The present invention relates generally to monitoring the amount of materials, and more particularly, to methods and systems for accurate measurement of forces to determine the amount of materials in a container.
Materials that are used in industrial operations are often stored in containers before being mixed together to create a desired mixture. For instance, storage containers are frequently used in industries such as agriculture, pharmaceuticals and oil field applications. For example, in oil field operations fluids are often stored in containers before being discharged into a blender or being pumped down hole. The containers used are often mounted on vehicles and are transportable. In some applications, the materials used in oil field operations are stored in a multiple compartment storage unit such as a Mountain Mover available from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., of Duncan, Okla.
It is often desirable to accurately monitor the amount of materials stored in a container. Additionally, in instances where material is being discharged from a container, it is desirable to monitor the rate at which material is being discharged, both to maintain the necessary inventory and to ensure that the correct amount of material is being discharged. However, the materials used are often hazardous or not environmentally friendly making their exposure undesirable. Moreover, space is often limited giving rise to a need for a material monitoring system and method with minimal space and equipment requirements.
Some specific example embodiments of the disclosure may be understood by referring, in part, to the following description and the accompanying drawings.
While embodiments of this disclosure have been depicted and described and are defined by reference to example embodiments of the disclosure, such references do not imply a limitation on the disclosure, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The subject matter disclosed is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those skilled in the pertinent art and having the benefit of this disclosure. The depicted and described embodiments of this disclosure are examples only, and not exhaustive of the scope of the disclosure.
The present invention relates generally to monitoring the amount of materials, and more particularly, to methods and systems for accurate measurement of forces to determine the amount of materials in a container.
In one exemplary embodiment, the present invention is directed to a weighing assembly comprising: a base plate; a first bearing plate and a second bearing plate coupled to the base plate; a first load sensor coupled to the first bearing plate and a second load sensor coupled to the second bearing plate; and a mounting block; wherein there is a gap between a portion of the first load sensor and a portion of the first bearing plate; wherein there is a gap between a portion of the second load sensor and a portion of the second bearing plate; wherein a first portion of the mounting block is coupled to the first load sensor; wherein a second portion of the mounting block is coupled to the second load sensor; wherein each of the first load sensor and the second load sensor includes a first electrical connector and a second electrical connector; wherein the first electrical connector of the first load sensor is connected to the first electrical connector of the second load sensor; wherein the second electrical connector of the first load sensor is connected to a power supply; and wherein a sum of currents output from the first load sensor and the second load sensor indicates a force applied to the mounting block.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method of weighing a container comprising: providing a container having a plurality of standing legs; providing a plurality of weighing assemblies, each of the plurality of weighing assemblies comprising: a base plate; a first bearing plate and a second bearing plate coupled to the base plate; a first load sensor coupled to the first bearing plate and a second load sensor coupled to the second bearing plate; a mounting block resting on the first load sensor and the second load sensor; wherein a sum of current outputs from the first load sensor and the second load sensor indicates amount of force applied to the mounting block; coupling each of the plurality of standing legs to the mounting block of one of the plurality of weighing assemblies; determining the weight of the container by summing the amount of force applied to the mounting block of each of the plurality of weighing assemblies.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention is directed to a weighing assembly comprising: a base plate; a plurality of bearing plates coupled to the base plate; a plurality of load sensors; wherein each of the plurality of load sensors is coupled to one of the plurality of bearing plates; a mounting block symmetrically supported by the plurality of load sensors; and a current measurement device for measuring a sum of currents output from the plurality of load sensors.
The features and advantages of the present disclosure will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of exemplary embodiments, which follows.
The present invention relates generally to monitoring the amount of materials, and more particularly, to methods and systems for accurate measurement of forces to determine the amount of materials in a container.
Turning now to
Identical load sensors 108 rest on each bearing plate 104. Each load sensor 108 is coupled to a bearing plate 104 at its two lateral ends. In one exemplary embodiment, the bearing plates 104 may be threaded and a first bolted connection 106 may couple the bearing plates 104 to the load sensors 108. Although bolted connections 106 are used in the exemplary embodiment, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, any suitable fastener may be used to couple the bearing plates to the load sensors. Moreover, in one embodiment, a first fastener may be used to couple the bearing plates 104 to the base plate 102 and a second fastener may be used to couple the load sensors 108 to the bearing plates 104.
In one exemplary embodiment, load cells may be used as load sensors. Electronic load cells are preferred for their accuracy and are well known in the art, but other types of force-measuring devices may also be used. As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, however, any type of load-sensing device can be used in place of or in conjunction with a load cell. Examples of suitable load-measuring devices include weight-, mass-, pressure- or force-measuring devices such as hydraulic load cells, scales, load pins, dual shear beam load cells, strain gauges and pressure transducers. Standard load cells are available in various ranges such as 0-5000 pounds, 0-10000 pounds, etc.
There is a gap 110 between the middle portion of the load sensors 108 and the middle portion of the bearing plates 104. The gap 110 allows the load sensors 108 to move up or down in response to the application of forces to the load sensors 108. Each load sensor 108 includes electrical connectors which will be discussed in more detail below, in conjunction with
The mounting block 114 includes a receiving portion 118 for receiving the leg of the container (not shown) that is to be monitored. In one exemplary embodiment, the receiving portion 118 may be elliptical. The receiving portion 118 may include a receiving rod 120 which may be operable to mate with a corresponding mating portion at the bottom of the leg of the container (not shown) that is to be monitored. Accordingly, the weight of the container is transferred through the container leg (not shown), the receiving rod 120 and the mounting block 114 to the load sensors 108.
The receiving rod 120 may be mated to the mounting block 114 with a pin trap 122. The pin trap 122 may be a flat metal plate with a hole for the receiving rod 120 and slots for securing the pin trap 122 to the mounting block 114 with bolting connections 124. The slots allow flexibility in positioning or mating the receiving rod 120 relative to the mounting block 114.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, each load sensor 108 will produce a current which indicates the force incident on that load sensor from the mounting block 114. The load sensors 108 are physically and electrically combined to measure the force from a support leg of the container being monitored and provide a single scalar output representing that force. The symmetrical arrangement of the load sensors 108 in the weighing assembly 100 cancels the majority of off axis force contributions from moments, torques, vibration and/or actual off axis forces within the weighing assembly. Accordingly, a fixed assembly is provided without requirements for multiple degrees of freedom or checking requirements. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the weighing assembly 100 may be scalable for particular applications such as, for example, 0-150,000 pound capacity.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the weighing assembly 100 may include a cover 126 to prevent ice, dirt, debris and other materials from entering the gap between the load sensor 108 and the bearing plate 104. As would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, presence of such materials in the gap 110 may lead to errors in the force measurements obtained from the load sensors 108. Accordingly, the use of a cover 126 further improves the system's accuracy.
Accordingly, the current output 308 from the first load sensor 108 is combined with the current output 310 from the second load sensor 108 to produce a single current output 312 using Kirchhoff's Current Law. This single output may be measured by a current measurement device and is representative of the force incident on all the load sensors used in a particular weighing assembly 100. Moreover, the use of current outputs minimizes system susceptibility to electrical noise. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in one exemplary embodiment, the current output may be measured using an ammeter (not shown). Moreover, as would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the present invention is not limited by the number of load sensors used and any desirable number of load sensors may be chained together in a similar fashion to obtain measurements in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, although the exemplary embodiment includes two load sensors, the present invention is not limited to any particular number of load sensors and any number of load sensors may be used to carry out the present invention. For instance, in another embodiment, the weighing assembly may include four load sensors, symmetrically arranged under the mounting block. In each instance, the total current output from the weighing assembly may be scaled to fall within a desired range in order to determine the total force on the particular weighing assembly.
Therefore, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the readings from two or more load sensors may be combined into a single output which minimizes cost and complexity of the electronics necessary to process the signals received. Additionally, because the readings of the load sensors 108 are combined in real time, the present invention provides a cancellation of applied moments and errors from transient loads such as wind loads, off axis forces, or vibrations that result from not sampling all load sensors substantially simultaneously.
Specifically, in an exemplary embodiment, the current from each of the two load sensors 108 may be 2 [mA] when there is no load applied and the current may be 10 [mA] when a full load is applied. In this exemplary embodiment, the range of total current readings from the weighing assembly is between 4 [mA] in instances when there is no load applied to the system and 20 [mA] when a full load is applied. Accordingly, the force applied to the weighing assembly 100 may be determined for any given value of the total current 312. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, any number of load sensors may be used with the total current scaled to fit within the desired range.
In one exemplary embodiment, the scalar output from a weighing assembly 100 may be connected to an information handling system 314. As would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the information handling system 314 may include any instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute, classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, switch, store, display, manifest, detect, record, reproduce, handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business, scientific, control, or other purposes. For example, the information handling system 314 may be a network storage device, or any other suitable device and may vary in size, shape, performance, functionality, and price. Moreover, the weighing assembly 100 may be communicatively coupled to the information handling system 314 through a wired or wireless connection. Specifically, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, a signal processing system may be used to process and transmit the signals from the weighing assembly 100 to the information handling system 314.
As shown in
The base plate 102 of each weighing assembly 100 in
Although
When using multiple weighing assemblies 100 to monitor a container 404, the scalar output from the multiple weighing assemblies 100 may be substantially simultaneously combined in real time to monitor the system as a whole. Additionally, because the readings of the weighing assemblies 100 are combined in real time, the present invention provides a cancellation of applied moments and errors from transient loads such as wind loads that result from not sampling all weighing assemblies simultaneously. In one exemplary embodiment, the outputs from one or more of the disclosed weighing assemblies 100 may then be communicated to an information handling system 314 to weigh a multiple compartment storage unit such as a Mountain Mover.
In this embodiment, the information handling system 314 may store the tare weight of the storage unit being monitored based on the sum of the weights at each weighing assembly 100. As material is added to or removed from the storage unit, the output of the load sensors 108 of each weighing assembly 100 will increase or decrease respectively. The information handling system 314 may then monitor the weight measured at each weighing assembly 100 and determine the weight of the material being added to or removed from the container 404, by summing the weight measurements at all the weighing assemblies 100 coupled to the legs of that particular container 404. Specifically, the weight of the material may be determined by subtracting the tare weight of the container 404 from the total weight of the container 404 with the materials contained therein. Moreover, by continuously monitoring the weight of the material in the container 404 the mass flow rate to or from the container 404 may be determined using the gravitational constant, g. Using the mass flow rate, for a material with a known density the volumetric flow rate may be determined.
Standing legs 504 are coupled to each weighing assembly 100 in the manner described in more detail in conjunction with
The use of the weighing assembly 100 of the present invention in conjunction with the weighing system 500 of
Accordingly, as would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the system and methods disclosed herein may be used to maintain the necessary inventory and/or perform quality control to ensure that the material is supplied to or discharged from the storage unit at the desired rate. Moreover, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, with an appropriate control system, the present invention may be used to provide electronic feedback for closed-loop controlled metering of the material at a desired rate. In one exemplary embodiment a threshold value for the mass, volume, mass flow rate and/or volumetric flow rate of the materials in a container may be stored in the information handling system 314. The information handling system 314 may then alert the user if the mass, volume, mass rate and/or volumetric flow rate of the materials in the container fall below or exceeds that threshold value. Stated otherwise, the information handling system 314 may alert a user of any deviations from a desired value.
In one exemplary embodiment, the weighing assembly 100 may be used in conjunction with a multiple compartment storage unit. Each leg of a multiple compartment storage unit is coupled to a weighing assembly 100. The load sensor readings from the weighing assembly at each leg of the multiple compartment storage unit is then used to determine the tare weight of the storage unit. The tare weight of the multiple compartment storage unit may be stored in an information handling system, and the materials to be stored or metered may be added to the multiple compartment storage unit.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the weighing assembly disclosed herein has a wide range of applications. For instance, the weighing assembly may be used in conjunction with monitoring multiple compartment storage units and fluid storage units as well as vertical bins used to store solid materials such as sand and cement.
Although the weighing assembly disclosed herein is discussed in conjunction with vehicles used in oil field applications, as would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the weighing assembly disclosed herein may be used in conjunction with any application where it is desirable to monitor the amount of materials in a container.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in order to prevent distortions resulting from changes in temperature, the base plate, the bearing plates, the load sensors and the mounting block used in a weighing assembly are desirably made from materials having predetermined thermal coefficients. For example, in one embodiment, the bearing plate may be made from 1018 CR Steel and the load sensors may be made from 4142 Steel. In that exemplary embodiment, the mounting block may be made from 4340 steel and the base plate may be made from HSLA Steel Plate (ASTM A514) which has nearly the same temperature expansion coefficients as the bearing plate and load sensor materials, minimizing stresses from thermal loads.
Therefore, the present invention is well-adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those which are inherent therein. While the invention has been depicted and described by reference to exemplary embodiments of the invention, such a reference does not imply a limitation on the invention, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The invention is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those ordinarily skilled in the pertinent arts and having the benefit of this disclosure. The depicted and described embodiments of the invention are exemplary only, and are not exhaustive of the scope of the invention. Consequently, the invention is intended to be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims, giving full cognizance to equivalents in all respects. The terms in the claims have their plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and clearly defined by the patentee.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1730173 | Stearns | Oct 1929 | A |
2590946 | Darling | Apr 1952 | A |
2795403 | Mead | Jun 1957 | A |
2821854 | Franke | Feb 1958 | A |
3072209 | Perry, Jr. | Jan 1963 | A |
3155248 | Haller | Nov 1964 | A |
3279550 | Kersten | Oct 1966 | A |
3291234 | Woodburn | Dec 1966 | A |
3381943 | Miller | May 1968 | A |
3547291 | Batterton et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3587760 | Othmar et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3591147 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3661220 | Harris | May 1972 | A |
3687319 | Adam et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3693083 | Hamilton et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3792790 | Brubaker | Feb 1974 | A |
3854540 | Holmstrom, Jr. | Dec 1974 | A |
3857452 | Hartman | Dec 1974 | A |
3893655 | Sandiford | Jul 1975 | A |
3931999 | McCain | Jan 1976 | A |
3934739 | Zumsteg et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3949822 | English et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4020911 | English et al. | May 1977 | A |
4063605 | Graham | Dec 1977 | A |
4095659 | Blench et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4103752 | Schmidt | Aug 1978 | A |
4163626 | Batterton et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4187047 | Squifflet | Feb 1980 | A |
4203497 | Harris et al. | May 1980 | A |
4249623 | McCauley | Feb 1981 | A |
4249838 | Harvey et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4345628 | Campbell et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4345872 | Arnold | Aug 1982 | A |
4411325 | Hamilton | Oct 1983 | A |
4411327 | Lockery et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4465420 | Dillman | Aug 1984 | A |
4621972 | Grotte | Nov 1986 | A |
4634335 | Van Den Pol | Jan 1987 | A |
4666003 | Reichow | May 1987 | A |
4708569 | Nijenhuis | Nov 1987 | A |
4726435 | Kitagawa et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4775018 | Kroll et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4775275 | Perry | Oct 1988 | A |
4819750 | Carnevale | Apr 1989 | A |
4844189 | Shisgal et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4913198 | Hayahara et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4969112 | Castle | Nov 1990 | A |
5044861 | Kirchhoff et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5127450 | Saatkamp | Jul 1992 | A |
5133212 | Grills et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5161628 | Wirth | Nov 1992 | A |
5205370 | Paul et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5333695 | Walter | Aug 1994 | A |
5343000 | Griffen et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5452615 | Hilton | Sep 1995 | A |
5546683 | Clark | Aug 1996 | A |
5578798 | Nuyts | Nov 1996 | A |
5600104 | McCauley et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5635680 | Dojan | Jun 1997 | A |
5637837 | Merz et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5650928 | Hagenbuch | Jul 1997 | A |
5665910 | Knutson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5717167 | Filing et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5752768 | Assh | May 1998 | A |
5764522 | Shalev | Jun 1998 | A |
5811737 | Gaiski | Sep 1998 | A |
5811738 | Boyovich et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5850757 | Wierenga | Dec 1998 | A |
5880410 | Neuman | Mar 1999 | A |
5884232 | Buder | Mar 1999 | A |
6118083 | Boyovich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6148667 | Johnson | Nov 2000 | A |
6186657 | Fuchsbichler | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6242701 | Breed et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6284987 | Al-Modiny | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313414 | Campbell | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6384349 | Voll | May 2002 | B1 |
6474926 | Weiss | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6495774 | Pederson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6532830 | Jansen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6601763 | Hoch et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6769315 | Stevenson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6919516 | Frye et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928886 | Meusel et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6948535 | Stegemoeller | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7048432 | Phillippi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7202425 | Knudsen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214028 | Boasso | May 2007 | B2 |
7214892 | Williamson | May 2007 | B2 |
7240549 | Kimbara et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7267001 | Stein | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7353875 | Stephenson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7528329 | Nuyts | May 2009 | B2 |
7538281 | Pottebaum et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
20010038018 | Bell et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030047387 | Bogat | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030047603 | Lustenberger et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030202869 | Posch | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040016576 | Kuechenmeister et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050110648 | Lehrman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060225924 | Ivan et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070107540 | Davies | May 2007 | A1 |
20070125543 | McNeel et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070201305 | Heilman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080066911 | Luharuka et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080271927 | Crain | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090107734 | Lucas | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
37 17 417 | Dec 1988 | DE |
295 18 215 | May 1996 | DE |
2474335 | Jul 1981 | FR |
WO 9419263 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 2009065858 | May 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Practical Strain Gage Measurements” (http://www.omega.com/techref/pdf/strainGage—Measurement.pdf), pp. 94-130, Agilent Technologies, Inc. © 1999. |
“The Strain Gage” (http://www.omega.com/literature/transactions/volume3/strain2.html#—top), pp. 1-6, Omega Engineering, Inc. © 2003-2012. |
International Search Report in PCT/GB2010/001717, May 10, 2011. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,297, Apr. 21, 2011. |
Boerger pump—available at: http://www.boerger-pumps.com/contero/gallery/Prospekte—USA/us—p—ssr—boerger—powerfeed—0309.pdf. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/741,509, Aug. 19, 2009. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/741,509, Jan. 28, 2010. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, Mar. 18, 2009. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, Jul. 7, 2009. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, Jan. 28, 2010. |
Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, Mar. 31, 2010. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,551, Jun. 15, 2011. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/GB2010/000512, Jun. 25, 2010. |
International Search Report in PCT/GB2011/000071, Mar. 21, 2011. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/235,270, Mar. 4, 2011. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,450, Jun. 18, 2010. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,009 dated Jul. 23, 2012. |
Fenna et al., “Dictionary of Weights, Measures, and Units,” Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. I, 65 and 66. |
Kutz et al., “Mechanical Engineers' Handbook,” 2nd Ed., 1998, pp. I, II, and 1332. |
Abulnaga, “Slurry Systems Handbook,” 2002, pp. I, II, and 1.20. |
Communication from European Patent Office in EEHC/SJW/N28306 dated Aug. 31, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110174551 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |