Patients with respiratory ailments may be required to breathe therapeutic gas, such as oxygen. The therapeutic gas may be delivered to the patient from a therapeutic gas source by way of a nasal cannula.
Delivery of therapeutic gas to a patient may be continuous, or in a conserve mode. In continuous delivery, the therapeutic gas may be supplied at a constant flow rate throughout the patient's breathing cycle. A significant portion of the therapeutic gas provided in continuous delivery is wasted (i.e., the therapeutic gas delivered during exhalation of the patient is lost to atmosphere). In order to overcome the wastefulness of continuous delivery, related-art devices may operate in conserve mode using a conserver system.
A conserver system may be a device which senses a patient's inspiration, and delivers a bolus of therapeutic gas are relatively higher pressure (e.g., 25 PSIG) and high velocity during each inhalation. By delivering therapeutic gas only during inhalation, the amount of therapeutic gas lost to atmosphere may be reduced.
For a detailed description of the various embodiments, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims to refer to particular system components. This document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not function.
In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . .” Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct electrical or mechanical connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct connection, or through an indirect connection via other devices and connections.
“Nares” shall mean the nostrils of a patient.
“Naris” shall mean a single nostril of a patient, and is the singular of “nares.”
“Flow state of breathing orifices” shall refer to a flow state of a set of breathing orifices at a particular point in time. For example, considering only the nares of a patient as the set of breathing orifices, each nare can be open to flow (designated as “O” below) or blocked to flow (designated as “B” below), and thus the flow state of the breathing orifices in the example set being the left nare and the right nare (in that order) may take any one of the following states: {O, O}, {O, B}, {B, O}, and {B, B}. Similarly, in a set being the left nare, the right nare, and mouth (in that order) the flow state may take any one of the following flow states: {O, O, O}, {O, B, O}, {B, O, O}, {B, B, O}, {O, O, B}, {O, B, B}, and {B, O, B}.
“Substantially”, in relation to a recited volume, shall mean within +/−10% of the recited volume.
“About,” in reference to a recited value, shall mean the recited value plus or minus +/− ten percent (10%).
“Controller” shall mean, alone or in combination, individual circuit components, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a microcontroller with controlling software, a digital signal processor (DSP), a processor with controlling software, a field programmable gate array (FPGA), or a programmable logic device (PLD), configured to read inputs and drive outputs responsive to the inputs.
The following discussion is directed to various embodiments. Although one or more of these embodiments may be preferred, the embodiments disclosed should not be interpreted, or otherwise used, as limiting the scope of the disclosure, including the claims. In addition, one skilled in the art will understand that the following description has broad application, and the discussion of any embodiment is meant only to be an example of the embodiment, and not intended to intimate that the scope of the disclosure, including the claims, is limited to that embodiment.
The various embodiments are directed to delivery of therapeutic gas by way of bolus control. More particularly, various example embodiments control, on a breath-t-breath basis, the location of bolus delivery based on the flow state of breathing orifices of the patient. More particularly still, when two or more breathing orifices are open to flow, the various example embodiments alternate delivery location flow. At the selected delivery location the example embodiments balance considerations of gas velocity, efficacy of delivery to the lungs, discomfort and/or damage to mucosal tissue, and noise associated with the delivery of the therapeutic gas.
Designers of bolus-type therapeutic gas delivery systems balance a host of factors when designing such systems. For example, from the standpoint of efficacy of therapeutic gas delivered to the lungs, the earlier in an inhalation the therapeutic gas is delivered, and the greater the volume of the gas delivered earlier in the inhalation, the greater the efficacy of the therapeutic gas to the patient. The timing and volume considerations for delivery of therapeutic gas favor higher pressure and/or higher velocity delivery of therapeutic gas to the breathing orifices.
Another consideration in the design of therapeutic gas delivery system is the noise or sound associated with the delivery. Many therapeutic gas delivery systems are designed and constructed for use not only during waking hours of the patient, but also during sleep. The higher the pressure of each bolus, and the higher the velocity of the therapeutic gas of the bolus, the louder the sound or noise associated with the system. Thus, sound and/or noise considerations favor lower pressure and/or lower velocity of bolus delivery of therapeutic gas to the breathing orifices.
Yet another consideration in the design of bolus-type therapeutic gas delivery systems is damage and/or discomfort of the patient caused by the therapeutic gas delivery. That is, while higher pressure and/or higher velocity of therapeutic gas may increase efficacy of the gas delivered to the lungs, the higher pressure and/or higher velocity may cause physical damage (e.g., tearing) of the mucosal membranes within the nose. Moreover, the higher pressure and/or the higher the velocity cause more pronounced drying of the mucosal tissue. Damage and/or dryness of the mucosal tissue may cause physical damage to the mucosal membranes, and damage and/or dryness may also causes swelling of the mucosal tissue. Swelling increases the resistance to airflow, which further exacerbates the therapeutic gas delivery problem.
In designing bolus-type therapeutic gas delivery systems to balance these considerations, the inventors of the current specification identified various shortcomings of related-art devices. In particular, related-art devices assume that pressure regulators can quickly respond to pressure drops caused by bolus delivery. However, currently available pressure regulators have response delay or lag, and such lag results in lowered pressure during bolus delivery. The lowered pressure may result in providing less than the prescribed titration volume of therapeutic gas delivered. The lowered pressure may also result in providing the therapeutic gas at lower velocity. Delivering less than the prescribed titration volume and/or lower velocity means less therapeutic gas is delivered deep into the lungs, and thus results in lower efficacy.
Moreover, related-art devices fail to consider turbulence in therapeutic gas flow caused by tubing connections, bends in tubing connections, and flow through control valves. That is, even if hypothetically assumed related-art devices can consistently deliver the prescribed titration volume at each inhalation (which is not necessarily true), the turbulence of the therapeutic gas flow results in lower average velocity in movement toward the lungs. Similarly, a turbulent flow of therapeutic gas flowing through the nose may result in greater irritation of the mucosal tissue, as compared to a laminar flow through the nose.
Thus, at least some example embodiments are directed to delivery of therapeutic gas to a patient which addresses (at least in part) these considerations. More particularly, example embodiments address shortfalls in delivery of therapeutic gas by delivering a bolus of therapeutic gas to only one breathing orifice (e.g., a single naris) during each inhalation if multiple breathing orifices are open to flow. With respect to each bolus delivered to a breathing orifice, an initial portion of the bolus is supplied from therapeutic gas in an accumulator to account for lag or response time of a pressure regulator. Thereafter, a subsequent portion of the bolus is dispensed from a combination of therapeutic gas through the pressure regulator and the therapeutic gas in the accumulator. In this way, the pressure of the therapeutic gas remains within a predetermined range of pressures during bolus delivery, which better ensures delivery of the prescription titration volume, and better ensures sufficient velocity.
The pressure regulator 104 provides therapeutic gas, within a predetermined range of pressures, to an example storage, pressure vessel, or accumulator 106. As the name implies, the accumulator 106 accumulates or holds a predetermined volume of therapeutic gas. The predetermined volume is selected at the design stage based on a host of factors. For example, one consideration in selecting the volume of the accumulator 106 is the response time of the pressure regulator 104 to pressure drops on the downstream side of the pressure regulator 104. For pressure regulators with faster response time, the volume of the accumulator may be lower. Oppositely, for pressure regulators with slower response time, the volume of the accumulator may be higher. Another consideration is that in some cases the system 100 is a portable system carried by the patient. The weight of the example accumulator 106 may increase exponentially with increasing volume. Patients needing oxygen during perambulation are very sensitive to weight of the delivery system, and thus weight considerations drive the design toward smaller accumulators. Another consideration is the range of pressure within the accumulator 106. Putting aside response time of the pressure regulator 104, larger volumes for the accumulator 106 result in smaller pressure drops during bolus delivery, and smaller volumes for the accumulator 106 result in larger pressure drops during bolus delivery. Thus, pressure drop considerations drive the design toward accumulators with larger volume.
Still referring to
In accordance with one example system, for a pressure regulator 104 having a set point downstream pressure of about 25 PSIG, the accumulator 106 may have an internal volume of between and including 15 milliliters (mL) and 20 mL, and in one example case has an internal volume of about 10 mL. Further in the example system the orifice of the orifice plate 108 has a circular aperture with a diameter of between and including 0.5 millimeters (mm) and 1.5 mm, and in one case a diameter of about 1.0 mm. The example pressure set point, volume of the accumulator, and size of the orifice, and taking into account other flow paths to the patient (e.g., lumens of a nasal cannula) results in an approximately linear relationship between bolus delivery time and bolus delivery volume. In particular, the example relationships results in about 10 mL of therapeutic gas delivery for each 100 milliseconds (ms) of delivery time. Such a linear relationship makes programming and control of the system 100 easier to implement. Thus, for a prescription titration volume of 30 mL, the example delivery system may open to flow one or more of the flow control valves for 300 ms. As another example, for a prescription titration volume of 60 mL, the example delivery system may open to flow one or more of the flow control valves for 600 ms.
The system 100 couples to a patient (not shown) by way of a variety of ports or hose connections, such as naris hose connections 110 and 112, and an oral hose connection 114. For example, the system 100 may couple to a patient's nares by way of the nasal cannula, and lumens of the nasal cannula couple to the naris hose connections 110 and 112. In accordance with at least some embodiments, the system 100 monitors patient breathing and delivers therapeutic gas to a left naris (LN), a right naris (RN), or to the mouth (M) of the patient when open to flow. More particularly, in cases where only one breathing orifice is open to flow, the system 100 delivers to only one breathing orifice. In cases where two or more breathing orifices are open to flow, the example system 100 alternates the delivery location, mutually exclusively.
In accordance with at least some embodiments, the system 100 comprises both electrical components and mechanical connections. In order to differentiate between electrical connections and mechanical connections,
The example system 100 thus comprises electrically-controlled valves in the form of three-port valve 118, three-port valve 120, and three-port valve 122. In accordance with various embodiments, each of these three-port valves may be a five-volt solenoid operated valve that selectively couples one of two ports to a common port (each common port labeled as C in the figure). Three-port valves 118, 120, and 122 may be Humprey Mini-Mizers having part No. D3061, such as may be available from the John Henry Foster Co., or equivalents. Each three-port valve 118, 120, and 122 is electrically coupled to the controller 116. By selectively applying voltage from the controller 116 on a respective electrical connection, the controller 116 may be able to control the state of the system 100. For example, with respect to the three-port valve 118, the three-port valve 118 may: couple gas from the accumulator 106 and/or pressure regulator 104 to the common port and therefore to the example left naris; and couple a sensor in the example form of pressure sensor 124 to the common port and therefore the example left naris. Likewise, the three-port valve 120, under command of the controller 116, may: couple gas from the accumulator 106 and/or pressure regulator 104 to the common port and therefore the example right naris; and couple a sensor in the example form of pressure sensor 126 to the common port and therefore the example right naris. Further still, three-port valve 122 under command from the controller 116 may: couple gas from the accumulator 106 and/or pressure regulator 104 to the common port and therefore the patient's mouth; and couple a sensor in the example form of pressure sensor 128 to the common port and therefore the mouth.
The example pressure sensors 124, 126, and 128 are electrically coupled to the controller 116 such that the controller 116 can read the pressure and/or flow sensed by each. More particularly, the controller 116 may read values indicative of airflow (e.g., inhalation by the patient) through each respective breathing orifice. In alternative embodiments, the pressure sensors 124, 126, and 128 couple to the common ports of the three-port valves 118, 120, and 122, respectively, if the pressure sensors can withstand the pressure of the therapeutic gas during bolus delivery without damage. Regardless of the precise placement, the controller 116 may be able to determine when the patient is inhaling, and in some cases an indication of how much of the air drawn by the patient flows through each of the monitored breathing orifices.
Consider a situation where the system 100 couples to the nares of the patient by way of a bifurcated nasal cannula. As the patient inhales, outlet ports in the nasal cannula proximate to the openings of each naris experience a drop in pressure. The drop in pressure may be sensed through the nasal cannula and associated tubing by each of the pressure sensors 124 and 126. Likewise, a sensing and delivery tube may be placed proximate to the patient's mouth, and thus the pressure sensor 128 may detect an oral inhalation by the patient. In accordance with various embodiments, the system 100 senses whether a patient has airflow through a monitored breathing orifice. If only one breathing orifice is open to flow, the example system 100 delivers therapeutic gas to the breathing orifice open to flow.
Still considering the situation where the patient couples to the system 100 by way of a bifurcated nasal cannula and a separate sensing and delivery tube for the mouth, if there is no obstruction to inhalation in either the nares or the mouth, therapeutic gas may be provided to only one breathing orifice in each inhalation, with the delivery location alternating between the open breathing orifices in subsequent inhalations. Should one naris of the patient become congested or blocked, with respect to the remaining breathing orifices, the delivery location of the therapeutic gas may alternate, mutually exclusively, among the remaining breathing orifices. In some cases, the delivery location is changed for each inhalation. In other cases, the therapeutic gas may be delivered to only one breathing orifice for a plurality of breaths, and then the delivery location may alternate to the next open breathing orifice in the group.
Consider, as an example, that the system 100 of
Still referring to
The various embodiments discussed to this point address (at least in part) issues associated with potential shortcomings in the flow of therapeutic gas caused by response time of the pressure regulator 104. As mentioned above, however, in the design of delivery devices, sound and noise considerations favor lower pressure of therapeutic gas delivery, and lower velocity. In order to at least partially counteract a delivery pressure and velocity selection, at least some example embodiments implement flow straighteners within the therapeutic gas flow to reduce turbulence. That is, turbulence of the therapeutic gas flow results in lower average velocity in movement toward the lungs. Turbulence may be introduced in many ways. For example, flowing the therapeutic gas through the orifice of the orifice plate 108 may introduce turbulence. Sharp turns in flow lumens through which the therapeutic gas flows may introduce turbulence, such as within the electrically-controlled valves. Relatedly, each electrically-controlled valve has a valve seat and a moveable member, and when the moveable member is repositioned to enable flow, the flow pathway through the valve seat represents an orifice that introduces turbulence.
In order to reduce turbulence, the example system 100 implements a flow straightener within the flow pathway to each hose connection (and thus to each breathing orifice). For example, the system 100 implements a flow straightener 130 disposed within the fluid pathway between the outlet port (i.e., the common port) of the three-port valve 118 and the left naris hose connection 110. Similarly, the system 100 implements a flow straightener 132 disposed within the fluid pathway between the outlet port of the three-port valve 120 and the right naris hose connection 112. Finally, the system 100 implements a flow straightener 134 disposed within the fluid pathway between the outlet port of the three-port valve 122 and the oral hose connection 114. The flow straighteners 130, 132, and 134 may take any suitable form, such as a plurality of walls or channels within the fluid pathway to make the flow of therapeutic gas closer to laminar flow. Regardless of how the flow straighteners 130, 132, and 134 are implemented, making the therapeutic gas flow more laminar may increase the average velocity in the direction of the patient, may enable the therapeutic gas flow to travel further into the lungs, and may reduce irritation and damage to the mucosal membranes. The specification now turns to example implementations of the system 100.
The system 100 itself may take several forms. In some cases, the system 100 may be an integrated system in which the patient leases, rents, or buys the entire system. For example, when the gas source 102 is a bottle of therapeutic gas, the bottle, pressure regulator 104, accumulator 106, and the remaining valves and sensors may be a single product. In other cases, the gas source 102 may be coupled to an integrated system that comprises the pressure regulator 104, the accumulator 106, and the remaining valves and sensors, as shown by dashed line 136. In yet still further cases, the pressure regulator 104, the accumulator 106, and the orifice plate 108 may be an integrated component, as shown by dashed line 138. The integrated component may then fluidly couple to a delivery system, such as shown by dashed line 140. Thus, the specification contemplates all such variations.
In the event that either of the nares as a group or the mouth become blocked or otherwise unavailable for inspiration, the system 100 provides the bolus to the breathing orifice through which inhalation takes place.
The system 300 couples to a patient (not shown) by way of a variety of hose connections, such as naris hose connections 310 and 312, and an oral hose connection 314. As before, the example system 100 monitors patient breathing and delivers therapeutic gas to a left naris, a right naris, or to the mouth of the patient when open to flow. More particularly, in cases where only one breathing orifice is open to flow, the system 300 delivers to only one breathing orifice. In cases where two or more breathing orifices are open to flow, the example system 300 alternates the delivery location, mutually exclusively.
The system 300 comprise a controller 316, and electrical connections to the controller are shown in dashed lines as before. The example system 300 thus comprises electrically-controlled valves in the form of three-port valve 318, three-port valve 320, and three-port valve 322, such as the Humprey Mini-Mizers discussed above. With respect to the three-port valve 318, the three-port valve 318 may: couple gas from the accumulator 306 and/or pressure regulator 304 to the common port and therefore to the example left naris; and couple a sensor in the example form of a flow sensor 324 to the common port and therefore the example left naris. Likewise, the three-port valve 320, under command of the controller 316, may: couple gas from the accumulator 306 and/or pressure regulator 304 to the common port and therefore the example right naris; and couple a sensor in the example form of a flow sensor 326 to the common port and therefore the example right naris. Further still, three-port valve 322 under command from the controller 316 may: couple gas from the accumulator 306 and/or pressure regulator 304 to the common port and therefore the patient's mouth; and couple a sensor in the example form of a flow sensor 328 to the common port and therefore the mouth.
The example flow sensors 324, 326, and 328 are electrically coupled to the controller 316 such that the controller 116 can read indications of flow sensed by each flow sensor. More particularly, the controller 316 may read values indicative of flow through each flow sensor (e.g., inhalation by the patient) and thus through each respective breathing orifice. In alternative embodiments, the flow sensors 324, 326, and 328 may couple to the common ports of the valves 318, 320, and 322, respectively, if the flow sensors can withstand the pressure of the therapeutic gas during bolus delivery without damage. Regardless of the precise placement, the controller 316 may be able to determine when the patient is inhaling, and an indication of how much of the air drawn by the patient flows through each of the monitored breathing orifices.
The pressure sensors of the system 100 of
Three-port valve 330, in a first valve position, couples the flow sensor 324 to the atmospheric vent ATM, thus enabling gas flow through the flow sensor 324 for measurement purposes. The three-port valve 330, in a second valve position, couples the flow sensor 324 to a blocked port 332. Consider, as an example, that after a bolus has been delivered, the three-port valve 318 may change valve positions, thus fluidly coupling the flow sensor 324 to the common port and the example left naris. If the flow sensor 324 outlet is not blocked, a portion of the therapeutic gas may reverse flow through the flow sensor 324 and out the atmospheric vent. Three-port valve 330 (as well as corresponding three-port valves 334 and 336) may be used to temporarily block reverse flow and loss of therapeutic gas. In some cases, the valves 330, 334, and 336 may remain in a position that blocks flow for about 300 milliseconds after therapeutic gas delivery has stopped by a change of valve position by upstream three-port valves 318, 320, and 322. After the expiration of the period of time of possible reverse flow has ended, one or more of the three-port valves 330, 334, and 336 may change valve positions, thus enabling the flow sensors to sense airflow (e.g., an inhalation). The description with respect to the three-port valves 318 and 330, and flow sensor 324 for the left naris is equally applicable for the corresponding structures for the right naris and the mouth.
Returning to
The example system 500
As before, the example pressure regulator 504 is selected, designed, or constructed to have a set point downstream of about 25 PSIG. Also as before, the pressure regulator 504 has a non-zero response time with respect to drop in the downstream pressure. The embodiments of
In accordance with example embodiments, delivery of a bolus of therapeutic gas to a breathing orifice may again be considered to have a first portion and a second portion. In particular, during a first portion of a delivery of a bolus of therapeutic gas, therapeutic gas is delivered from the accumulator 106 and through bypass tubing 542. Stated another way, when the controller 516 activates a valve in the delivery system 540 to begin to provide a bolus of therapeutic gas to the patient, the controller 316 substantially simultaneously changes the valve position of three-port valve 544 to enable the bypass flow. Thereafter, during a second portion of each inhalation, the example system 100 dispenses therapeutic gas from the accumulator 106 and through the pressure regulator 104. During the second portion, the bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542 may continue, or once the pressure regulator 504 opens to flow the three-port valve 544 may change valve position to halt or cease the bypass flow.
Consider, as an example, delivery to the left naris. During a prior exhalation, the pressure regulator 504 recharges or fills the accumulator 506 with therapeutic gas, and the pressure downstream from the pressure regulator 504 reaches its upper control limit. Thus, during the prior exhalation the pressure regulator 504 fully closes and the bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542 is blocked. When the system 500 senses an inhalation, the controller 516 commands delivery of therapeutic gas to the example left naris hose connection 510 (and thus the left naris). Therapeutic gas starts to flow immediately from the accumulator 506, through the orifice of the orifice plate 508, through the left naris hose connection 110, through a lumen of the nasal cannula, and ultimately to the left naris. Contemporaneously with commanding delivery of therapeutic gas to the left naris (e.g., simultaneously), the controller 516 may initiate the bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542 by commanding the three-port valve 544 to change valve positions. Thus, during the first portion of the inhalation the therapeutic gas is supplied from the accumulator 506 and through the bypass tubing 542. When the pressure downstream of the pressure regulator 504 drops sufficiently and/or after the reaction time of the pressure regulator 504 is met, the pressure regulator 504 opens to enable flow through the pressure regulator 504. Thus, during a second portion of the delivery of the bolus of therapeutic gas is from both the pressure regulator 504 and the accumulator 506.
During an inhalation, the controller 516 may cease flow through the bypass tubing 542 at any suitable time by commanding the three-port valve 544 to change valve positions and thus blocking the bypass flow through the bypass tubing. Determining the length of time bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542 is enabled may take many forms. In one example case, the bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542 may take place for a predetermined amount of time based on the response time of pressure regulator 504 (and based on the size of the orifice limiting the bypass flow). In yet still other cases, the controller 516 may enable the therapeutic gas to flow through the bypass tubing 542 for an amount of time that is variable and based on the prescription titration volume and/or the amount of time therapeutic gas is delivered to the patient. For example, the controller 516 may enable bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542 for an amount of time being a predetermined percentage (e.g., 5%, 10%) of the bolus delivery time to the patient. If the controller 516 plans to deliver, for example, a bolus of 60 mL (e.g., by flowing therapeutic gas for 600 ms), the controller 516 may enable bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542 for 60 ms to help maintain the pressure until pressure regulator 504 opens to flow.
In yet still further cases, the controller 516 may only enable the bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542 when the size of the bolus is above a predetermined volume and/or the amount of time therapeutic gas is to be delivered is above a predetermined time. For example, the controller 516 may refrain from enabling bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542 for smaller bolus sizes (e.g., refrain for bolus sizes of 32 mL or less). The refraining from enabling the bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542 for smaller bolus sizes may be based on an assumption, or based on empirical testing, that the accumulator 506 and pressure regulator 504 can adequately supply the volume. However, the controller 516 may enable bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542 for larger bolus sizes (e.g., enable the bypass flow bolus sizes of greater than 32 mL) based on an assumption, or based on empirical testing, that pressure downstream of the pressure regulator 504 may fall below a predetermined pressure (thus adversely affecting bolus size and velocity) in the absence of the bypass flow.
In yet still further cases, the bypass tubing 542 and related three-port valve 544 and orifice may be implemented to reduce the size of the accumulator 506 without regard to response time of pressure regulator 504. That is, by enabling the bypass flow through the bypass tubing 542, the volume of the accumulator 506 may be smaller than cases that do not implement the bypass tubing 542
The specification now turns to a more detailed discussion of operating any of the example systems 100, 300, and/or 500. Referring to system 100 as representative, when only one breathing orifice is open to flow the example systems provide the bolus of therapeutic gas to the only breathing orifice open to flow. If more than one breathing orifice is open to flow, then the example systems alternate in some fashion between the breathing orifices open to flow. In an ideal situation the example systems would simultaneously detect that breathing orifices are open to flow, and make a decision about delivery location. However, for a variety of reason simultaneous detection may not be possible. For example, the controller 116 may be programmed to cycle through reading values from the various pressure and/or flow sensors, and thus the first breathing orifice found to be open to flow may have been first only from a sampling standpoint. Moreover, anatomical differences between breathing orifices of the patient may cause inhalation to be sensed at a first breathing orifice before a second breathing orifice though both are technically open to flow. Thus, a certain amount of hysteresis may be used in the detection and delivery system.
Consider a situation where the representative system 100 is providing therapeutic gas only to the nares of a patient (i.e., there is no oral sensing or delivery). Further consider that both the patient's nares are blocked. The example system, not sensing either breathing orifice is open to flow, may refrain from providing therapeutic gas to the patient. In actual circumstance an alarm may sound under this assumption, and/or the example system may go to continuous mode in the hope of providing at least some oxygen to the patient. If at any point the example system senses inhalation through the left nariss, then a bolus of therapeutic gas is provided to the left naris during the inhalation. Further consider that having a single naris, here the left naris, open to flow continues for several inhalations and each time the example system provides a bolus to the left naris.
Now consider that in a subsequent inhalation the representative system 100 again senses flow in the left naris and begins bolus delivery, but during the inhalation also senses flow in the right naris (i.e., there is a time delay in sensing the flow in the right naris). The example system stores the information about the right naris, such as setting a dual flag indicating both nares open to flow, and setting a location flag indicating the last delivery was to the left naris. In a subsequent inhalation (e.g., an immediately subsequent inhalation), the example system may first sense flow in the left naris but may refrain from providing a bolus to the left naris (because of one or both of the flags), and then provide the bolus to the right naris as soon as flow is detected in the right naris. The example system would leave the dual flag asserted (as again both nares are open to flow), and toggle the location flag indicating the last delivery was to the right naris. In a next subsequent inhalation (e.g., an immediately subsequent inhalation), the example system may first sense flow in the left naris and deliver to the left naris, but again also eventually sense flow in the right naris. The example system would again leave the dual flag asserted, and toggle the location flag indicating the last delivery was to the left naris. The process continues as long as both nares are open to flow.
Now consider that the left naris becomes clogged or blocked to flow during a delivery to the right naris. That is, during a particular inhalation the bolus is delivered to the right naris, but the example system fails to detect flow in the left naris. In this situation the example system would de-assert the dual flag (as now only one naris is open to flow), and toggle the location flag indicating the last delivery was to the right naris. In a subsequent inhalation where the left naris remains blocked to flow, as soon as the inhalation is detected for the right naris, the bolus of therapeutic gas is delivered to the right naris.
With the benefit of this disclosure, one of ordinary skill in the art extend to a three breathing orifice case that takes into account delays in sensing inhalations. Moreover, overrides would be present in each situation such that if the example system intends to deliver to a particular breathing orifice, but flow fails to materialize in a certain amount of time, then the system defaults back to delivery to a breathing orifice open to flow where flow has been sensed.
The ROM 704 stores instructions executable by the processor 702. In particular, the ROM 704 may comprise a software program or instructions that, in whole or in part, implements the various embodiments discussed herein. The RAM 706 may be the working memory for the processor 702, where data may be temporarily stored and from which instructions may be executed. Processor 702 may couple to other devices within the delivery system by way of A/D converter 710 (e.g., sensors to sense attributes of airflow) and D/A converter 708 (e.g., electrically controlled valves). Thus, the ROM 704, and/or the RAM 706 may be non-transitory computer-readable mediums upon which instructions are stored.
The above discussion is meant to be illustrative of the principles and various embodiments of the present invention. Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 62/904,062 filed Sep. 23, 2019, titled “Method And System Of Sensing Airflow And Delivering Therapeutic Gas To A Patient,” and incorporated by reference herein as if reproduced in full below.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2020/051932 | 9/22/2020 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62904062 | Sep 2019 | US |