The present invention relates to a method for allocating a characteristic for allowing a terminating automatic return call.
Hereafter, instead of using non-specialized German terminology, the English nomenclature and acronyms from the ITU-T and ETSI standards are used, such as, for example:
The present invention relates to the field of end-to-end additional services such as, for example, automatic return call “call completion”. The automatic return call “call completion” service for connections from an A subscriber (caller) to a B subscriber (callee) is specified by the following terms CCBS and CCNR in ITU-T I.253.3 (07-1996), Completion of calls to busy subscribers, and ITU-T I.253.4 (07-1996), Completion of calls on no reply, respectively:
At the A-subscriber end, it is established according to ITU-T I.253.3 (07-1996), Completion of calls to busy subscribers, that the CCBS service can be assigned to the A-subscriber at an individual level, for this see in ITU-T I.253.3 (07-1996), Completion of calls to busy subscribers, “3.1 provision/withdrawal”, first paragraph.
At the B-subscriber end, there is both in general and in particular for those subscribers who are connected to an automatic subscriber exchange—also known as a branch exchange—no standardized individual allocation according to ITU-T or ETSI as to whether the automatic return call service may be activated for said B-subscribers. The reason for this is that the necessity for differentiation at the subscriber level has not been recognized. Therefore the information as to whether the activation of an automatic return call is allowed is derived for each distribution point from the presence or absence of functionality in the distribution point.
This distribution point-specific establishment of permission without taking the type of subscriber into account has proved to be inadequate. This also applies to connections which contain a number conversion, as is the case with IN connections, and where the SCP (valid from IN capability set 2) decides, on the basis of the relevant IN service without taking the type of subscriber into account, whether the call completion indicator provided by the B-subscriber's distribution point should be overwritten with the content “possible” or, if necessary, with the content “not possible”. This indicator or the image thereof is contained in the “RELEASE” message for connection release, originating from the B-subscriber's distribution point. Thus, for example, with IN connections having the numerical sequence 0900 . . . , the “call completion” indicator CCI is reset from “possible” to “not possible”. This additionally makes it possible to prevent IN-specific billing from being circumvented by an automatic return call. In certain IN services, such as, for example, “Corporate Access” (virtual, geographically independent direct dialing-in zone for businesses), this modification of the indicator is not sufficient on the basis of the IN service alone, however, since a distinction ought to be made here between the telephone number of the switchboard and the telephone numbers of individual employees in a business. “Corporate Access” businesses with geographically scattered locations use Corporate Access so that they can be reached on one telephone number (irrespective of the location), and can take into account geographical (nearest business location) and temporal criteria (business location where the switchboard is staffed in the relevant period, allowing for regional public holidays, for example).
The establishment of permission for an automatic return call through the distribution point is also inadequate because the network operator receives malfunction reports as a result of the restricted availability of this additional service, the reports being due not to a malfunction but to a limited functionality.
EN 301 140 V1.3.4 (199-06), Intelligent Network (IN), Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP, Capability Set 2 (CS2), Part 1: Protocol specification, ETSI, 1999, discloses how, through the IN service, but not at individual subscriber level, the SCP can instruct the SSP to modify the “call completion” indicator in the “RELEASE” message if necessary.
The object underlying the present invention is thus to specify a method for allocating a characteristic for allowing a terminating automatic return call that can be specifically administered by or for the B-subscriber. In particular, this method is also intended to allow the provision of the relevant information in the “call completion” indicator (only) to B-subscribers who can be addressed via an IN service.
Accordingly, one aspect involves a method for allocating a characteristic for allowing a terminating automatic return call from an A subscriber to a B subscriber, which are each connected to a switching office. The B subscriber is dialed via an IN service having number conversion, and the IN service is provided by means of a Service Switching Point and a Service Control Point. The switching office provides for the B-subscriber an indicator at an individual level that contains information as to whether an automatic return call is allowed for the B-subscriber. An image of the indicator is transmitted to the switching office of the A-subscriber in a connection set-up/release message. Depending on information transmitted by the Service Control Point, the permission contained in the indicator for an automatic return call is modified in the image in the Service Switching Point.
The process steps according to the invention provide a method that does not require adaptations of any kind in the respective telecommunications network or therefore on further distribution points apart from that of the B-subscriber, and thus conforms to the existing ITU-T and ETSI recommendations and standards. The term “terminating automatic return call” is used because, according to the present invention, permission for the automatic return call “call completion” service is divided up into a permission for activation component and a permission to answer automatic return calls component, the latter being related not to the distribution point assigned to the B-subscriber but to the respective B-subscriber.
To put the exact facts of the case once again in another way: the method according to the invention relates to the allocation of permission to be called by an automatic return call and not, for instance, to permission to activate an automatic return call. In order to facilitate allocation at individual B-subscriber level of permission for an automatic return call, the invention arranges for said allocation to be based on an individual indicator that is specific to each B-subscriber. In one embodiment of the present invention this can be implemented, for example, by using a single bit for each B-subscriber. This bit contains the information:
Advantageous embodiments of the invention are set out in further claims.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention are explained hereafter with the aid of the drawings, in which;
The following exemplary embodiments disclose preferred embodiments having allocation at individual B-subscriber level of permission for an automatic return call.
In a first configuration according to
For further explanation, reference is now made to
In this way it is now possible to signal to the A-subscriber the permission for an automatic return call at individual B-subscriber level whilst retaining the option of intervention, dependent on the IN service; this is done through the SCP. This permission at individual B-subscriber level can be firmly established by a Centrex administrator; it is also possible, however, for the person associated with the B-subscriber to be able to release the permission using a special sequence of symbols that can be input via the telephone keypad, for example *38#, and to block this permission using #38#.
The exemplary embodiment according to
According to the configurations shown in
In a further embodiment of the present invention provision can be made for the image of the indicator cc term to be signaled back as far as the A-subscriber itself. In this way, on a telephone with a display facility, the person in question can see whether this CCBS/CCNR service is possible for the call in question even before the CCBS/CCNR service is activated.
It would also be conceivable for the invention to be used for a non-standardized additional CC service, such as that disclosed in WO 03/036928 A1.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04025373.4 | Oct 2004 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP05/05330 | 5/17/2005 | WO | 4/20/2007 |