This nonprovisional application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a) to German Patent Application No. 10 2019 212 275.2, which was filed in Germany on Aug. 15, 2019, and which is herein incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to a method for adaptation of a detected camshaft position of a camshaft in an internal combustion engine. The invention further relates to a control unit that is equipped and designed to carry out such a method, and also to an internal combustion engine with which this method can be carried out, as well as to a vehicle having such an internal combustion engine.
In modern internal combustion engines, especially in gasoline engines, increasing use is being made of adjustable camshafts and valve control systems for exact air control. As a result, it has become possible in the meantime to flexibly configure the control phases, the control times, and the control profiles of the intake and exhaust valves.
For adjustment of the control phases, so-called camshaft phasers are used here, which make the angles of the control cams on the camshaft possible through continuous adjustment. Complementary variable valve control systems (for example, the known, so-called Valvetronic) additionally make possible a variation of the valve stroke and a simultaneous change in the opening period.
In this way, largely unthrottled combustion methods such as the Miller cycle concept are also being increasingly implemented, namely in addition to the normal Otto cycle. In this context, “unthrottled” can mean that the air charge can be largely decoupled from the actuation of the throttle valve and is accomplished exclusively through the control of the intake and/or exhaust valves.
As such engine concepts (camshaft-controlled and variable valve control systems) become increasingly widespread, however, the requirements intensify for accuracy of the setting of the camshaft itself and of the valve adjustment mechanisms. Because the camshafts are driven directly by the crankshaft, even small deviations from the target position intended for a specific cylinder charge lead to significant deviations in the load-dependent specific cylinder charge, and thus to unfavorable emissions effects and operating states.
In order to ensure that the exact angular position of the cams or of the camshafts is known in relationship to the intake and exhaust valves or in relationship to the crankshaft position, very accurate crankshaft and camshaft sensor arrangements are provided, which detect position, rotation, and location relative to one another in an accurate and highly dynamic manner. Reference systems are used for calibration. Additionally, both the camshafts themselves and the associated sensor arrangements can be measured with high accuracy during production and after assembly. Production-related deviations can be detected and compensated in this way. Correction data for compensation can be stored individually in the engine control unit. In this way, the necessary positions and locations of the camshaft can be detected accurately in operation. In the load-dependent control of the adjustment mechanisms of the camshaft and the valves, the associated gas control can be accurately set during load change (fresh gas delivery, exhaust removal). In particular, in this way the cylinder charge or the gas quantity (also fresh gas quantity or fresh air quantity) can always be better controlled in a load-dependent manner and, for certain methods, largely unthrottled.
The disadvantage or the problem nonetheless exists that, in the event of small deviations in the components (sensors, transfer elements, adjusters, etc.) that are calibrated and matched to one another, deviations in position occur, which adversely affect gas exchange control and, in particular, the setting of the quantity of fresh gas or air. As a result, this means that the desired air quantity is not provided for a requested operating load. The same problem also arises when essential components of the drive train that work together for control of the air quantity are replaced. These components include transfer elements such as chains, gears, and belts, as well as the sensor arrangements that detect the position and direction of rotation of the crankshaft or camshaft and transmit them to an engine control unit.
In order to ensure optimal load-dependent gas quantity control, it can be useful to re-measure the components accurately and to match them to one another after every rebuild. It is also possible to specify the installation of more accurate components as part of maintenance, or to design the application or the engine to be sufficiently “emissions robust” that certain deviations are tolerable.
Another approach can also is in identifying such positional changes from the analysis of operating data of the engine and compensating them through control technology.
For this purpose, there is an approach in DE 10 2016 219 584 B4, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 10,711,717, in which the combined identification of an intake valve stroke phase difference and an exhaust valve stroke phase difference of a cylinder of an internal combustion engine is based on the means that the phase position and the amplitude of a selected signal frequency of the pressure pulsations in the intake air in the air intake tract are identified with respect to a crankshaft phase angle signal from the dynamic pressure pulsations in the intake air that can be associated with the relevant cylinder. On the basis of these phase positions and amplitudes, the intake valve stroke phase difference and the exhaust valve stroke phase difference are then determined with the aid of lines of equal phase position and lines of equal amplitude. This method is intended to perform an identification of the control times in a simple and economical manner.
A similar method is known from DE 10 2016 222 533 B4, which corresponds to US 2020/0063674. Here, deviations in the valve train of the internal combustion engine are detected and controlled accordingly in that an intake valve stroke phase difference and/or an exhaust valve stroke phase difference are identified by analysis of dynamic pressure pulsations in the intake air in the air intake tract of the relevant internal combustion engine in operation, and from this a valve stroke phase deviation value is determined with respect to a valve stroke phase reference value, and a first deviation value of the valve train is identified on the basis thereof.
Both methods make it possible in principle to identify phase differences that can occur during operation of an engine. They also permit compensation of such a phase difference using control technology.
One problem with these approaches, however, is that the accuracy of the compensation can only be judged with difficulty, and thus it may only be possible to ensure to a limited extent that the correction value is in fact suitable for adequately compensating a phase difference.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method for adaptation of a detected camshaft position of a camshaft in an internal combustion engine with which the abovementioned disadvantages are at least partially overcome.
The method according to the invention for adaptation of a detected camshaft position of a camshaft in an internal combustion engine is characterized by the following:
Detection of an ACTUAL gas signal in a gas space that is associated with the camshaft and is associated with a detected camshaft position,
Processing of the gas signal to produce an ACTUAL gas criterion,
Modeling of multiple simulated gas criteria, each of which is associated with a camshaft position (in particular, a target camshaft position),
Comparison of the simulated gas criteria with the ACTUAL gas criterion,
Determination of a simulated gas criterion with the least deviation from the ACTUAL gas criterion,
Determination of an ACTUAL camshaft position that corresponds to the simulated gas criterion with the least deviation from the ACTUAL gas criterion,
Determination of a camshaft position correction value from the difference between the ACTUAL camshaft position determined and the detected camshaft position, and
Determination of corrected camshaft positions by correcting the detected camshaft positions with the camshaft position correction value.
The method uses the relationship between a camshaft position—and the positions of the intake and exhaust valves that are directly dependent thereon—and the gas state in a gas space located upstream of the combustion chamber of the internal combustion engine or in a downstream gas space, namely the air intake tract or the exhaust tract. These tracts are connected to the combustion chamber by the intake or exhaust valves, respectively.
In this context, the term “camshaft position” can refer to the position of an adjustable camshaft that affects the control (phase position, control time, control profile) of a controlled valve, and not to the rotational position in operation that depends on the angular position of a driving crankshaft.
Here, the detection of an ACTUAL gas signal includes the sensing of a gas variable or of a gas variable behavior in the air intake tract or in the exhaust tract. Such a gas variable can be, for example, the intake pressure p2 or the exhaust gas back pressure p3 or the gas volume flow rates V2 or V3 occurring there. Other gas variables can also include the temperatures T2 or T3 upstream or downstream of the combustion chamber or other gas properties such as flow velocity and density.
For optimal operation of the internal combustion engine with respect to emissions, fuel consumption, performance, running smoothness, etc., it is desirable to determine precisely the gas charge introduced into the combustion chamber. In this way, the additional parameters for optimal combustion can be matched, in particular the fuel quantity to be delivered or directly injected. The charge exchange, in which the fresh gas is drawn in or delivered and the exhaust gas is discharged or removed, depends on the control times, control profiles, and control phases of the intake and exhaust valves, among other factors.
The behavior over time of the relevant valve strokes is controlled through the crankshaft correlated in time with the behavior of the actual piston stroke. The charge exchange becomes dependent in operation on the positions of the intake and exhaust valves in relation to the crankshaft phase angle, and thus in relation to the position of the reciprocating piston.
In order to be able to set the gas charge or the charge exchange optimally for each operating point, the requisite control parameters are detected through measurement of a reference engine in the operating states that occur. Typical operating states here are rotational speed and load, which are detected and stored with the associated valve timing and any supplementary operating parameters of exhaust turbochargers or other charging devices. A reference data set is derived therefrom, which includes the particular desired air charge as a function of the associated valve timing and camshaft phasers. In other words, for each camshaft position or a camshaft phase position, a typical gas variable is identified that characterizes the required gas charge. The same also applies to a corresponding gas variable for exhaust gas discharge. Manufacturing tolerances and deviations between the reference engine and the production internal combustion engine in question can be compensated by correction values that can be permanently set.
Deviations of the actual positions of the intake and exhaust valves relative to the crankshaft phase angle or the reciprocating piston position from the ideal reference positions can occur during operation or due to replacement of major components. These deviations alter the gas exchange or charge exchange. This causes the actual fresh gas charge to deviate from the fresh gas charge identified as the reference. This means that the control parameters must be corrected in order to compensate adverse effects with respect to emissions, fuel consumption, performance, running smoothness, etc.
According to the invention, for this purpose an ACTUAL gas signal is detected that is associated with a detected camshaft position. The ACTUAL gas signal here can also be a gas signal behavior over a specific period of time, for example one crankshaft rotation or one complete combustion cycle, so that a complete gas signal profile that correlates with a specific camshaft position is detected.
For simplified subsequent processing, this ACTUAL gas signal is compressed or simplified to produce an ACTUAL gas criterion. For example, signal processing algorithms such as an FFT filter (Fast Fourier Transform filter), a bandpass filter, or the like, can be used for conversion of the ACTUAL gas signal into an ACTUAL gas criterion. In all these methods, the raw signal data are reduced so that the characteristic relationships between the signal and the camshaft behavior or the valve behavior are preserved, but the quantity of data is reduced enough that processing and storage are simplified.
In another step, simulated gas criteria that have the same characteristics as the ACTUAL gas criterion are then modeled. These simulated criteria may also be criteria behaviors that correlate with the corresponding behaviors of the camshafts or of the intake or exhaust valves. These simulated gas criteria are then varied in that the criteria for different camshaft positions are modeled so that there is a family of simulated gas criteria, each of which belongs to one specific camshaft position.
The variation is accomplished in that a virtual, relative adjustment of the camshaft (phase) takes place at a specific crankshaft angle, for example. As a result, the control phases relative to the crank angle are shifted forward or backward in relation to the crankshaft angle. As a result, simulated gas criteria are on hand for the relevant control range, in particular the tolerance range of a camshaft position. The tolerance range can be +/−5° and, in particular, also +/−3°.
Modeling methods or modeling aids for these simulated gas criteria are likewise mathematical signal processing algorithms and systems, such as: Gaussian process models, neural networks, polynomial models, and inverse FFT (Fast Fourier Transform). What is important here is that the family of simulated gas criteria has the same characteristics as the ACTUAL gas criterion derived from the gas signal.
In a next step, the ACTUAL gas criterion is then compared with the simulated gas criteria. In this process, one of the simulated gas criteria that has the least deviation from the gas criterion is determined. This determination likewise takes place with the aid of statistical/mathematical methods, as for example: averaging, median calculation, evaluation of a standard deviation. In this way, the simulated gas criterion that has the least deviation from the ACTUAL gas criterion can be determined. For this simulated gas criterion with the least deviation, it is possible to determine an ACTUAL camshaft position that corresponds to the simulated gas criterion with the least deviation from the ACTUAL gas criterion.
In a next step, the deviation or the difference between this determined ACTUAL camshaft position and the detected camshaft position (belonging to the ACTUAL gas signal) can then be determined. This difference characterizes the deviation between the ACTUAL camshaft position and the detected camshaft position. This difference can stem from, e.g., signs of wear and the replacement of components or from changes in the crankshaft/camshaft/valve system. From this difference, it is then possible to determine a camshaft position correction value that serves to determine corrected camshaft positions in that detected camshaft positions are corrected by the identified camshaft position correction value.
The application of the camshaft position correction value to the detected camshaft positions then re-establishes high agreement between the camshaft position thus corrected and an ACTUAL camshaft position that belongs to the detected ACTUAL gas signal. In this way, it is possible to correct or to adapt camshaft positions during vehicle operation in a simple and very reliable manner.
In this context, methods exist in which the corrected camshaft positions of an intake camshaft and/or of an exhaust camshaft are determined. By means of the choice or the combination of corrected camshaft positions, the charge exchange can be corrected especially accurately, or by means of the selection of a camshaft position correction, the method can be simplified accordingly, without greater inaccuracies arising in the determination of the charge gas quantity or exhaust gas quantity. In particular, the application of the method to an intake camshaft ensures the accurate determination of the charge gas quantity or fresh air quantity necessary for the essential exhaust variables.
In this context, methods exist in which a valve position criterion that relates to an intake valve and/or an exhaust valve is also modeled in addition to the determination of a corrected camshaft position. Such valve position criteria can be further adjustment options in which not only the setting angle, which is to say the camshaft position or the phase angle of the camshaft, is set, but also additional setting parameters that can affect the valve stroke profile. In this way, additional changes to the valve control (control profile, control times) can be achieved that go beyond a simple phase shifting through setting of the camshaft.
In this context, methods exist in which the modeling of a valve position criterion is supplemented by the modeling of an air charge or a fresh air charge on the basis of the valve position criteria. In this way, the cylinder charge or the fresh gas charge can be achieved with particular accuracy and repeatability.
Methods exist in which the detected camshaft position is determined in relation to a crankshaft position by means of a camshaft position sensor arrangement and a crankshaft position sensor arrangement. With the aid of such sensor arrangements, variables can be matched exactly to a crankshaft position.
In this context, methods exist in which the crankshaft position sensor arrangement or the camshaft position sensor arrangements include one of the following sensors: inductive speed sensor, differential Hall sensor, AMR sensor, Hall phase sensor. Such sensors, typically referred to as engine speed sensors or speed transmitters, are beneficial for engine management. Both the engine speed and the angular position of the crankshafts, and thus also the stroke position of the engine pistons, can be determined with them.
In addition, they permit an accurate identification of the operating cycle position in four-stroke engines (0 to 720 degrees crankshaft angle) in that the position of the camshaft in relation to the crankshaft is detected. As a rule, magnetic field changes are generated through pulse generator wheels in this case. In this way, the number of generated pulses increases with increasing speed. The sensors can either operate inductively or by using the Hall effect or as AMR sensors (Anisotropic Magneto-Resistance sensors). Hall phase sensors are used in conjunction with adjustable camshafts. Phase sensors are also used to indicate the position of the crankshaft in relation to a camshaft position. With these, it is possible to make the important distinction as to whether an engine piston that is moving upward is in the compression stroke or in the exhaust stroke. This information can be important for identifying the adjustment angle of the camshaft (camshaft position).
Methods exist in which the ACTUAL gas signal is an ACTUAL pressure signal. The pressure behavior in the air intake tract or in the exhaust tract can be detected especially easily by pressure sensors.
Methods exist in which the ACTUAL gas signal is an ACTUAL volume flow signal, which likewise must be detected very accurately and with high resolution. With these, it is possible to detect signal behaviors that correlate with the valve position behavior. In this context, methods exist in which the ACTUAL gas signal is detected as an intake pipe pressure behavior signal in an intake manifold (air intake tract).
Methods also exist in which the ACTUAL gas signal is detected as an exhaust pipe pressure behavior signal in an exhaust manifold (exhaust tract). In this case, the sensing of the pressure in the intake manifold or in the exhaust manifold is especially helpful, since the pressure behaviors are then detected close to the intake or exhaust valves, and thus a high correlation exists between the valve behavior (and camshaft motion) and the detected gas signal.
In this context, methods exist in which the processing of the gas signal to produce a gas criterion is accomplished by means of a signal filtering method, in particular using one of the following methods: FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) filtering method, bandpass filtering method. These methods permit simple data reduction, but at the same time ensure that relevant and characteristic signal data are preserved.
Methods exist in which the generation of the simulated gas criteria is accomplished by means of a computer-implemented modeling method or system. In this case, the following can be used, in particular: neural networks, Gaussian process models, polynomial models, inverse FFT, additional empirical or physics-based models. These methods allow the simulation of the gas criteria such that they compare well with the identified gas criteria, and characteristic variables correspond to one another.
Methods exist in which one of the following computer-implemented comparison methods is performed in order to determine the ACTUAL camshaft position: cross-correlation method, standard deviation, averaging. These methods are statistical evaluation methods that can be applied especially simply and accurately, and that make it possible to determine the agreement between the identified gas criteria and the simulated gas criteria.
The invention also relates to a control unit that is equipped and designed to carry out the method according to the invention. In such a control unit, both the necessary signal processing steps and the necessary comparison algorithms can be performed. In addition, the necessary stored data must be kept available in a fixed or variable fashion in such a control unit.
An internal combustion engine with a control unit suitable for setting a gas quantity makes it possible to carry out the matching of a camshaft adjustment and the gas exchange control that is dependent thereon in a self-correcting and more or less self-adaptive manner. As a result, changes caused by wear and/or maintenance can be corrected without resource-intensive additional measurements and matchings.
The method according to the invention can be realized in a vehicle having such an internal combustion engine. And low-emission and load-optimized vehicle operation can be realized over the long term.
Further scope of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus, are not limitive of the present invention, and wherein:
In a schematic representation,
Following the combustion, the piston 8 pushes the exhaust gas out of the combustion chamber 5 through the exhaust valve 11 into the exhaust manifold 12, whence it continues through the turbine 13 of an exhaust turbocharger, which may optionally be equipped with a wastegate valve or a variable turbine geometry. The exhaust valve 11 is driven by the exhaust camshaft 14. The crankshaft 10 drives the exhaust camshaft 14 and the intake camshaft 7 through a drive belt 15, and thus also operates the intake valve 4 and the exhaust valve 11.
The rotary motions of the crankshaft 10 are detected by a crankshaft sensor 16, and the rotary motions of the camshafts 7, 14 are detected by an intake camshaft sensor 17 and an exhaust camshaft sensor 18, respectively. These sensors provide corresponding signals to an engine control unit 19. One or more gas signal sensors 20, 21 for detecting a gas signal or a signal behavior SACT are arranged in the region of the intake manifold or in the region of the exhaust manifold. In the present example, these are pressure sensors, which detect an intake pressure p2 and an exhaust gas back pressure p3, respectively.
In other embodiments, the corresponding gas signals SACT can also be a volume flow rate or a temperature behavior, which then are detected and recorded by other suitable, corresponding sensors, and are provided to the engine control unit 19.
The sequence of the method is now explained by way of example on the basis of
First, an adaptation release takes place in block B1. For this purpose, a defined operating state of the internal combustion engine 1 is queried. For this purpose, the engine is in an operating state in which no fuel is being supplied or injected. In addition, the operating positions of the throttle valve 3 and of any wastegate valve that may be present, or the position of a variable turbine geometry, are queried, all of which must be within a defined range. The ambient pressure p1 and the temperature T2 in the intake pipe must also be within a defined range. Furthermore, the engine speed n must likewise be within a specified speed range. For this purpose, the speed signals of the crankshaft sensor 16 and (if a temperature sensor is present) a temperature signal T1 are queried, and the ambient pressure p1 (outside of the intake pipe) is determined. If the appropriate conditions are present, pressure detection is carried out in block A1. A corresponding detected signal of the pressure sensor 20 in the intake manifold 2 or the exhaust manifold 12 serves this purpose.
The corresponding signal behavior for this ACTUAL gas signal SACT is shown in
For the comparison, a gas criterion KSIM is then modeled in the modeling block B4, namely taking into account the data for the operating point at which the ACTUAL gas criterion KACT has been identified. This information on the operating point or on the reference model is provided by the control block B3. A gas criterion family KSIM1-n, which is derived from the simulated gas criterion KSIM, is formed in block B4 in that simulated gas criteria KSIM are modeled for different camshaft positions CamSIM. In this process, the camshaft position is varied virtually between a maximum position CamSIMmax and a minimum position CamSIMmin. The following can be employed for modeling the gas criterion family KSIM1-n: neural networks, Gaussian process models, polynomial models, inverse FFT (Fast Fourier Transform), etc.
This gas criterion family KSIM1-n thus produced is delivered to the comparison block B5, where it is compared with the detected ACTUAL gas criterion (see
Additional variations and exemplary embodiments are evident to the person skilled in the art on the basis of the claims. In addition to the pressure behaviors described above, temperature behaviors and/or volume flow rates can also serve as gas signals. The method described here using the example of an intake camshaft can also be applied to an exhaust camshaft. It is also possible to apply the above-described method to other adjustment arrangements for control and adjustment arrangements of the intake and exhaust valves, and thus to derive appropriate valve position criteria KVS in block A2 (
The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2019 212 275.2 | Aug 2019 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6446605 | Fehrmann et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6488008 | Jankovic et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6550451 | Müller et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6804997 | Schwulst | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6827063 | Breitegger et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6871632 | Henn et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6915788 | Nakamura | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6978666 | Wu et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7036472 | Mencher et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058501 | Yasui et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7093573 | Kunz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117080 | Sobel | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7162356 | Fuwa et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7212912 | Okubo et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7213550 | Nishida | May 2007 | B2 |
7302835 | Galtier et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7305950 | Sinnamon | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7376506 | Schueler | May 2008 | B2 |
7451036 | Fuwa et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454954 | Taglialatela et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7703441 | Hathout et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7810460 | Ruiz | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7830749 | Kyllingstad | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7832259 | Wang et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7891347 | Eser et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7921700 | Raichle et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930093 | Bauer et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7991488 | Viele | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000875 | Klein et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8086385 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8140174 | Yasui | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8739616 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8857409 | Lee | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8977470 | Leone et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9026338 | Iwatani | May 2015 | B2 |
9217387 | Loeffler et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9273656 | Schule et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9435277 | Garrard et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9605607 | Elsner et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9657670 | Wu et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9810161 | Fiorini et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10012156 | Rauscher et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10151253 | Kaisser et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10337416 | Surnilla | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10415494 | Braun et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10450977 | Kainz et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10472999 | Pedro et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10570831 | Braun et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10584650 | Braun et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10669965 | Braun et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10711717 | Braun | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10718283 | Braun | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10774758 | Moik et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10788396 | Attard | Sep 2020 | B2 |
20030097214 | Gross | May 2003 | A1 |
20100063775 | Colling | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110093182 | Weber et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110137509 | Sarac | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120290189 | Davis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20150308360 | Knafl et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170082055 | Cygan, Jr. et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180045126 | He | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180058350 | Zhu | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180274397 | Pochner | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190242305 | Burkhardt et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200063674 | Braun et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103699035 | Feb 2015 | CN |
102913334 | Jun 2015 | CN |
103149032 | Jun 2015 | CN |
10115262 | Apr 2003 | DE |
10224213 | Oct 2003 | DE |
10344773 | May 2005 | DE |
10360333 | Jul 2005 | DE |
102004043365 | Mar 2006 | DE |
102004054711 | May 2006 | DE |
102007035314 | Jan 2009 | DE |
10237221 | Jun 2009 | DE |
102007061226 | Jun 2009 | DE |
102008004442 | Jul 2009 | DE |
102005042794 | Aug 2009 | DE |
102008001099 | Oct 2009 | DE |
102006013501 | Dec 2009 | DE |
102004001102 | Jan 2010 | DE |
102009027400 | Jan 2011 | DE |
102009043431 | Mar 2011 | DE |
102007024416 | Jan 2012 | DE |
102010041999 | Apr 2012 | DE |
102010041119 | Apr 2013 | DE |
102010027215 | Sep 2013 | DE |
102012212860 | Dec 2013 | DE |
102013206608 | Oct 2014 | DE |
102014203687 | Mar 2015 | DE |
102014223136 | May 2015 | DE |
102014000396 | Jul 2015 | DE |
102004047945 | Aug 2015 | DE |
102014214438 | Aug 2015 | DE |
102011081157 | Oct 2015 | DE |
102014207270 | Oct 2015 | DE |
102015209665 | Dec 2015 | DE |
102015200472 | Jul 2016 | DE |
112009001425 | Jul 2016 | DE |
102015203637 | Sep 2016 | DE |
102015226138 | Dec 2016 | DE |
102015213933 | Jan 2017 | DE |
102015215566 | Feb 2017 | DE |
102015222408 | Mar 2017 | DE |
102016116852 | Mar 2017 | DE |
102016117939 | Apr 2017 | DE |
102015221203 | May 2017 | DE |
102004026006 | Jun 2017 | DE |
102015226461 | Jun 2017 | DE |
102016219582 | Jun 2017 | DE |
102011052224 | Jul 2017 | DE |
102016200782 | Jul 2017 | DE |
102015226446 | Aug 2017 | DE |
102016203759 | Sep 2017 | DE |
102017118624 | Feb 2018 | DE |
102016216652 | Mar 2018 | DE |
102016217222 | Mar 2018 | DE |
102016219584 | May 2018 | DE |
102016222533 | Jul 2018 | DE |
102017000399 | Jul 2018 | DE |
0429819 | Mar 1993 | EP |
1470333 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1611318 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1402165 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2162802 | Oct 2010 | EP |
1518051 | Jan 2012 | EP |
1669822 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2397673 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2492475 | May 2014 | EP |
2929167 | Oct 2016 | EP |
2551495 | Jan 2018 | EP |
2993358 | Jun 2015 | FR |
3812633 | Aug 2006 | JP |
101574668 | Dec 2015 | KR |
WO2008140405 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2018060339 | Apr 2018 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210047946 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |