The invention relates to a method for adjusting the distances between cylinders of an inking unit and a printing machine.
Methods are known for adjusting the distances between cylinders of an inking unit and printing machines comprising suitable inking units for implementing this method.
For example, EP 1 249 346 B1 shows such a method and such a printing machine. According to the teaching of this publication an optic sensor or a camera analyzes a substrate to be printed, which has passed through the above-mentioned printing machine, while the settings of the cylinders participating in the printing process at each respective inking unit was being adjusted. The sensor or the camera records the light emitted at a certain spectral range and, based on measurements, it optimizes the relative positions of the cylinders participating in the printing process, which limit the cylinder gap. In this processes it is disadvantageous that during the adjustment here the generation of maculation can occur, because initially printing must occur at cylinder positions not yet optimized, in order to obtain measurements for the control of the relative positions of the cylinders.
Another method for adjusting the relative positions of the cylinders is known from the publication DE 102 11 870 A1. Here it is suggested to first mutually roll cylinders of an inking unit against each other in order to achieve inking the cylinders and then, at a state of mutual contacting, to set them into an extended idle state. During this idle period here a streak forms on the circumferential area of the respective cylinder by the ink drying.
The width of this streak, which is equivalent to its extension in the circumferential direction, represents a measure for the compression between the two participating cylinders. Accordingly, to the cited publication this width is measured perhaps with a camera, and the measurement serves as the basis for optimizing the compression. The publication DE 102 11 870 A1 relates to offset printing machines, in which ink and humidifying agents are guided over a plurality of different cylinders until these raw materials of the offset printing process reach the die plate cylinder and finally the substrate to be printed. Accordingly, in the publication DE 102 11 870 A1 it is also suggested to pivotally suspend a camera device in an inking unit such that after the pivoting of the camera device the circumferential areas of various cylinders of the printing mechanism can be examined.
The measuring method shown has proven unsuitable for various printing methods, among other things including relief printing. In this printing method, among other things, large imprecisions develop due to the relatively thick flexible layers on the surfaces of some cylinders during the adjustment of the distance between the cylinders.
Accordingly, the objective of the present invention is to provide a method for adjusting the distances of cylinders participating in the printing process, which corrects this disadvantage.
The objective is attained in claims 1 and 13.
The application of measures according to the invention in connection with relief printing methods, such as in flexo-printing, is particularly advantageous. For the sake of completeness it shall be mentioned that the European Patent application EP 238 489 2 A1, still unpublished at the time the present publication was filed, as well as the also still unpublished PCT/EP2011/057417 show the measures of the preambles of claim 1 and 13. However, in the above-mentioned publications of prior art it is not taught to use information for adjusting the distance between the two cylinders limiting the second roller gap which were gathered during the adjustment of the distance between the two cylinders, which limit the first cylinder gap.
This can occur in various fashions:
Generally, the first roller gap is formed by the inking cylinder, which may be an anilox roll or a plain roll, and a die plate cylinder. In particular in die plate cylinders, which are used for relief printing, there are differences in elevation on the die plate cylinders and frequently here tolerances have to be accepted, which exceed the intended limits. It is therefore recommended to adjust this first roller gap, which frequently is also called inking gap, based on careful measurements.
How precisely this can occur is described in detail, among other things, in the two above-mentioned publications EP 238 489 2 A1 and PCT/EP2011/057417, with their disclosed content regarding this topic being mandatory for understanding the present publication and thus is included in the present publication by way of reference:
An optic sensor is pointed to the surface of one of the rollers, advantageously the inking roller. The light emitted by the roller surface can be measured via the sensor. When the cylinders forming the roller gap are adjusted in reference to each other and begin to contact each other this leads to a change of the measurements of the optic sensor. In particular, measurements such as the spectral intensity of the remitted light change due to contacting.
When by the above-described measures the relative distance has been determined that shall exist between the cylinders limiting the first cylinder gap in order to ensure an optimal ink transfer here conclusions can be drawn regarding the optimal relative position of the cylinders of the second cylinder gap.
This particularly applies when both cylinder gaps are limited at one of their sides by the very same cylinder and this cylinder shows the largest tolerances on its circumferential area among the participating cylinders. This is generally the case when the first roller gap is formed by an inking roller and a die plate cylinder and the second roller gap is limited by the same die plate cylinder and a counter pressure cylinder. In this case, the adjustment of the first roller gap yields reliable information regarding the tolerances and the embodiment of the die plate of the die plate cylinder.
These results can be used for the adjustment of the die plate cylinder contacting the impression cylinder or also a blanket cylinder. Here, at least one pre-setting can be performed similar to the contacting situation in the first roller gap. Of course, in this context different diameters of the inking cylinder and the impression cylinder or blanket cylinder also need to be considered for the adjustment.
The quality of the adjustment of the relative cylinder positions in reference to the second cylinder gap can then also be reviewed by way of measurements. It is possible to perform these measurements on different cylinder surfaces. However, it is beneficial to observe only one cylinder surface. Here, it has shown that the measurements can occur on a surface of one cylinder, which is either arranged upstream in reference to the two cylinder gaps or which limits the first cylinder gap towards the front, seen in the direction of transportation of the ink towards the substrate to be printed. This is the case, for example, in the above-mentioned inking roller. In flexo-printing machines plain rolls or anilox rolls are used for inking the die plate cylinders. As already stated and explained in detail in the two above-mentioned publications EP 238 489 2 A1 and PCT/EP2011/057417, this already leads to a contacting between cylinders for changing the ink layer on the ink transferring cylinder, even when no ink transfer has yet occurred. During a further enhancement of the contacting of course ink transfer occurs and a considerable weakening of the ink layer on the cylinder transferring ink. This can be measured very well.
Of course, an ink transfer can also be measured on the cylinder receiving the ink, such as a die plate cylinder. Advantageously the measuring of the ink layer occurs directly on the cylinder surface, i.e. without here any medium needing to be introduced, such as substrate to be printed or additional paper inserted in the cylinder gap for the purpose of absorbing printing ink.
In general it is advantageous for the first cylinder gap, where the information is gathered, upon which the adjustment or pre-adjustment of the second gap occurs, to be the cylinder gap and/or roller gap which is located most upstream in reference to the direction of ink transportation.
Here it shall be mentioned that the terms cylinder and roll(er) can be interchanged in the present publication and/or used equivalently.
In particular during run ups it will frequently occur that the cylinders rotate during the measurements. This means that the cylinders are made to contact each other, while they are rotating or while at least one of the cylinders is rotating. This means, among other things, that any excess ink transfer between the cylinders occurs during the rotation, which is equivalent to the situation during the printing operation, of course.
In additional or as an alternative to the rotation during the ink transfer here the cylinder, with the measurement occurring on its surface, can be rotating during said measurement. Here, different angular values are advantageous, about which the cylinder rotates.
With regards to the above-mentioned cylinder rotation it shall be mentioned, of course, that generally the rotation of both cylinders or rollers limiting a roller gap is advantageous.
Frequently it will be necessary to perform so-called run ups. During a run up the cylinders limiting a cylinder gap are rotating and the cylinders are made to approach each other. The approach can occur in steps. During one step the cylinder may perform several rotations. This may become necessary because even upon the cylinder contacting a measurable effect and/or a measurable change of the surface of the ink layer forms only after several rotations. Frequently the number of rotations will be different for various roller gaps. For example, the loss in ink can be quickly measured when the inking cylinder is made to contact a die plate cylinder. However, when the contacting situation in the printing gap is measured based on the ink loss on the surface of an upstream located inking roller, here frequently several rotations of the participating cylinders are necessary in order to verify the contact between the printing cylinder and the impression cylinder and/or between the printing cylinder and the substrate to be printed in the printing gap. This circumstance leads to the fact that the number of rotations of the participating cylinders in the inking gap should be lower than the one in the printing gap when measuring occurs on the inking roller or an upstream arranged roller.
For example, a run up may comprise for the cylinders, limiting the inking gap, gradually approaching each other with here during or after each step a number of rotations of the cylinders on which the measurements occur being waited for until said measurement actually occurs. After the inking gap has been adjusted, the rollers limiting it are mutually made to contact the next cylinder, frequently an impression cylinder. During the gradual approach (run up) the participating cylinders rotate by a second number of rotations M, until once more a measurement occurs. The second number M is here advantageously greater than the first number N.
In a flexo-printing machine the adjustment of the printing gap between the impression cylinder and the format cylinder can occur therefore such that, after the inking gap has been adjusted within the scope of the run up, and while the anilox roll and the format roller are made to contact the impression cylinder as a roller package, with here maintaining their optimized relative position:
After the expiration of a known lag of the measuring effect the above-mentioned sensor records the intensity of the light reflected on the anilox roll. Elevated block sections, now in addition to the anilox roll contact, also show a contact to the impression cylinder, lead on the anilox roll to a different light intensity than lower laying block sections, which only contact the anilox roll and are separated from the impression cylinder. Based on these light intensities a control device determines the sections of the block, which show contacting in the second roller gap (printing gap), and show sections not being in contact here. The contact information gathered here (contact image) allocates the control device to the previously determined elevation profile. By comparing the contact image with the elevation profile the control device can determine the additionally required approach of the format cylinder to the impression cylinder so that this roller gap also transfers ink completely and is kept from excessive squeezing.
During the comparison the contact image with the elevation profile the control device checks, which areas already show contacts in the elevation profile of the block with a roughly adjusted roller gap, and calculates the lower lying profile depths in the block based on the approach additionally required.
In general, the control device controls the processes occurring during the measurement, i.e. here all above-mentioned processing steps can run computer-controlled and the control device is adjusted such that it can execute them automatically. This applies for all methods described and claimed in this publication.
Additional exemplary embodiments of the invention are discernible from the graphic description and the claims.
The individual figures show:
The ink unit 1 causes overall a transportation of the ink 2 in the direction of ink transportation 14. The two optic sensors 15 and 16 shall be mentioned in particular. The optic sensor 15 can directly analyze the ink-free surface 13 of the anilox roll 5 when it 13 has moved along the direction indicated by the arrow 10 into the work area of the first optic sensor 15.
In this position the optic sensor 15 can also directly analyze the effect of the contacting between the anilox roll 5 and the format cylinder 6. As already mentioned in the introductory description, based on the change of the ink layer 4 the quality of the contacting between the anilox roll 5 and the format cylinder 6 can be determined by an optic measurement.
After the largely ink-less surface 13 of the anilox roll has passed the operating area of the first optic sensor 15 it also passes the doctor blade 17, with subsequently the largely inkless surface 13 being re-inked inside the ink reservoir doctor 3. After leaving the area of the ink reservoir doctor 3 the respective surface area of the anilox roll 5 can reach the operating area of the second optic sensor 16, which in the situation shown can analyze the quality of the ink coating of the respective surface area.
The
In
In
Here it must be considered, of course, that the cylinders might show different target diameters right from the start. For example, the central impression cylinder 9 of a central cylinder flexo-printing machine shows a much larger nominal diameter than the anilox roll, of course, which is mounted in an inking unit 1. Upon the anilox roll 5 contacting the format cylinder 6, within the scope of the examination of the ink layer 4 by the first optic sensor 15, information is gathered about the surface condition and the tolerances of the surface of the anilox roll 5, which can be used during the process of the format cylinder 6 contacting the impression cylinder 9. In this context it is particularly advantageous, based on this knowledge, to first perform a preliminary adjustment of the relative position between the format cylinder 6 and the impression cylinder 9.
It has shown that it is possible to examine the relative position of the format cylinder 6 and the impression cylinder 9 with a sensor as well, which examines the ink layer on a roller (such as the format cylinder 6) positioned upstream in reference to the impression cylinder in the direction of the ink transportation 14. Surprisingly, this also applies when the examination is performed on the surface of a cylinder already positioned upstream in reference to the format cylinder 6. Advantageously, this examination can therefore also be performed on the surface of the anilox roll, as indicated in
Then it is possible to allow all three cylinders 5, 6, 9 continue rolling against each other and monitor the ink changes (primarily of the remitted light 1) on the surface of the anilox roll with a first optic sensor 15.
After some time, here measurable changes occur, which allow the discovery of the optimized contacting position C of the roller package comprising anilox roll 5 and format cylinder 6 in reference to the impression cylinder 9.
In order to adjust the inking gap 19 typically a run up 20 is executed. During the run up 20 the cylinders 5, 6, limiting the inking gap 19, rotate and the cylinders 5, 6 are made to approach each other. Such a run up 20 is shown in
This approach can occur in steps (as shown in
During the analysis of the
As already mentioned,
From the contact images and the allocated roller distances additionally an elevation profile 23, 24 of the format cylinder 6 can be determined. For this purpose, a control device checks at what positions a roller contact occurs with what distance -x. Such a detailed elevation profile is shown in
As already mentioned repeatedly, this can occur by a change of the surface of the ink layer and/or by an ink transfer and thus a loss of ink from the surface of the anilox roll 5. The first optic sensor 15 then records a reduced light intensity I in the area of the contact.
Information regarding the elevation profile of the format cylinder 6 can be used for adjusting the second roller gap (printing gap) 18. This method is advantageous in reference to a run up 20 with the same analysis as in the inking gap 19 because the intensity I of the light reflected by the anilox roll 5 changes as a measuring effect with a time lag for a contact in the printing gap. This time-delayed run-up behavior occurs essentially only after a change of contact in the printing gap 18. After a change of contact in the inking gap 19 here a considerably faster occurring, measurable change of the light intensity I of the remitted light occurs than in the first optic sensor 15.
Based on the elevation profile of the format cylinder the roller distance between the format cylinder 6 and the impression cylinder 9 can be adjusted at least roughly such that some parts of the block 7, 8 come into contact with the impression cylinder and other parts do not.
This can occur as follows:
In a previous adjustment of the distance of the anilox roll 5 and the format cylinder 6 the control device has recorded and saved at least some of the measurements of the first optic sensor 15 together with the relative positions x of the respective rollers 5 and 6.
For example, the control device may save in a storage device certain values developing for light intervals at certain area sections 26 at a roller distance determined for the anilox roll 5 and the format cylinder 6.
Summarizing it can be said the pairs of values comprising data regarding the contact image and the relative cylinder position are saved.
If the control device now determines similar values during the approach of the roller package comprising the anilox roll 5 and the format cylinder 6, the control device can determine what additional adjustment value D is still necessary during the adjustment of the inking gap 19 in order to reach the optimized distance B.
Until the point of time t1 the pair of rollers, comprising the anilox roll and the format cylinder, is made to contact the impression cylinder, and measurements are performed with the sensor 15 (run up 20) after a respective fixed number of rotations of the participating rollers, which of course may be different depending on their diameters. At the point of time t1 a measurement occurs, which detects the control device after a comparison with the measurements during the adjustment of the inking gap as being similar to the measurement (during the adjustment of the inking gap). Due to the fact that it is also stored in the control device what relative position was assumed by the anilox roll and the format cylinder 5 at the respective measurement the control device can determine by forming the difference with the final optimized contacting position B what additional contacting value D was still necessary to adjust the inking gap 19. The control device therefore changes the relative position of the format cylinder by this additional approaching value D in reference to the impression cylinder until the point of time t2.
At the point of time t2 another measurement is performed, which shows that another adjustment is required in order to achieve the optimized distance C. This C is reached at the point of time t3.
Frequently it will occur that the control device deducts a correction value E from the additional adjustment value D before it performs the adjustment by the additional adjustment value D. The correction value D can be obtained empirically and it should be considered that the surface features of the impression cylinder 9 are different from those of the anilox roll 5, of course, which is one of the reasons for a different inking gap behavior in the inking gap 19 and the inking gap 18.
The control device can use different parameters for the comparison between the present measurements during the adjustment of the printing gap 18 and the measurements obtained during the adjustment of the inking gap. For example, it can check at what sub-sections 26 of the surface detail 25 of the format cylinder certain light intensity values are exceeded or fallen short of. If it results here that during the present measurements a certain portion of the sub-sections 26 of a surface detail 25 shows significant changes in intensity I of the remitted light and this portion is equivalent to the respective portion of a measurement during the adjustment of the inking gap, the control device can operated in the above-described fashion and determined the additional adjustment value D.
Additionally or supplementary here the control device may also check in what way sub-sections 26 of a surface detail 25 are aligned in reference to each other and in case of identical allocation patterns it can assume a measurement in similar relative positions of the surfaces.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 086 047.9 | Nov 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/071161 | 10/25/2012 | WO | 00 | 4/9/2014 |