The present disclosure relates to containers, particularly to containers having one or two metal ends applied to one or both ends of the container body and crimp-seamed or double-seamed onto the container body, and most particularly to such containers used for retort processing and in which the container body is non-metallic.
Traditionally, retort containers have been constructed substantially entirely of metal. For many decades the standard retort food container has been the metal can, in which a metal can body is closed by a pair of metal ends that are double-seamed onto the ends of the can body. Each metal end has an outer peripheral portion forming a “curl” that receives the end of the can body, and after each end is applied the curl and the end of the can body are rolled up together to form a double seam. This construction has the great advantage that it readily withstands retort processing without the seams being compromised, because the plastically deformed metal of the can body in the seam area tends to hold its deformed shape despite the stress and high temperature during retort.
More recently there has been a desire to construct retort containers that use less metal, motivated by the potential cost reduction and improved aesthetics that such a construction can offer. The development described in the present disclosure addresses this desire.
In particular, the present disclosure describes a method that can be applied to retort containers having a non-metallic container body mated with one or two metal ends. In the conventional all-metal retort container, it is relatively easy to apply the metal end to the straight-walled container body because the method is tolerant of a relatively large diametral clearance between the chuck wall of the metal end and the side wall of the container body. With certain types of container constructions as proposed herein, however, there must be a much smaller clearance (and, preferably, an interference fit) between the chuck wall and the container body side wall in order to achieve a good seal in the seaming operation, as further described below. This makes it considerably more difficult to apply the metal end to the container body in a rapid automated process because even a slight misalignment between the axis of the metal end and the axis of the container body (or an out-of-round condition of the container body) can result in a failed application. Such a failure is a significant problem in a high-speed automated seaming line.
In accordance with the invention in one embodiment, a method for applying a closure to a container body is described herein. The method comprises the steps of:
By providing the compound-angled chuck wall on the metal end, the metal end's application to the container body side wall is facilitated because a substantial diametral clearance can be employed, which helps guide the metal end onto the container body and reduces chances of a misalignment occurring that could cause stoppage of a high-speed automated seaming line. As the side wall proceeds toward the channel, the diametral clearance diminishes and eventually is reduced to zero (or even an interference fit) in order to achieve the tight fit needed between the metal end and the container body for good sealing in the seaming operation.
In one embodiment, the diametral clearance ΔD is at least about 2% of the inside diameter ID. As an example, if the inside diameter is 3 inches, then ΔD is at least about 0.06 inch (i.e., there is a radial clearance of 0.03 inch on each side).
The method can further include the step of forming a crimp seam or a double seam between the metal end and the side wall of the container body. In particular embodiments, the metal end can be a laminated structure having a layer of metal and a coating of a thermoplastic material, and the method can further include the step of heat-sealing the metal end to the container body concurrently with or subsequent to the step of forming the crimp seam or double seam. The resulting heat seal between the metal end and the container body side wall essentially “locks” the seam so that it is substantially resistant to unrolling or loosening (e.g., during retort processing of the container, where increased internal pressure and elevated temperature tend to stress and weaken the seam).
In preferred embodiments, the angle α1 for the upper part of the compound-angled chuck wall is within a range of about 2° to about 10°, and the angle α2 for the lower part is within a range of about 20° to about 40°.
The method is applicable to various types of containers. The method can be applied when the container body is made substantially entirely of thermoplastic material, as well as when the container body has a composite construction (e.g., paper laminated with a thermoplastic film). The method is not limited to any particular shape or type of container body, but can be applied to various shapes (e.g., round, non-round, etc.) or types (e.g., thermoformed, extruded, blow-molded, etc.).
Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings in which some but not all embodiments of the inventions are shown. Indeed, these inventions may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
It will be understood that, as previously noted, the side wall 14 can have any of various cross-sectional shapes, including round shapes as well as various non-round shapes. It will be further understood that use of the term “inside diameter” (ID) in the present application and claims does not imply that the container is round. As applied to both round and non-round containers, the inside diameter ID is the distance from a point A on the inner surface of the side wall to another point B directly opposite from point A, where points A and B are connected by a line that passes through a central axis of symmetry of the container.
Also shown in
The metal end 30 is configured such that at least a bottom edge 44 of the lower part 42b of the chuck wall has an outside diameter that is smaller than the inside diameter ID of the container body side wall 14 at the upper edge 20 thereof by a diametral clearance ΔD. Additionally, a top edge 46 of the lower part 42b of the chuck wall has an outside diameter that is at least as great as the inside diameter ID of the container body side wall 14 at the upper edge 20 thereof.
The method of applying the metal end 30 to the container body 12 is now described with reference to the sequential views in
As shown in
In the process of pushing the metal end 30 onto the container body 12, the lower part 42b of the chuck wall is used to guide the relative movement of the upper edge 20 of the side wall 14 into the channel such that a concentric relationship is established between the metal end 30 and the upper edge 20 of the container body side wall 14 before the upper edge 20 enters the channel. This is illustrated by the comparison between
Next, as illustrated in
Advantageously the diametral clearance ΔD between the lower edge 44 of the lower part 42b of the chuck wall and the inner surface 24 of the container body side wall 14 is at least about 2% of the inside diameter ID of the inner surface 24.
Advantageously the angle α1 is within a range of about 2° to about 10° and the angle α2 is within a range of about 20° to about 40°.
The method can be applied to containers and metal ends having various configurations (including round or non-round). For example, the metal ends can have various make-ups. In one embodiment, the metal end is a laminated structure having a layer of metal and a coating of a thermoplastic material. In this case, the method can include the additional step of heat-sealing the metal end to the container body concurrently with or subsequent to the step of forming the crimp seam or double seam. Such heat-sealing can be accomplished using any suitable heating device or method, including resistive heating, inductive (radio frequency) heating, ultrasonic heating, etc.
The method is applicable to container bodies of various constructions and materials. In one embodiment the container body 14 is made substantially entirely of thermoplastic material. For example, the container body can be a blow-molded container body having a bottom wall integrally joined to the side wall.
Alternatively the container body 14 can be an extruded container body having an open lower end 16 as shown in
The container described above employs a non-flanged (straight-walled) container body, but the invention is not limited to non-flanged container bodies.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which these inventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the inventions are not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2828903 | Adkins | Apr 1958 | A |
3073478 | Henchert | Jan 1963 | A |
3405439 | Uemura | Oct 1968 | A |
3406891 | Buchner et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3549440 | Adcock et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3616047 | Kehe | Oct 1971 | A |
3625785 | Holmstrom et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3694609 | Kennedy | Sep 1972 | A |
3774801 | Gedde | Nov 1973 | A |
3843014 | Cospen et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3868917 | Arfert | Mar 1975 | A |
3909326 | Renck | Sep 1975 | A |
3912154 | Godar | Oct 1975 | A |
3934749 | Andrulionis | Jan 1976 | A |
3978232 | Dodsworth et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3988185 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4093102 | Kraska | Jun 1978 | A |
4095390 | Knudsen | Jun 1978 | A |
4217843 | Kraska | Aug 1980 | A |
4241864 | Kessler | Dec 1980 | A |
4448322 | Kraska | May 1984 | A |
4530442 | Vogel, Jr. et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4606472 | Taube et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4626157 | Franek et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4643330 | Kennedy | Feb 1987 | A |
4667842 | Collins | May 1987 | A |
4674649 | Pavely | Jun 1987 | A |
4711362 | Korcz et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4716755 | Bulso, Jr. et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4735339 | Benge et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4808052 | Bulso, Jr. et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4809861 | Wilkinson et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4890759 | Scanga et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4891484 | Waggott et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4940158 | Farrell et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4941306 | Pfaffmann et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4948006 | Okabe et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4991735 | Biondich | Feb 1991 | A |
5025123 | Pfaffmann et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5025124 | Alfredeen | Jun 1991 | A |
5046637 | Kysh | Sep 1991 | A |
5053593 | Iguchi | Oct 1991 | A |
5069355 | Matuszak | Dec 1991 | A |
5071029 | Umlah et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5257709 | Okabe et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5331127 | Chen | Jul 1994 | A |
5360498 | Blomqvist et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5562799 | Ross et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5590807 | Forrest et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598734 | Forrest et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5721028 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5847370 | Sluka et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858141 | Repp et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5971259 | Bacon | Oct 1999 | A |
5977527 | Preston et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6043471 | Wiseman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6078033 | Bowers et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079185 | Palaniappan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6102243 | Fields et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104013 | Miller | Aug 2000 | A |
6116500 | Cahill | Sep 2000 | A |
6262402 | Isoyama et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6408498 | Fields et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412252 | Sarles et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419110 | Stodd | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6460723 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6477823 | Kitterman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6499622 | Neiner | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6516968 | Stodd | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6555801 | LeMieux et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6629399 | Sarles et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6702142 | Neiner | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725630 | Rea et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732495 | Sarles et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736283 | Santamaria et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6747252 | Herzog | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6875965 | Herzog | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6915553 | Turner et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6964796 | Koyama et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7065941 | Sarles et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7100789 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7119310 | Hammen et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137524 | Nomula | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7174762 | Turner et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7318536 | Maravich et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7341163 | Stodd | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7370774 | Watson et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7380684 | Reed et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7484639 | Maravich et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7591392 | Watson et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7772518 | Rajesh et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8360125 | Schwiese et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20010032839 | Herzog | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030089079 | Rea et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050029269 | Stodd et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060071005 | Bulso | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060186127 | Rajesh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070095847 | Gruver et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070187352 | Kras et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080041867 | Jochem et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080050207 | Turner et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080216960 | Schwiese et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090020543 | Bulso | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090230079 | Smolko | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090257847 | Schumann et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090269169 | Turner et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100006532 | Lee | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100006571 | Shibasaka et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100038365 | Ishida et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100176134 | Cramer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110095030 | Dunn et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110226787 | Yourist | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130059048 | Price et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130105467 | Morin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130272820 | Price et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 489 218 | Jul 2005 | CA |
422 690 | Oct 1966 | CH |
0 099 159 | Jan 1984 | EP |
0 420 519 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0 742 152 | Nov 1996 | EP |
1 078 696 | Aug 1967 | GB |
1 207 306 | Sep 1970 | GB |
2 051 627 | Jan 1981 | GB |
2 067 158 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2 384 478 | Jul 2003 | GB |
8-151041 | Jun 1996 | JP |
WO 9534469 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9637414 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 2006050465 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2007014211 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
eLIBRARY.RU—Advances in fusion bonding techniques for joining thermoplastic matri . . . [online] [retrieved Jan. 14, 2011]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=585705>. 1 page. |
International Search Report/Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/061615; dated Feb. 6, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability/Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/061615 dated Apr. 29, 2014. |
International Search Report/Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/053062 dated Nov. 5, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2012/053062 dated Mar. 4, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/035283 dated Jun. 25, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,056 dated Jul. 31, 2014. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,651 dated Mar. 28, 2014. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,651 dated Jul. 10, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120321415 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |