Method and system of maintaining a browser in a design application workflow

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8751579
  • Patent Number
    8,751,579
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 2, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 10, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A system for maintaining consistent workflow is disclosed. The system includes a browser, a local application, a server application, and protocol logic configured to coordinate interactions between the local application and the server application and control the browser. Upon detecting the local application becoming active, the protocol logic freezes the browser until an event with respect to the local application is detected. The protocol logic is further configured to utilize a plurality of browser network parameters shared with a number of other protocols in order to ensure that the protocol logic is compatible with different network security devices.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE(S) TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

Not Applicable.


STATEMENT AS TO RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to design application workflow, and in particular to methods and systems for maintaining a browser in a design application workflow.


Under conventional systems, end-user workstations like Windows PCs provide the users with multiple applications to access, edit and/or modify different types of documents and data formats.


When building or designing an application, application designers define workflows and application logic to describe the possible actions of a user on data models. Current Internet browser technologies do not permit mixing browser-based workflow with local workstation application workflow. Indeed, while browsers are capable of launching other applications to view and/or edit data objects (such as a document or a video clip), this behavior is “fire and forget” meaning that the browser behavior is not dependent on other application behavior. In other words, at any point in time, a user can go back to the browser from an opened application, close the browser or switch to another application (such as a website), making any feedback from the opened application unpredictable. For example, a user can use the Internet Explorer to start the Word application to edit an HTML file. But once the HTML file is opened in the Word application, the user can freely switch back to the Internet Explorer and continue to browse the Web without regard to the current condition of the Word application. This makes it impossible for an application designer to enforce and design application workflow mixing browser and local applications.


Hence, it would be desirable to provide methods and systems that are capable of, amongst other things, mixing browser and local applications in a design application workflow.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A system for maintaining consistent workflow is disclosed. In one embodiment, the system includes a browser, a local application, a server application, and protocol logic configured to coordinate interactions between the local application and the server application and control the browser. Upon detecting the local application becoming active, the protocol logic freezes the browser until an event with respect to the local application is detected. The protocol logic is further configured to utilize a plurality of browser network parameters shared with a number of other protocols in order to ensure that the protocol logic is compatible with different network security devices.


In another embodiment, a system for maintaining consistent workflow includes a browser, a local application, a server application, and protocol logic configured to synchronize the behavior amongst the browser, the local application and the server application. Upon detecting a first event with respect to the local application, the protocol logic freezes the browser until a second event with respect to the local application is detected. The protocol logic is further configured to utilize a plurality of browser network parameters shared with a plurality of other protocols in order to ensure that the protocol logic is compatible with different network security devices.


In one aspect, a method of maintaining consistent workflow between a browser and an application is disclosed. According to the method, the browser is activated to establish a browser session. Launch of the application is then initiated. Upon detecting that the application is to be launched, the browser is frozen until an event with respect to the application is detected. A number of browser network parameters shared with a number of other protocols may be used in order to ensure compatibility with different network security devices.


Reference to the remaining portions of the specification, including the drawings and claims, will realize other features and advantages of the present invention. Further features and advantages of the present invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the present invention, are described in detail below with respect to accompanying drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Aspects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the invention presented in conjunction with the accompanying drawings:



FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating the status of a browser and a local application using a protocol according to one embodiment of the present invention; and



FIGS. 3A-D are simplified schematic diagram illustrating an example of use according to one embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

One or more embodiments of the present invention will now be described. In one embodiment, the present invention is provided in the form of a browser protocol, similar to other network protocols like FTP, HTTP or MAILTO:. The protocol by enabling state and data communication between the browser and other local workstation application solves the problem of workflow implementation for an application designer. During the usage of this protocol, the browser is able to keep its session alive, since this is compatible with URL session management and cookies session management. The protocol is not restricted to any type of applications or documents.



FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of the present invention. The system 10 includes a client computer 12 and a server computer 14. The client computer 12 and the server computer may communicate via a computer network, such as, the Internet 16. The client computer 12 and the server computer 14 may include, for example, personal computers, workstations and any other types of computing devices.


The client computer 12 may further include a browser 18, a local application 22, a protocol 20 implemented in the form of software. The server computer 14 may further include a server application 24.


The protocol 20 is used to control or coordinate the interactions amongst the browser 18, the local application 22 and the server application 24, as will be further explained below.


In one embodiment, the browser 18, the local application 22, the server application 24 and the protocol 20 collectively provide a certain application or functionality, such as, a document retrieval/editing system. For example, the local application 22 may coordinate with the server application 24 to retrieve document(s) from the server computer 14 by using the browser 18 and the protocol 20. The protocol 20 may be configured to perform the following functions including, for example, starting or launching another application from a browser, freezing the browser, monitoring the launched application, keeping the browser session alive and closing the launched application.



FIG. 2 illustrates the status of the browser 18 and the local application 22 using the protocol 20 according to one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, the browser 18 is initially launched by a user to establish a browser session. Upon receiving an indication from the user that the local application 22 is to be launched, the protocol 20 operating with the browser 18 launches the local application 22. The local application 22 may then interact with the server application 24 to perform certain functions. Upon launching the local application 22, the protocol 20 also freezes the browser 18. The browser 18 is frozen in that the browser session is still alive but no direct user action with respect to the browser 18 is permitted. In other words, the user cannot interact with the browser 18 directly. For example, the browser 18 is prevented from reacting to user-initiated events, such as, a mouse click on a link or a close menu command. However, the browser 18 may continue to interact with other applications, such as the local application 22. The protocol 20 may cause the browser 18 to be released in response to certain events and/or conditions, i.e., the browser 18 may return to an active state from the frozen state. Such events and/or conditions may be triggered by the local application 22. For example, when the local application 22 is deactivated, the protocol 20 may release the browser 18. The browser session becomes active again and direct user action with respect to the browser 18 is permitted.



FIGS. 3A-D show an example illustrating the use of the system 10. The system 10 is used in the context of a document publishing service whereby users are given the right to access and/or edit documents. A number of documents are stored on the server computer 14 and made available over the Internet 16 for access and edit. The documents may be generated by various applications using different formats, such as, Excel, Word, HTML, etc.


As shown in FIG. 3A, a user may activate the browser 18 to establish a browser session. The browser session allows the user to reach a website, vis-à-vis, the server computer 14, via the Internet 16. The website is coupled to the server computer 14 where the desired document(s) are stored. In order to access the website to retrieve the desired document(s), the user may need to provide the proper identification and access information.


In FIG. 3B, the user clicks on an edit link in order to retrieve and edit a desired document. Upon detecting the user clicking on the edit link, the protocol 20 activates the local application 22 to allow the user to retrieve and edit the document. For example, the local application 22 may include a Word or Excel application. The local application 22 and the server application 24 may cooperate with each other to achieve the desired functions.


In FIG. 3C, the local application 22 is launched by the protocol 20, as indicated by the new window. The local application 22 allows the user to access and/or edit the document. The protocol 20, however, causes the browser 18 to be frozen in the background. In other words, the user is no longer able to interact with the browser 18, such as, using the browser 18 to access other website(s).


In FIG. 3D, once the user is finished with accessing and/or editing the document, the user closes the local application 22. Upon detecting that the local application 22 has been closed, the protocol 20 causes the browser 18 to be released. The user once again is able to use the browser 18 to perform other functions, such as, requesting the website to retrieve another document from the server computer 14.


It should be noted that the protocol 20 is able to work with a number of different applications, such as, the local application 22. Furthermore, the protocol 20 is independent of an application, i.e., the protocol 20 is able to work with any type of application, such as, a document application, an email application, etc. Moreover, the protocol 20 may be configured to work with different types of browsers, such as, Internet Explorer and others. In addition, the protocol 20 may utilize browser network parameters shared with other protocols (such as, FTP, LDAP, MAILTO, NEWS) to ensure that the protocol 20 is compatible with different network security devices, such as, firewalls.


Use of the protocol 20 may provide a number of advantages and/or benefits. For example, since the protocol 20 is configured to control the behavior of the browser 18 and the local application 22, the protocol 20 enables the behavior of the browser 18 and the local application 22 to be synchronized. Consequently, workflow control can be better managed. This is particularly advantageous because as more and more applications have become web-based, the use of the protocol 20 allows consistency between a browser and a web-based application to be maintained more effectively.


The methods or algorithms described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executable by a processor, or in a combination of both, in the form of control logic, programming instructions, or other directions, and may be contained in a single device or distributed across multiple devices. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. A storage medium may be coupled to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor.


The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided for purposes of illustration and description to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit of scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein, but is to be accorded the full scope consistent with the claims, wherein reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more”. All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various embodiments described throughout this disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the claims. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited using the phrase “step for”.

Claims
  • 1. A system for maintaining consistent workflow, the system comprising: a processor; anda machine-readable storage medium including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to implement a browser, a local application, and protocol logic, wherein the instructions further cause the protocol logic to: establish a line of communication between the local application and the browser;control the browser;upon detecting the local application becoming active, freeze the browser until an event with respect to the local application is detected; andutilize a plurality of browser network parameters shared with a plurality of other protocols in order to ensure that the protocol logic is compatible with different network security devices,wherein the local application is a non-browser application and the local application is a non-browser embedded application, and the event includes closing of the local application.
  • 2. The system of claim 1 wherein when the browser is frozen pursuant to the protocol logic, the browser remains alive in that the browser and the local application are capable of interacting with one another.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein when the browser is frozen pursuant to the protocol logic, a user is not allowed to interact with the browser directly.
  • 4. The system of claim 1 wherein when the browser is frozen pursuant to the protocol logic, the browser is prevented from reacting to user-initiated events, and wherein the user-initiated events comprise one or more of a mouse click and a menu command.
  • 5. The system of claim 1 wherein the protocol logic works with a plurality of application types, the local application belonging to one of the plurality of application types.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein a primary purpose of the local application is a word processor.
  • 7. A system for maintaining consistent workflow, the system comprising: a processor; anda machine-readable storage medium including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to implement a browser, a local application, and protocol logic, wherein the instructions further cause the protocol logic to: synchronize behavior among the browser, the local application and the server application by establishing a line of communication between the browser, the local application and the server application;upon detecting a first event with respect to the local application, freeze the browser until a second event with respect to the local application is detected; andutilize plurality of browser network parameters shared with a plurality of other protocols in order to ensure that the protocol logic is compatible with different network security devices, and wherein the elements are implemented by a computerwherein the local application is a non-browser application and the local application is a non-browser embedded application, and the second event includes closing of the local application.
  • 8. The system of claim 7 wherein when the browser is frozen pursuant to the protocol logic, a browser session associated with the browser remains alive allowing the browser and the local application to interact with one another.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein when the browser is frozen pursuant to the protocol logic, a user is not allowed to interact with the browser directly.
  • 10. The system of claim 7 wherein the first event includes opening of the local application.
  • 11. The system of claim 7 wherein the protocol logic works with a plurality of browser types, the browser belonging to one of the plurality of browser types.
  • 12. The system of claim 7 wherein the protocol logic works with a plurality of application types, the local application belonging to one of the plurality of browser types.
  • 13. A method of maintaining consistent workflow between a browser and an application by a processor executing the browser and the application, the method comprising: activating the browser to establish a browser session;initiating launch of the application;establishing a line of communication between the browser and the application;upon detecting that the application is to be launched, freezing the browser until an event with respect to the application is detected; andusing a plurality of browser network parameters shared with a plurality of other protocols to ensure compatibility with different network security devices;wherein the application is a non-browser application and the application is a non-browser embedded application and the event includes closing of the application.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 wherein when the browser is frozen, the browser remains alive in that the browser and the application are capable of interacting with one another.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein when the browser is frozen, a user is not allowed to interact with the browser directly.
  • 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the protocol works with a plurality of browser types, the browser belonging to one of the plurality of browser types.
  • 17. The method of claim 13, wherein the protocol works with a plurality of application types, the application belonging to one of the plurality of browser types.
US Referenced Citations (132)
Number Name Date Kind
5577188 Zhu Nov 1996 A
5608872 Schwartz et al. Mar 1997 A
5649104 Carleton et al. Jul 1997 A
5715450 Ambrose et al. Feb 1998 A
5761419 Schwartz et al. Jun 1998 A
5819038 Carleton et al. Oct 1998 A
5821937 Tonelli et al. Oct 1998 A
5831610 Tonelli et al. Nov 1998 A
5873096 Lim et al. Feb 1999 A
5918159 Fomukong et al. Jun 1999 A
5963953 Cram et al. Oct 1999 A
6023722 Colyer Feb 2000 A
6092083 Brodersen et al. Jul 2000 A
6141793 Bryant et al. Oct 2000 A
6169534 Raffel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178425 Brodersen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189011 Lim et al. Feb 2001 B1
6216135 Brodersen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233617 Rothwein et al. May 2001 B1
6266669 Brodersen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6289462 McNabb et al. Sep 2001 B1
6295530 Ritchie et al. Sep 2001 B1
6314458 Steele et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324568 Diec et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324693 Brodersen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6336135 Niblett et al. Jan 2002 B1
6336137 Lee et al. Jan 2002 B1
D454139 Feldcamp et al. Mar 2002 S
6367077 Brodersen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6393605 Loomans May 2002 B1
6405220 Brodersen et al. Jun 2002 B1
6434550 Warner et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446089 Brodersen et al. Sep 2002 B1
6523022 Hobbs Feb 2003 B1
6535909 Rust Mar 2003 B1
6549908 Loomans Apr 2003 B1
6553563 Ambrose et al. Apr 2003 B2
6560461 Fomukong et al. May 2003 B1
6574635 Stauber et al. Jun 2003 B2
6577726 Huang et al. Jun 2003 B1
6601087 Zhu et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604117 Lim et al. Aug 2003 B2
6604128 Diec Aug 2003 B2
6609146 Slotznick Aug 2003 B1
6609150 Lee et al. Aug 2003 B2
6621834 Scherpbier et al. Sep 2003 B1
6654032 Zhu et al. Nov 2003 B1
6665648 Brodersen et al. Dec 2003 B2
6665655 Warner et al. Dec 2003 B1
6684438 Brodersen et al. Feb 2004 B2
6711565 Subramaniam et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724399 Katchour et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728702 Subramaniam et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728960 Loomans et al. Apr 2004 B1
6732095 Warshavsky et al. May 2004 B1
6732100 Brodersen et al. May 2004 B1
6732111 Brodersen et al. May 2004 B2
6754681 Brodersen et al. Jun 2004 B2
6763351 Subramaniam et al. Jul 2004 B1
6763501 Zhu et al. Jul 2004 B1
6768904 Kim Jul 2004 B2
6778989 Bates et al. Aug 2004 B2
6782383 Subramaniam et al. Aug 2004 B2
6804330 Jones et al. Oct 2004 B1
6826565 Ritchie et al. Nov 2004 B2
6826582 Chatterjee et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826745 Coker Nov 2004 B2
6829655 Huang et al. Dec 2004 B1
6842748 Warner et al. Jan 2005 B1
6845408 Lemke et al. Jan 2005 B1
6850895 Brodersen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6850949 Warner et al. Feb 2005 B2
6901425 Dykes et al. May 2005 B1
7210101 Terashima et al. Apr 2007 B2
7340411 Cook Mar 2008 B2
7620655 Larsson et al. Nov 2009 B2
7698160 Beaven et al. Apr 2010 B2
8082301 Ahlgren et al. Dec 2011 B2
8095413 Beaven Jan 2012 B1
8095594 Beaven et al. Jan 2012 B2
8275836 Beaven et al. Sep 2012 B2
20010044791 Richter et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020072951 Lee et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082892 Raffel Jun 2002 A1
20020095454 Reed et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020129352 Brodersen et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140731 Subramaniam et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020143997 Huang et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020162090 Parnell et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165742 Robins Nov 2002 A1
20020170071 Parnell et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030004971 Gong Jan 2003 A1
20030009460 Bates et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018705 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018830 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030066031 Laane et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030066032 Ramachandran et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069936 Warner et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070000 Coker et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070004 Mukundan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070005 Mukundan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074418 Coker et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030120675 Stauber et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030145056 Fujisawa et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030151633 George et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159136 Huang et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030187921 Diec et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030189600 Gune et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204427 Gune et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030206192 Chen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225730 Warner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040001092 Rothwein et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010489 Rio et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015981 Coker et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040027388 Berg et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040128001 Levin et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040168030 Traversat et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040185840 Sumino et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186860 Lee et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193510 Catahan et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199489 Barnes-Leon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199536 Barnes Leon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199543 Braud et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249854 Barnes-Leon et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260534 Pak et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260659 Chan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268299 Lei et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050050555 Exley et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050091098 Brodersen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20060026664 Pierre et al. Feb 2006 A1
20070050449 Beck Mar 2007 A1
20070260702 Richardson et al. Nov 2007 A1