This application claims priority to Swedish Application No. 1950209-5, filed Feb. 19, 2019; the content of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The invention relates generally to automatic amplification of visual impressions of spatial relationships. In particular, the present invention concerns a method for assisting a subject to acquire spatial information about a surrounding environment, a processing circuitry for performing this method and a head mountable arrangement containing the proposed processing circuitry. The invention also relates to a computer program product and a non-volatile data carrier.
Eye/gaze tracking is the process of measuring the motion and/or positioning of an eye relative to the head, or the point of gaze. An eyetracker is a device for measuring eye positions and eye movement. Eyetrackers are used in many different applications.
There are various methods for measuring eye movement. The most popular variant uses video images from which the eye position is extracted. Other methods use search coils, or are based on the electrooculogram. Originally, eyetracking technology was used in research on the visual system, in psychology, in psycholinguistics, marketing and in product design. Today, we see an increasing use of eyetrackers as input devices for human-computer interaction in various kinds of devices and apparatuses from smartphones to aircrafts. Many times, an eyetracker is an efficient means of interaction for a person who has reduced ability to speak and/or is unable to enter computer commands via conventional interfaces.
US 9,185,352 describes systems and methods that relate to a user providing input to a computing device using eye tracking from a mobile position. Here, a scene camera is mounted to the user so that the system collects image information related to where the user is looking. An indication is provided on a monitor of the computing device, or other field of view, to signify the presence and location of an identifying region of the monitor or field of view. An eye camera mounted to the user collects image information of the user's eye relating to a direction of gaze of the eye. When the direction of gaze of the user's tracked eye intersects the identifying region of the monitor or field of view, suitable eye tracking methods for controlling a computing device may be used to send instructions to the computing device.
US 2015/0049012 shows a method, an apparatus and a computer program product that provide feedback to a user of an augmented reality (AR) device having an optical see-through head mounted display (HMD). The apparatus obtains a location on the HMD corresponding to a user interaction with an object displayed on the HMD. The object may be an icon on the HMD and the user interaction may be an attempt by the user to select the icon through an eye gaze or gesture. The apparatus determines whether a spatial relationship between the location of user interaction and the object satisfies a criterion, and outputs a sensory indication, e.g., visual display, sound, vibration, when the criterion is satisfied. The apparatus may be configured to output a sensory indication when user interaction is successful, e.g., the icon was selected. Alternatively, the apparatus may be configured to output a sensory indication when the user interaction fails.
Thus, different technical solutions exist that identify a user's point of regard and provide feedback in the form of visual display, sound and vibration regarding the user's interaction with an apparatus.
However, there is yet no efficient means of aiding a user's sense of sight to gain enhanced spatial knowledge about the general environment surrounding the user.
One object of the present invention is therefore to offer a solution that enables a subject to acquire spatial information about a surrounding environment by using the subject's own ocular activity to attain more details than the subject's eyes themselves can provide.
According to one aspect of the invention, this object is achieved by a method performed in a processing circuitry, which method involves receiving gaze data describing an estimated point of regard of the subject. The method involves receiving spatial data describing a distance between a reference point and an object in the surrounding environment; and generating a feedback signal for presentation to the subject, where the feedback signal is generated based on the estimated point of regard and the spatial data. The feedback signal indicates a distance from the subject to the object in the surrounding environment.
This method is advantageous because it enables amplification of various visual stimuli and/or replacing visual stimuli with one or more other sensory stimulus, for instance relating to hearing and/or touch. Consequently, people with any degree of visual capacity, i.e. ranging from being completely blind to having perfect eyesight, can gain enhanced spatial information about their environment in a robust and reliable manner.
According to one embodiment of this aspect of the invention, feedback signal also indicates a movement of the object relative to the subject. For instance, an approaching object may be indicated in a first manner, while a stationary object may be indicated in a second manner. Of course, a departing object may be indicated in yet a third manner. Thereby, the user can identify and avoid potentially harmful objects in his/her environment.
The feedback signal is preferably configured to cause at least one first sensory stimulus to be applied to the subject in the form of an acoustic signal, a haptic signal and/or a visual signal. Thus, the subject may “regard” his/her surrounding environment via sound cues and/or a haptic actuator (e.g. a wristband) in addition to, or as a supplement to his/her own visual impressions.
According to another embodiment of this aspect of the invention, an intensity of the at least one first sensory stimulus reflects a distance to a first surface element of an object that intersects a straight line between an eye-base line of the subject and the estimated point of regard. Here, the first surface element is located closer to the eye-base line than any other surface element of objects in the surrounding environment along said straight line. Preferably, the intensity of the feedback signal is relatively high for a comparatively short distance, and vice versa. This means that the estimated point of regard “sees” the object that is located closest to the subject. In other words, normal vision is mimicked in a natural and intuitive manner.
According to further embodiments of this aspect of the invention, the reference point is either located on the eye-base line, or at a geometric center of a head mountable arrangement worn by the subject. The former is straightforward to implement. In the latter case, the head mountable arrangement is presumed to incorporate an eyetracker that generates the gaze data. The geometric center represents an estimated point around which the head mountable arrangement is rotated when mounted on the subject. This, in turn, provides a good and consistent user experience.
According to yet another embodiment of this aspect of the invention, in addition to or as an alternative to distance information, the spatial data describes color and light intensity information reflected from at least one object in the surrounding environment. The method involves obtaining at least one visual quality of at least one of said at least one object from the spatial data; and generating the feedback signal such that it reflects said at least one visual quality. Thus, for example, the at least one visual quality may represent a color, a surface texture and/or an object class describing the object. The feedback signal may be configured to cause at least one second sensory stimulus to be applied to the subject, which reflects the color, the surface texture and/or the object class, and is different from the at least one first stimulus. Consequently, for example in parallel with a tactile feedback indicating distance, the subject may hear an audio signal saying “green book.” Of course, for a visually impaired person, this is highly useful information.
According to still another embodiment of this aspect of the invention, generating the feedback signal involves presenting a visual signal to the subject in the form of an ocular cue confirming a position for the estimated point of regard at a particular object in the surrounding environment. The ocular cue is represented by at least one graphical element being shown in a field of view for the subject at such a position that the at least one graphical element superimposes the estimated point of regard. Hence, a seeing person can be efficiently guided through a scene even if he/she has very poor vision.
In addition to, or as an alternative, the method may involve presenting an acoustic signal to the subject, which acoustic signal provides a sound cue confirming a position for the estimated point of regard at a particular object in the surrounding environment. Here, the sound cue simulates an acoustic source being located at the estimated point of regard via three-dimensional positional audio effects. Thus, the subject will “hear” the object that he/she is looking at. For a blind person, or someone with a severe visual impairment, this gives very good guidance when orienting him-/herself in an area.
According to a further aspect of the invention the object is achieved by a computer program containing instructions which, when executed in a processing circuitry, cause the processing circuitry to carry out the above-described method.
According to another aspect of the invention, the object is achieved by a non-volatile data carrier containing such a computer program.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, the above object is achieved by a processing circuitry configured to be included in a head mountable arrangement for assisting a subject to acquire spatial information about a surrounding environment. The processing circuitry contains first and second input interfaces and an output interface.
The first input interface is configured to receive gaze data from an eyetracker, which gaze data describe an estimated point of regard of the subject. The second input interface is configured to receive spatial data describing a distance between a reference point and an object in the surrounding environment. The output interface is configured to provide a feedback signal indicating a distance from the subject to the object in the surrounding environment. The feedback signal is generated based on the estimated point of regard and the spatial data. The advantages of this processing circuitry, as well as the preferred embodiments thereof, are apparent from the discussion above with reference to the above method.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, the above object is achieved by a head mountable arrangement containing the proposed processing circuitry, an eyetracker, a distance sensor, and at least one feedback unit. The eyetracker is configured to generate gaze data describing an estimated point of regard of a subject wearing the head mountable arrangement. The distance sensor, e.g. including a 3D camera, is configured to generate spatial data describing a distance between a reference point and an object in a surrounding environment. The at least one feedback unit is configured to present a feedback signal to the subject, which feedback signal is generated based on the estimated point of regard and the spatial data. The feedback signal indicates a distance from the subject to the object in the surrounding environment. The advantages of this head mountable arrangement, as well as the preferred embodiments thereof, are apparent from the discussion above with reference to the above method.
Further advantages, beneficial features and applications of the present invention will be apparent from the following description and the dependent claims.
The invention is now to be explained more closely by means of preferred embodiments, which are disclosed as examples, and with reference to the attached drawings.
The head mountable arrangement A contains a processing circuitry 210, an eyetracker 110, a distance sensor 130 and one or more feedback units 115R, 115L, 121 and 122 respectively.
The eyetracker 110 is configured to generate gaze data describing an estimated point of regard of the subject U who is wearing the head mountable arrangement A. In
The distance sensor 130 is configured to generate spatial data describing respective distances between a reference point and at least one object within a view field/detection range VF in an environment surrounding the subject U. Thus, the distance sensor 130 may include a depth mapping camera, such as a TOF (time of flight) camera or a 3D camera, e.g. using stereo triangulation/stereo or photogrammetry, a structured-light 3D scanner, a laser rangefinder, an acoustic range finder (e.g. using ultrasound) and/or a radar to obtain depth data.
Each of the at least one feedback unit is configured to present a feedback signal to the subject U. The feedback signal is generated based on the estimated point of regard, e.g. PoR1 or PoR2, and the spatial data produced by the distance sensor 130. The feedback signal indicates a distance from the subject U to a particular object, e.g. 141 or 142, of the objects surrounding the subject U. Examples of appropriate feedback units are displays, e.g. in the form of an HMD (head/helmet mounted display) or EVFs (electronic viewfinders), either as a common unit for both eyes, or as separate units for each respective eye 115R and 115L. Alternatively, or in addition to such a display, the feedback unit may be represented by one or more headphones/earphone pieces 121 and/or haptic actuators, e.g. in the form of a haptic wristband 122 and/or an electronic braille board.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the feedback signal also indicates a movement of the object relative to the subject U. The movement, in turn, may be expressed in terms of velocity and direction. This means that an approaching object can be indicated in a first manner, while a stationary object can be indicated in a second manner and/or a departing object can be indicated in a third manner. Further, the object's velocity is preferably reflected by a magnitude of the feedback signal. Thereby, the user U can be aided to identify and avoid potentially harmful objects in his/her environment.
Referring now to
The first input interface 211 is configured to receive the gaze data DGT from the eyetracker 110. The gaze data DGT describe an estimated point of regard, e.g. PoR1 or PoR2, of the subject U. The second input interface 212 is configured to receive the spatial data Dspat from the distance sensor 130. The spatial data Dspat describe at least one distance, e.g. d1 and d2, between the reference point P and at least one object, e.g. 141 and 142, in the surrounding environment. The output interface 213 is configured to provide the feedback signal SFB that indicates the distance from the subject U to one of said objects, e.g. 141 or 142. The feedback signal SFB is generated based on the estimated point of regard, e.g. PoR1 or PoR2, and the spatial data Dspat.
The processing circuitry 210 is configured to control the overall functioning of the head mountable arrangement A in such a manner that the subject U is assisted to acquire spatial information about an environment surrounding the subject U. Inter alia, according to one embodiment of the invention, this means that the processing circuitry 210 controls the output interface 213 to generate the feedback signal SFB to cause at least one first sensory stimulus to be applied to the subject U. The at least one first sensory stimulus, in turn, may be in the form of an acoustic signal SFB-A, a haptic signal SFB-H and/or a visual signal SFB-V. Specifically, a first feedback driver 221 may be configured to generate the acoustic signal SFB-A for presentation via a speaker, a headphone and/or an earpiece, e.g. 121; a second feed-back driver 222 may be configured to generate the haptic signal SFB-H for presentation via haptic actuator, e.g. the haptic wristband 122 and a third feedback driver 223 may be configured to generate the visual signal SFB-V for presentation via display, e.g. 115, 115R, and/or 115L.
Preferably, an intensity of the at least one first sensory stimulus reflects a distance, say d1, to a first surface element of an object 141 intersecting a straight line between the eye-base line of the subject U and the estimated point of regard PoR1. Here, the first surface element is located closer to the eye-base line than any other surface element of the objects in the surrounding environment along said straight line. In other words, the estimated point of regard PoR1 “sees” objects in a manner corresponding to how the sense of sight functions for a person with normal eyesight. To provide an intuitive user experience, it is preferable that the intensity of the at least one first sensory stimulus is relatively high for a comparatively short distance, and relatively low for a comparatively long distance. For example a volume of sound generated in the headphone 121 may be stronger when the subject's U estimated point of regard PoR1 is located on the first object 141 at the first distance d1 than when the subject's U estimated point of regard PoR2 is located on the second object 142 at the second distance d2 because the second distance d2 is longer than the first distance d1. Analogously, a haptic force and/or haptic frequency generated by the haptic wristband 122 may be stronger/higher when the subject's U estimated point of regard PoR1 is located on the first object 141 than when the subject's U estimated point of regard PoR2 is located on the second object 142. Alternatively, or in addition thereto, a visual signal SFB-V may be generated, which visual signal SFB-V illustrates the differences in distance between d1 and d2. For instance, the somewhat shorter distance d1 to the first object 141 may be illustrated via the display 115R, 115L and/or 115 being more brightly illuminated and/or showing a pattern with higher contrast than when the estimated point of regard PoR2 is positioned at the second object 142 at the longer distance d2.
If the distance sensor 130 contains an image registering means, for example an electronic sensor based on CCD (charge-coupled device) or CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor) technology, the spatial data Dspat may further describe light intensity and/or color information reflected from the objects 141, 142 and 143 in the surrounding environment. If such image-related information is available in the spatial data Dspat, the processing circuitry 210 is preferably configured to obtain at least one visual quality of at least one of said objects from the spatial data Dspat. The processing circuitry 210 is preferably further configured to generate the feedback signal SFB, such that it further reflects the at least one visual quality. For example, the at least one visual quality may express a color, a surface texture and/or an object class.
Here, the feedback signal SFB may reflect the at least one visual quality by causing at least one second sensory stimulus to be applied to the subject U, i.e. a stimulus that is different from the at least one first sensory stimulus. This means that if for example the first sensory stimulus is a haptic feedback produced by the haptic wristband 122, the second sensory stimulus may be acoustic feedback generated by the headphone 121, preferably in parallel with the haptic feedback. For instance, while the haptic feedback illustrates the second distance d2 to the second object 142, the headphone 121 may present an audio message saying: “shiny blue” to the subject U. The object class may express a categorization of any object detected at the estimated point of regard, for example by employing an image processing matching algorithm in the processing circuitry 210. Consequently, provided that the second object 142 has been categorized to belong to an object class “cups”, the headphone 121 may feedback a second sensory stimulus in the form of an audio message saying: “shiny blue cup.”
In
In order to sum up, and with reference to the flow diagram in
In a first step 510, gaze data are received that describe an estimated point of regard of the subject. In a subsequent, or more preferably, parallel, step 520; spatial data are received that describe respective distances between a reference point and objects in the surrounding environment.
Then, in a step 530, a feedback signal is generated for presentation to the subject. The feedback signal is generated based on the estimated point of regard and the spatial data. The feedback signal indicates a distance from the subject to an object of said objects in the surrounding environment. Preferably, the feedback signal indicates the distance to a surface element of an object intersecting a straight line between an eye-base line of the subject and the estimated point of regard, where said surface element is located closer to the eye-base line than any other surface element along said straight line.
Thereafter, the procedure loops back to steps 510 and 520 again.
All of the process steps, as well as any sub-sequence of steps, described with reference to
The term “comprises/comprising” when used in this specification is taken to specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps or components. However, the term does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more additional features, integers, steps or components or groups thereof.
The invention is not restricted to the described embodiments in the figures, but may be varied freely within the scope of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1950209-5 | Feb 2019 | SE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20070041600 | Zachman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080088469 | Doemens et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20140184496 | Gribetz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150035744 | Robbins et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20160048019 | Haddick et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160054837 | Stafford | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160267708 | Nistico et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20180101223 | Ishihara et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180299952 | Koker | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20200117270 | Gibson | Apr 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
108351522 | Jul 2018 | CN |
549488 | Jan 1979 | JP |
130467 | Aug 2015 | RO |
130945 | Feb 2016 | RO |
2016110804 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2016131793 | Aug 2016 | WO |
2017149526 | Sep 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
CN202010090696.7, “Office Action”, dated Apr. 28, 2022, 10 pages. |
EP20158207.9, “Extended European Search Report”, dated Jun. 23, 2020, 7 pages. |
SE1950209-5, “Search Report”, dated Oct. 4, 2019, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200387221 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |