The present invention regards a method of absorbing vapours and gases by controlling overpressure in storage tanks for liquids, together with an application of the method.
When storing liquids in tanks, any movements or changes in pressure or temperature will cause the liquid to “breathe”. The term “breathing” here indicates that molecules pass from the liquid phase to the gaseous phase or vice versa in order to achieve thermodynamic equilibrium. This mass transfer between liquid and gas can be considerable, and may take place across large temperature and pressure ranges for liquids containing many different components. The reason for this is that different components have different boiling points and vapour pressures, along with the fact that the liquid is capable of associating volatile components.
If a closed tank moves, the liquid will also move. This will cause local pressure changes to occur in the liquid, which may cause vapour to come out of the liquid, in turn resulting in a pressure increase in the tank. Upon cessation of this movement, the liquid will be able to absorb this vapour, resulting in a pressure reduction.
Both gas and liquid will change volume upon changes in pressure and temperature. When the temperature rises, most liquids and gases will occupy a larger volume (expansion). Therefore, if the tank volume does not change, the pressure will rise. When the temperature falls, the opposite will occur, i.e. a pressure reduction. Thus the thermodynamic relationships cause closed tanks to be subjected to alternating overpressure and underpressure.
Overpressure and underpressure may also occur in a closed tank when liquid is introduced to or evacuated from the tank.
There are limits to what can be tolerated in the way of pressure changes in tanks. In the event of an excessively low pressure, there is a risk of the tank collapsing, and in the event of an excessively high pressure, there is a risk of the tank cracking. Thus the problem associated with pressure control of storage tanks is two-part.
Today, a pressure reduction that may lead to the tank collapsing is often dealt with by introducing more external gas. As an example, when transporting petroleum products and crude oil in tankers, a so-called “inerting” process is carried out when the pressure is too low. This method consists in leading purified waste gas (inert gas) from the propulsion engine of the vessel down into the tanks. In the case of other types of transport or storage, e.g. transport of petrol by road or rail, the problem is often solved by allowing air to replace the missing gas volume.
A pressure increase that may lead to a tank cracking may today be dealt with in different ways. Floating roofs are used, as is the technique of passing the gas on to other tanks or processes for possible further treatment. However, when transporting petroleum products and crude oil onboard tankers, the problem is solved by opening the tank to let the gas escape to the atmosphere until the pressure in the tank has been sufficiently reduced. This is extremely polluting, and the authorities of various countries are working to introduce legislation that will reduce this type of discharge of VOC {“Volatile Organic Compounds”). Several publications exist which describe methods and systems that focus on solving the problem of overpressure. These solutions have comprised different suction and condensation devices, focusing especially on the problems associated with storage and transport of liquefied gases (LNG and LPG).
From NO 305 525 there is known a method and a device for storage and transport of liquefied natural gas. Decoction is removed from the tank and condensed in a condensation device with a cooler, and then passed back to the tank. The device separates methane and nitrogen, and the nitrogen is discharged to the atmosphere.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,784,560 teaches a method and a device for storage and handling of liquefied gas. Decoction from the liquefied gas is circulated in a device that cools by use of another liquefied gas and condenses the decoction, passing this back to the bottom of the tank.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,733,838 describes a system for re-liquefying the decoction from a liquefied gas. The system comprises an insulated storage tank, a venturi, a pump and a heat exchanger. The system is intended for use in connection with storage of liquefied gas. Part of the liquefied gas is compressed and expanded in a heat exchanger in order to provide cooling. The storage tank is cooled through expansion of a partially condensed stream that is passed into that part of the storage tank which contains vapour.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,921,412 describes a vapour recovery device that employs a condensing dispensing nozzle. The nozzle is placed in the fill opening and cools vapour/gas that flows out during filling, condensing this so that it drips back into the tank.
Norwegian patent application 1999 6471 regards a method, a device and a system for condensation of vapours and gases. The method is based on the circulation of liquid through a venturi that draws gas, and where the mixture is led to the bottom of the tank. The patent application argues that the gas will condense in the liquid on its way down to the tank, and that any further condensation will take place at the bottom of the tank.
Various absorption devices for removal of volatile organic compounds are known from U.S. Pat. No. 3,861,890, JP 63 119 833 and EP 0 819 751 A1, which devices are provided as separate units outside the tank or tanks from which the volatile compounds are to be removed.
The three first-mentioned publications describe rather comprehensive systems for storage of cooled liquefied gas. Only Norwegian patent application 1999 6471 attempts to solve the problems associated with handling and storage of volatile liquids on a large scale. In addition, various devices are known which suck vapour/gas from a tank that is being filled, condense the vapour/gas and passes the condensate back to the tank from which the filling is taking place. As neither today's solution for control of tank pressure during transport of crude oil nor other solutions seem to be acceptable, the present invention proposes an alternative solution to the problem.
The present invention regards a method of absorbing vapours or gases from one or more storage tanks for liquids, which method consists in leading the vapour/gas down to an absorption device placed in a submerged position in the tank liquid near the bottom of the storage tank; absorbing the gas into the tank liquid that surrounds the absorption device and circulates through this or is supplied from an external source; and leading the non-absorbed vapour/gas from the absorption device back to the gas zone at the top of the tank or out of the tank. Thus the absorption device is submerged in the tank liquid, which may optionally be used as the absorption medium for the vapour/gas. Consequently, the absorption efficiency is enhanced by the absorption taking place under the hydrostatic pressure from the overhead liquid.
By locating the absorption device down in a tank instead of outside the tank, the space requirements are reduced significantly, which is particularly beneficial with respect to ships. This will also result in the absorption device being subjected to a lot less in the way of external loads, while reducing the risk of corrosion. A further advantage of the method according to the invention is that the power requirement is reduced, as the pump is located in the tank, which reduces the pumping head. At the same time, any cavitation problems in the pump will be reduced as a result of not having to pump liquid out of the tank.
The placing of tall and heavy absorption towers on a ship's deck will often result in the ship's structure having to be reinforced. In a multi-tank system such as on a ship, where it may be desirable to have several absorption units, it would, in accordance with the present invention, be advantageous to place one absorption unit in each tank.
The invention further includes the application of the method to a tank ship and a tank truck.
The following will explain the invention in greater detail by means of an example of an embodiment and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The absorption device presented herein exhibit similarities to commercial absorption columns but have several essential differences. Firstly, it is only active when submerged in the absorption liquid. Secondly, it also represents a new principle of operation, as the absorption liquid is not pumped through the device due to the difference in hydrostatic pressure between the inside and the outside. Moreover, the absorption takes place with gas and liquid flowing co-currently, which is in contrast to the more common countercurrent absorption device.
Even though the absorption device of the above described embodiments is described as an absorption column filled with mechanical structure, it is also conceivable for the absorption device to be constructed as a gas-liquid mixer consisting of a pipe with an internal mechanical structure that causes a turbulent mixing of the gas and the liquid, which will result in a higher degree of absorption. Furthermore, one may conceivably also use a single absorption device consisting only of a pipe in which the gas/vapour is introduced through nozzles that cause the gas/vapour to form small bubbles in the pipe, whereby bubble absorption will take place.
The method and the application according to the invention will be very environmentally friendly, as it will eliminate today's VOC discharges. The system may also be used in a situation where several tanks are connected via pipelines, such as in the case of transport of petroleum products onboard tank ships. In such a case, the system will be able to contribute to a desired pressure reduction in all the tanks. The argument can also be made that the invention will have a valuable technical impact for the oil companies and the companies transporting the crude oil. Today, the oil is processed on the platform so as to contain small amounts of the lighter fractions, to avoid exactly these problems of discharges during transport. In terms of economics however, it is desirable to send the crude oil to the refineries containing as much as possible of the lighter fractions, to allow the oil companies to obtain the highest possible price for the cargo. As such, a tank ship equipped with a process plant that can handle lighter grades of oil without discharges will be in greater demand and be able to obtain higher freight rates.
This application is a continuation of PCT/NO02/00395 filed Oct. 31, 2002 and published in English as WO03/038333 on May 8, 2003, and claims priority from NO Patent Application 2001 5326 filed Oct. 31, 2001; the entire contents of the prior applications being incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1930592 | Harnsberger | Oct 1933 | A |
2157579 | Urquhart | May 1939 | A |
2640627 | Doelter | Jun 1953 | A |
2784560 | Johnson, Jr. | Mar 1957 | A |
2849150 | Tompkins, Jr. | Aug 1958 | A |
2853149 | Gosselin | Sep 1958 | A |
2947379 | Aubrey | Aug 1960 | A |
3123249 | Gorand et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3648436 | Schonewald et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3733838 | Delahunty | May 1973 | A |
3778969 | Sudduth | Dec 1973 | A |
3861890 | Doncer et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3881894 | Onufer | May 1975 | A |
3884651 | Velegol | May 1975 | A |
3907542 | Kano et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3921412 | Heath et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3995871 | Vornberger et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4090525 | Potter | May 1978 | A |
4432777 | Postma | Feb 1984 | A |
4671071 | Sasaki | Jun 1987 | A |
4821908 | Yost | Apr 1989 | A |
4859405 | Squarer et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4880445 | Watten | Nov 1989 | A |
5076822 | Hewitt | Dec 1991 | A |
5101750 | Dumas | Apr 1992 | A |
5165561 | Scheurenbrand et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5205330 | Sekine | Apr 1993 | A |
5476986 | Jacobsen | Dec 1995 | A |
5503659 | Crosman | Apr 1996 | A |
5897690 | McGrew | Apr 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
37 21 700 | Jan 1989 | DE |
0 819 751 | Jan 1988 | EP |
6319833 | May 1988 | JP |
WO9740307 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9843029 | Oct 1998 | WO |
0148419 | Jul 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040221718 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/NO02/00395 | Oct 2002 | US |
Child | 10830697 | US |