These aspects and features of the invention and others will be better understood after a reading of the following detailed description together with the following drawings wherein:
These problems and others are addressed in the present invention by anodizing aluminum-copper alloys such as AA2219, AA2024 and AA2014 using a microarc oxidation process. The process employs a basic anodizing solution containing a metallic silicate and a combined AC/DC waveform and a relatively low current density. Beneficially, the anodization solution is cooled to about 4° C. at the beginning of the anodization process, and the current applied to the solution has a ratio of DC to AC components of about 5:1. As an oxide film begins to form on the object being anodized, the DC voltage is increased to maintain a current density of about 10 mA/cm2 or less. The process is ended when the DC voltage reaches about 300 to 320 VDC. This process reduces the fatigue strength of the anodized object by a smaller amount than the above-described sulfuric acid anodization process. It is believed that this improvement is due to the fact that less copper is dissolved from aluminum alloy using the present process than is dissolved using prior anodization processes.
The oxide coating formed in this manner provides relatively little corrosion resistance and is not suitable for many applications. However, the present inventors have also found that the porous oxide coating provides an excellent base for various polymer sealants that would not bond well to untreated metal. Para-p-xylylene sealants, such as Parylene HT, have been found to bond particularly well to this coating and provide good levels of corrosion resistance. Thus the combination of a low current density oxidation process and a sealant provides an aluminum-copper alloy with greater corrosion resistance and greater fatigue strength than has heretofore been possible.
As illustrated in
The general shape of the V vs. t plots is independent of the anodizing bath composition and is comparable to the anodization profile of AA 2219 in
As Bath 3 offered the fastest anodization time, this bath was used in additional testing to determine optimal pH.
To further reduce the dissolution of copper, it is beneficial to begin the anodization process in a chilled water bath so that the starting temperature of the bath is about 4° C. While the bath temperature increases during the anodization process, it generally does not exceed about 30° C. Higher starting temperatures were found to result in a greater loss of copper from the alloy and consequently a greater reduction in fatigue strength.
As noted above, stage IV begins at approximately 280 VDC and continues until an equilibrium is reached and no further increases in VDC occur. Tests have been conducted up to a voltage of about 320 VDC. When the fatigue strength deficit of AA2219 samples tested using Bath 10 and a pH of 13 was analyzed, it was found to be about 12 percent as compared to about 38 percent for samples anodized in a traditional acid anodization bath. Additional tests were conducted on specimens wherein the anodization process was stopped at a final voltage of about 300 VDC. This shorter anodization reduced the amount of copper dissolved and also produced a less durable protective oxidation layer. However, this method produced almost no fatigue strength deficit. Moreover, the coating produced by stopping the process at 300 VDC was porous and readily accepted a parylene coating. Two examples of the above-described process are discussed below.
An anodizing bath was formed of potassium hydroxide and a sodium silicate solution (Fisher-Scientific SS338) which contained 29.2% amorphous silica, 9.1% sodium oxide and 61.7% water. The bath contained 5 g/L KOH and 40 g/L of the silicate solution to produce a pH of about 13. The bath was contained in a 60 mL cylindrical cell with a stainless steel cathode fabricated such that it lined the sides and bottom of the cell. The cell was cooled in an ice-water bath to about 4° C.
The objects to be coated comprised disc-shaped samples of AA2219 that were 600 grit polished and had a diameter of 1 cm and a height of 0.5 cm. The flat surfaces of the samples were cut in the long transverse/short transverse plane from AA2219-T851 plate.
AC and DC power supplies were used in series to produce a combined DC/AC waveform with a ratio of about 5:1. The object to be coated or anode was connected to the power supply using a steel rod wrapped in PTFE tape and placed into the solution which in turn was chilled in an ice bath to about 4° C. The initial DC voltage was 0 and was raised gradually to 320 VDC as the spark anodization process proceeded to maintain a current density at the anode of 10 mA/cm2. The process was complete in about 30 minutes at which point the further increase in voltage with time was minimal. In addition, the pitting of Parylene coated samples was less severe. The pits were much smaller and fewer in number.
The anode was thereafter removed from the electrical circuit and coated with Parylene HT. Subsequent testing of the sample showed an improved corrosion resistance over uncoated samples. Uncoated samples subjected to a 5% NaCl solution typically exhibited pitting after approximately 24 hours while coated samples resisted pitting for from 4 to 7 days.
Fatigue strength of the above sample was also improved, being about 12 percent in the untreated sample as opposed to about 38 percent in samples anodized using a sulfuric acid bath.
The anodizing bath and sample preparation in the second example was identical to the first example. AC and DC power supplies were used in series to produce a combined DC/AC waveform with a ratio of about 5:1, and a water bath was used to cool the anodization bath to 4° C. The initial DC voltage was 0 and was raised gradually to maintain a current density at the anode of 10 mA/cm2. However, in the second example, the anodization process was halted when the applied voltage reached 300 VDC. This required less than the 30 minute process time of Example 1.
The anode was thereafter removed from the electrical circuit and coated with Parylene HT. Subsequent testing of the sample showed an improved corrosion resistance over uncoated samples, similar to that exhibited by the samples of Example 1. However, in this case, almost no fatigue strength deficit was noted.
The present invention has been described herein in terms of a presently preferred embodiment. Obvious modifications and additions to this embodiment will become apparent to those skilled in the relevant arts upon a reading and understanding of this disclosure. It is intended that all such modifications and additions comprise a part of the present invention to the extent they fall within the scope of the several claims appended hereto.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/823,728, filed Aug. 28, 2006, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60823728 | Aug 2006 | US |