Method and system to implement seller authorized buying privileges within a network-based shopping facility

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8140424
  • Patent Number
    8,140,424
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 10, 2007
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 20, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
A method that commences by receiving a bid for a particular sales listing from a first bidder that is not pre-approved to bid on the particular sales listing. The method continues by restricting the bid for the particular sales listing from the bidding process associated with the particular sales listing, the restricting based on the requirement of the first bidder to be pre-approved to bid on the particular sales listing.
Description
FIELD

The present disclosure relates to electronic commerce. Specifically, the present disclosure provides for a seller to select shoppers to provide buying privileges to buy an offering offered for sale by the seller within a network-based shopping facility such as, for example, an Internet-based shopping facility.


ART BACKGROUND

More and more Internet users are realizing the ease and convenience of buying and selling online by way of person-to-person online trading pioneered by eBay Inc., the assignee of the present disclosure. As a result, collectors, hobbyists, small dealers, unique item seekers, bargain hunters, and other consumers are able to buy and sell millions of items at various online shopping sites.


The success of the online shopping sites, such as the Internet-based shopping facilities, depends upon their ability to provide enjoyable shopping experiences and easy-to-use and reliable environments in which buyers and sellers can conduct business efficiently. The online shopping sites can offer their services by facilitating auctions or by allowing sellers to offer their offerings for fixed prices. The current Internet-based shopping facilities have been presented with public relations risks due to excessive bid retraction and cancellation activities. For example, the reputation of eBay Inc. as a safe trading place was threatened because of the excessive bid retraction and cancellation activities during the recent auction of the Titanic deck chair and other high profile listings. It is estimated that as many as eighty percent of the bids made on the Internet-based shopping facilities are bogus.


In the light of the foregoing, there is a need to enhance the traders' trust of the online shopping facilities. Particularly, it would be valuable and useful to provide a seller with a degree of confidence that a specific shopper is sincere about bidding on the seller's auction listing or offering to buy the seller's fixed price listing.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements, and in which:



FIG. 1 is block diagram illustrating an exemplary network-based commerce facility in the form of an Internet-based auction facility 10;



FIG. 2 illustrates the web home page for an exemplary Internet-based auction facility;



FIG. 3 illustrates the pre-approve bidders main web page for an exemplary Internet-based auction facility;



FIG. 4 illustrates the pre-approve bidders logon web page for an exemplary Internet-based auctions facility;



FIG. 5 illustrates the pre-approve bidders form web page for an exemplary Internet-based auctions facility;



FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate the view item web page for an exemplary Internet-based auction facility;



FIG. 6C illustrates an exemplary error message;



FIG. 7 is a database diagram illustrating an exemplary database for the Internet-based auction facility;



FIG. 8 is a diagrammatic representation of an exemplary embodiment of the bidder feedback profile summary table;



FIG. 9 is a diagrammatic representation of one exemplary embodiment of the bidder feedback profile details table; and



FIG. 10 illustrates the flow chart of one embodiment of the method for seller authorized bidding through an Internet-based auction facility.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A method and system to implement seller authorized buying privileges within a network-based shopping facility are described. The present invention proposes a method and system whereby a seller can select shoppers to provide buying privileges to buy an offering offered for sale by the seller. The buying privileges can include the authorization to bid on the seller's auction listing and the authorization to offer to buy the seller's fixed price listing. A listing may, for example, comprise an item or service offering. In this description, the terms listing, item and offering are used interchangeably. Unauthorized bidders are blocked from bidding on the item.


An advantage of the present disclosure is that the seller does not have to manually monitor shopping activities because only the shoppers pre-approved by the seller are allowed to bid on or offer to buy the seller's listing. The shoppers also benefit from the present disclosure because a healthier trading environment is created because only the pre-approved candidates are allowed to compete with them. The community benefits in general because the shopping facility is perceived to have a safer trading place for the community because only the serious shoppers are allowed to bid on and offer to buy the listings. Seller authorized buying privileges can be requested by any seller with privileges to list on the shopping facility and for any listing, although the sellers with high profile listings would have more interest to do so. The present disclosure is extremely useful for high profile listings: charity listings, special events and holiday promotions.


In the ensuing description, a method and system to implement seller authorized buying privileges within a network-based auction facility are described. It will be appreciated that the method and system are also applicable to the fixed priced listings. In this description, the terms pre-approval and authorization are used interchangeably. In various embodiments, the seller is empowered to use different mechanisms to pre-approve bidders. For example, the seller may view a potential bidder's bidding history and profile to determine whether or not to pre-approve the bidder to bid on a listing. It is understood that if the vetting process is too strict, the conversion rate on the item will be affected. To mitigate, in one embodiment, the auction facility educates the sellers to use proper vetting mechanism to choose their bidders. Also, in one embodiment, the seller may remove the pre-approval restriction anytime during the auction. For example, the seller may wish to take the risk to open the listing to all potential bidders if the pre-approval restriction produces no bids or the bids amounts are low. In one embodiment, the seller may add and remove the pre-approval restriction multiple times during the auction.


In one embodiment, the seller may remove a bidder from the pre-approved list after the seller has added the bidder to the pre-approved list. In one embodiment, the seller may add bidders to and remove bidders from the pre-approved list multiple times during the auction of the listing. In one embodiment, the seller may request the pre-approval of bidders for his/her listing without specifying any bidders initially, and then add the bidders to the pre-approved list from time to time. In one embodiment, the seller has the choice to apply the pre-approve bidders list from a prior or current listing to all ongoing listings with the auction facility and/or any future listings. In one embodiment, the seller may pre-approve the bidders individually or in a bulk. In one embodiment, the seller may view the list of the pre-approved bidders and their respective Usernames/email addresses by logging on to the auction facility web site and providing the listing identification number.


In one embodiment, the bidders within the United States of America as well as international bidders may be pre-approved to bid on the listing. In one embodiment, only the predetermined currencies can be used to bid on a listing.


In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details.


Terminology/Definitions


Unauthorized bidders include bidders who are not pre-approved by the seller to bid on a particular item. Authorized bidders include bidders who are pre-approved to bid on a particular item by the seller. Items include auction listings. Bidders include bidders and potential bidder.


Auction Facility



FIG. 1 is block diagram illustrating an exemplary network-based commerce facility in the form of an Internet-based auction facility 10. While an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is described within the context of an auction facility, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention will find application in many different types of computer-based, and network-based, commerce facilities.


The auction facility includes an authorization module 40 and a communications module 42. The authorization module 40 includes the CGI servers 18 that provide an intelligent interface to the back-end of facility 10, database engine server 22 and database 23. The communications module 42 includes one or more of a number of types of front-end servers, namely the page servers 12 that deliver web pages (e.g., markup language documents), picture servers 14 that dynamically deliver images to be displayed within Web pages, listing servers 16, CGI servers 18, and search servers 20 that handle search requests to the facility 10. E-mail servers 21 provide, inter alia, automated e-mail communications to the users of the facility 10.


The back-end servers include a database engine server 22, a search index server 24 and a credit card database server 26, each of which maintains and facilitates access to a respective database.


The Internet-based auction facility 10 may be accessed by a client program 30, such as a browser (e.g., the Internet Explorer distributed by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Wash.) that executes on a client machine 32 and accesses the facility 10 via a network such as, for example, the Internet 34. The sellers and the buyers (or bidders) access the auction facility through the client machines 32. Other examples of networks that a client may utilize to access the auction facility 10 include a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), or the Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) network.



FIG. 2 illustrates the web home page for an exemplary Internet-based auction facility. The home page 100 includes a “seller services” link 102, which provides access to the seller services page. The seller services page, in turn, includes a buying and selling tools link, which provides access to the buying and selling tools page. The buying and selling tools page, in turn, includes a pre-approve bidders link, which provides access to the pre-approve bidders logon web page.



FIG. 3 illustrates the pre-approve bidders logon web page for an exemplary Internet-based auctions facility. The pre-approve logon page 200 prompts the seller to provide a proper username 202 and password 204. When the seller provides the proper username 202 and password 204, the logon page 200 provides access to the pre-approve bidders main web page.



FIG. 4 illustrates the pre-approve bidders main web page for an exemplary Internet-based auction facility. The pre-approve bidders main page 300 displays the currently active 302 and the past 304 auction listings for the particular seller. The pre-approve bidders main page 300 includes an “edit” link 306, which allows the seller to edit the pre-approve bidders list for the corresponding listing 302. The editing can include adding bidders to or subtracting bidders from the pre-approve bidders list. The pre-approve bidders main page 300 also includes a “deactivate” link 308, which allows the seller to deactivate the pre-approve bidders list such that the shoppers need not seek the seller's authorization to bid on the listing. If the seller removes the pre-approval restriction during the auction, the auction facility 10 requests the seller to inform the pre-approved bidders that the listing is now available to all potential bidders. In one embodiment, the seller can inform the pre-approved bidders of the removal of the pre-approval restriction through email. The pre-approve bidders main page 300 also includes an “add a new item” link 310, which provides access to the pre-approve bidders form page.



FIG. 5 illustrates the pre-approve bidders form web page for an exemplary Internet-based auction facility. The pre-approve bidders form page 400 prompts the seller to provide an item number 402. The item number 402 can be provided by the auction facility 10 and corresponds to the item for which the seller wishes to pre-approve the bidders. The form page 400 also prompts the seller to add or remove the identifiers 404 for the bidders whom the seller wishes to authorize to bid on the particular item. The identifier 404 can include the bidder Username. The bidders identifiers 404 that are added to the form page 400 are stored in the authorized bidders table described below with reference to FIG. 7. The view item web page described below with references to FIGS. 6A and 6B is updated to include the information submitted through the form page 400. In one embodiment, if the seller's username 302 does not match with the item number 402, the auction facility 10 prompts an error message asking the seller to recheck the item number 402. In one embodiment, if the Username for the bidder does not match with a Username in the bidder table in the database 23, the auction facility 10 prompts an error message indicating that the bidder is not registered, suspended, terminated or merged.



FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate the view item web page for an exemplary Internet-based auction facility. If the seller has requested pre-approval restriction for the item, the auction facility 10 flashes an error message 520 when the unauthorized bidders attempt to bid on the item. An exemplary error message 520 is illustrated in FIG. 6C. The error message 520 informs the unauthorized bidder to contact the seller to seek the pre-approval to bid. The error message 520 can appear in the bidder box area 510. In one embodiment, if the potential bidder is on the pre-approve bidders list to bid on this item, the auction facility 10 prompts him/her with a message to continue with the bidding process.


The view item page 500 includes an “about me” page link 502, which provides access to the about me web page. The unauthorized bidders may visit the about me page for more details regarding the seller including the seller's vetting process/guidelines. In one embodiment, the “about me” page link 502 is added in the item description area 504. In one embodiment, when the seller removes the pre-approval restriction, the restricted message is removed from the bid box area. In one embodiment, the seller can request pre-approval restriction after the auction has begun for the remaining time on the auction. In such a case, in one embodiment, the seller can manually cancel the bids made prior to the implementation of the pre-approval restriction.


Database Structure


The auction facility 10 provides the seller with information regarding the potential bidder such that the seller can make an informed determination regarding whether to pre-approve the bidder. The information may include the bidder's bidding history and feedback profile. The information is included in the database 23. In one embodiment, the seller provides the auction facility 10 with the bidder contact information to obtain information regarding the bidder. The bidder contact information can include the bidder Username or email address. The seller may obtain the bidder contact information through the bidder or the auction facility 10. In one embodiment, the auction facility 10 matches the contact information provided by the seller with the contact information stored in the database 23 to provide the seller with user information.



FIG. 7 is a database diagram illustrating an exemplary database 23, maintained by and accessed via the database engine server 22, which at least partially implements and supports the auction facility 10. The database 23 may, in one embodiment, be implemented as a relational database, and includes a number of tables having entries, or records, that are linked by indices and keys. In an alternative embodiment, the database 23 may be implemented as a collection of objects in an object-oriented database.


The database 23 includes a bidder table 602, which contains a listing of the registered bidders of the auction facility 10. The bidder table 602 can also be referred to as the user table because each user may operate as both a bidder and a seller within the auction facility 10. The bidder table includes a link to a bidding history table 604 for each registered bidder. Each bidding history table 604 is populated with the particular bidder's bidding history records. Each bidding history record may include, inter alia, the title of a listing that was/is being auctioned via the auction facility 10, the bidder's bidding amount, and bid retraction information. The bid retraction information indicates whether the bidder retracted his/her bid on a particular item. Two other tables are also shown linked to the bidder table 602, namely a bidder feedback profile summary table 606 and a bidder feedback profile details table 608. The database 23 also includes an authorized bidders table 610 for each item for which the seller has requested the pre-approval of the bidders. The authorized bidders table 610 includes the list of bidders identifiers 404 that are authorized to bid on the particular item. The bidder identifier 404 can include the bidder Username.



FIG. 8 is a diagrammatic representation of an exemplary embodiment of the bidder feedback profile summary table 606. The summary table 606 stores a summary of the feedback information regarding the bidders. Sellers and bidders that have experienced a particular bidder's behavior during the past auctions provide the feedback information (or comments) regarding to the bidder. The summary table 606 includes a bidder identifier column 702 that stores, for each bidder, a bidder identifier providing a pointer to the bidder table 602. The total score column 704 stores the total number of feedback comments (e.g., negative, positive and neutral) received for each bidder. The total negative column 706 stores the total number of negative feedback comments received for each bidder, and the total positive column 708 similarly stores the total number of positive feedback comments received for each bidder. The number of retractions column 710 stores the total number of threads that each bidder has retracted from auctions.


The summary table 606 provides a good summary of the impressions of the users of the auction facility 10 regarding a particular bidder. Each bidder of the summary table 606 is linked to a bidder feedback profile details table 608. It is contemplated that other embodiments of the summary table 606 can include additional information such as whether the bidder has a credit card on file with the auction facility and whether the bidder is agreeable to use an online payment service (e.g., Billpoint).



FIG. 9 is a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of the bidder feedback profile details table 608. The details table 608 is populated with entries reflecting the details of each feedback comment or opinion submitted by a user to the auction facility 10 regarding a particular bidder. Typically, the users submitting the comments include sellers on whose auction listings the bidder has bid in the past. In one exemplary embodiment, the users are only permitted to provide feedback pertaining to a transaction upon conclusion of that transaction. The feedback details table 608 includes the item number column 802 that identifies the items for which the comments were submitted. The comment column 804 stores the actual texts of the feedbacks, comments, or opinions. The type column 806 stores the indications as to whether the comments are positive, negative or neutral. The date column 808 stores the dates on which the feedbacks, comments or opinions were received. The response column 810 stores the texts of the responses submitted by the bidder in response to the comments texts stored in column 804. Similarly, the rebuttal column 812 stores the texts of the rebuttals to such responses. The commentator column 814 stores the identifiers of the users that submitted the original comments stored in column 804. It is appreciated that further dates and other descriptive information may also populate the details table 608.


The tables 602, 604, 606 and 608 include information that can provide the seller with valuable insights to evaluate the potential bidders. In one embodiment, the information contained in the tables 602, 604, 606 and 608 is easily accessible to the sellers. In one embodiment, the seller can provide the bidder's identifier such as the Username or email address to access the information stored in the tables 602, 604, 606 and 608. It is contemplated that the databases of alternate embodiments can include additional tables that provide additional bidders related information.



FIG. 10 illustrates the flow chart of one embodiment of the method for seller authorized bidding through an Internet-based auction facility. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that with certain modifications the method is applicable in many different types of computer-based, and network-based, commerce facilities.


At block 902, a seller registered with the auction web site logs on to the site. If the seller were already logged on, then he/she need not logon again to use request the pre-approval restriction. The suspended, merged, or terminated seller who cannot use any other feature on the auction site is prohibited from using the seller authorized bidding feature. At block 904, the seller identifies the item for which he wishes to add the pre-approval restriction. At block 906, an alert text appears on the item web page to alert the potential bidders to get a pre-approval from the seller to bid on the item. The item web page or another web page linked to the item web page provides the potential bidder with the seller contact information and vetting process information. At block 908, the potential bidder contacts the seller and requests permission to bid on the item. It is understood that the bidder must be registered with and logged on to the auction web site. The bidder provides the seller with the bidder auction site identifier such as the Username or email address. At block 910, the seller uses the bidder's auction site identifier to retrieve the bidder's bidding history and profile information. At block 912, the seller determines whether to add the bidder to the pre-approve bidders list. At block 914, if the determination is positive, the seller adds the potential bidder identifier to the pre-approve bidders list. The bidder identifier is then added to an appropriate authorization table. At block 916, if the determination is negative, the bidder identifier is not added to the authorization table. In one embodiment, the potential bidder is informed through email that the seller has rejected his/her request for pre-approval. At block 918, the seller may edit the pre-approve bidder list. The editing can include the addition of the potential bidder to the list that was rejected at block 912. The editing can also include the removal of a bidder from the list.


When a bidder tried to bid on an item, the authorization module checks whether the bidder identifier is included in the item authorization table. If the bidder identifier is included in the authorization table, the bidder is allowed to bid on the item. If the bidder identifier is not included in the item authorization table, the bidder receives an error message.


Thus, a method and system to implement seller authorized bidding within a network-based auction facility have been described. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.


In addition, the methods as described above can be stored in memory of a computer system as a set of instructions to be executed. Also, the instructions to perform the methods as described above could alternatively be stored on other forms of computer-readable mediums, including magnetic and optical disks. For example, the method of the present invention can be stored on computer-readable mediums, such as magnetic disks or optical disks that are accessible via a disk drive (or computer-readable medium drive).

Claims
  • 1. A method including: receiving a bid for a particular item that is described by a sales listing from a first bidder that is not pre-approved to bid on the particular item that is described by the sales listing, the receiving done at least in part through the use of one or more processors;restricting the bid for the particular item that is described by the sales listing from a bidding process associated with the particular item that is described by the sales listing, the restricting being based on a requirement that the first bidder be pre-approved to bid on the particular item that is described by the sales listing and identifying the first bidder as not being pre-approved, the restricting done at least in part through the use of one or more processors; andcommunicating error information, over a network, to the first bidder, the error information indicating that bidding on the item is restricted to pre-approved bidders, the communicating done at least in part through the use of one or more processors.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the error information informs the first bidder to contact a seller to seek pre-approval to bid on the particular item that is described by the sales listing.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, including retrieving information for the seller after the first bidder seeks pre-approval from a seller to bid on the particular item that is described by the sales listing, the information to facilitate the seller in determining whether to authorize the first bidder to bid on the particular item that is described by the sales listing.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the retrieving of the information includes receiving an auction site identifier that identifies the first bidder.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the auction site identifier includes at least one of a username for the first bidder or an email address for the first bidder.
  • 6. The method of claim 3, wherein the information is one of a bidding history associated with the first bidder or profile information associated with the first bidder.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the bidding history includes bid retraction information that indicates whether the first bidder retracted a bid on a different and particular sales listing.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the profile information includes feedback information for a transaction in which the first bidder entered a bid.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, including receiving an authorization from the seller to authorize the bidder to bid on the particular item that is described by the sale listing that is listed for sale by the seller.
  • 10. A non-transitory machine-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to: receive a bid for a particular item that is described by a sales listing from a first bidder that is not pre-approved to bid on the particular item that is described by the sales listing;restrict the bid for the particular item that is described by the sales listing from a bidding process associated with the particular item that is described by the sales listing, the restriction based on a requirement that the first bidder is pre-approved to bid on the particular item that is described by the sales listing and an identification of the first bidder as not being pre-approved; andcommunicate error information, over a network, to the first bidder, the error information indicates that bidding on the item is restricted to pre-approved bidders.
  • 11. A method including: receiving an offer to buy a particular item that is described by a sales listing from a first buyer that is not pre-approved to buy the particular item that is described by the sales listing, the receiving done at least in part through the use of one or more processors;refusing the offer to buy the particular item that is described by the sales based on a requirement that the first buyer is pre-approved to buy the particular item that is described by the sales listing and identifying the first buyer as not being pre-approved, the refusing done at least in part through the use of one or more processors,communicating error information, over a network, to the first buyer, the error information indicating that offers to buy the particular item are being restricted to pre-approved buyers, the communicating done at least in part through the use of one or more processors.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the error information informs the first buyer to contact the seller to seek pre-approval to buy the particular item that is described by the sales listing.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, including retrieving information for the seller after the first buyer seeks pre-approval from the seller to buy the particular item that is described by the sales listing, the information to facilitate the seller in determining whether to authorize the buyer to buy the particular item that is described by the sales listing.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the retrieving of the information includes receiving an auction site identifier that identifies the first buyer.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the auction site identifier includes at least one of a username for the first buyer or an email address for the first buyer.
  • 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the information is one of a bidding history associated with the first buyer or profile information associated with the first buyer.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the bidding history includes bid retraction information that indicates whether the first buyer retracted a bid on a different and particular sales listing.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, wherein the profile information includes feedback information for a transaction in which the first buyer entered a bid.
  • 19. The method of claim 11, including receiving an authorization from the seller to authorize the buyer to buy the particular item that is described by the sale listing that is listed for sale by the seller.
  • 20. A non-transitory machine-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to: receive an offer to buy a particular item that is described by a sales listing from a first buyer that is not pre-approved to buy the particular item that is described by the sales listing;refuse an offer to buy the particular item that is described by the sales listing based on a requirement that the first buyer is pre-approved to buy the particular item that is described by the sales listing and an identification of the first buyer as not pre-approved,communicate error information, over a network, to the first buyer, the error information indicating that offers to buy the particular item are restricted to a pre-approved buyers.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 09/881,911, filed on Jun. 15, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,299,206, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/250,637 filed on Nov. 30, 2000, both of which are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (100)
Number Name Date Kind
3573747 Adams et al. Apr 1971 A
3581072 Nymeyer May 1971 A
4412287 Braddock, III Oct 1983 A
4674044 Kalmus et al. Jun 1987 A
4677552 Sibley, Jr. Jun 1987 A
4789928 Fujisaki Dec 1988 A
4799156 Shavit et al. Jan 1989 A
4823265 Nelson Apr 1989 A
4864516 Gaither et al. Sep 1989 A
4865516 Focke et al. Sep 1989 A
4903201 Wagner Feb 1990 A
5063507 Lindsey et al. Nov 1991 A
5077665 Silverman et al. Dec 1991 A
5101353 Lupien et al. Mar 1992 A
5136501 Silverman et al. Aug 1992 A
5168446 Wiseman Dec 1992 A
5205200 Wright Apr 1993 A
5243515 Lee Sep 1993 A
5258908 Hartheimer et al. Nov 1993 A
5280422 Moe et al. Jan 1994 A
5297031 Gutterman et al. Mar 1994 A
5297032 Trojan et al. Mar 1994 A
5305200 Hartheimer et al. Apr 1994 A
5325297 Bird et al. Jun 1994 A
5329589 Fraser et al. Jul 1994 A
5375055 Togher et al. Dec 1994 A
5394324 Clearwater Feb 1995 A
5426281 Abecassis Jun 1995 A
5485510 Colbert Jan 1996 A
5553145 Micali Sep 1996 A
5557728 Garrett et al. Sep 1996 A
5596994 Bro Jan 1997 A
5598557 Doner et al. Jan 1997 A
5640569 Miller et al. Jun 1997 A
5657389 Houvener Aug 1997 A
5664115 Fraser Sep 1997 A
5689652 Lupien et al. Nov 1997 A
5694546 Reisman Dec 1997 A
5706457 Dwyer et al. Jan 1998 A
5710889 Clark et al. Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne et al. Feb 1998 A
5715402 Popolo Feb 1998 A
5717989 Tozzoli et al. Feb 1998 A
5722418 Bro Mar 1998 A
5727165 Ordish et al. Mar 1998 A
5771291 Newton et al. Jun 1998 A
5771380 Tanaka et al. Jun 1998 A
5790790 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5794219 Brown Aug 1998 A
5799285 Klingman Aug 1998 A
5803500 Mossberg Sep 1998 A
5818914 Fujisaki Oct 1998 A
5826244 Huberman Oct 1998 A
5835896 Fisher et al. Nov 1998 A
5845265 Woolston Dec 1998 A
5845266 Lupien et al. Dec 1998 A
5850442 Muftic Dec 1998 A
5862223 Walker et al. Jan 1999 A
5872848 Romney et al. Feb 1999 A
5873069 Reuhl et al. Feb 1999 A
5884056 Steele Mar 1999 A
5890138 Godin et al. Mar 1999 A
5905974 Fraser et al. May 1999 A
5905975 Ausubel May 1999 A
5922074 Richard et al. Jul 1999 A
5924072 Havens Jul 1999 A
5926794 Fethe Jul 1999 A
5974412 Hazlehurst et al. Oct 1999 A
5991739 Cupps et al. Nov 1999 A
6012045 Barzilai et al. Jan 2000 A
6035288 Solomon Mar 2000 A
6035402 Vaeth et al. Mar 2000 A
6044363 Mori et al. Mar 2000 A
6047264 Fisher et al. Apr 2000 A
6055518 Franklin et al. Apr 2000 A
6058417 Hess et al. May 2000 A
6061448 Smith et al. May 2000 A
6073117 Oyanagi et al. Jun 2000 A
6081789 Purcell Jun 2000 A
6085176 Woolston Jul 2000 A
6104815 Alcorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6119137 Smith et al. Sep 2000 A
6178408 Copple et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189003 Leal Feb 2001 B1
6192407 Smith et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199050 Alaia et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202051 Woolston Mar 2001 B1
6240396 Walker et al. May 2001 B1
6243691 Fisher et al. Jun 2001 B1
6578014 Murcko, Jr. Jun 2003 B1
6947906 Underwood et al. Sep 2005 B1
7376612 Kwan May 2008 B1
7689469 Mesaros Mar 2010 B1
7966243 Taylor et al. Jun 2011 B2
20010049634 Stewart Dec 2001 A1
20020007338 Do Jan 2002 A1
20020013760 Arora et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020042755 Kumar et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049961 Fang et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020174060 Friedland et al. Nov 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
2253543 Mar 1997 CA
2658635 Aug 1991 FR
9300266 Feb 1993 NL
WO-9215174 Sep 1992 WO
WO-9517711 Jun 1995 WO
WO-9634356 Oct 1996 WO
WO-9737315 Oct 1997 WO
WO-9963461 Dec 1999 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080052218 A1 Feb 2008 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60250637 Nov 2000 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09881911 Jun 2001 US
Child 11852868 US