The present invention relates generally to the field of online promotions and, more specifically to a method and a system to facilitate an online promotion relating to network-based marketplace.
Sellers have traditionally utilized promotional games to incentivize buyers to perform a commercial activity. For example, a seller may offer a prize or an opportunity to win a prize in response to the buyer purchasing a product or sampling a service or performing some other predetermined activity. With the advent of the Internet, the techniques and practices utilized to conduct promotions in an online environment create a number of challenges.
One challenge is distinguishing a user, located at a client machine, who desires to participate in an online promotion from a user who does not desire to participate in an online promotion. Typically a user is informed of an online promotion with a first web page that promises a prize, game card or some other promotional device in exchange for the user performing a predetermined activity. The user elects to participate in the online promotion by utilizing the first web page. Subsequently, the user performs the desired predetermined activity usually by requesting a second web page that is associated with the activity. If the user has elected to participate, then the online promotion is delivered.
The above described sequence of events presents a challenge to a client machine that operates on the World Wide Web (WWW) because the WWW is intrinsically stateless (i.e., each Web page is processed without any knowledge of previous pages). Thus, the users election, as requested with the first web page, is not immediately available to the second web page that is associated with the predetermined activity.
A method to facilitate an online promotion in a network-based marketplace includes causing a user-provided election to participate in the online promotion to be recorded on a client machine associated with a user; and responsive to a trigger event, requesting a determination of the user-provided election as recorded on the client machine associated with the user, the determination to cause a presentation of the online promotion if so elected.
A method to facilitate an online promotion in a network-based marketplace, the method includes, at a client machine associated with a user, recording a user-provided election to participate in the online promotion on the client machine; responsive to a trigger event, reading the user-provided election; and if the user-provided election indicates participation in the online promotion, presenting the online promotion to the user.
The invention extends to a machine-readable medium for storing instructions that, when executed by the machine, cause the, machine to execute any one of the methods described herein. Other features of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed description which follows.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:
Methods and systems to facilitate online promotions in a network-based marketplace are described. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details.
In general, embodiments described below feature a network-based marketplace that allows users of the marketplace to transact products or services identified in listings, that are offered for sale by sellers. In addition, various embodiments of the network-based marketplace additionally allow users to post and view listings that may be transacted outside the electronic marketplace.
In one embodiment, the present invention is implemented as a network-based service that may be accessed through, for example, the Internet using a client application program such as a web browser. In another embodiment, the present invention is implemented as a network-based service that provides an application program interface that may be accessed through, for example, the Internet using a client application program such as a seller software tool.
The client application program 22 may be embodied as a browser (for example, a Microsoft Internet Explorer browser developed by Microsoft™ Corporation of Richmond, Wash. or Navigator™ browser developed by Netscape of Mountain View, Calif.). The client application program 22 executes under an operating system (for example, Microsoft™ Windows developed by Microsoft™ Corporation or MacOS X developed by Apple Computers of Cupertino, Calif.). The client application program 22 may also be embodied as seller software enabling a seller to configure listings that encourage buyers to participate in various network-based marketplace activities. The client application program 22 may read the web page 24, which may include information that is written to the storage component 26. The client application program 22 may store information on the storage component 26 in the form of a cookie 28. Further, the web page 24 may include a one-by-one invisible pixel 30 in the form of HTML code that does not visibly appear on the web page 24 and directs the browser to perform various operations.
Referring now to
The database 66 includes a user table 68, which contains a record for each user of the network-based marketplace machine 12. A user may operate as a seller, buyer, or both, within the network-based marketplace machine 12. The database 66 also includes a listings table 70 that may be linked to the user table 68 and a listing association table 72. A record in the user table 68 is associated with a user and may be linked to multiple items that are being, or have been, transacted via the network-based marketplace machine 12.
The database 66 also includes a note table 74 populated with note records that may be linked to one or more listing records within the listing table 70 and/or to one or more user records within the user table 68. Each note record within the note table 74 may include, inter alia, a comment, description, history or other information pertaining to an item or service being auction via the network-based marketplace machine 12, or to a user of the network-based marketplace machine 12.
A number of other tables are also shown to be linked to the user table 68, namely a user past aliases table 76, a feedback table 78, a bids table 80, an accounts table 82, and an account balances table 84.
A master categories table 86 stores records for listing categories presented across multiple views (or presentations) of listing categories via regional or community sites presented by the network-based marketplace machine 12. A site categories table 88 stores records indicating which listing categories are to be presented for respective regional or community sites, (e.g., a country, region or city specific site) presented by the network-based marketplace machine 12.
The database 66 is also shown to include an activity table 89 and an award table 90 to enable an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The activity table 89 and the award table 90 are utilized to associate a user activity to an elapsed time and an award.
At box 102, the election module 59 on the listing server 38 in the network-based marketplace machine 12 generates and communicates an opt-in web page 103 to the user at the client machine 10. In one embodiment, the opt-in web page 103 is communicated to the user in response to the user selecting a promotion screen element that may appear on various pages presented by the network-based marketplace or other third-party services. In other embodiments, the opt-in web page 103 is communicated in response to a predetermined user activity.
At box 104, the communications component 56 at the client machine 10 receives and displays the opt-in web page 103 to the user.
Returning to
At box 108, the logic component 54 on the client machine 10 writes the contents (e.g., a yes/no indication) of the opt-in box 107 into a cookie 28 located on the storage component 26 on the client machine 10 and ends.
At box 110, the listing module 60 communicates a bid confirmation web page 117, an example of which is illustrated in
Returning to
At box 116, the communications component 56 reads the one-by-one invisible pixel 30 which directs the communications component 56 to generate a non-visible pop-up window (e.g., to display the online promotion), to request the online promotion from the third party service machine 14 and to communicate the bid confirmation variables 118 to the third party service machine 14 including the bid confirmation referencing URL 120, the bid confirmation unique identifier 121, the bid confirmation time and date stamp 122, and the bid confirmation listing number 124. In one embodiment, the client machine 10 communicates the bid confirmation variables 118 as URL parameters to the third party service machine 14. In other embodiments the client machine 10 may communicate the bid confirmation variables 118 in a network message.
At decision box 126, the third party service machine 14 utilizes the bid confirmation time and date stamp 122 and the bid confirmation unique identifier 121 to identify if the request for a promotional game will cause the user at the client machine 10 to exceed the maximum number of promotional games in a predetermined period of time. If the user has exceeded the maximum number of promotional games, then the promotional game card 125 is not sent to the user and processing continues at box 130. Otherwise, at box 128, the third party service machine 14 records an additional promotional game played by the user in a database at the third party service machine 14 and communicates the promotion game card 125 to the client machine 10.
At box 129, the communication component 56, at the client machine 10, receives and populates the pop-up screen with the promotion game card 125 thereby enabling the user to view and participate in the online promotion.
At box 130, the third party service machine 14 communicates the bid confirmation variables 118 and promotional information 127 regarding the promotion (e.g., number of games played by the user, number of prizes won by the user, etc.) to the network-based marketplace machine 12.
At box 131, the detection module 62, at the network-based marketplace machine 12, receives the bid confirmation variables 118 and promotional information 127. The detection module 62 utilizes the bid confirmation variables 118 and the promotional information 127 to search the database 66 in the network-based marketplace machine 12 and obtain additional information for the purpose of generating management, demographic, and marketing reports.
An alternate embodiment of the above method may include testing the maximum number of promotional games at the client machine 10 or at the network-based marketplace machine 12. Further, another embodiment of the present invention may present the user at the client machine 10 an opt-out election instead of the opt-in election. In this embodiment, user action is required to not participate in the promotion. Otherwise, the user is automatically prompted to complete a registration form and presented with an online promotion game.
At box 136, the listing module 60, at the network-based marketplace machine 12, communicates an exemplary user-interface in the form of a bid confirmation web page 117 to the user at the client machine 10. Further, the bid confirmation web page 117 includes JavaScript bid confirmation variables 118, as previously described. In the present example the bid confirmation variables 118 include a reference time that chronicles the moment of bid confirmation in the form of the bid confirmation time and date stamp 122 that is utilized by the network-based marketplace machine 12 to compute an elapsed time.
At box 138, the client machine 10 receives and displays the bid confirmation web page 117 to the user on the client machine 10.
Returning to
At decision box 142, the detection module 62 determines if bid confirmation is an activity that should be recorded. The detection module 62 receives the bid confirmation variables 118 and utilizes the bid confirmation referencing URL 120 to search an activity table 89 to a match an activity URL 145 as illustrated in
At box 144, the detection module 62 records the activity in one or more entries in the user table 68 as illustrated in
Returning to
It will be appreciated that for other activity the detection module 62 may update the activity history table 148 for a single user. For example, a seller creating a listing for an item or service would cause the detection module 62 to update activity information 150 only for the seller and not a buyer (e.g., no buyer yet).
At decision box 146, the award module 64 determines if an award should be awarded based on activity information 150 in the respective activity history table 148 for which it was invoked. In the present example the bid confirmation is the most recent activity entered into the activity history table 148. Thus the logic for bid confirmation is utilized to analyze the other entries in the table (e.g., activity that has chronologically preceded the bid confirmation). In the present example, no other activity has preceded the bid confirmation, therefore the award module 64 ends. Processing within decision box 158 is discussed in greater detail upon the detection of a second activity.
At box 167, the third party service machine 14 communicates a payment confirmation web page 149, as illustrated in
Returning to
Returning to
At box 140, the payment confirmation activity is recorded and a determination is made regarding whether to award the user.
Returning to
At box 144, the detection module 62 records the payment confirmation activity in the buyer and seller activity history tables 148 in the user table 68. In the present embodiment the activity information 150 in the activity history table 148 and is updated with the payment confirmation variables 173 included in the notice of payment message 171 and the associated activity index 151; however, other embodiments may include additional or different information. Finally, the detection module 62 invokes the award module 64 for the activity history table 148 associated with the buyer and the activity history table 148 associated with the seller.
At decision box 146 the award module 64 determines if an award should be awarded. In the present example the payment confirmation activity is the most recent entry in the activity history table 148. Thus the logic for the payment confirmation is utilized to analyze the other activity entries in the table (e.g., activity that has preceded the payment confirmation) to determine if an award should be awarded. It will be appreciated that each activity has unique logic to determine if an award should be awarded. In the present example, the logic executed upon detecting payment confirmation causes the award module 64 to search the activity history table 148 associated with the buyer for corresponding bid confirmation activity (e.g., the same listing number, the same unique identifier, etc.). Upon detecting corresponding bid confirmation activity the award module 64 computes an exemplary elapsed time by subtracting the bid confirmation time and date stamp 122 associated with the bid confirmation activity from the pay time and date stamp 183 associated with the payment confirmation activity. For example, the award module 64 may compute elapsed time in seconds, minutes, hours, days or any standard unit of time. Next, the award module 64 determines the award based on the elapsed time by utilizing an award table 90.
It will be appreciated that a set of elapsed times 154 and award values 156 may be configured for any combination of network-based marketplace activities including a first activity and second activity with the same activity index 151.
Returning to
At box 158, the award module 64 awards the user for promptly performing an activity. In the present example, the award value 156 corresponds to a quantity of online promotions in the form of virtual scratch card games. In other embodiments the award value may correspond to a discount percentage or a number of free listings or a percentage reduction in fees or any other benefit that may provide an incentive to the user.
The present embodiment illustrates a buyer that performs a first activity (e.g., a bid confirmation) and is awarded for promptly performing a second activity (e.g., submitting payment using a third party service). In another embodiment, the buyer may be awarded for using a third party service for payment; however, receiving an award could additionally require the buyer to utilize a bank account as a source of payment rather than a credit card account.
Further, it will be appreciated that first and second activities might be any two activities performed by any user in the network-based marketplace. For example, a buyer that purchases a first item may be awarded for promptly purchasing a second item (e.g., from the same or different seller; from the same or different category; utilizing the same or different purchasing method including auctions, purchasing, etc.). In another example, a seller might list a first item and be awarded for promptly listing a second item (in the same or different category; for approximately the same or different prices, etc.). Indeed any first user activity that is performed in a network-based marketplace might be rewarded for timely performing any second user activity that is performed in a network-based marketplace including a second activity that is the same type as the first.
It will also be appreciated that in other embodiments both the buyer and the seller may be awarded. Further, other embodiments may award the buyer and the seller for an activity performed by the seller and an activity performed by the buyer. Thus, the buyer and the seller are awarded for cooperating to complete the first activity and the second activity in a timely manner.
The seller is further informed, via a text 332, of the activity that must be performed by the buyer to qualify the buyer to receive an award in the form of promotion game cards 125. The buyer may receive an award by paying for the item or service with the “XYZ Payment Service” as described by a text 332. It will be appreciated that other activities related to a network-based marketplace may also result in awarding the buyer the promotion game cards 125 (e.g., submitting the winning bid, paying for the item or service by identifying a bank account as a source of payment, etc.).
Returning to
The listing module 60 at the network-based marketplace machine 12 receives the listing description form 336 and creates a listing description web page 339 that is stored in the listing information field 184 in the listings table 70.
The detection module 62 updates the listing table 70.
At box 340, the detection module 62 detects that a buyer has paid for an item or service with the “Easy to use XYZ Payment Service.” Further, by utilizing the payment service the buyer has become qualified to win promotion game cards 125. The detection module 62 detects the payment and the qualification to receive promotion game cards 125 by receiving a message from a third party service machine 14 (e.g., a promotional marketeer) that provides online gaming services to the network-based marketplace machine 12. A promotional marketeer interfaces with the network-based marketplace machine 12 to monitor, process and award user activity on the network-based marketplace machine 12. For example, online gaming services may be provided by Maritz® of Fenton, Mo. or Milepoint® of Minneapolis, Minn. or Fairmarket of Woburn, Mass. In an alternate embodiment, the online gaming services may be provided by the network-based marketplace machine 12.
The detection module 62 extracts the listing index 181 included in the message from the third party service machine 14 to access the listing table 70 and extract the user identification index 182 thereby identifying the seller. Finally, the detection module 62 ends after invoking the award module 64 with the user identification index 182.
At box 342, the award module 64 awards the seller for entering the listing on the network-based marketplace machine 12. The award module 64 communicates a message to the third party service machine 14 (e.g. promotional marketeer) that includes the user identification index 182 and triggers the third party service machine 14 to award promotion game cards 125 to the seller identified by the user identification index 182. Other embodiments may award the seller with discounted fees, a free listing, a prize or any other benefit that might provide an incentive to the seller.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention the buyer may perform the second activity by winning proceeds from an online promotion. For example, a promotional marketer may communicate to the network-based marketplace machine 12 that the buyer has been awarded proceeds by scratching off the faces of Manny, Moe and Jack on a virtual scratch card (e.g., promotion game card 125). In this embodiment the associated seller may also receive an award. The seller may receive a percentage of the buyer's proceeds or receive an award in addition to the buyer's proceeds.
In yet another embodiment, the seller may be awarded when the buyer uses a third party service to pay for the service or item and uses a bank account as a source of payment rather than a credit card account.
At box 168, the seller receives a listing description form 170 that is utilized by the seller to enter a description of an item or service that is listed on the network-based marketplace machine 12.
At box 178, the listing module 60 at the network-based marketplace machine 12 receives the listing description form 170 and creates a listing description web page 186 that is stored in the listing information field 184 in the listings table 70. In the present embodiment, the listing module 60 inserts a text string into the listing description web page 186 upon detecting an affirmative election recorded by user at the client machine 10 in the election box 176.
Returning to
At box 179, the detection module 62 updates the listing table 70. Each listing entry includes a prompt buyer flag 180 that is utilized to record the seller's election as recorded by the election box 176. The detection module 62 ends after copying the election as recorded in the election box 176 into the prompt buyer flag 180 and updating the user identification index 182.
At box 192, the buyer performs an exemplary second activity by paying for the item or service with a third party service. The buyer may enter the third party service by selecting a third party service button which appears on one of the web pages provided by the network based marketplace machine 12. A buyer that has not previously joined the third party service may do so by utilizing a graphical representation and reference describing how to join the service. Once the buyer has joined the service, the buyer may pay for the item or service by using the third party service machine 14.
The client machine 10 communicates an authorization of payment 194 that includes the listing index 181 and other information, to the third party service machine 14. It will be appreciated that the buyer may acquire the item service from the seller in different ways. In one embodiment the buyer may submit a winning bid in an auction. In another embodiment the buyer may purchase the item from the seller.
At box 196, the third party service machine 14 receives and processes the authorization of payment 194 by debiting the account of the buyer and crediting the account of the seller.
At box 198, the third party service machine 14 communicates a notification of authorized payment 199 to the network-based marketplace machine 12. The notification of authorized payment 199 includes the listing index 181 in addition to other information.
At box 200, the detection module 62 detects the notification of authorization of payment 199 associated with the listing index 181.
At box 202, the detection module 62 associates the notification of authorization of payment 199 with a seller by utilizing the listing index 181 to extract the user identification index 182 of the seller from the listing table 70. Further, the detection module 62 invokes the award module 64 upon identifying an asserted prompt buyer flag 180 in the listing table 70.
At box 204, the award module 64 awards the seller for encouraging the buyer to pay for the item or service with the XYZ Payment Service. In the present example, the seller is awarded the opportunity to win a prize by receiving a promotion game card 125 in the form of a virtual scratch card game as illustrated in
In another embodiment the award module 64 may count the number of successful referrals to the third party service made by the seller and award the seller proportionately. For example, the seller may receive three promotion game cards 125 in response to a third buyer using the XYZ Payment Service where each buyer (e.g., first, second and third) has been encouraged by the seller to use the XYZ Payment Service and has used the XYZ Payment Service. Still other embodiments may reward the seller in forms other than the promotion game card 125 (e.g., cash back, fee discounts, free listings, or any benefit which may provide an incentive to the seller).
Other embodiments may award the seller from the network-based marketplace machine 12 (e.g., award the seller with discounted fees, a free listing, or any other benefit that might provide an incentive to the seller).
At box 302, the seller inputs an item or service listing description including an election to encourage the potential buyer to perform an activity via the listing description form 170. As previously described the listing description form 170 includes the window 172 to enter a listing description, the message 174 that informs the seller of an opportunity to receive a game card for encouraging a potential buyer to use the XYZ third party payment service and the election box 176 that enables the seller to elect to encourage the buyer to use the XYZ third party payment service.
The client application program 22 receives the listing description form 170 via a communications component 56 and communicates the listing description form 170 to a logic component 54.
At box 304, the logic component 54 of the client application program 22 updates a batch file in a storage component 26 on the client machine 10 with the contents of the listing description form 170 including the contents of the window 172 and the election box 176.
At decision box 305, the logic component 54 of the client application program 22 ends upon determining that the seller does not wish to complete another listing description form 170. Otherwise the logic component 54 branches to box 302.
At box 306, the seller transmits the batch file via the client application program 22. The communications component 56 receives the request to transmit the batch file from the seller and invokes the logic component 54. The logic component 54 reads the batch file from the storage component 26 and communicates the batch file to an application program interface module (APIM) 58 at the network-based marketplace machine 12.
At box 308, on the server side, the APIM 58 receives the batch file, extracts the listing information from the batch file and invokes the listing module 60 for each listing description form 170.
At box 310, the listing module 60 creates a listing description web page 186 for each listing description form 170 and stores the newly created listing description web page 186 in the listings table 70. In the present embodiment, the listing module 60 inserts a text string into the listing description page upon detecting an affirmative election recorded by user at the client machine 10 in the election box 176.
At box 312, the detection module 62 copies the election as recorded in the election box 176 into the prompt buyer field 174 of the listing table 70 and ends.
The exemplary computer system 400 includes a processor 402 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU) a graphics processing unit (GPU) or both), a main memory 404 and a static memory 406, which communicate with each other via a bus 408. The computer system 400 may further include a video display unit 410 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 400 also includes an alpha-numeric input device 412 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 414 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 416, a signal generation device 418 (e.g., a speaker) and a network interface device 420.
The disk drive unit 416 includes a machine-readable medium 422 on which is stored one or more sets of instructions (e.g., software 424) embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The software 424 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 404 and/or within the processor 402 during execution thereof by the computer system 400, the main memory 404 and the processor 402 also constituting machine-readable media.
The software 424 may further be transmitted or received over a network 426 via the network interface device 420.
While the machine-readable medium 492 is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present invention. The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to included, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic media, and carrier wave signals.
Thus, methods and systems to facilitate online promotions in a network-bases marketplace have been described. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573747 | Adams et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3581072 | Nymeyer | May 1971 | A |
4412287 | Braddock, III | Oct 1983 | A |
4674044 | Kalmus et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4677552 | Sibley, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4823265 | Nelson | Apr 1989 | A |
4833607 | Dethloff | May 1989 | A |
4864516 | Gaither et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4903201 | Wagner | Feb 1990 | A |
4949256 | Humble | Aug 1990 | A |
4982346 | Girouard et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5056019 | Schultz et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5063507 | Lindsey et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5076433 | Howes | Dec 1991 | A |
5077665 | Silverman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5101353 | Lupien | Mar 1992 | A |
5128752 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1992 | A |
5136501 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5168446 | Wiseman | Dec 1992 | A |
5202826 | McCarthy | Apr 1993 | A |
5205200 | Wright | Apr 1993 | A |
5243515 | Lee | Sep 1993 | A |
5258908 | Hartheimer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5280422 | Moe et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5287268 | McCarthy | Feb 1994 | A |
5297031 | Gutterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297032 | Trojan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305200 | Hartheimer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325297 | Bird et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329589 | Fraser et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5375055 | Togher et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380991 | Valencia et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5394324 | Clearwater | Feb 1995 | A |
5401946 | Weinblatt | Mar 1995 | A |
5426281 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5485510 | Colbert | Jan 1996 | A |
5537314 | Kanter | Jul 1996 | A |
5553145 | Micali | Sep 1996 | A |
5557728 | Garrett et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5598557 | Doner et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5638457 | Deaton et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640569 | Miller et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5657389 | Houvener | Aug 1997 | A |
5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694546 | Reisman | Dec 1997 | A |
5706457 | Dwyer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710886 | Christensen et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710889 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715402 | Popolo | Feb 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5727165 | Ordish et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734838 | Robinson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740252 | Minor et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5757917 | Rose et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761648 | Golden et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771291 | Newton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771380 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774870 | Storey | Jun 1998 | A |
5778178 | Arunachalam | Jul 1998 | A |
5790790 | Smith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794210 | Goldhaber et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794219 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5799285 | Klingman | Aug 1998 | A |
5803500 | Mossberg | Sep 1998 | A |
5806044 | Powell | Sep 1998 | A |
5818914 | Fujisaki | Oct 1998 | A |
5822737 | Ogram | Oct 1998 | A |
5826241 | Stein et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
5845266 | Lupien et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848396 | Gerace | Dec 1998 | A |
5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
5855007 | Jovicic et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855008 | Goldhaber et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5872848 | Romney et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873069 | Reuhl et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5883620 | Hobbs et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884056 | Steele | Mar 1999 | A |
5884277 | Khosla | Mar 1999 | A |
5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897621 | Boesch et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897622 | Blinn et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903874 | Leonard et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905975 | Ausubel | May 1999 | A |
5922074 | Richard et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926794 | Fethe | Jul 1999 | A |
5945652 | Ohki et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945653 | Walker et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953423 | Rosen | Sep 1999 | A |
5956694 | Powell | Sep 1999 | A |
5960409 | Wexler | Sep 1999 | A |
5963917 | Ogram | Oct 1999 | A |
5970469 | Scroggie et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983196 | Wendkos | Nov 1999 | A |
5987500 | Arunachalam | Nov 1999 | A |
5991739 | Cupps et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009412 | Storey | Dec 1999 | A |
6014634 | Scroggie et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014635 | Harris et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6029015 | Ishiguro | Feb 2000 | A |
6029141 | Bezos et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029150 | Kravitz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035280 | Christensen | Mar 2000 | A |
6035288 | Solomon | Mar 2000 | A |
6035402 | Vaeth et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039244 | Finsterwald | Mar 2000 | A |
6044363 | Masakatsu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047264 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047274 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052670 | Johnson | Apr 2000 | A |
6055518 | Franklin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058417 | Hess et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061448 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073117 | Oyanagi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085176 | Woolston | Jul 2000 | A |
6101485 | Fortenberry et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105001 | Masi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105008 | Davis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119137 | Smith et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138106 | Walker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6173267 | Cairns | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178408 | Copple et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192407 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199079 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202051 | Woolston | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212556 | Arunachalam | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237145 | Narasimhan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243691 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246996 | Stein et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266651 | Woolston | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266652 | Godin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278980 | Wendkos | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6321208 | Barnett et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321210 | O'Brien et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330543 | Kepecs | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332126 | Peirce et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336009 | Suzumi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336098 | Fortenberry et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336099 | Barnett et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6401077 | Godden et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6450407 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6490602 | Kraemer | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505168 | Rothman et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6556975 | Wittsche | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571216 | Garg et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578012 | Storey | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594640 | Postrel | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6628307 | Fair | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643624 | Philippe et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6839683 | Walker et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6842739 | Postrel | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6865547 | Brake, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6895386 | Bachman et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7162436 | Eckel, Jr. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7318049 | Iannacci | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20010007099 | Rau et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010009005 | Godin et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010023407 | Liyanearachchi et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010027436 | Tenembaum | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032164 | Kim | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047308 | Kaminsky | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049628 | Icho | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010049634 | Stewart | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010049647 | Sheehan et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020013774 | Morimoto | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020038282 | Montgomery | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040344 | Preiser et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046157 | Solomon | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049664 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020069134 | Solomon | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069184 | Tilly et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091580 | Wang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111889 | Buxton et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120548 | Etkin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120554 | Vega | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138649 | Cartmell et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143612 | Barik et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143614 | Maclean et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147655 | Say | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174050 | Eynard et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030004809 | Palcic et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014350 | Duell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050861 | Martin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030083943 | Adams et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105705 | Eyre | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030163575 | Perkins et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030233278 | Marshall | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040204990 | Lee et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204991 | Monahan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215467 | Coffman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-9809447 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO-0129750 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0137171 | May 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“@wards online”, Canadian Airlines, http://web.archive.org/web/19970704234541/www.cdnair.ca/cpi.html, Copyright (c) 1994-1997—Canadian Airlines International Ltd., 1. |
“AA/US Alliance Question”, g=mileage+combine+redeem&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF- 8&oe=UTF-8&selm=6s1oa8%24v66%241%40nnrp1.dejanews.com&rnum=9, Feb. 18, 2004, 1page. |
“American Express Membership Rewards: A Good Deal or Not?”, q=combine+points+programs&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=crazyone-2509972357090001%40async83.city-net.com&rnum=4, Feb. 18, 2004, 2 pages. |
“Aviation Competition: Effects on Consumers from Domestic Airline Alliances Vary”, q=mileage+combine+redeem&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=GAORPTrc99037.txtp2%40us.govnews.org&rnum=6, GAO report about Northwest-Continental alliance notes: ?Passengers who belong to both American's and US Airways' frequent flyer programs will be able to combine miles from both airlines to redeem an award for travel on either airline.?,21. |
“Biz-to-Biz Buzz May 24, 2000. (News Briefs)”, Newsbytes PM, (May 24, 2000),N/A. |
“Business Roundup. (News Briefs)”, InternetWeek, (Apr. 5, 1999),p. 7. |
“Combinable Miles Are the Stuff of Frequent Flyers' Dreams”, FrequentFlier.com—helpinq frequent flyers earn more miles and travel awards throuqh fre . . . , May 25, 1998, http://frequentflier.com/ff052498.htm, Feb. 10, 2004, 4. |
“Continental Airlines OnePass—Interactive Reward Charts”, file://\\Bstz-tkgukobdl5\Clients—A—M\EBAY\P107\Prior%20Art\Rewards4.html, pp. 1-8. |
“Delta . . . a long relationship ends”, q=mileage+combine+redeem&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=7adhof%24me8%241%40news-1.news.gte.net&rnum=5, Someone saying that starting Jan. 1, 1999 you could combine AA and USAir miles to redeem on either,1. |
“Exchange of Ideas: Why the street is in love with Purchasepro.com's congeries of revenue models . . . ”, Red Herring, vol. 76,(Mar. 1, 2000),2 pgs. |
“Family of Web rental applications unveiled”, KM World, vol. 9, No. 2,(Mar. 1, 2000),1 page. |
“Government agencies can procure materials. (BidTheWorld.com)”, Link-Up, Vo. 17, No. 1,(Jan. 1, 2000),p. 19. |
“Keeping You Informed”, Canadian membership guide, pp. 6-7, www.cdnair.ca, pp. 6-7. |
“Last minute gift ideas and stocking stuffers from AT&T”, http://www.att.com/news/1294/941221.csa.html AT&T News Release, Dec. 21, 1994,, ?AT&T True Rewards ? Points can be redeemed for frequent flyer miles on Delta, United and USAir, AT&T Long-Distance Certificates and selected Walt Disney company products and services.?,2 pgs. |
“OnePass Online Auction”, Continential Airlines, file://\\Bstz-tkgukobd15\15CLIENTS—A—M\EBAY\P107\Prior%20Art\Copy%20of%20OnePass%20Online% . . . , 1 pg. |
“Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 38, No. 1., (Jan. 1995),pp. 83-84. |
“Requesting a Reward”, Continental Airlines OnePass—Requestinq a Reward, file://\\Bstz-tkgukobd15\CLIENTS—A—M\EBAY\P107\Prior%20Art\Rewards2—files\onepass—fr—main—files\r . . . , Jul. 28, 2004, Copyright 2001 Continental Airlines,2 pgs. |
“Service helps hospitals shop online. (Company Business and Marketing)”, Link-Up, May/Jun. 2000, vol. 17, No. 3, Supplied by the British Library—“The world's knowledge” www.bl.uk,(May 1, 2000),p. 14. |
“Web beacon”, http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/W/Web—beacon.html, Webopedia.com, Last modified: Aug. 21, 2003.Copyright 2003 Jupitermedia Corporation.,(Jan. 22, 2002),3 pgs. |
“Welcome to ShopOnePass”, Continental Airlines ShopOnePass, file://\\Bstz-thgukobd15\Clients—A—M\EBAY\P107\Prior%20Art\Continental%20Airlines%, Copyright (c) 2002 Continental Airlines, Inc., 1. |
“Welcome to the Sloan Career Development Office Interview Bidding and Scheduling System”, CDO Interview Bidding & Scheduling—Login, file://\\Bstz-tkgukobd15\Clients—A—M\EBAY\P107\Prior%20Art\CDO%20Interview%20Bi . . . , 3 pgs. |
Asbrand, Deborah , “Taking Stock in Trading Exchanges (Industry Trend on Event)”, Electronic Business, http://www.reed-electronics.com/eb-mag/index.asp?layout=articlePrint&articleID=CA42124, Apr. 15, 2004,(Apr. 1, 2000),2 pgs. |
Chan, H.C.B. , “Design and implementation of a mobile agent-based auction”, IEEE Pac RIM Conf Commun Comp Proc, vol. II,(2001),pp. 740-743. |
Chen, Jian , et al., “Bidder's strategy under group-buying auction on the Internet”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, A (Systems and Humans), vol. 32, No. 6,(Nov. 2002),pp. 680-690. |
Creed, Adam , “Haggling Online in the Philippines. (Magtawaran Auction) (Company Business and Marketing) (Brief Article)”, Newsbytes, (May 1, 2000),2 pgs. |
Dalton, Gary , “Going, Going, Gone!: E-commerce is leading to an anything goes . . . ”, Information Week, vol. 755,(Oct. 4, 1999),44 pages. |
Davidow, Emily , “The dynamics of pricing/ Annotated Title: There are many forms of dynamic pricing marketplaces, bid-ask, and auctions; electronic commerce and technology has affected the art of pricing”, E-Commerce Business, Journal,(Feb. 2000),p. 42. |
Edwards, Morris , “New B2B players spreads benefits of e-commerce”, Communications News, vol. 38, No. 1, (Jan. 1, 2001),p. 98. |
Edwards, Mark J., “Your Web Browser is Bugged”, www.ntsecurity.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=9543, www.ntsecurity.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=9543,(Jul. 13, 2000),3 pages. |
Fisher, Dennis , “More goods on the block: Waybid, Bid.com open a wider range to buyers”, eWeek, vol. 17, No. 55,(Dec. 18, 2000),39 pages. |
Franse, Karen , “Distribution Briefs”, VARbusiness, Mar. 11, 2002, http://www.varbusiness.com/Components/printArticle.asp?ArticleID=33901, Apr. 7, 2004, (Mar. 18, 2002),2. |
Furger, Roberta , “Working the Web Bazaar”, PC World.com—Working the Web Bazaar, PC World magazine, May 2000, http://www.pcworld.com/resource/printable/article/0,aid,15823,00.asp, Apr. 7, 2004, vol. 18, No. 5,(May 1, 2001),10.. |
Furger, Roberta , “Working the Web Browser”, PC World, vol. 18, No. 5,(May 1, 2000),135 pages. |
Goldsborough, Reid , “Internet Auctions Examined”, Link-Up, p. 24, vol.17, No. 6, reidgold@netaxs.com,(Nov./Dec. 2000),1 pg. |
Goldstein, D.E. , “Medical E-procurement-navigating in a B2B market”, Health Management Technology, vol. 21, No. 8,(Aug. 2000),pp. 30-36. |
Greengard, Samuel , “What traffic will bear: Companies are using new strategies”, Business Finance, vol. 7, No. 3,(Mar. 1, 2001),48 pages. |
Gupta, Pankaj , “Most Flexible FF”, http://groups.google.com/groups?q=combine+points+programs&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=555t5k%24r1j%40hpax.cup.hp.com&rnum=8,%202/20/2004, Google Search: combine points programs,2 pgs. |
Jaroneczyk, Jennifer , “Sold on an old idea. (Internet/Web/Online Service Information)”, Internet World, Vo. 7, No. 4,(Feb. 15, 2001),p. 22. |
Jaroneczyk, Jennifer , “Sold on an old idea: Though dynamic pricing has been around for . . . ”, Internet World, (Feb. 15, 2001),22 pages. |
Jaroneczyk, Jennifer , “Sold on an Old Idea: Though dynamic pricing has been around . . . ”, Internet World Feb. 15, 2001 ,22 pages. |
Kalin, Sari , “How Low can you go? If your smart, you'll decide your online . . . ”, Darwin Magazine, Apr. 2001, http://www.darwinmag.com/read/040101/low.html, May 3, 2004, vol. 1, No. 7,(Apr. 1, 2001),5. |
Kumar, Manoj , et al., “Sales Promotions on the Internet”, IBM Research.Division, T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, mkumar, anand, anant, rakesh@watson.ibm.com, 11. |
Lindsay, Jeff , et al., “The Historic Use of Computerized Tools for Marketing and Market Research: A Brief Survey”, Electronic Tools for Market Research: A Historical Survey, www.jefflindsay.com/market-research.shtml, Kimberly-Clark Corporation, 2100 Winchester Road, Neenah, WI 54956, Updated Dec. 27, 2001, 20. |
McKendrick, Joseph , “eMarket Shakeout: Old Economy Players Step Up”, Electronic Commerce World, vol. 10, No. 11,(Nov. 1, 2000),34 pages. |
Merlino, Laurel , “auction anxiety . . . ”, Upside, (Oct. 1, 2000),246 pages. |
Mitchell, Lori , “BayBuilder delivers easy, profitable reverse auctions”, InfoWorld, vol. 22, No. 22,(Jun. 5, 2000),52 pages. |
Mollison, Caitlin , “America West airlines opts for reverse auctions: the airline selected MaterialNet;s software to control spending with key suppliers and cut costs. ( A case study)”, Internet World, vol. 8, No. 4,(Dec. 15, 1999),p. 42. |
Mollman, Steve , “Name your price: Are you ready to bicker over the cost of a sandwich? In the new economy, you won't pay retail for anything. (Industry or Trend Event)”, PC/Computing, (Jan. 1, 2000),p. 56. |
Mollman, Steve , “Sold! Never Pay Retail Again. Online auctions are changing the . . . ”, PC/Computing, vol. 11, No. 1,(Feb. 1, 2000),130 pages. |
Morgan, Lisa , “Pick your Lot: Build consumer-oriented auctions with AuctionBuilder”, InternetWeek.com, vol. 829, 44pgs.,(Sep. 18, 2000),4 pgs. |
Ohlson, Kathleen , “Looking behind, beyond B2B marketplace woes”, Network WorldFusion, http://www.nwfusion.com/cgi-bin/mailto/x.cgi, vol. 18, No.22,(Jun. 11, 2001),4 pgs. |
Patel, Jeetu , et al., “New Platform Options Fuel E-Commerce”, Information Week, http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printHTMLArticle.jhtml?article=/779/precomme . . . , vol. 779,(Mar. 27, 2000),4 pgs. |
Piccinelli, G , et al., “e-service composition: supporting dynamic definition of process-oriented negotiation parameters”, 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert System Applications 2001, p. 727, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/dexa/2001/1230/00/12300727abs.htm, Conference Paper, Munich, Germany,(Sep. 3, 2001),1 pg. |
Queree, Anne , “Bid it out—Annotated Title: Purchasers will be able to gain control with “dynamics due to the growth of online auctions””, Global Finance, vol. 14, No. 1, British Library, www.bl.uk,(Jan. 2000),pp. 36-37. |
Seminerio, Maria , “When you Gotta Take Stock”, eWeek Enterprise News & Reviews, http://\\eweek.com/print—article/0,1761,a=13253,00.asp, vol. 17, No. 55, Copyright 2004 Ziff Davis Media, Inc.,(Dec. 11, 2000),2 pgs. |
Strassmann, Paul A., “The Impact of B2B”, Computerworld, http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2000/0,4814,51535,00.html, Vo. 34, No. 44,(Oct. 2, 2000),3 pgs. |
Turek, Norbert , “Online Portals Offer Bandwidth and Voice Services Annotated Title-Small and midsize firms are turning to online access to serivces that they might have problems . . . ”, Information Week.com, http://www.informationweek.com/shared/printHTMLArticle.jhtml?article=/784/prb.andwid . . . , (May 1, 2000),4 pgs. |
Weiss, Scott , “Pam Am FF Program”, http://groups.goole.com/groups?q=mileage+combine+redeem&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=54303h%247r2%40news.bu.edu&rnum=1, 3 pgs. |
Wilson, Tim , “B2B Sellers Fight Back on Pricing”, InternetWeek.com, http://www.internetweek.com/lead/lead121200.htm vol. 841, Dec. 12, 2000 ,3 pgs. |
Wilson, Tim , “Hubs Rate Poorly on Feature Depth: Many offer little beyond auctions”, InternetWeek.com, http://www.internetweek.com/lead/lead100900.htm, vol. 832, Oct. 9, 2000 ,4 pgs. |
“@wards online”, Canadian Airlines, Copyright (c) 1994-1997—Canadian Airlines International Ltd., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19970704234541/www.cdnair.ca/cpi.html>, 1 page. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Advisory Action dated Mar. 23, 2009”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Advisory Action dated May 2, 2008”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Advisory Action dated Nov. 19, 2008”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Appeal Brief filed Aug. 25, 2008”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Appeal Brief filed Dec. 17, 2008”, 26 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Final Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2008”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Final Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2004”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Final Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2007”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2005”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2004”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2003”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2006”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2007”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed May 20, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Reply Brief filed Jun. 3, 2009”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Response filed Mar. 4, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2008”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Response filed 05-04-04 to Final Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2004”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Response filed Jun. 25, 2007 to Final Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2007”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Response filed Aug. 24, 2005 to Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2005”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Response filed Oct. 9, 2003 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2003”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Response filed Oct. 18, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2007”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Response filed Nov. 29, 2006 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2006”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Response filed Dec. 13, 2004 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2004”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Advisory Action dated Jun. 22, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Appeal Brief filed Apr. 20, 2006”, 29 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Appeal Brief filed Aug. 7, 2006”, 30 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Examiner Interview Summary dated Mar. 4, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Examiner Interview Summary dated May 19, 2009”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Final Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Final Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2004”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Final Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2005”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2007”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Final Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2003”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2005”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Non Final Office Action dated May 11, 2004”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2003”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2008”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2009”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Jan. 12, 2006”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Reply Brief filed Jan. 3, 2007”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Feb. 3, 2005 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2004”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Mar. 29, 2004 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2003”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Apr. 29, 2008 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2007”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed May 18, 2009 to Final Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Jul. 17, 2009 to Advisory Action dated Jun. 22, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Aug. 11, 2004 to Non Final Office Action dated May 11, 2004”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Aug. 25, 2005 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2005”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Oct. 9, 2003 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2003”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Dec. 5, 2008 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2008”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Feb. 8, 2010 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2009”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Advisory Action dated Apr. 3, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Final Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2009”, 28 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Final Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2010”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2008”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 3, 2003”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed Mar. 6, 2009 to Final Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed May 7, 2009 to Advisory Action dated Apr. 3, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed Sep. 26, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2008”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Response filed Nov. 6, 2009 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2009”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2009”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2009”, 25 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Response filed Jan. 5, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Response filed Sep. 28, 2009 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2009”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Advisory Action dated Jul. 6, 2009”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Final Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2008”, 31 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2009”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2008”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Response filed Jan. 9, 2009 to Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2008”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Response filed Jun. 13, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2008”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Response filed Jun. 22, 2009 to Final Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2009”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Response filed Jul. 22, 2009 to Adisory Action dated Jul. 6, 2009”, 16 pgs. |
“Aviation Competition: Effects on Consumers from Domestic Airline Alliances Vary”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=mileage+combine+redeem&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=GAORPTrc99037.txtp2%40us.govnews.org&rnum=6>, (Feb. 2, 1999), 25 pages. |
“Business Roundup”, Internet Week, (Apr. 5, 1999), 7. |
“Continental Airlines OnePass—Interactive Reward Charts”, web site, transferred in, 1-8. |
“Exchange of Ideas: Why the street is in love with Purchasepro.com's congeries of revenue models”, No source listed, (Mar. 1, 2000), 2 pages. |
“Family of Web Rental Applications Unveiled”, KMWorld, 7(1), (Jan. 1, 1998), 2 pages. |
“Government agencies can procure materials”, Link-up, 17(1), (Jan. 1, 2000), p. 19. |
“Keeping You Informed”, Canadian membership guide, www.cdnair.ca, transferred in, 6-7. |
“Last minute gift ideas and stocking stuffers from AT&T”, AT&T News Release, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.att.com/news/1294/941221.csa.html>, (Dec. 21, 1994), 2 pages. |
“OnePass Online Auction”, Continental Airlines, transferred in, (2002), 1 page. |
“Requesting a Reward”, Continental Airlines OnePass—Requesting a Reward, transferred in, (2001), 2 pages. |
“Service helps hospitals shop online”, Link-up, (May/Jun. 2000), p. 14. |
“Web Beacon”, Webopedia, (Aug. 21, 2003), 3 pages. |
“Welcome to ShopOnePass”, Continental Airlines ShopOnePass, transferred in, 1 page. |
“Welcome to the Sloan Career Development Office Interview Bidding and Scheduling System”, CDO Interview Bidding & Scheduling—Login, transferred in, 3 pages. |
Baumann, G. W, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin,, (Jan. 1995), 83-84. |
Brown, Janelle, “What does it take to make a buck off of Usenet?”, salon.com > Technology,, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.salon.com/tech/feature/1999/05/24/deja>, (May 24, 1999), 4 pages. |
Furger, Roberta, “Working the Web Bazaar”, PC World magazine, (May 2000), 10 pages. |
Mollman, Steve, “Sold! Never pay retail again. Online auctions are changing the way businesses buy and sell everything”, PC Computing, (Feb. 2000), 131-151. |
Pacek, Greg, “American Express Membership Rewards: A Good Deal or Not?”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=combine+points+programs&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=crazyone-2509972357090001%40async83.city-net.com&rnum=4>, (Sep. 25, 1997), 2 pages. |
Roberson, G.W., “AA/US Alliance Question”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://groups.google.com/q=mileage+combine+redeem&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=6s1oa8%24v66%241%40nnrp1.dejanews.com&rnum=9>, (Aug. 26, 1998), 1 page. |
Seminerio, Maria, “When You Gotta Take Stock”, EWeek, http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C1759%2C1243705%2C00.asp, (Dec. 11, 2000), 2 pages. |
Staff, Newsbytes, “Biz to Biz Buzz”, Newsbytes PM, (May 24, 2000), 2 pages. |
Tadjr, “Delta . . . a long relationship ends”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=mileage+combine+redeem&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=7adhof%24me8%241%40news-1.news.gte.net&rnum=5>, (Feb. 17, 1999), 1 page. |
Wilson, Tim, “Hubs Rate Poorly on Feature Depth”, InternetWeek.com, http://www.internetweek.com/lead/lead100900.htm, (Oct. 9, 2000), 4 pages. |
Winship, Tim, “Combinable Miles Are the Stuff of Frequent Flyers' Dreams”, FrequentFlier.com-helping—frequent—flyers—earn—more—miles—and—travel—awards—through—free . . . , transferred in, (May 25, 1998), 4 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Appeal Brief filed Feb. 4, 2010”, 25 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Final Office Action dated May 3, 2010”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Apr. 15, 2010”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2010”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Reply Brief filed Jun. 22, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Appeal Brief filed Nov. 29, 2010”, 29 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Examiner's Answer dated Feb. 7, 2011”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Appeal Brief filed Jul. 27, 2010”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/407,756, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request dated May 27, 2010”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Advisory Action dated Oct. 1, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Response filed Sep. 7, 2010 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2010”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Response filed Feb. 1, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2010”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Response filed Sep. 13, 2010 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2009”, 15 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, filed Aug. 2, 2012 Method and System to Discharge a Liability Associated With a Proprietary Currency. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,017, Advisory Action dated Aug. 19, 2010”, 3. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188 Final Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2010”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Response filed Jun. 24, 2010 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2010”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,044, Final Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2014”, 53 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Examiner Interview Summary dated May 20, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2014”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Jun. 20, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2014”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Final Office Action dated May 12, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Response filed Feb. 28, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2013”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Response filed Apr. 3, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Advisory Action dated Apr. 26, 2016”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Examiner Interview Summary dated Dec. 8, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2014”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Final Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2015”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2015”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Mar. 9, 2015 to Final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2014”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response Filed Apr. 6, 2016 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2015”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/969,449, Response filed Aug. 11, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2015”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188 Examiner Interview Summary dated Dec. 16, 2016”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Advisory Action dated May 12, 2017”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Final Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017”, 35 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Final Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2014”, 31 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016”, 35 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Response filed Mar. 24, 2015 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2014”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Response filed May 1, 2017 to Final Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017”, 30 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Response filed Dec. 9, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2014”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,188, Response filed Dec. 26, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016”, 26 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Appeal Brief filed Dec. 8, 2014”, 34 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Appeal Decision dated Jun. 13, 2017”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request dated Nov. 6, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief dated Apr. 2, 2015”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Sep. 12, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,194, Reply Brief filed Jun. 2, 2015”, 51 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Final Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2016”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Final Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2014”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2015”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Response filed Feb. 17, 2015 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2014”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Response filed Oct. 19, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2015”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,606, Response filed Oct. 30, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2014”, 13 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040204967 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |