Method for adapting an injection quantity

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10746124
  • Patent Number
    10,746,124
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 16, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 18, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A method for adapting an injection quantity in an injection system of an internal combustion engine of a mild-hybrid motor vehicle or motor vehicle having a starter-generator or integrated starter-generator is disclosed. In an operating phase in which the e-machine of the motor vehicle drives the internal combustion engine, at least one small-quantity test injection is performed into a cylinder of the internal combustion engine. The associated injection quantity is determined based on a resulting torque. Corresponding correction variables for the adaptation of the injection quantity are determined therefrom. The method may eliminate the need to perform test injections during overrun phases of the internal combustion engine.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a U.S. National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/EP2014/057680 filed Apr. 16, 2014, which designates the United States of America, and claims priority to DE Application No. 10 2013 207 555.3 filed Apr. 25, 2013, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a method for adapting an injection quantity in injection systems of internal combustion engines of mild hybrid motor vehicles or motor vehicles having a starter generator (SG) or an integrated starter generator (ISG).


BACKGROUND

Injection systems of motor vehicles require intelligent adaptation methods in order to meet the requirements for the course of combustion/emissions/acoustics. In this respect, the system performance in the new state as well as in aged systems is highly significant.


Such adaptation methods are known. For example, a so-called MFMA (minimum fuel mass adaptation) method is known, in which the deviations in the actual and setpoint injection quantities are determined in the minimum quantity range (<3 mg) during the service life of the motor vehicle on the basis of changes in engine speed, and are constantly adapted. According to this method, small quantities of fuel are injected into a cylinder in overrun phases, in which injection normally does not occur, and the change in engine speed is used to calculate the associated injection quantity by reference to models. The correction variables are stored in program maps, on an injector-specific basis for the tested minimum quantities. Such a method is described in DE 102 57 686 A1.


New vehicle functions, such as the sailing mode, for example, pose considerable limitations for the activation of the MFMA method, however, since fewer and fewer overrun phases occur in these cases. As a result, this correction method is activated to a lesser and lesser extent in vehicles of this type, and therefore an adaptation of an injection quantity ultimately no longer takes place. In addition, the application thereof requires a relatively great amount of effort given that there are numerous variations of transmission/clutch.


SUMMARY

One embodiment provides a method for adapting an injection quantity in injection systems of internal combustion engines of mild hybrid motor vehicles or motor vehicles having a starter generator or an integrated starter generator, in which, in an operating phase in which the electric motor of the motor vehicle drives the internal combustion engine thereof, at least one minimum-quantity test injection into a cylinder of the internal combustion engine is performed, the associated injection quantity is determined via the resultant torque and, on the basis thereof, corresponding correction variables for adapting an injection quantity are determined.


In a further embodiment, the method is performed when the internal combustion engine is started.


In a further embodiment, the method is performed when the shut-down internal combustion engine is carried along by the electric motor.


In a further embodiment, the method is performed in the sailing mode.


In a further embodiment, the increase in torque of the internal combustion engine achieved via the test injection is compensated for by regulating the electric motor.


In a further embodiment, the test injection quantity is increased in a stepwise manner and, parallel thereto, the torque of the electric motor at the particular engine cylinder is reduced.


In a further embodiment, the method is performed as a workshop function during idling of the internal combustion engine.


In a further embodiment, the test injection is performed at a constant torque of the electric motor.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Aspects of the invention are discussed below with reference to FIG. 1, which shows a flow chart of an example method for adapting an injection quantity.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present invention provide a method for allowing minimum fuel adaptation without the need for overrun phases.


Some embodiments provide a method for adapting an injection quantity in injection systems of internal combustion engines of mild hybrid motor vehicles or motor vehicles having a starter generator (SG) or an integrated starter generator (ISG), in which, in an operating phase in which the electric motor of the motor vehicle drives the internal combustion engine thereof, at least one minimum-quantity test injection into a cylinder of the internal combustion engine is performed, the associated injection quantity is determined via the resultant torque and, on the basis thereof, corresponding correction variables for adapting an injection quantity are determined.


In the case of the motor vehicles discussed here, the associated electric motor can start the internal combustion engine and can also carry along the shut-down internal combustion engine. An adaptation of the injection quantity is performed in such systems. The overrun phases necessary for the normal MFMA method are no longer required. Instead, the disclosed method may be used in an operating phase in which the electric motor of the motor vehicle drives the internal combustion engine. The method can be performed not only in the starting phase of the internal combustion engine, but also, in particular, when the shut-down internal combustion engine is carried along by the electric motor (in the sailing mode). The method can also be performed as a workshop function, which has the advantage over the workshop MFMA method performed nowadays that it does not require the dynamic phases of revving-up and therefore functions with substantially greater flexibility and speed.


Another advantage is that the number of variations and, therefore, the amount of effort required for the application thereof is less than for the driving MFMA method. The reason therefor is that the vibration characteristics of the crankshaft are not superimposed by different transmission/converter/gear ratio combinations.


The disclosed adaptation method can be performed, in principle, in the driving mode or in the workshop mode. Two different methods are therefore possible, in principle:


1. regulating the electric motor to a stable rotational speed while simultaneously carrying out test injections, and


2. generating rotational nonuniformity at a constant torque of the electric motor.


One possible embodiment of the aforementioned first variation is the sailing mode. In this case, the engine is decoupled and the vehicle coasts without an additional braking effect from the engine. The internal combustion engine is held at an idling speed by the starter generator (SG) or the integrated starter generator (ISG). In this phase, a test injection into an engine cylinder is performed. The value measured as negative torque (relative to the cycle without injection) during the electronic speed control correlates with the torque indicated by the test injection. The resultant torque can be used to determine the associated injection quantity and, on the basis thereof, corresponding correction variables for adapting an injection quantity can be determined.


The test injection quantity can be increased in a stepwise manner and, parallel thereto, the torque of the electric motor at the particular engine cylinder can be reduced. The increase in torque of the internal combustion engine achieved via the test injection is therefore compensated for by regulating the electric motor.


In another embodiment of the method, such an adaptation procedure is performed as a workshop function during idling. In this case, an engine speed that is stable for the driver is not of great significance. Therefore, fuel may be injected into the individual cylinders at a constant torque of the electric motor in this case. The rotational nonuniformity generated by the combustion correlates with the torque, i.e. with the actually injected fuel mass. The known MFMA algorithm can be used without substantial modifications for such an adaptation method. All that needs to be considered is that the force necessary to move the crankshaft is not supplied via the vehicle drive train, but rather by the associated electric motor.


The above-described variation of the method therefore corresponds to the second method mentioned further above, in which the rotational nonuniformity is generated at a constant torque of the electric motor. This method can be performed with all SG/ISG systems. A precondition for the specified first method is a high-resolution rotational speed/torque regulation of the electric motor over time (which is given for asynchronous motors).



FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of method for adapting an injection quantity. The method, which is presented as an example, relates to the adaptation of an injection quantity in a injection system, which has a plurality of injection valves, of an internal combustion engine of a motor vehicle provided with an integrated starter generator (ISG). When the corresponding activation conditions are met, in a first step, the rail pressure setpoint value for the current adaptation is set. The engine speed with ISG is then corrected without injections. The corresponding controller parameters are then frozen. The engine speed profile is stored with the associated controller parameters.


The injection valve to be adapted is then selected. This is followed by an activation of a specific number of injections of a defined setpoint fuel mass using this injection valve. The resultant engine speed profile is stored and a comparison of the engine speed profile with and without injection is performed. The actually injected fuel mass is determined and the difference between the setpoint and actual fuel mass is determined. The obtained difference is stored as a correction value and is assigned to the particular rail pressure/injection valve.


This method is repeated until all the injectors have been adapted at all rail-pressure reference points. The corresponding adaptation of an injection quantity can be performed using the correction variables obtained.

Claims
  • 1. A method for adapting an injection quantity in an injection system of an internal combustion engine of a motor vehicle having an electric motor, the method comprising: after a starting phase of the internal combustion engine and during an operating phase in which the electric motor of the motor vehicle drives the internal combustion engine, performing a minimum-quantity test injection into a cylinder of the internal combustion engine, during a sailing mode of the motor vehicle when the internal combustion engine is decoupled from a drive train and the vehicle coasts without a braking effect from the internal combustion engine,increasing a quantity of the minimum-quantity test injection in a stepwise manner,while increasing the test injection quantity, reducing the torque of the electric motor at a particular engine cylinder,determining a torque of the internal combustion engine resulting from each of the minimum-quantity test injections,determining an actual injection quantity based on the determined torque,determining corresponding correction variables for adapting a target injection quantity based on the determined actual injection quantity, andapplying the correction variables to adapt a subsequent injection quantity.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the minimum-quantity test injection is performed during an idling of the internal combustion engine.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, comprising performing the minimum-quantity test injection at a constant torque of the electric motor.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, comprising controlling the electric motor to maintain the electric motor at a stable rotational speed while performing the minimum-quantity test injection.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2013 207 555 Apr 2013 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2014/057680 4/16/2014 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2014/173742 10/30/2014 WO A
US Referenced Citations (21)
Number Name Date Kind
5070836 Wahl et al. Dec 1991 A
6367769 Reiter et al. Apr 2002 B1
6520434 Reiter et al. Feb 2003 B1
6783109 Ogura et al. Aug 2004 B2
6994281 Reiter Feb 2006 B2
7073485 Truscott et al. Jul 2006 B2
7139657 Bouchain et al. Nov 2006 B2
7506827 Petrone et al. Mar 2009 B2
7815128 Beilharz et al. Oct 2010 B2
8430343 Nagatomo Apr 2013 B2
8620500 Becker et al. Dec 2013 B2
8973893 Lehner et al. Mar 2015 B2
9435305 Mechi Sep 2016 B2
20050199221 Dietl Sep 2005 A1
20060293829 Cornwell et al. Dec 2006 A1
20090164086 Geveci et al. Jun 2009 A1
20120013325 Tonner et al. Jan 2012 A1
20130024098 Li Jan 2013 A1
20130167809 Siedentopf et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130255639 Guillen Castillo et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140346244 Russe et al. Nov 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
102787926 Nov 2012 CN
102985670 Mar 2013 CN
10257686 Jul 2004 DE
10305523 Aug 2004 DE
10345967 Apr 2005 DE
102006048979 Apr 2008 DE
102008000587 Oct 2008 DE
102008000911 Oct 2009 DE
102009000741 Aug 2010 DE
102009009270 Aug 2010 DE
102010017093 Dec 2010 DE
102010021169 Nov 2011 DE
102011075732 Nov 2012 DE
102011076363 Nov 2012 DE
102010014320 Oct 2016 DE
0416265 Mar 1991 EP
2527637 Nov 2012 EP
2538061 Dec 2012 EP
2397851 Aug 2004 GB
2397851 Aug 2004 GB
2498533 Jul 2013 GB
2498783 Jul 2013 GB
2010096075 Apr 2010 JP
2011137442 Jul 2011 JP
2011190798 Sep 2011 JP
2012172594 Sep 2012 JP
02084102 Oct 2002 WO
03081007 Oct 2003 WO
2004074673 Sep 2004 WO
2009019584 Feb 2009 WO
2012076561 Jun 2012 WO
2013026978 Feb 2013 WO
2014167134 Oct 2014 WO
2014173742 Oct 2014 WO
2014173920 Oct 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (10)
Entry
U.S. Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/783,939, 17 pages, dated Jan. 27, 2017.
Chinese Office Action, Application No. 201480020859.7, 16 pages, dated Feb. 28, 2017.
European Search Report, Application No. 13165546.6, 8 pages, dated Oct. 14, 2013.
German Office Action, Application No. 102013206600.7, 7 pages, dated Dec. 12, 2013.
German Office Action, Application No. 102013207555.3, 5 pages, dated Jan. 23, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/EP2014/057477, 20 pages, dated Aug. 7, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/EP2014/057680, 18 pages, dated Aug. 11, 2014.
Japanese Office Action, Application No. 2016509442, 6 pages, dated Jun. 27, 2016.
Chinese Office Action, Application No. 201480023513.2, 13 pages, dated Jun. 19, 2017.
U.S. Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/783,939, 11 pages, dated Jul. 24, 2017.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160069290 A1 Mar 2016 US