Embodiments of the invention relate to a method and device for controlling a motor vehicle in the presence of disturbances such as those caused by a trailer or semi-trailer.
Stability is a concern for a vehicle towing a trailer, especially when the vehicle towing the trailer is traveling at high speed or making a turn. Since the trailer significantly affects the dynamics of the towing vehicle, many control systems use techniques to improve the stability of the towing vehicle especially when a trailer is present. For example, systems such as anti-lock braking systems (“ABS”), traction control systems (“TCS”), and vehicle dynamics control (“VDC”) systems are configured to perform a variety of functions that impact the vehicle and the trailer in order to improve stability. Furthermore, the towing vehicle can better control its transmission if the presence of a trailer is known to a control unit in the vehicle.
When towing a trailer, vehicles generally need additional hardware including a hitch articulation angle sensor to detect the behavior of the trailer, and to activate the vehicle's brake or engine control in response to trailer activity. In some other cases, signals from an electronic stability program (“ESP”) are used for a detection of trailer oscillation. Once a trailer oscillation has been detected, the brake or the engine control is applied. However, once the trailer oscillation has started, any application of brake or engine control may be too late to be effective. Furthermore, since these controls are based on a heuristic approach in which only a portion of the vehicle dynamics is considered (instead of specific trailer dynamics), brake and engine controls can be unreliable.
Accordingly, there is a need for improved methods and systems for controlling a towing vehicle in the presence of a trailer. The following summary sets forth certain embodiments of such methods and systems. However, it does not set forth all such embodiments and should in no way be construed as limiting of any particular embodiment.
Generally, according to one embodiment of the invention, a hitch force is first estimated based on a vehicle dynamics model using parameters such as steering angle, yaw rate, vehicle speed, and lateral acceleration signals. These parameters are generally available within a vehicle control system such as an ESP system. Based on the estimated hitch force, a compensation system is then used to compensate a vehicle control based on the estimated hitch force.
In another form, the invention provides a method of controlling a towing vehicle. The method includes sensing at least a movement of the towing vehicle, and an angle of the towing vehicle. The method also includes determining a disturbance at the hitch based on data including at least the movement of the vehicle and the angle of the vehicle, and generating a compensation signal based on the determined disturbance at the hitch.
In another form, the invention provides a system for controlling a towing vehicle. The system includes a plurality of sensors to sense respective vehicle conditions including a movement and a speed of the towing vehicle. The system also includes an estimating module to receive the sensed conditions including the movement of the towing vehicle and the speed of the towing vehicle, and to estimate a disturbance at the hitch based on data including the sensed conditions. The system also includes a compensation module to receive the estimated disturbance from the estimating module, and to generate a compensation signal based on the estimated disturbance at the hitch.
In another form, the invention provides a method of controlling a towing vehicle. The method includes modeling a plurality of dynamics of the vehicle, and determining a disturbance from the modeled dynamics of the vehicle. The method also includes determining at least one of a wheel torque and a steering angle based on the determined disturbance at the hitch.
In another form, the invention provides a system for controlling a towing vehicle. The system includes a means for modeling a plurality of dynamics of the vehicle, and a means for determining a hitch force based at least in part on the modeled dynamics. The system includes a means for compensating at least one of a wheel torque and a steering angle based on the force at the hitch.
Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the following detailed description, claims, and drawings.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. Unless limited otherwise, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” and “mounted” and variations thereof herein are used broadly and encompass direct and indirect connections, couplings, and mountings. In addition, the terms “connected” and “coupled” and variations thereof are not restricted to physical or mechanical connections or couplings.
As should also be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, the systems shown in the figures are models of what actual systems might be like. As noted, many of the modules and logical structures described are capable of being implemented in software executed by a microprocessor or a similar device or of being implemented in hardware using a variety of components including, for example, application specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”). Terms like “processor” may include or refer to both hardware and/or software. Furthermore, throughout the specification capitalized terms are used. Such terms are used to conform to common practices and to help correlate the description with the coding examples, equations and/or drawings. However, no specific meaning is implied or should be inferred simply due to the use of capitalization. Thus, the claims should not be limited to the specific examples or terminology or to any specific hardware or software implementation or combination of software or hardware.
Embodiments of the invention relate to a method and system for controlling a motor vehicle in the presence of a trailer or semi-trailer. In one embodiment, a hitch force is considered a disturbance to a model describing a plurality of towing vehicle dynamics. The hitch force is estimated based on the model.
In a specific embodiment, a first vehicle condition that indicates a movement of the vehicle is sensed. A second vehicle condition that indicates an angle of the vehicle is also sensed. A hitch force is then estimated from the movement and the angle of the vehicle.
In one embodiment, a compensation system 160 (
In one embodiment, the towing vehicle sensor array 168 detects and monitors some specific conditions of the vehicle 100. For example, the sensors 112A, 112B, 112C, and 112D are used to sense a condition of the vehicle that is indicative of a movement or a speed of the towing vehicle 100. Sensed conditions are then transduced and converted into calibrated signals that are indicative of acceleration of the vehicle 100. If the sensors 112A, 112B, 112C, and 112D are equipped with any calibration circuitry or microprocessor therein, the speed can be converted internally to a calibrated form in the sensors 112A, 112B, 112C, and 112D. Otherwise, the conditions can be converted into calibrated signals by other external processes in a manner known in the art. Furthermore, other sensors such as the steering sensor 120, the yaw rate sensor 124, and the lateral acceleration sensor 128 are used to detect or sense events and movements, such as side-to-side movements, side-to-side acceleration of the towing vehicle, and angles of the movements. Collectively, values of the signals outputted by the sensors 112A, 112B, 112C, 112D, 120, 124, 128, or by the sensor array 168 are referred to as sensed values, or values, hereinafter. As a result, the ECU 116 and the compensation system 160 can use data from existing sensors available in a standard control system to control the motor vehicle in the presence of a trailer. In this way, additional hardware or sensors are unnecessary. Furthermore, since only data from the towing vehicle 100 needs to be used, data from the trailer is then also unnecessary.
The ECU 116 includes a processor 164 that receives the values from the towing vehicle sensor array 168. The processor 164 then processes the values from the towing vehicle sensor array 168 according to a program stored in a memory 170. Although the memory 170 is shown as being external to the processor 164, the memory 170 can also be internal to the processor 164. Similarly, although the compensation system 160 is shown as being external to the processor 164, the compensation system 160 can also be internal to the processor 164, or integrated in other control systems of the vehicle 100. Furthermore, the processor 164 can be a general-purpose micro-controller, a general-purpose microprocessor, a dedicated microprocessor or controller, a signal processor, an application-specific-integrated circuit (“ASIC”), or the like. In some embodiments, the compensation system 160 and its functions described are implemented in a combination of firmware, software, hardware, and the like. To be more specific, as illustrated in
In the embodiment shown in
In one embodiment, the disturbance compensation module 176 generates a compensation factor or signal as an output to be received at a torque distribution module 178 that distributes the compensation factor or signal to different control modules that are part of a vehicle control system 180. In the embodiment shown in
Using the exemplary free-body diagram 200 as shown in
In some embodiments, the towing vehicle dynamics are represented by a linear bicycle model as shown in EQN. 1:
wherein the variable β is a body slip angle, the variable {dot over (ψ)} is a yaw rate, the steering angle δf is a system input, M is a mass of the vehicle, v is a longitudinal speed of the towing vehicle, the variable Iz is the moment of inertia of the towing vehicle around CG 220, Cf, Cr are cornering stiffness of front and rear tires, respectively, lf and lr are the distances from the front and rear axle or wheels 204, 208 to CG 220, and lh is the length from the rear axle or wheel to the hitch 216. In some other embodiments, other towing vehicle models such as a two-track model, non-linear bicycle model, single-track model and the like can also be applied.
In general, the vehicle speed (v) is calculated from the wheel speed sensor signals of all four wheels. Of course, the wheel speed signals from a different number of wheels can also be used depending on the particular application. Thereafter, assuming {circumflex over (β)} and {dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)} are estimates of the body slip angle β and the yaw rate {dot over (ψ)}, respectively, and measuring β and {dot over (ψ)}, the hitch force estimate ({circumflex over (F)}yh) can be determined as shown in EQN. 2.
{circumflex over (F)}yh(t)={circumflex over (F)}yh(t−1)+K1(ν)(β−{circumflex over (β)})+K2(ν)({dot over (ψ)}−{dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)}) (2)
EQN. 2 shows that the hitch force estimate ({circumflex over (F)}yh) at time t can be dependent on the hitch force estimate ({circumflex over (F)}yh) at a previous time instant, a body slip angle β, a body slip angle estimate {circumflex over (β)}, a yaw rate {dot over (ψ)}, and a yaw rate estimate {dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)}. Particularly, in some embodiments, EQN. 2 also shows that when the body slip angle β is equal to the body slip angle estimate {circumflex over (β)}, and the yaw rate {dot over (ψ)} is equal to the yaw rate estimate {dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)}, the hitch force estimate ({circumflex over (F)}yh) converges into a specific value. The estimation of the hitch force (Fyh) can be considered accurate when the hitch force estimate ({circumflex over (F)}yh) converges. In some embodiments, {circumflex over (β)} and {dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)} are given by EQN. 3 as follows.
{circumflex over (β)}(t)={circumflex over (β)}(t−1)+K3(ν){circumflex over (β)}(t−1)+K4(ν){dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)}+K9(ν)(β−{circumflex over (β)}(t−1))+K10(ν)({dot over (ψ)}−{circumflex over ({dot over (ψ)}(t−1))+K5δf, and
{dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)}(t)={dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)}(t−1)+K6(ν){circumflex over (β)}(t−1)+K7(ν){dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)}+K11(ν)(β−{circumflex over (β)}(t−1))+K12(ν) {dot over (ψ)}−{dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)}(t−1))+K8δf (3)
wherein K1(ν), K2(ν), K3(ν), K4(ν), K5(ν), K6(ν), K7(ν), K8(ν), K9(ν), K10(ν), K11(ν), and K12(ν) are coefficients. These coefficients can generally be derived from the dynamic model selected such as the model of EQN. 1, as detailed hereinafter.
Similar to EQN. 2, values of the body slip angle estimate {circumflex over (β)}, and the yaw rate estimate {dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)} at time t depend on the values of the body slip angle estimate {circumflex over (β)}, and the yaw rate estimate {dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)} at a previous time instant, respectively, among other things. Furthermore, the values of the body slip angle estimate {circumflex over (β)}, and the yaw rate {dot over (ψ)} at time t are also dependent on the differences between the estimates and the values from the respective sensors or from the towing vehicle sensor array 168. In some embodiments, if only the yaw rate {dot over (ψ)} from the yaw rate sensor 124 is available, K1(ν) is set to 0. In some embodiments, if only the body slip angle β from the body slip angle sensor 132 is available, K2(ν) is set to 0. In some embodiments, the body slip angle β can also be calculated from a lateral acceleration αy from the lateral acceleration sensor 128 by EQN. 4:
Some exemplary values of K1(ν), K2(ν), K3(ν), K4(ν), K5(ν), K6(ν), K7(ν), K8(ν), K9(ν), K10(ν), K11(ν), and K12(ν) can be derived from EQN. 1 as follows.
wherein D and E are adjustable parameters. In this case, only the yaw rate {dot over (ψ)} is used as a feedback measurement. In some embodiments, the value of D ranges from about −8000 to about −4000, and the value of E ranges from about −100 to about −10. Once the values of the parameters are obtained from the respective sensors, the coefficients can be determined with EQN. 5. As a result, values of the body slip angle estimate {circumflex over (β)}, and the yaw rate estimate {dot over ({circumflex over (ψ)} of EQN. 3 can be determined. Similarly, values of the hitch force estimate ({circumflex over (F)}yh) can also be obtained from EQN. 2 when the towing vehicle is moving.
Once the disturbance such as the hitch force estimate ({circumflex over (F)}yh) has been determined, the disturbance compensation module 176 generates a compensation factor based on some requirements of the vehicle control system 180. For example, the compensation factor can include a plurality of engine torque parameters or values, front steering torque parameters or values, rear steering torque parameters or values, and brake torque parameters or values determined based on the hitch force estimate ({circumflex over (F)}yh). In some embodiments, the compensation factor or signal can include only the front steering torque parameters when the vehicle control system 180 is configured to control only the front steering. In some other embodiments, the vehicle control system 180 can be configured to control engine torque. As a result, the compensation factor can include some engine torque parameters. Still in some other embodiments, the vehicle control system 180 can be configured to control both the front steering torque and the engine torque. In such cases, the compensation factor includes both the front steering torque parameters and the engine torque parameters.
In some embodiments, the vehicle control system 180 controls the wheel torque, the compensation factor for the trailer dynamics for the front and the rear torques can be determined by EQN. 6 and EQN. 7, respectively, as follows.
ΔTf=C1{circumflex over (F)}yh (6)
ΔTr=C2{circumflex over (F)}yh (7)
wherein ΔTf and ΔTr are the front and the rear torque compensation factor or values, respectively, and C1 and C2 are respective selectable parameters based on the model selected such as the model expressed in EQN. 1. In some embodiments, these parameters also generally depend on known variables such as the distances from the front and rear axles or wheels 204, 208 to CG 220 (lf and lr), the length from the rear axle or wheel to the hitch 216 (lh), the front steering angle (δf), and the back steering angle (δr). In one embodiment, the front wheel torque compensation factor (ΔTf) and the rear wheel torque compensation factor (ΔTr) can be expressed as follows.
wherein P1 and P2 are selectable parameters determined in the torque distribution module 178, and have values ranging from about 0.0 to about 10.0 in some embodiments. The values of P1 and P2 can also be adjusted depending on a plurality of vehicle dynamics such as the yaw rate ({dot over (ψ)}) and the lateral acceleration (ay). When ΔTf is greater than zero, the torque distribution module 178 distributes the compensation factor to the engine torque control 182 such that the engine torque can be compensated or adjusted accordingly. When ΔTf is less than zero, the torque distribution module 178 distributes the compensation factor to the brake torque control 184 such that the brake torque can be compensated or adjusted accordingly.
If the vehicle control system 180 controls the steering or the steering angles, the compensation factor for the trailer dynamics for the front and the rear steering angles can be determined by EQN. 10 and EQN. 11, respectively, as follows.
Δδf=C3{circumflex over (F)}yh, and (10)
Δδr=C4{circumflex over (F)}yh, (11)
wherein C3 and C4 are selectable parameters based on the model selected such as the model expressed in EQN. 1. In some embodiments, these selectable parameters (C3 and C4) depend on known variables such as the distances from the front and rear axle or wheels 204, 208 to CG 220 (lf and lr), the length from the rear axle or wheel to the hitch 216 (lh), the front steering angle (δf), and the cornering stiffness of the front and rear tires (Cf, and Cr). In one embodiment, the front steering angle compensation factor (Δδf) and the rear steering angle compensation factor (Δδr) can be expressed as follows.
wherein Cf, and Cr are the cornering stiffness of the front and rear tires, respectively. The values of P3 and P4 can also be adjusted depending on a plurality of vehicle dynamics such as the yaw rate ({dot over (ψ)}) and the lateral acceleration (ay), and will be determined in the torque distribution module 178. In some embodiments, the values of P3 and P4 can have values ranging from about 0.0 to about 1.0. Once the values of Δδf and Δδr have been determined, Δδf and Δδr are then fed to the front steering torque control 188 and the rear steering torque control 192, or to other parts of the vehicle control 180, to adjust the steering angles applied to the front and the rear wheels.
Various features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3908782 | Lang et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4023863 | Sisson et al. | May 1977 | A |
4023864 | Lang et al. | May 1977 | A |
4034822 | Stedman | Jul 1977 | A |
4232910 | Snyder | Nov 1980 | A |
4275898 | Muste Llambrich | Jun 1981 | A |
4697817 | Jefferson | Oct 1987 | A |
4706984 | Esler et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4850249 | Kirstein | Jul 1989 | A |
5011170 | Forbes et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5139374 | Holt et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5333940 | Topfer | Aug 1994 | A |
5348331 | Hawkins | Sep 1994 | A |
5380072 | Breen | Jan 1995 | A |
5707071 | Prestidge et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5747683 | Gerum et al. | May 1998 | A |
5861802 | Hungerink et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5964819 | Naito | Oct 1999 | A |
6223114 | Boros et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6272407 | Scholl | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311111 | Leimbach et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324447 | Schramm et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349247 | Schramm et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6438464 | Woywod et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446998 | Koenig et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452485 | Schutt et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466028 | Coppinger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494281 | Faye et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501376 | Dieckmann et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6523911 | Rupp et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553284 | Holst et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6600974 | Traechtler | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604035 | Wetzel et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6636047 | Hecker et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6655710 | Lindell et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6756890 | Leimbach et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7272481 | Einig et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20040246116 | Polzin | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006946 | Traechtler et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050065694 | Nenninger | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050125132 | Stumpp et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050206229 | Lu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060125313 | Gunne et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1477338 | Nov 2004 | EP |
2402453 | Aug 2004 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060206253 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |