The present invention relates to closed die forging in general and in particular the forging of wheel suspension safety elements in aluminium, for the automobile industry.
The common method for closed die forging aluminium is inherited from classical steel forging. Two dies are mounted in a press, and are pressed vertically against each other impressing their form on a blank that lies there between. Each die includes a negative half imprint of the form of the finished product milled into the die material; the dimension of the imprint being corrected for the temperature of the blank and die tool. A brake surface is milled along the rim of each half form. When the die tools are pressed against each other to the end position, these brake surfaces form a gap or gutter of minimum 3 mm. The forge process is “kneading” the material, and properly executed it will provide a high strength aluminium alloy with very high endurance strength. Thus, forging is particularly suited for highly stressed components, e.g. in the wheel suspension of a car.
The classical forging process has four main drawbacks:
1. Comparatively large consumption of materials (much waste). The pressure build up in order to fill the tool form is created by braking the material in the gutter. The gutter is integrated into the die tool, and follows the movement of the dies. Thus, initially the gutter forms a very large gap. The large gap will allow an easy flow of material through the gutter. Only at the end of the press stroke sufficient pressure is created to fill the form. Waste of 30% is considered a very good result (weight of waste material compared with the weight of the finished product).
2. The press force requirements are large. At the end of the press stroke, a large total working area (the surface of the product in addition to the area of the gutters) must be put under sufficient pressure to get the material flowing out of the gap between the dies.
3. Requirements for special lubrication fluids, in relatively large volumes. The material is squeezed from the centre of the tool and out through the brake gap/gutter with a steadily increasing pressure. There are large horizontal movements of material along the tool surfaces, which must be lubricated with special lubricating fluids in relatively large quantities.
4. The demanding requirements for centring the blank. A prerequisite for the process is that the material should flow freely in all directions. Thus, it is not possible to place stoppers/orienting pins in the tool. The blank must therefore be placed accurately in the press, e.g. with a robot.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and tool for closed die forging with less waste of raw materials compared with prior art methods.
Another object is to provide a method and tool for closed die forging which requires less press force.
Still another object is to provide a closed die forging method and tool in which large horizontal flow of material is avoided, thus making the requirements on lubrication less stringent.
Yet still another object is to provide a method and tool for closed die forging in which the blank is more or less self centring in the press.
These objects are achieved in a method and tool according to the appended patent claims. In particular the method includes closed die forging a product from a preform blank of a forgeable material by placing the blank in a press tool, said press tool including a number of centre and side members surrounding the blank, closing the press tool upon the blank, and forging the blank with short horizontal and vertical movements of the tool avoiding large horizontal movements in the material.
The tool for forging a blank into a product according to the method in claim 1 includes a number of upper (21) and lower (22) centre members, and first (23, 24) and second (25, 26) side members, said first (23, 24) and second (25, 26) side members enclosing said upper (21) and lower (22) centre members defining a closed cavity with the form of product.
The invention will now be described in detail in reference to the appended drawings, in which
The classical prior art forging process is illustrated in
In the new, inventive forge process, illustrated in
Initially, the blank 20 is placed between the centre members 21, 22 clamping the blank in position. Then, the side members 23, 24 and 25, 26 are closed upon the blank. By this arrangement, it is not necessary to place the blank with great precision, as the tool itself will align the blank in a correct position when the side members close upon it.
In the first forge step,
Synchronously, or when the horizontal movement is finished, the centre members are forced together squeezing until the material has filled the rest of the form. This step is illustrated in
In this embodiment of the inventive forge process, a small fixed brake gap may be employed, in the range of 0.5-1.0 mm. The brake gap is mainly included in order to allow the form to be filled completely, while taking care of small differences in the volume of the blank. The amount of waste material is negligible. However, an additional step is needed for removing the rim of waste material.
In the embodiment shown in
In
In
In case the width of the product exceeds about 30 mm, the centre members must be divided into several sub-members, as illustrated in
In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20040634 | Feb 2004 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO05/00054 | 2/14/2005 | WO | 7/2/2007 |