This disclosure relates generally to patient monitoring. More particularly, the present invention relates to determination of an indicator that signifies the general clinical state of a patient in terms of planned care and that may be used as a guide in evaluating when the patient is clinically ready for or in need of planned care measures.
Patient monitors are electronic devices designed to display physiological information about a subject. Electrocardiogram (ECG), electroencephalogram (EEG), plethysmographic signals, and signals related to blood pressure, temperature, and respiration represent typical physiological information contained in full-size patient monitors. Patient monitors are typically also furnished with alarming functionality to alert the nursing staff when a vital sign or physiological parameter of a patient exceeds or drops below a preset limit. Alarms are normally both audible and visual effects aiming to alert the staff to a life-threatening condition or to another event considered vital. In most monitors, the alarm limits may be defined by the user, since the limits typically depend on patient etiology, age, gender, medication, and various other subjective factors. Each specific physiological parameter, such as heart rate or blood pressure, may also be assigned more than one alarm limit.
In addition to individual sensor/parameter alarms, patient monitors can be configured to raise combinatory alarms. That is, several physiological parameters may be used to determine a combined index and to give an alarm when the combined index fulfills a specific criterion. The combinatory alarms may range from simple combinations like “low heart rate and low arterial pressure” to complex rule-based scenarios used in various clinical support systems, for example.
One drawback of the use of the combinatory indices/alarms is that the more physiological parameters are used to determine the combinatory index, the more difficult it is for a clinician to grasp the connection between the behavior of the index and the underlying physiological behavior of the patient. Along with the increasing number of parameters, the determination rule of the combinatory index becomes more complex, especially if different weights are used for different parameters, i.e. components of the combinatory index. The alarm limits related to such indices typically signify specific events and it is important that the clinician is fully aware of the physiological meaning of the alarm for each patient, otherwise the use of the combinatory alarms leads to low appreciation of the features of the monitoring system.
Another drawback related to the present patient monitor systems is that both the individual sensor alarms and the combinatory indices are designed to watch over critical events that are more or less sudden in nature. Consequently, the present patient monitor systems can detect such events but cannot reflect the more general, albeit small and/or slow deterioration or improvement in the general clinical condition of the patient. Particularly, the present patient monitor systems fail to provide illustrative indicators for assisting the staff in deciding when the general clinical state of the patient has improved enough for the next phase of the planned care. The present patient monitor systems therefore cannot support the staff in deciding when the patient is ready for a new phase of therapy. Furthermore, clinical decision support systems are complex and expensive, due to the embedded diagnostic intelligence, and it would be desirable if common patient monitors with only modest computing power, and thus also modest cost, could be provided with an ability to track the slow and/or small changes in the general clinical state of the patient in view of the planned care.
The above-mentioned problems are addressed herein which will be comprehended from the following specification.
In an embodiment, a method for determining a clinical index indicative of a general clinical state of a subject in terms of planned care includes selecting a set of physiological parameters for a type of care to be applied to a subject, the set of physiological parameter being determined from the subject. The method further includes attaching a targeted value range to each physiological parameter belonging to the set of physiological parameters and determining a general condition index of the subject as a function of at least two integers belonging to a group including (i) the number of physiological parameters of the set that are currently within respective targeted value ranges, (ii) the number of physiological parameters of the set that are currently outside respective targeted value ranges, and (iii) the total number of physiological parameters in the set of physiological parameters.
In another embodiment, an apparatus for determining a clinical index indicative of a general clinical state of a subject in terms of planned care includes a selection unit configured to select a set of physiological parameters for a type of care to be applied to a subject, the set of physiological parameter being determined from the subject. The apparatus further includes a range definition unit configured to associate a targeted value range with each physiological parameter belonging to the set of physiological parameters and a determination unit configured to determine a general condition index of the subject as a function of at least two integers belonging to a group including (i) the number of physiological parameters of the set that are currently within respective targeted value ranges, (ii) the number of physiological parameters of the set that are currently outside respective targeted value ranges, and (iii) the total number of physiological parameters in the set of physiological parameters.
In a still further embodiment, a computer program product for determining a clinical index indicative of a general clinical state of a subject in terms of planned care comprises a first program product portion configured to select a set of physiological parameters for a type of care to be applied to a subject, the set of physiological parameter being determined from the subject. The computer program product further comprises a second program product portion configured to associate a targeted value range with each physiological parameter belonging to the set of physiological parameters and a third program product portion configured to determine a general condition index of the subject as a function of two integers belonging to a group including (i) the number of physiological parameters of the set that are currently within respective targeted value ranges, (ii) the number of physiological parameters of the set that are currently outside respective targeted value ranges, and (iii) the total number of physiological parameters in the set of physiological parameters.
Various other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be made apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.
The physiological signals 11 acquired from the subject 100 are supplied to a control and processing unit 12 through a pre-processing stage (not shown) comprising typically an input amplifier and a filter, for example. The control and processing unit converts the signals into digitized format for each measurement channel. The digitized signal data may then be stored in the memory 13 of the control and processing unit. The digitized signal data may be utilized by parameter algorithms 14 adapted to record, when executed by the control and processing unit, the time series of the physiological parameters. The obtained time series of the physiological parameters may be stored in the memory.
For the determination of the general condition index, the control and processing unit is provided with one or more index algorithms 15, each index algorithm being configured to determine a general condition index that reflects the general clinical condition of the subject in view of the type of care related to the algorithm. It is to be noted here that depending on the planned care the general clinical condition is evaluated from different points of view and therefore different physiological parameters are needed depending on the type of care. Below, ventilator weaning is used as an example of the type of care applied to the subject.
The control and processing unit is further configured to control the display unit 16 of the apparatus. A display control algorithm 17 may be stored in the memory of the control and processing unit and the apparatus may be provided with more than one display unit. The user may supply information and control the apparatus/system through user interface 18. Various input information, such as patient data, may also be input through a network interface 19. Further, all the physiological parameters are not necessarily determined by the control and processing unit based on the physiological waveform signals 11 measured from the subject at the bedside, but one or more of the physiological parameters needed in the determination of the general condition index may also be received through the network interface from a laboratory, for example.
Each physiological parameter may be provided with a default targeted value range that defines the range of values that the parameter should have normally. The targeted value range is termed target zone in this context. The default limits of the target zones may be stored in memory 13, as is denoted with reference number 101 in
After the determination of the target zones, the control and processing unit determines the general condition index (step 26) based on the selected set of physiological parameters and the respective target zones, compares the obtained value of the index with preset alarm limit(s), and raises an alarm if necessary (step 27). The control and processing unit further displays the index in multiple formats to the user (step 28).
As the physiological waveform signals 11 are typically processed in fixed length time windows termed epochs, new values for physiological parameters are obtained at regular intervals, such as every 30 seconds. Steps 26 to 28 may be carried out accordingly, thereby to obtain a new index value at regular intervals, such as every 30 seconds.
In step 27, the value of the ratio is compared with the alarm limit(s) of the index and an alarm is produced if necessary. It is to be noted that the individual parameters used for the index may each have their own alarm limit(s) and an alarm may be produced for each parameter individually.
In terms of the determination of the general condition index of the subject, the control and processing unit 12 of
The menu field of
The screen page of
Depending on the value of M, the trends and the target zones of the selected physiological parameters may be presented on one or several screen pages and the general condition index may be presented on one or more of these pages. Furthermore, various mechanisms may be utilized to enhance the clarity of the presentation. For example, legends may be used to indicate which curves belong to the left scale and which to the right scale. The parameter or index trend graphs may also be displayed with different colors depending on the magnitude of the index or parameter value with respect to respective limit values.
A conventional patient monitor may be upgraded to enable the monitor to determine and display the general condition index. Such an upgrade may be implemented, for example, by delivering to the monitor a software module that may involve different functionality depending on the parameters available in the monitor. The software module may be delivered, for example, on a data carrier, such as a CD or a memory card, or the through a telecommunications network. Since the software module may utilize the physiological parameters already determined by the monitor, the module does not necessarily comprise more than three portions: a first program product portion configured to select a set of physiological parameters for the type of care to be applied to the subject, a second program product portion configured to associate a targeted value range with each physiological parameter belonging to the set of physiological parameters, and a third program product portion configured to determine a general condition index of the subject as a function of two integers belonging to a group including the number of physiological parameters of the set that are currently within respective targeted value ranges, the number of physiological parameters of the set that are currently outside respective targeted value ranges, and the total number of physiological parameters in the set of physiological parameters. However, the software module may also determine one or more of the physiological parameters, especially if all physiological parameters are not available in the monitor, and the module may be provided with a display control portion for the features of the index visualization. The determined parameters are thus typically new, derived parameters, such the ratio PaO2/FIO2. Regardless of whether or not the software of the control and processing unit is upgradable, the control and processing unit may also utilize physiological parameters transferred from an external entity, such as a laboratory or an external data system. The set of physiological parameters selected for a type of care to be applied to the subject may thus include internally determined parameters and/or parameters imported from an external entity. The apparatus may also be implemented as an auxiliary apparatus/unit connectable to an existing patient monitor. In this embodiment, the apparatus/unit may comprise the functionality of the software module, for example.
The general condition index provides a single global descriptor for the condition of the subject in terms of the type of care applied to the subject. Although the descriptor is a combinatory index, it is clear for clinician how the index is formed and how the components affect the final index value. This global descriptor may also be adapted to the subject in question by selecting the parameters based on which the index is determined and/or by adjusting the limits of the targeted value range of one or more parameter. The “weight” of a single parameter may be adjusted by extending or narrowing the target zone, so that it will be more likely that the parameter value will be within the target zone. Yet, the “weight” of a parameter remains clear to the user, since the limits of the target zone can be seen from the screen. It is therefore also easy for the user to modify the effect of a physiological parameter on the index.
In step 24, the user may also be given a chance to adjust the set of parameters, not only the target zones. The general condition index may also be defined as the ratio (M−L)/M, where M−L represents the number of physiological parameters that are currently outside the respective target zones. This may be used, for example, to track if the general condition of the subject is deteriorating. Furthermore, the general condition index may also be determined as the ratio L/(M−L), (M−L)/L, M/L, or M/(M−L). All ratios reflect the balance between parameters that are and are not within their expected value ranges. Thus, an alert can be specified as high or low limit violation of “in range” or “out of range” percentage.
Instead of the ratio of the two integers, another function of two or three integers selected or derived from among L, M−L, and M may be used, such as a difference, a ratio of differences, or a square of a ratio. The integer 2L−M, for example, directly indicates whether a majority of the parameters are within the respective target zones. The result obtained may further be scaled or normalized to a desired index scale.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural or operational elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they have structural or operational elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.