The present invention relates to a method for removing an offshore jacket structure standing on the sea bed in a body of water in accordance with the preamble of claim 1. The invention also relates to a seagoing vessel for removing or installing and transporting an offshore jacket structure as recited in the preamble of claim 5.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,540,441 describes a transporter for removing offshore jacket structures, said transporter having an elongate cradle-like structure made from tubular elements. The cradle-like structure has a U-shaped cross section. When approaching a jacket structure to be removed, the transporter is rotated 90° and floated in vertical orientation so as to embrace the jacket on three sides. After the transporter has been attached to the jacket and the legs of the jacked severed, the transporter with the jacket is raised through de-ballasting and rotated back to the horizontal position before being towed to a predetermined destination for the jacket. Even though the transporter in its vertical position is moved towards the jacket both by means of tugs and winches, it has a quite substantial water line area which makes it prone to uncontrolled movements caused by environmental forces like waves, such movements being particularly critical in the connecting phase since the jacked could easily be damaged. The transporter according to U.S. Pat. No. 6,540,441 also has the drawback of being larger than necessary in the sense that it has about twice as much buoyancy as necessary for carrying the jacket structure. This is because the sides of the U-shaped cradle will be entirely above the water in a towing situation.
The purpose of the present invention is to alleviate the drawbacks mentioned above and to provide a method and vessel that will permit the vessel to approach the jacket structure in a safe and controlled manner also under inclement weather conditions, while the shape of the vessel is such that it has little excess buoyancy and is easy to build with common shipyard technology and equipment.
This is obtained according to the invention by a method as recited in claim 1 and a vessel as recited in claim 5. Advantageous embodiments of the inventions are recited in the respective dependent claims.
For better understanding of the invention it is referred to the following description of the exemplifying embodiment shown in the appended drawings.
The vessel 1 shown in
Generally speaking, in plan view the vessel is delta-shaped with a nose section added at the apex, or it may also be likened to a Y, except for the transverse section 9.
With the exception of the control room 5 and pump room 9, the complete vessel 1 is subdivided into ballast compartments. This is indicated in the side view in
The vessel 1 is preferably made as a stiffened flat plate construction all-over. Although such a construction is heavier than a tubular construction for the same buoyancy, the flat plate construction has several advantages. For instance, flat plate constructions can be efficiently manufactured in shipyards due to their long established highly mechanised production lines for such structures. The steel material will not be a major cost factor in this connection. The heavier plating required at the deep submergence end of the vessel will contribute to the fixed ballast needed at this end for reasons of hydrostatic stability during the submergence operation, as will be explained later. The flat plate construction further provides flat deck surfaces that will simplify and reduce the cost of providing jacket support points due to the freedom to choose the position of such points.
Although the size of the vessel 1 will depend on the size of the jacket structures 15 to be removed or installed, a preferred embodiment for service in the North Sea has an overall length of 115 meter, a maximum width of 100 meter and auxiliary columns 37 meter high. The steel weight is about 6200 tons and the fixed ballast 5000 ton. The displacement is about 30 000 ton for the main buoyancy section and about 11 000 ton for the auxiliary buoyancy columns. The maximum steel plate thickness is about 40 mm.
Such a vessel would be able to handle jacket structures weighing about 8000 ton.
The method according to the invention will be described below with reference to
In
In
During the procedure of bringing the vessel 1 to the position shown in
In
This removal operation assumes that the legs of the jacket structure have been cut in advance. It may be necessary to fix e.g. a sleeve arrangement around some of the legs in order to prevent the cut ends from slipping off their contact surfaces when bringing the vessel 1 into contact with the jacket. However, the slender shape of the fore part of the vessel makes it relatively wave transparent, thus minimizing the wave induced forces transferred from the vessel to the jacket.
Before lifting of the jacket can start, the brackets 14 will have to be securely connected to legs of the jacket. These connections can be of a direct welded type, a gripper type, a wedge type, or any suitable type known to the skilled person. The purpose of these connection brackets is to carry the complete weight of the jacket as it is lifted from the seabed.
When the preparations for lifting the jacket are completed, ballast water is pumped out of the vessel 1. This may be done in a way to make it first move mainly vertically from the seabed before starting the rotation movement. In some applications, however, it may be preferable to start the removal of the ballast water in such a way that the vessel 1 and jacket 15 are rotated while the bottom rounded part 11 of the vessel is still in contact with the seabed 16. This sequence is illustrated in
When in the
It will be noted that during the entire procedure described above, a part of the nose section 5 is always above the water for stability reasons.
It will be understood that the vessel according to the invention also may be used for installing a jacket structure. In this case, the method according to the invention will be performed essentially in the reverse order, except that no winches are necessary on the vessel.
The heavy permanent or semi-permanent ballast 12 in the vessel 1 may consist of concrete, iron or mud, brine or the like. In this context, semi-permanent means that the ballast may be removed, but not by simple pumps. Furthermore, the heavy ballast may at least partly be provided through the use of heavier plating than otherwise necessary in the area of the footings 8 of the columns 3. Although these columns in the exemplifying embodiment described above are shown having a quadrangular cross section, if expedient, they may have an oval or circular cross section, or consist of a cluster of tubular members, e.g. taken from legs of an already scrapped jacket structure.
In the embodiment described above the water depth permits the vessel to be set down on the seabed before attachment to the jacket. However, it is also possible to use the vessel according to the invention in somewhat deeper water where the vessel would not be able to touch the seabed without becoming totally immersed. In such cases, the vessel will still approach the jacket at an angle, but this will occur at some distance above the seabed. The draft of the vessel will be determined by the amount of overhang permitted by the available capacity in the vessel to shift the centre of buoyancy to compensate for the offset centre of gravity.
Although the invention has been described above with reference to a specific exemplifying embodiment, it will be clear to the skilled person that the invention may be varied and modified within the frame of the invention defined by the elements of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20034814 | Oct 2003 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2004/000327 | 10/27/2004 | WO | 00 | 12/11/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/039968 | 5/6/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3347052 | Steitle et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3448712 | Adams et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3823564 | Crout et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3859804 | Koehler et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
5111764 | D'Ettorre | May 1992 | A |
6276875 | Gunnar et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6540441 | Foss et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20040258483 | Vatsvag | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO03033342 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070140794 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |