Patent Grant
11855789
Embodiments relate to transmission of digital data messages to a receiver via a communication link.
Content or messages are transmitted in numerous applications. For example, Ethernet or related techniques are used to transfer a large amount of data within the network of a company or via the internet. On a smaller scale, data is for example transmitted within vehicles, such as for example within an automobile in order to operate power windows or the like. Modern vehicles also utilize numerous sensors in order to monitor environmental conditions, i.e. physical quantities related to the operation of the vehicle or particular components thereof.
Failure of the transmission of digital data messages between a controller and a corresponding receiver via a communication link may result in a complete loss of the information intended to be transmitted. Moreover, in more complicated interrelated systems, a broken communication link may also result in the whole system becoming inoperable or becoming inefficient. Therefore, there is a desire to increase functional safety and reliability in the communication of data messages.
According to exemplary embodiments, a controller operable to transmit digital data messages to a receiver via a communication link providing for at least a first and a second transmission path comprises a first signal terminal for the first transmission path and a second signal terminal for the second transmission path. The first signal terminal is operable to digitally transmit a first message to the receiver according to a first transmission technique while the second signal terminal is operable to digitally transmit a second message to the receiver according to a second different transmission technique. That is, the controller sends, to the same receiver, messages using two different transmission techniques at the same time or in parallel, wherein parallel transmission may also include scenarios where the first and second messages are sent with a predetermined time difference or one after the other. This may serve to increase functional safety by introducing redundancy into the transmission scheme. Functional safety may even be increased to a higher extent as compared to an approach where two independent identical communication links are redundantly used, since two different transmission techniques are utilized to communicate with the same receiver. For example, this may avoid that systematic errors cease transmission, which might occur at the same time in redundant systems relying on the same transmission technique.
According to exemplary embodiments, a content transmitted by the first and the second messages by the different transmission techniques is identical. This can serve to increase the reliability in that the content can still be transmitted or received to or by the receiver even when one of the transmission techniques encounters an error.
According to exemplary embodiments utilizing a data bus comprising at least a first bus line for the first transmission path and a second bus line for the second transmission path, the first transmission technique uses a variation of a voltage on the bus or on a first signal terminal connected to the bus in order to transmit the message while the second transmission technique uses a variation of a current on the second bus line or on a second signal terminal connected to the same. This can increase reliability of the transmission in scenarios, where external influences may distort voltages and, to a lesser extent, currents or vice-versa.
According to exemplary embodiments, a controller is operable to be used together with a data bus having at least a first bus line for digitally transmitting a first message, a second bus line for providing a reference potential and a third bus line for providing an operating voltage, that is in a system where the controller is powered by an operating voltage from the receiver and via the bus. A first signal terminal of the controller is connectable to the first bus line and operable to digitally transmit the first message according to the SPC (Short PWM Code) protocol, varying a voltage on the first signal terminal to transmit the message. A second signal terminal of the controller is connectable to the second bus line and operable to digitally transmit the second message to the receiver according to the SPC protocol, using a variation of a current on the second signal terminal to physically transmit the second message. A third terminal of the controller is connected to the third bus line providing the operating voltage. This can allow integration of a controller for transmitting data messages in a backwards-compatible manner into an existing system based on the SPC protocol. The functional safety can optionally be increased when the second transmission technique using a variation of a current is used. The same controller, however, can still be utilized with standard setups in already existing environments.
According to exemplary embodiments, a sensor system also comprises a sensor operable to provide a sensor signal indicative of a physical quantity sensed by said sensor, wherein the controller further comprises a sensor input terminal coupled to the sensor. The received sensor signal or the content provided by the sensor signal may then be transmitted via the two different transmission techniques. This can, in an inexpensive and efficient manner, increase the functional safety of systems relying on sensor data also in unfriendly environments, such as, for example, in automobiles.
Some embodiments comprise a digital control circuit installed within an apparatus for performing a transmission as illustrated above. Such a digital control circuit, e.g. a digital signal processor (DSP), needs to be programmed accordingly. Hence, yet further embodiments also provide a computer program having a program code for performing embodiments of the method, when the computer program is executed on a computer or a digital processor.
Some embodiments of apparatuses and/or methods will be described in the following by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
Various exemplary embodiments will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the figures, the thicknesses of lines, layers and/or regions may be exaggerated for clarity. It should be understood, however, that there is no intent to limit further embodiments to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, further embodiments are to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the invention. Like numbers refer to like or similar elements throughout the description of the figures.
It will be understood that when an element is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present. Other words used to describe the relationship between elements should be interpreted in a like fashion (e.g., “between” versus “directly between,” “adjacent” versus “directly adjacent,” etc.).
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of further embodiments. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes” and/or “including,” when used herein, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components and/or groups thereof.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the exemplary embodiments belong. It will be further understood that terms, e.g., those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
Since different techniques rely on different modulation and transmission schemes, they can be vulnerable to different kinds of distortions so that, even when one transmission technique fails to accomplish a transmission of a digital data message, the same can still be transmitted by the second transmission technique. When using, for example, a wired data bus having at least two bus lines, one bus line can be used to digitally transmit a first message to the receiver using a variation of a voltage on the bus line, while the second message can be transmitted using a varying current on the second bus line.
In order to provide the signals for the transmission over the first and second transmission paths 6a and 6b, the controller 2 comprises a first signal terminal 8a for the first transmission path 6a and a second signal terminal 8b for the second transmission path 6b. That is, the signals used to transmit the digital messages according to the first transmission technique and the second transmission technique are provided at the signal terminals 8a and 8b, respectively. Those can, for example, be directly connected to bus lines of a wired data bus or to antennas of a wireless communication system or the like.
According to one exemplary embodiment, content transmitted by the first and the second messages via the first and the second transmission paths 6a and 6b is identical so as to increase functional safety and reliability of the system since the content can still be received even when one of the transmission paths is disturbed or broken.
According to some embodiments, an order of bits used for a digital transmission of the content is different within the first message and the second message when the same content is transmitted by both messages. That is, the bit pattern to transmit the same content using the different transmission techniques can additionally be scrambled or modified in a predetermined manner so as to still increase the reliability of the system. For example, the individual bits of the second message can be the inverse of the bits of the first message. Even in the unlikely event that an error affects both transmission techniques in parallel and at the same time, there is still a chance to recover the content when different parts of the content are affected.
According to some exemplary embodiments, the length of a first sequence of bits used to transmit the content in the first message and of a second sequence of bits used to transmit the identical content in the second message is identical, wherein the bit value of each bit at a given position in the first sequence is the inverse of the bit value of the bit at the same position in the second sequence. That is, the first message can be the bit-wise inverse of the second message, which can provide for additional redundancies due to interrelated properties of a redundancy information such as, for example, a cyclic redundancy check value (CRC) which can be computed and appended to the first and second sequences of bits individually prior to their transmission.
According to some exemplary embodiments, at least one message of the group of the first message and the second message is transmitted using a serial transmission protocol using signals of varying width to represent digital content. To this end, a signal of varying width can be understood to be a pulse width modulated signal (PWM) where a digital quantity is represented by a fraction of a predetermined pulse length in which the signal is transmitted with a characteristic corresponding to one logical state, while the signal is transmitted with another characteristic corresponding to another logical state in the remaining time of the predetermined pulse length. To this end, the predetermined pulse length can be understood as a common clock time interval on which the protocol relies and which, therefore, should be available at the sender and at the receiver.
However, a signal of varying width shall generally be understood herein as any transmitted pulse shape or pulse formation in which a characteristic length or time can be varied so as to represent digital content. For example, two signal pulses of similar or identical shape which are transmitted with a varying time difference are also understood to be a signal of varying width. That is, the signal corresponds to the first pulse, the second pulse and the signal waveform between the pulses. The use of a transmission protocol using signals of varying width to represent digital content can permit use of simple and inexpensive devices due to the simplicity of the representation, which can furthermore provide for a high robustness with respect to a superposition of external noise signals and the like.
According to some exemplary embodiments, a common clock time interval for the transmission according to the serial transmission protocol is signaled from the controller to the receiver using a preamble to a content of a transmitted message, wherein a time difference between two signal pulses in the preamble corresponds to an integer multiple of the common clock time interval. That is, the common clock time interval is defined by the transmitter and provided to the receiver. This can provide an extremely high flexibility in systems design since the controller can collaborate with a wide range of receivers or chips receiving the transmitted messages due to the fact that the controller defines the clock cycles used within the protocol itself. Especially in sensor systems, where the sensors and associated controllers are typically provided with large structural sizes allowing for only moderate operating frequencies, this can permit combining sensors with nearly arbitrary receivers or control units having a receiver, without the need to provide receivers tailored to one particular sensor. U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2009/046773A1 and 2010/002821 A1 disclose particular ways to use a preamble to provide a common clock time interval from the controller to the receiver. These documents are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, and the provision of a common clock time interval as disclosed in those applications is expressly defined as a part of a particular exemplary embodiment.
According to some exemplary embodiments, a digital quantity is represented by two consecutive signal pulses transmitted with a time difference of a predetermined number of common clock time intervals, the predetermined number being related to the digital quantity. For example, the predetermined number of common clock time intervals between the two signal pulses directly equals a number to be transmitted using the serial transmission protocol. That is, if the number four is to be transmitted, the second signal pulse is sent four common clock time intervals after the first signal pulse. Each sequence of two signal pulses (which is a signal of varying width) representing a number or is also referred to as a nibble. With respect to one particular embodiment of a protocol to digitally transmit data using nibbles, reference is again made to U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2009/046773A1 and 2010/002821 A1. The protocols described therein shall be understood to be part of one particular exemplary embodiment.
According to some embodiments, the serial transmission protocol associated with the first transmission technique is the SENT (Single Edge Nibble Transmission, SAE J2716 standard) protocol or the SPC protocol. According to further embodiments, only the second transmission technique uses one of these two protocols. According to yet further embodiments, both transmission techniques rely on the SPC or the SENT protocol or, more generally, on the same protocol. To this end, a protocol shall be understood to be a rule with respect to how digital data is mapped into symbols or bit sequences or generally into quantized information to be transmitted at a time by a transmission technique. It is important to note that, while the protocol can be the same for the transmission over both transmission paths, the transmission technique itself, i.e. the particular way the information is physically transmitted over the corresponding transmission medium, can be different. For example, a transmission technique in that sense can be equal to the physical layer of a typical protocol stack, while the SPC or SENT protocol or the logical protocol as referred to herein, shall be associated to one single or a combination of several higher layer protocols of the protocol stack. In that sense, digitally transmitting can be understood to prepare digital data for transmission according to one of those protocols, while the transmission via a physical layer itself according to a transmission technique can typically use analog signals or quantities. Of course, other exemplary embodiments can use different protocols, such as, for example, pulse width modulation (PWM), Peripheral Sensor Interface 5 (PSI5, as standardized and developed further by the PSI5 organization, http://psi5.org), Peripheral Acceleration Sensor protocol (PAS3/PAS4), Distributed Systems Interface (DSI, as standardized and developed further by the DSI Consortium, http://www.dsiconsortium.org). The individual protocols can be used to transmit one of the first message and the second message individually or to transmit both messages using the same protocol. It is additionally noted that arbitrary other protocols suitable to digitally transmit messages can be used in further exemplary embodiments which expressly also includes any future developments of those protocols.
Hence, data of the same protocol can, for example, be transmitted by a transmission technique relying on or being implemented in the voltage domain and, in parallel, by a second transmission technique relying on or being implemented in the current domain. That is, variations in voltage of a voltage level or voltage pulses can be used to transmit the first message according to the first transmission technique via signal terminal 6a, while, at the same time, variations of a current on the second signal terminal 6b can be used to transmit the second message according to the second transmission technique. This can be beneficial in that, for example, additional voltages can be induced in the bus lines in the presence of a magnetic field, while the current-based transport technique can be fairly robust with respect to the presence of magnetic fields.
According to two further exemplary embodiments of controllers or sensor systems discussed with respect to
While SENT is a unidirectional communication standard where data from a sensor is transmitted autonomously without any intervention of the data receiving device, i.e. the receiver, SPC provides for the possibility of a half-duplex synchronous communication, where the receiver triggers a transmission. Generally, in SENT and SPC, a signal is transmitted from the controller or the sensor by a series of pulses, where the distance between consecutive falling edges of the associated pulses defines the transmitted data words. That is, the number of consecutive clock cycles (e.g. three microseconds) between two consecutive pulses corresponds to the transmitted symbol or data directly.
As the controller 2 of
In this particular embodiment, the controller 2 comprises a digital signal processor (DSP) 26 having stored its associated program logic in read-only memory (ROM) 28, and having access to further data stored in an erasable EPROM (EEPROM) 30. While the read-only memory comprises data required for the operation of the DSP 26 itself, the EEPROM 30 can, for example, comprise additional data, such as, for example, calibration data for the sensors associated with the controller 2, serial numbers, manufacturer codes or the like.
The controller 2, in particular the DSP 26, receives, via the sensor input terminals 18a and 18b, sensor input signals indicative of the physical quantities sensed by the individual sensors.
The DSP 26 then provides a first and a second message, comprising information on at least one of the sensor signals of the sensors 14 or 16. That is, a representation of the content provided by the sensors 14 and 16, that is of the sensor signals, is transformed to appropriate messages or to an appropriate message format. The message, that is the digital representation of the content, is then transferred to an SPC protocol generator 32 which transfers the message into the transmission format as required by the SPC standard. The protocol generator 32 provides the message as ready for transmission according to the SPC protocol to a first transmitter 34 or output stage operating according to a first transmission technique, and, in parallel, to a second transmitter 36 or current modulator, operating according to a second, different transmission technique. In the particular example, the first transmitter operates in the voltage domain, i.e., the transmission technique relies on the variation of voltage levels on the bus line connected to the first terminal 20, as described in the specification of the SPC protocol. To this end, different voltage levels can be defined and the transition from one voltage level to the other voltage level indicates the start of a time measurement according to the SPC protocol.
In parallel, the second message is processed by the second transmitter 36, which is operating in the current domain. That is, the physical layer implementation differs from that of the first transmitter 34 in that the transitions between the different states of the SPC protocol are signaled by differing current levels. To this end, for example, a current level representing a logical “low” state can be defined to be one half of a current level associated to the logical “high” state. However, further embodiments may, of course, define other voltage and/or current levels to transmit or signal the transition between the different states.
In utilizing an embodiment of a controller 2 as illustrated in
This can increase the functional safety without having to implement two completely separate sensor and transmitter systems, each making use of the same technology. Embodiments therefore can be not only cheaper than such an approach but also be safer with respect to critical operating conditions and environments. As already previously indicated, systematic errors in two identical implementations can be avoided when implementing systems according to which two transmission paths are used with different transmission techniques in order to transmit messages to the same receiver.
Although
Irrespective of whether the protocols used in the protocol generators 32 and 38 are identical or not, the embodiment of
For the sake of completeness,
To this end, it can be noted that the first and second messages can either be received from an external device, as for example illustrated in the embodiments of
In a transmission step 52 the first message is digitally transmitted to the receiver via the first transmission path according to a first transmission technique. Furthermore, the transmission step comprises digitally transmitting the second message to the same receiver via the second transmission path according to a second transmission technique, the second transmission technique being different from the first transmission technique. Both transmissions may be performed in parallel or at the same time.
In a message creation step 54, a content to be transmitted is processed so that a first message is provided such that the first message comprises the content and a second message is provided such that also the second message comprises the content. Comprising the content in this respect means that the identical content can be reconstructed from either one of the messages according to a reconstruction rule. That is, both messages, when transmitted, transport the same information.
In a transmission step 56, the first message is transmitted according to the first transmission technique while the second message is transmitted according to the second transmission technique so as to allow for a redundant transmission and a possible reconstruction of the content even when one of the transmission techniques fails.
While exemplary embodiments have previously been described in particular with respect to sensor implementations, that is, for implementations where sensor data or sensor information is read out and transmitted by a controller, further embodiments can also utilize the concept described herein in other applications. For example, apart from automotive applications, functional safety can play a role in applications in the aircraft or space industry or the like. According to the previous considerations, the embodiments described herein or further alternative embodiments can, therefore, also be applied in other technical fields and areas, such as for example the aerospace industry.
The description and drawings merely illustrate the principles of the invention. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements that, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of the invention and are included within its spirit and scope. Furthermore, all examples recited herein are principally intended expressly to be only for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the invention and the concepts contributed by the inventor(s) to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass equivalents thereof.
Functional blocks denoted herein as “means for . . . ” (performing a certain function) shall be understood as functional blocks comprising circuitry that is adapted for performing a certain function, respectively. Hence, a “means for s.th.” may as well be understood as a “means being adapted or suited for s.th.”. A means being adapted for performing a certain function does, hence, not imply that such means necessarily is performing said function (at a given time instant).
Functions of various elements shown in the figures, including any functional blocks labeled as “means,” “means for,” etc., may be provided through the use of dedicated hardware, such as “a processor,” “a controller,” etc. as well as hardware capable of executing software in association with appropriate software. Moreover, any entity described herein as “means,” may correspond to or be implemented as “one or more modules,” “one or more devices,” “one or more units,” etc. When provided by a processor, the functions may be provided by a single dedicated processor, by a single shared processor, or by a plurality of individual processors, some of which may be shared. Moreover, explicit use of the term “processor” or “controller” should not be construed to refer exclusively to hardware capable of executing software, and may implicitly include, without limitation, digital signal processor (DSP) hardware, network processor, application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), field programmable gate array (FPGA), read only memory (ROM) for storing software, random access memory (RAM), and non-volatile storage. Other hardware, conventional and/or custom, may also be included.
It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that any block diagrams herein represent conceptual views of illustrative circuitry embodying the principles of the invention. Similarly, it will be appreciated that any flow charts, flow diagrams, state transition diagrams, pseudo code, and the like represent various processes which may be substantially represented in computer readable medium and so executed by a computer or processor, whether or not such computer or processor is explicitly shown.
Furthermore, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, where each claim may stand on its own as a separate embodiment. While each claim may stand on its own as a separate embodiment, it is to be noted that—although a dependent claim may refer in the claims to a specific combination with one or more other claims—other embodiments may also include a combination of the dependent claim with the subject matter of each other dependent claim. Such combinations are proposed herein unless it is stated that a specific combination is not intended. Furthermore, it is intended to include also features of a claim to any other independent claim even if this claim is not directly made dependent to the independent claim.
It is further to be noted that methods disclosed in the specification or in the claims may be implemented by a device having means for performing each of the respective steps of these methods.
Further, it is to be understood that the disclosure of multiple steps or functions disclosed in the specification or claims may not be construed as to be within the specific order. Therefore, the disclosure of multiple steps or functions will not limit these to a particular order unless such steps or functions are not interchangeable for technical reasons. Furthermore, in some embodiments a single step may include or may be broken into multiple sub steps. Such sub steps may be included and part of the disclosure of this single step unless explicitly excluded.
The present application is continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/750,444, filed on Jan. 25, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5166664 | Fish | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5828850 | Misaka | Oct 1998 | A |
| 6072646 | Ebata | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6188314 | Wallace | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6493401 | Erckert | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6522689 | Heinrich | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6545625 | Hottgenroth | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6864671 | Bernardon | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 7053655 | Brox | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7282995 | Stephelbauer | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7295578 | Lyle | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7589431 | Hentsch | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7660305 | Wiget | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 8230146 | Wiesgickl | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8446977 | Ovchinnikov | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8503501 | Saito | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 9467185 | Hammerschmidt | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9503250 | Van Rens | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9565036 | Zerbe | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9571155 | Malhotra | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9602317 | Hailu | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9654310 | Chang | May 2017 | B1 |
| 9722822 | Zhang | Aug 2017 | B1 |
| 9735992 | Hammerschmidt | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9768978 | Coenen | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9819523 | Lee | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9847802 | Farley | Dec 2017 | B1 |
| 9917590 | Zhang | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9929760 | Chu | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9941999 | Milesi | Apr 2018 | B1 |
| 10187099 | Rasbornig | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10348417 | Krall | Jul 2019 | B1 |
| 10547477 | Nguyen | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10756857 | Rasbornig | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10903865 | Rasbornig | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10911086 | Hammerschmidt | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 11032100 | Scherr | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11549971 | Stepan | Jan 2023 | B2 |
| 11677441 | Fleischhacker | Jun 2023 | B2 |
| 11689326 | Rasbornig | Jun 2023 | B2 |
| 20010020281 | Retter | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020001225 | Poechmueller | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20030026251 | Morris et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043750 | Remboski | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030095367 | Mares | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20040055370 | Normann | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040120405 | Jaussi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20050040709 | Enders | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267659 | Sunaga | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060133601 | Ferianz | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195018 | Guillen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070060394 | Gowin | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070160075 | Carpassi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20080094317 | Kim | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080247544 | Candelore | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312860 | Bauerle | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090003464 | Matsubara | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090046773 | Scherr | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090058620 | Bernardon | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090144385 | Gold | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090157928 | Riegebauer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090177827 | Perisich | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216408 | Ueno | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090267673 | Kamenicky | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090298645 | Wang | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090315899 | Pourbigharaz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100002821 | Hammerschmidt | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100118887 | Matsumoto | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100199018 | Harada | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262736 | Wiesgickl | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20120019354 | Saldin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120074972 | Rasbornig | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120106976 | Bernard | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120195400 | Tomar | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120206257 | Krippendorf | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20130163995 | Uemura | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130181529 | Tang | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130198422 | Subbiah | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130253774 | Hammerschmidt | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130287143 | Davies | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130344834 | Souto Diez | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130345924 | Tomar | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140028086 | Hammerschmidt | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140081120 | Valdastri | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140214970 | Rasbornig | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20150180482 | Bourstein | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150194992 | Rasbornig | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20160020797 | Hammerschmidt | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160119006 | Hammerschmidt | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160182109 | Rasbornig | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20170111195 | Hammerschmidt | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20190199451 | Krall | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190199558 | Nguyen | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20200096363 | Kollmitzer | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200244481 | Scherr | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200358565 | Rasbornig | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20210380060 | Koch | Dec 2021 | A1 |
| 20220026976 | Stepan | Jan 2022 | A1 |
| 20220038222 | Rasbornig | Feb 2022 | A1 |
| 20220052873 | Lewandowski | Feb 2022 | A1 |
| 20220294492 | Fleischhacker | Sep 2022 | A1 |
| 20230173684 | Wang | Jun 2023 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1909005 | Feb 2007 | CN |
| 101499639 | Aug 2009 | CN |
| 101960767 | Jan 2011 | CN |
| 202275482 | Jun 2012 | CN |
| 102726032 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 104937908 | Sep 2015 | CN |
| 10142408 | Apr 2003 | DE |
| 102007046440 | Jan 2009 | DE |
| 102008031498 | Jan 2010 | DE |
| 102009040911 | Apr 2010 | DE |
| H0969843 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| H10124407 | May 1998 | JP |
| 2002511212 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2020 for German Patent Application No. 102013114355.5. |
| Search Report dated Dec. 7, 2016 for French Patent Application No. 1400024. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2019 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201710728664.3. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2016 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201410034275.7. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2016 for Chinese Patent APPiication No. 201410034275. 7. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200358565 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13750444 | Jan 2013 | US |
| Child | 16941050 | US |
