Method for adjusting a process for automated bucket loading based on engine speed

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6321153
  • Patent Number
    6,321,153
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 9, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 20, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
A method for adjusting a process for automated bucket loading of a work machine having an engine and a work implement. The work implement includes a bucket. The method includes the steps of determining when the bucket engages a pile of material, initiating the automated bucket loading process in response to the bucket engaging the pile of material, determining an actual engine speed relative to a full engine speed, and adjusting a lift velocity command to the work implement, the lift velocity command adjustment being made as a function of a comparison of the actual engine speed to full engine speed.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




This invention relates generally to a method for adjusting a process for an automated bucket loading cycle for a digging operation and, more particularly, to a method for adjusting the process as a function of variations in engine speed.




BACKGROUND ART




Earthworking machines, for example, wheel loaders, track loaders, and the like, having work implements, such as buckets, are often used to dig material from one location, and dump the material at one or more other locations. For example, wheel loaders having buckets are used to dig materials such as gravel, sand, soil, and the like, and dump the material into the bed of a truck, or at other sites.




In a work environment in which the dig and dump process is performed repeatedly for long periods of time, it is desired to work as efficiently and productively as possible. However, as fatigue sets in, or if the operator is relatively inexperienced, the dig cycle may not be as productive as desired. Furthermore, some work environments may be harsh for human operators, due to such factors as dust, weather, and adverse surroundings.




As a result, attempts have been made to automate the dig process to maximize productivity and efficiency. For example, in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 5,968,103, Rocke discloses a system and method which automates the loading process of a work machine, such as a wheel loader, by monitoring various crowd factors as the bucket of the machine enters a pile of material. During the initial phase of the process, the system determines that the bucket has entered the pile, and responsively begins to lift the bucket rapidly. The lifting action of the bucket causes the front end of the work machine to be pushed downward, thus maintaining traction with the ground as the machine continues to push into the pile. The system then tilts the bucket back as it continues lifting in a controlled manner, thus loading the bucket to capacity.




The system disclosed by Rocke is designed to work with the engine of the work machine at full throttle. However, there are situations where it is desired to push into a pile of material with the engine at some speed less than full throttle. For example, the ground may be wet or sandy, and thus not able to provide good traction. Maintaining the engine at full speed may then cause the work machine to slip excessively as it enters the pile.




When the engine is operated at less than full speed, however, the invention disclosed and claimed by Rocke continues to command the same lift velocity as before. This results in the bucket rising out of the pile too quickly, thus causing the automated dig cycle to no longer load the bucket to capacity. It is desired therefore, to improve the invention disclosed by Rocke to adjust the automated bucket loading cycle to compensate for variations in engine speed.




The present invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems as set forth above.




DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION




In one aspect of the present invention a method for adjusting a process for automated bucket loading of a work machine having an engine and a work implement is disclosed. The work implement includes a bucket. The method includes the steps of determining when the bucket engages a pile of material, initiating the automated bucket loading process in response to the bucket engaging the pile of material, determining an actual engine speed relative to a full engine speed, and adjusting a lift velocity command to the work implement, the lift velocity command adjustment being made as a function of a comparison of the actual engine speed to full engine speed.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a diagrammatic illustration of a work machine engaging a pile of material; and





FIG. 2

is a flow diagram illustrating a preferred aspect of the present invention.











BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION




Referring to

FIG. 1

, a work machine


102


is illustrated engaging a pile of material


112


. The work machine


102


is depicted as a wheel loader


104


. However, other types of work machines, e.g., track loaders, backhoe loaders, excavators, front shovels, and the like, may be used as well with the present invention.




The pile of material


112


may be any of a variety of materials that are to be loaded at the pile


112


and dumped at another location. For example, the pile


112


may include gravel, sand, dirt, and the like. Typically, the present invention works well if the pile of material


112


is an aggregate, such as a pile of gravel.




In the preferred embodiment, the work machine


102


is powered by an engine


106


, such as an internal combustion engine. In addition, the work machine


102


includes a work implement


108


, preferably having a bucket


110


attached for digging and loading. In the example of the wheel loader


104


, the work implement


108


is preferably powered and controlled by hydraulic systems (not shown) as is well known in the art.




In commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 5,968,103, Rocke discloses a system and method for automating bucket loading of a work machine


102


using crowd factors, i.e., various machine parameters which are monitored to determine the degree of crowding of the pile of material


112


. The present invention is an improvement of an automated bucket loading routine, such as the one disclosed by Rocke.




The system and method of Rocke monitors parameters such as torque of the work machine


102


, wheel slip, ground speed, and the like to determine the forces being placed on the bucket


110


as the work machine


102


approaches the pile of material


112


. When the monitored parameters indicate that the bucket


110


has entered the pile


112


, the automated bucket loading process is initiated.




The automated bucket loading process commences by lifting the bucket


110


rapidly, while beginning to tilt the bucket


110


back, i.e., “racking”the bucket


110


. The rapid lifting of the bucket


110


creates forces which tend to push the work machine


102


downward, which adds needed traction as the work machine


102


continues to push forward into the pile


112


.




When the monitored crowd factors indicate that the bucket


110


has loaded to a desired amount, the automated system quickly racks the bucket


110


all the way back while completing the process of lifting the bucket


110


out of the pile


112


. The work machine


102


is then ready to leave the pile


112


with a fully loaded bucket


110


for dumping elsewhere.




The system and method of Rocke is designed to lift the bucket


110


as rapidly as possible upon initial contact of the bucket


110


with the pile of material


112


. This rapid lifting of the bucket


110


is in cooperation with the engine


106


operating at full speed. However, there are situations in which it is desired to operate the engine


106


at less than full speed. For example, if the ground is wet, the work machine


102


may lose traction if the work machine


102


approaches and engages the pile


112


with the engine


106


at full speed. Therefore, an operator may operate the engine


106


at a reduced speed to maintain traction. As another example, an operator may prefer to operate the engine


106


at less than full speed to extend the useful life of the engine


106


.




When the engine


106


is operating at less than full speed in the system of Rocke, the rapid lifting of the bucket


110


at initial contact of the pile


112


is no longer in cooperation with the speed of the engine


106


. As a result, the bucket


110


lifts out of the pile of material


112


too quickly, and the bucket


110


is no longer able to capture a full load.




The present invention, as illustrated in the flow diagram of

FIG. 2

, is designed to establish the cooperation between the speed of the engine


106


and the lifting speed of the bucket


110


upon initial contact with the pile


112


so that the bucket


110


is allowed to capture full loads from the pile of material


112


.




In a first decision block


202


, it is determined if the bucket


110


has engaged the pile of material


112


. Preferably, this determination is made by monitoring crowd factors, as described above.




When it is determined that the bucket


110


has engaged the pile


112


, control proceeds to a first control block


204


, in which an automated bucket loading process, such as the process described by Rocke in U.S. Pat. No. 5,968,103, is initiated.




In a second control block


206


, the speed of the engine


106


is determined, preferably using an engine speed sensor (not shown), which is well known in the art. The actual engine speed is compared to full engine speed in a second decision block


208


. If the actual engine speed is equal to full engine speed, the automated bucket loading process continues; for example, as described in Rocke. However, if the actual engine speed is determined to be less than full engine speed, control proceeds to a third control block


210


.




In the third control block


210


, the lift velocity is reduced in response to the actual engine speed being less than full engine speed. Preferably, the lift velocity is reduced by adjusting a lift velocity command to the work implement


108


. In the preferred embodiment, the lift velocity is reduced in proportion to an amount of reduction in engine speed. For example, if it is determined in the second control block


206


that the actual engine speed is 82% of full engine speed, the lift velocity command, in the preferred embodiment, would be reduced to 82% of the full lift velocity command. However, it is to be understood that the reduction in lift velocity may be determined by other means as well, such as a table of velocity ranges, a non-linear reduction curve, and the like, without deviating from the spirit of the present invention.




In a third decision block


212


, it is determined if the speed of the engine


106


has been reduced below a threshold value. If the engine speed is determined to be below a threshold, control proceeds to a fourth control block


214


. In the fourth control block


214


, the lift velocity is maintained at a predetermined threshold value. For example, if the threshold value of the engine speed is set at 65% of full engine speed, and it is determined that the actual speed of the engine


106


is some value below 65% of full engine speed, the lift velocity will be maintained at a minimum threshold value; for example, 65% of full lift velocity. The minimum lift velocity threshold value is determined to ensure adequate lift of the bucket


110


through the pile


112


.




Industrial Applicability




As an example of applications of the present invention, a wheel loader is often used to dig, i.e., scoop, buckets of material from piles and dump the buckets of material at another location. For example, a wheel loader may be used to load gravel from a pile into trucks. As another example, a wheel loader may load loose material from blasting at an open pit mine site into trucks to haul the material away from the site.




In the above examples, the process of loading, carrying, and dumping is repetitive and is often performed for long periods of time. Therefore, it is desired to automate at least part of the process to maximize productivity and efficiency, and minimize fatigue and operator error. An automated bucket loading system and method, such as the system and method described above with reference to the patent by Rocke, works well for this purpose.




However, the automated bucket loading system and method, if designed to function with the engine at full speed, does not function as efficiently when the engine is operated at less than full speed. The present invention, therefore, improves the fundamental automated bucket loading system and method of Rocke by adjusting for variations in engine speed during the work process.




Other aspects, objects, and features of the present invention can be obtained from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for automatically adjusting a process for automated bucket loading of a work machine having an engine and a work implement, the work implement including a bucket, including the steps of:determining when the bucket engages a pile of material; initiating the automated bucket loading process in response to the bucket engaging the pile of material; determining an actual engine speed relative to a full engine speed; and adjusting a lift velocity command to the work implement, the lift velocity command adjustment being made as a function of a comparison of the actual engine speed to full engine speed.
  • 2. A method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein adjusting a lift velocity command includes the step of reducing the lift velocity command as a function of the actual engine speed being reduced in comparison to full engine speed.
  • 3. A method, as set forth in claim 2, wherein reducing the lift velocity command includes the step of reducing the lift velocity command in proportion to an amount of reduction in engine speed.
  • 4. A method, as set forth in claim 3, wherein reducing the lift velocity command includes the step of maintaining the lift velocity command above a minimum threshold value.
US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
4518044 Wiegardt et al. May 1985
5214916 Lukich Jun 1993
5528843 Rocke Jun 1996
5720358 Christensen et al. Feb 1998
5968103 Rocke Oct 1999
6065904 Cook et al. May 2000