorption ratio may be represented according to an alternative formula (5):
where Na is the sodium concentration in the water, in me/L; Cax is a modified calcium value, in me/L, that represents calcium species concentration in the water with compensation due to the salinity of the water, the HCO3/Ca ratio (in me/L), and the estimated partial pressure of CO2 in the soil surface; and Mg is the concentration of magnesium species in the water, in me/L.
Moreover, it should also be appreciated that the invention is directed to each feature, system, subsystem, or technique described herein and any combination of two or more features, systems, subsystems, or techniques described herein and any combination of two or more features, systems, subsystems, and/or methods, if such features, systems, subsystems, and techniques are not mutually inconsistent, is considered to be within the scope of the invention as embodied in the claims.
Use of ordinal terms such as “first,” “second,” “third,” and the like in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements.
Those skilled in the art should appreciate that the parameters and configurations described herein are exemplary and that actual parameters and/or configurations will depend on the specific application in which the systems and techniques of the invention are used. Those skilled in the art should also recognize or be able to ascertain, using no more than routine experimentation, equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention. It is therefore to be understood that the embodiments described herein are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto; the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
As used herein, the term “plurality” refers to two or more items or components. The terms “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,” “containing,” and “involving,” whether in the written description or the claims and the like, are open-ended terms, i.e., to mean “including but not limited to.” Thus, the use of such terms is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter, and equivalents thereof, as well as additional items. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of,” are closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively, with respect to the claims. Further the use of the term “potable” with reference to water, especially treated water, does not limit the scope of the inventive subject matter and can refer to water suitable for livestock use, including consumption.
This application claims the benefit as a continuation-in part under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/524,078, titled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IRRIGATION,” filed on Sep. 20, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,277,627, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/805,512, titled “ELECTRODIALYSIS FOR DESALINATION OF SEAWATER AND BRACKISH WATER FOR AGRICULTURAL USE” filed on Jun. 22, 2006, and to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/804,610, titled “ELECTRODIALYSIS AND FILTRATION FOR AGRICULTURAL WATER PRODUCTION,” filed on Jun. 13, 2006, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2514415 | Rasch | Jul 1950 | A |
| 2681319 | Bodamer | Jun 1954 | A |
| 2681320 | Bodamer | Jun 1954 | A |
| 2788319 | Pearson | Apr 1957 | A |
| 2794777 | Pearson | Jun 1957 | A |
| 2815320 | Kollsman | Dec 1957 | A |
| 2854394 | Kollsman | Sep 1958 | A |
| 2923674 | Kressman | Feb 1960 | A |
| 2943989 | Kollsman | Jul 1960 | A |
| 3014855 | Kressman | Dec 1961 | A |
| 3035777 | Bodell et al. | May 1962 | A |
| 3074864 | Gaysowski | Jan 1963 | A |
| 3099615 | Kollsman | Jul 1963 | A |
| 3148687 | Dosch | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3149061 | Parsi | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3149062 | Gottschal | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3165460 | Zang | Jan 1965 | A |
| 3291713 | Parsi | Dec 1966 | A |
| 3330750 | McRae et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
| 3341441 | Giuffrida et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
| 3375208 | Duddy | Mar 1968 | A |
| 3627703 | Kojima et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3630378 | Bauman | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3645884 | Gilliland | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3686089 | Korngold | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3755135 | Johnson | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3869375 | Ono et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3869376 | Tejeda | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3870033 | Faylor et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3876565 | Takashima et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3989615 | Kiga et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4032452 | Davis | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4033850 | Kedem et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4089758 | McAloon | May 1978 | A |
| 4102752 | Rugh, II | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4116889 | Chlanda et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4119581 | Rembaum et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4130473 | Eddleman | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4153761 | Marsh | May 1979 | A |
| 4160738 | Guter | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4167551 | Tamura et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4191811 | Hodgdon | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4197206 | Karn | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4216073 | Goldstein | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4217200 | Kedem et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4226688 | Kedem et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4228000 | Hoeschler | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4294933 | Kihara et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4298442 | Giuffrida | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4321145 | Carlson | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4330654 | Ezzell et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4358545 | Ezzell et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4374232 | Davis | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4430226 | Hegde et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4465573 | O'Hare | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4473450 | Nayak et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4505797 | Hodgdon et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4574049 | Pittner | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4614576 | Goldstein | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4632745 | Giuffrida et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4636296 | Kunz | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4655909 | Furuno | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4661411 | Martin et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4671863 | Tejeda | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4687561 | Kunz | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4702810 | Kunz | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4707240 | Parsi et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4747929 | Siu et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4747955 | Kunin | May 1988 | A |
| 4751153 | Roth | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4753681 | Giuffrida et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4770793 | Treffry-Goatley et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4804451 | Palmer | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4806244 | Guilhem | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4808287 | Hark | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4849102 | Latour et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4871431 | Parsi | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4872958 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4915803 | Morris | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4925541 | Giuffrida et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4931160 | Giuffrida | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4956071 | Giuffrida et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4964970 | O'Hare | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4969983 | Parsi | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4983267 | Moeglich et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5026465 | Katz et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5030672 | Hann et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5066375 | Parsi et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5066402 | Anselme et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5073268 | Saito et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5082472 | Mallouk et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5084148 | Kazcur et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5092970 | Kaczur et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5094732 | Oldani et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5106465 | Kaczur et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5116509 | White | May 1992 | A |
| 5120416 | Parsi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5126026 | Chlanda | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5128043 | Wildermuth | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5154809 | Oren et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5166220 | McMahon | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5176828 | Proulx | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5196115 | Andelman | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5203976 | Parsi et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5211823 | Giuffrida et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5223103 | Kazcur et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| H1206 | Thibodeaux | Jul 1993 | H |
| 5240579 | Kedem | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5254227 | Cawlfield et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5259936 | Ganzi | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5286354 | Bard et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5292422 | Liang et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5308466 | Ganzi et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5308467 | Sugo et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5316637 | Ganzi et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5344566 | Clancey | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5346624 | Libutti et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5346924 | Giuffrida | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5356849 | Matviya et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5358640 | Zeiher et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5364439 | Gallup et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5376253 | Rychen et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5397445 | Umemura et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5411641 | Trainham, III et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5423965 | Kunz | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5425858 | Farmer | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5425866 | Sugo et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5434020 | Cooper | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5444031 | Hayden | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5451309 | Bell | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5458787 | Rosin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5460725 | Stringfield | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5460728 | Klomp et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5489370 | Lomasney et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5503729 | Elyanow et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5518626 | Birbara et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5518627 | Tomoi et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5536387 | Hill et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538611 | Otowa | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538655 | Fauteux et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539002 | Watanabe | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5547551 | Bahar et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5558753 | Gallagher et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5580437 | Trainham, III et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5584981 | Turner et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5593563 | Denoncourt et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5599614 | Bahar et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5635071 | Al-Samadi | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5670053 | Collentro et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5679228 | Elyanow et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5679229 | Goldstein et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5714521 | Kedem et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| RE35741 | Oren et al. | Mar 1998 | E |
| 5736023 | Gallagher et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5759373 | Terada et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5762774 | Tessier | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766479 | Collentro et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5788826 | Nyberg | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5804055 | Coin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814197 | Batchelder et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5837124 | Su et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5858191 | DiMascio et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5868915 | Ganzi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5891328 | Goldstein | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5925240 | Wilkins et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928807 | Elias | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5954935 | Neumeister et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5961805 | Terada et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5980716 | Horinouchi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6030535 | Hayashi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6060535 | Villar et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6099716 | Molter et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6126805 | Batchelder et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6149788 | Tessier et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6171374 | Barton et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183643 | Goodley | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6187201 | Abe et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6190528 | Li et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6190558 | Robbins | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193869 | Towe et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6197174 | Barber et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6214204 | Gadkaree et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6228240 | Terada et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235166 | Towe et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6248226 | Shinmei et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254741 | Stuart et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6258278 | Tonelli et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267891 | Tonelli et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6274019 | Kuwata | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6284124 | DiMascio et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6284399 | Oko et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6296751 | Mir | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6303037 | Tamura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6344122 | Deguchi et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6365023 | De Los Reyes et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6365051 | Bader | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6391178 | Garcia et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6402916 | Sampson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402917 | Emery et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6458257 | Andrews et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6462935 | Shiue et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6482304 | Emery et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6495014 | Datta et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6508936 | Hassan | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6537436 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6645383 | Lee et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6649037 | Liang et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6726822 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6766812 | Gadini | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6780328 | Zhang | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6824662 | Liang et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6896814 | Chidambaran et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 7083730 | Davis | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7459088 | Davis | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7501064 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 8114259 | Zuback | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8182693 | Wilkins | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8277627 | Ganzi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 20010003329 | Sugaya et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037942 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020092769 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104804 | Grott | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136749 | Rose et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020144948 | Aimar et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020189951 | Liang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030080467 | Andrews et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030089609 | Liang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030106845 | Bernard et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030155243 | Sferrazza | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030201235 | Chidambaran et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030205526 | Vuong | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040007358 | Lien | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040035802 | Emery et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040055955 | Davis | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040079700 | Wood et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255955 | Daly | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050016922 | Enzweiler et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050016932 | Arba et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103622 | Jha et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103630 | Ganzi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103631 | Freydina et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103644 | Wilkins et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103717 | Jha et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103722 | Freydina et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103723 | Wilkins et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103724 | Wilkins et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109703 | Newenhizen | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050115906 | Shay | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050121388 | Wood et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050210745 | Grott | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050263457 | Wilkins et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060060532 | Davis | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060091077 | Haas et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060144787 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060231403 | Riviello | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060231495 | Freydina et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070215344 | McElhiney | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070284251 | Zuback et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070284252 | Ganzi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080277341 | Huang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090314718 | Sparrow et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100089756 | Wilkins et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1862992 | Oct 1992 | AU |
| 2316012 | Apr 2005 | CA |
| 1044411 | Aug 1990 | CN |
| 1201055 | Sep 1965 | DE |
| 2708240 | Aug 1978 | DE |
| 3238280 | Apr 1984 | DE |
| 4016000 | Oct 1993 | DE |
| 4238532 | May 1994 | DE |
| 4418812 | Mar 1999 | DE |
| 19942347 | Jul 2004 | DE |
| 0170895 | Mar 1989 | EP |
| 0503589 | Oct 1994 | EP |
| 0621072 | Mar 1997 | EP |
| 0870533 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 1106241 | Jun 2001 | EP |
| 0680932 | Aug 2001 | EP |
| 0803474 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 1075868 | Jun 2003 | EP |
| 1101790 | Sep 2004 | EP |
| 1222954 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1506941 | Nov 2005 | EP |
| 1172145 | May 2007 | EP |
| 1068901 | Aug 2007 | EP |
| 1388595 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 1762546 | Aug 2011 | EP |
| 2818267 | Sep 2003 | FR |
| 776469 | Jun 1957 | GB |
| 877239 | Sep 1961 | GB |
| 880344 | Oct 1961 | GB |
| 893051 | Apr 1962 | GB |
| 942762 | Nov 1963 | GB |
| 1048026 | Nov 1966 | GB |
| 1137679 | Dec 1968 | GB |
| 1381681 | Jan 1975 | GB |
| 1448533 | Sep 1976 | GB |
| 54-5888 | Jan 1979 | JP |
| 05271015 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 06-000339 | Jan 1994 | JP |
| 06030535 | Feb 1994 | JP |
| 07-155750 | Jun 1995 | JP |
| 07-265865 | Oct 1995 | JP |
| 09-253643 | Sep 1997 | JP |
| 11042483 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 2001-79358 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2001-79553 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2001-104960 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2001-113137 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2001-113279 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2001-113280 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2001-121152 | May 2001 | JP |
| 2005007347 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2005007348 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 114874 | Aug 1999 | RO |
| 216622 | Nov 1972 | RU |
| 990256 | Jan 1983 | RU |
| 1118389 | Oct 1984 | RU |
| 2004137231 | Jun 2006 | RU |
| 2281255 | Aug 2006 | RU |
| 9211089 | Jul 1992 | WO |
| 9532052 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| 9532791 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| 9622162 | Jul 1996 | WO |
| 9725147 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| 9746491 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| 9746492 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| 9811987 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| 9817590 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| 9820972 | May 1998 | WO |
| 9858727 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| 9939810 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| 0030749 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 0075082 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 0064325 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| 0149397 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| 0204357 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 0214224 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| 0226629 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 03086590 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 2004013048 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| 2005087669 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2005113120 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2006031732 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| 2007145785 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2007145786 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2009038805 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Dow Liquid Separations. FILMTEC Membranes (S.S. Beardsley and S.A. McClellan). Membrane Softening: An Emerging Technology Helping Florida Communities Meet the Increased Regulations for Quality Potable Water. Aug. 1997. AWWA 1995 Membrane Technology Conference. |
| T. Hayes and D. Arthur. “Overview of emerging produced water treatemnt technologies” The 11th Annual International Petroleum Environmental Conference. Oct. 15, 2004. |
| “Affordable Desalination Sets Low Energy Record,” press release, http://www.affordableseal.com/home/news/ADC%20Sets%20Low%20Energy%20Record%205-8-06.pdf, May 4, 2006, printed on Apr. 16, 2008. |
| “Desalting Handbook for Planners”, Desalination and Water Purification Research and Development Program, Report No. 72, 3rd Edition, Jul. 2003, pp. 1-233. |
| “Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater”, World Health Organization, vol. 2, Wastewater Use in agriculture, pp. 1-196, undated. |
| “Preliminary Research Study for the Construction of a Pilot Cogeneration Desalination Plant in Southern California,” Water Treatment Technology Program Report No. 7, U.S. Department of the Interior May 1995. |
| “Salt Content in Irrigation Water”, Lenntech, pp. 1-5, undated. |
| “SAR Hazard of Irrigation,” Lenntech, pp. 1-4, undated. |
| “Zeta Potential” Lenntech, pp. 1-3, undated. |
| Almulla et al., “Developments in high recovery brackish water desalination plants as part of the solution to water quantity problems,” Desalination 153 (2002) pp. 237-243. |
| ASTM, “Standard Practice for Calculation and Adjustment of the Langelier Saturation Index for Reverse Osmosis,” Designation: D3739-94 (Reapproved 1998) pp. 1-4. |
| Busch et al., “Reducing energy consumption in seawater desalination,” Desalination 165 (2004) 299-312. |
| Calay, J.-C. et al., “The Use of EDI to Reduce the Ammonia Concentration in Steam Generators Blowdown of PWR Nuclear Power Plants,” PowerPlant Chemistry, vol. 2, No. 8, 2000, pp. 467-470. |
| Cote, et al, “A new immersed membrane for pretreatment to reverse osmosis,” Desalination 139 (2001) 229-236. |
| Cote, et al, “Use of Ultrafiltration for Water Reuse and Desalination,” The ZEEWEED® Ultrafiltration Membrane. |
| Del Pino et al., “Wastewater reuse through dual-membrane processes: opportunities for sustainable water resources,” Desalination 124 (1999) 271-277. |
| Dimascio et al., “Electrodialesis Polishing (An Electrochemical Deionization Process),” 1994, pp. 164-172. |
| Dimascio, et al., “Continuous Electrodeionization: Production of High-Purity Water without Regeneration Chemicals,” The Electrochemical Society Interface, Fall 1998, pp. 26-29. |
| Farmer et al., Capacitive Deionization of NH4ClO4 Solutions with Carbon Aerogel Electrodes, J. Appl. Electro-Chemistry, vol. 26, (1996), pp. 1007-1018. |
| FDA, “Guide to Inspections of High Purity Water Systems,” printed from www.fda.gov. on Dec. 28, 2001. |
| Frost & Sullivan, “Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration Hold Huge Potential for the Desalination Pretreatment Market” published Nov. 14, 2006, Water Online. |
| Ganzi, G.C. et al., “Electrodeionization: Theory and Practice of Continuous Electrodeionization,” Ultrapure Water, Jul./Aug. 1997, pp. 64-69. |
| Gifford et al. “An Innovative Approach to Continuous Electrodeionization Module ad System Design for Power Applications” 7 pages, Oct. 2000. |
| Gittens, G.J. et al., “The Application of Electrodialysis to Demineralisation,” A.I.Ch.E.I.Chem.E. Symposium Series No. 9, 1965 (London: Instn chem. Engrs), pp. 79-83. |
| Glueckauf, “Electro-Deionisation Through a Packed Bed,” British Chemical Engineering, Dec. 1959, pp. 646-651. |
| Hell et al., “Experience with full-scale electrodialysis for nitrate and hardness removal,” Desalination 117 (1998) 173-180. |
| Hobro et al., “Recycling of Chromium from Metal Finishing Waste Waters Using Electrochemical Ion Exchange (EIX),” 1994, pp. 173-183. |
| Jha, Anil D. et al., “CEDI: Selecting the Appropriate Configuration,” reprinted from Power Engineering, Aug. 2000 edition. |
| Johnson, et al., “Desalting by Means of Porous Carbon Electrodes,” Electrochemical Technology, vol. 118, No. 3, Mar. 1971, pp. 510-517. |
| Kedem et al., “EDS—Sealed Cell Electrodialysis,” Desalination, vol. 46, 1983, pp. 291-299. |
| Kedem et al., “Reduction of Polarization by Ion-Conduction Spacers: Theoretical Evaluation of a Model System,” Desalination, vol. 27, 1978, pp. 143-156. |
| King, C. Judson, et al., “Separation Technology in Japan”; Japanese Technology Evaluation Center; International Tech. Research Institute, Loyola College in Maryland, pp. 1-143, Mar. 1993. |
| Korngold, “Electrodialysis Process Using Ion Exchange Resins Between Membranes,” Desalination, vol. 16, 1975, pp. 225-233. |
| Laktionov, Evgueni Viktorovitch, “Demineralisation De Solutions Electrolytiques Diluees. Analyse Comparative Des Performances De Differents Procedes D'Electrodialyse”, Directuer de these, Universite Montpellier II, Science Et Technique Due Languedoc, Jul. 17, 1998. |
| Larchet et al., “Application of electromembrane technology for providing drinking water for the population of the Aral region,” Desalination 149 (2002) 383-387. |
| Lesch et al., “A Short Note on Calculating the Adjusted SAR Index” American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2009, vol. 52(2), pp. 493-496. |
| Matejka, “Continuous Production of High-Purity Water by Electro-Deionisation,” J. Appl. Chem., Biotechnol., vol. 21, Apr. 1971, pp. 117-120. |
| Mohammad et al., “Predicting flux and rejection of multicomponent salts mixture in nanofiltration membranes,” Desalination 157 (2003) 105-111. |
| Nesicolaci, M., “Reverse Osmosis is Taking Global Water & Wastewater Treatment by Storm,” Water Purification Solutions, Severn Trent Services, undated. |
| Oren et al., “Studies on Polarity Reversal with Continuous Deionization,” Desalination, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, NL, vol. 86, No. 2, Jun. 1, 1992, pp. 155-171. |
| Pourcelly, Gerald, Conductivity and selectivity of ion exchange membranes: structure-correlations, Desalination, vol. 147 (2002) pp. 359-361. |
| Public Health and the Environmental World Health Organization, “Desalination for Safe Water Supply, Guidance for the Health and Environmental Aspects Applicable to Desalination,” Geneva 2007. |
| R. Simons, “Electric Field Effects on Proton Transfer Between Ionizable Groups and Water in Ion Exchange Membranes,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 29, No. 2, 1984, pp. 151-158. |
| R. Simons, “Strong Electric Field Effects on Proton Transfer Between Membrane-Bound Amines and Water,” Nature, vol. 280, Aug. 30, 1979, pp. 824-826. |
| R. Simons, “The Origin and Elimination of Water Splitting in Ion Exchange Membranes During Water Demineralisation by Electrodialysis,” Desalination, vol. 28, Jan. 29, 1979, pp. 41-42. |
| R. Simons, “Water Splitting in Ion Exchange Membranes,” Pergamon Press Ltd., 1985, pp. 275-282. |
| Shaposhnik et al., “Demineralization of water by electrodialysis with ion-exchange membranes, grains and nets,” Desalination, vol. 133 (2001) pp. 211-214. |
| Sirivedhin et al., “Reclaiming produced water for beneficial use: salt removal by electrodialysis,” J. of Membrane Science 243 (2004) pp. 335-343. |
| Tseng, Tai, et al., “Optimization of Dual-Staged Nanofiltration Membranes for Seawater Desalination”; American Water Works Association 2003 CA-NC Annual Fall Conference; Oct. 7, 2003. |
| U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Sandia National Laboratories, “Desalination and Water Purification Technology Roadmap—A Report of the Executive Committee,” Jan. 2003. |
| U.S. Congress, Office of the Technology Assessment, “Using Desalination Technologies for Water Treatment,” OTA-BP-O-46 (Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office), Mar. 1988. |
| USFilter, “CDI-LXtm Systems,” product information, 2001, 6 pgs. Mar. 2001. |
| USFilter, “H-Series Industrial CDI(r) Systems,” product information, 1998, 4 pgs. |
| Von Gottberg et al., “Optimizing Water Recovery and Energy Consumption for Seawater RO Systems,” Water & Process Technologies, General Electric Technical Paper (2005). |
| Walters, et al., “Concentration of Radioactive Aqueous Wastes,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Jan. 1955, pp. 61-67. |
| Wang, et al., A Study of the electrodeionization process-high-purity water production with a RO-EDI system,: Desalination, vol. 132, pp. 349-352, Oct. 3, 2000. |
| Warshawsky et al., “Thermally Regenerable Polymerable Polymeric Crown Ethers, II Synthesis and Application in Electrodialysis,” pp. 579-584, publication and date unknown. |
| Watson, “The Basics of Seawater Desalting by Reverse Osmosis,” Water & Wastes Digest, pp. 16-19, Jan. 2007. |
| Wood, “Hot Water Sanitization of Continuous Electrodeionization Systems” Pharmaceutical Engineering, vol. 20, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2000, pp. 1-15. |
| Wood, J.H. et al., “Continuous Electrodeionisation: Module Design Considerations for the Production of High Purity Water,” Proc. of IEX at the Millenium, Jul. 16, 2000, pp. 44-51. |
| World Bank, “Seawater and Brackish Water Desalination in the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia,” A Review of Key Issues and Experience in Six Countries Final Report, Main Report, Dec. 2004. |
| World Health Organization, Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality; Chemical Facts Sheet pp. 296-461 (2003). |
| www.waterline.com/content/news/article.asp Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration Hold Huge Potential for the Desalination Pretreatment Market, Nov. 14, 2006. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130015135 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60805512 | Jun 2006 | US | |
| 60804610 | Jun 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11524078 | Sep 2006 | US |
| Child | 13599871 | US |
