The present invention relates generally to the field of medical devices, and more particularly to methods for using suture devices for approximating wounds.
Many wounds and surgical incisions are closed using surgical sutures or some other surgical closure device. Barbed sutures are well known and have recently been gaining attention for various medical applications. Typically, barbed sutures are constructed with a series of “barbs” or “protrusions” (used interchangeably herein) that extend outwardly from the suture and function to increase the holding strength of the suture and/or eliminate the need for knot tying. The size and shape of the barbs have practical limitations in a surgical setting.
Barbed sutures are available as both “uni-directional” and “bi-directional” in design. Bi-directional barbed sutures have barbs in two opposing directions on each side of a central region, with needles at both the first and second ends. Typically, closure using these devices starts in the center of the incision, and each half of the incision is closed by stitching from the center outwards towards the ends using the respective first and second needles. Uni-directional barbed suture devices have all of the anchors or barbs facing in one direction, and a needle only at a first end. These devices are applied from one end of the incision to the other.
Some uni-directional barbed sutures include an anchor, tab, loop or the like on the distal end of the suture to provide a “stop” that contributes to the holding strength of the suture and eliminates the need to tie knots to secure the suture on initiation of the closure. The term “stop element” is used herein to refer to any such element regardless of design or type. One such device is disclosed in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/248,542, filed on Sep. 29, 2011 (Publication No. US2013/0085525), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. With sutures of this type, however, in certain instances and when placed in certain ways, users have been known to pull too hard on the suture and exceed the holding strength of the stop element or compromise the integrity of the stop element. The present invention provides an improved method for using a uni-directional barbed suture having a stop element by which the holding strength of the suture can be greatly increased.
The present invention provides a method for approximating a wound defined by first and second opposing edges joined at one end at a first apex and joined at an opposite end by a second apex, using a uni-directional, barbed wound closure device having a needle coupled to a proximal end and a stop element at a distal end. The method includes taking a first pass with the needle by entering intact tissue at a location in proximity to the first apex, and exiting in intact tissue at a location away from and above the first apex; pulling the wound closure device through the path defined by the first pass until the stop element is seated above the tissue plane; moving the needle in a direction back toward the first apex and taking at least a second pass in a direction substantially perpendicular to the first pass at a location above or adjacent to the first apex; moving in a direction toward the second apex, proceeding to approximate the wound using a continuous suturing pattern; moving in a direction toward the first apex, taking at least two passes across the wound; and cutting off a free end of the wound closure device in proximity to a surface of the tissue.
The wound closure device may be made of a polymeric material, and may further be an absorbable material such as polydioxanone.
In one embodiment, the stop element is a substantially planar tab element having a length and width, wherein the length is greater than the width.
Also provided is a method for approximating a wound defined by first and second opposing edges joined at one end at a first apex and joined at an opposite end by a second apex, using a wound closure device having a needle coupled to a proximal end and a stop element at a distal end. The method includes taking a first pass with the needle by entering intact tissue at a location above the first apex, and exiting in intact tissue at a location further away from and above the first apex; pulling the wound closure device through the path defined by the first pass until the stop element is seated; moving the needle in a direction back toward the first apex and taking at least a second pass in a direction substantially perpendicular to the first pass at a location above the first apex; moving in a direction toward the second apex, proceeding to approximate the wound using a continuous suturing pattern; moving in a direction toward the first apex, taking at least two passes across the wound; and cutting off a free end of the wound closure device in proximity to a surface of the tissue.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments thereof, which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
As indicated previously, using known stitching techniques users, such as surgeons, have been known to place too much tension on the suture, the entire load of which is ultimately directed to the stop element 108. The method described below greatly increases the holding strength of this exemplary uni-directional barbed suture or any such suture having a stop element of any sort on the end.
Referring now to
The wound closure device 100 is then passed through the tissue until the stop element 108 is gently seated against the tissue. Preferably, the stop element should be seated above the tissue plane and visible as shown. Then, moving in a direction back toward the first apex but still within the intact tissue above the apex, at least one second pass is taken substantially perpendicularly to the first pass, as shown generally by the arrows in
Once this is accomplished, the user can proceed in a direction toward the second apex with a traditional, well known continuous suturing pattern 220 to close the incision, taking apposing bites on either side of the wound in standard fashion and as shown in
To complete and secure the closure, at least one, and preferably two passes 222 are taken in the reverse direction (i.e., back toward the first apex) across the incision as shown in
By taking the first two passes as specifically described herein to initiate the approximation, the wound closure device is more securely “locked” in place, which greatly enhances the holding strength of the wound closure device as compared to other known continuous suturing techniques where the stitching is initiated and immediately continues in the same general direction until the approximation is completed. Further, the greater holding strength during initiation provides more even distribution of load along the length of the closure. Since the anchors are oriented in one direction, the tissue can slide easily over the anchors in the direction of the initiation end. This inherently can allow more load to be put on the end effector. The initiation technique described here relives some of the stress put on the initiation end and better balances the closure between the initiation and termination ends. The table shown in
Although illustrative embodiments of the present invention have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments and that various other changes and modifications may be effected herein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4823794 | Pierce | Apr 1989 | A |
5053047 | Yoon | Oct 1991 | A |
5123913 | Wilk | Jun 1992 | A |
5219359 | McQuilkin | Jun 1993 | A |
5222976 | Yoon | Jun 1993 | A |
5312436 | Coffey | May 1994 | A |
5366480 | Corriveau | Nov 1994 | A |
5403346 | Loeser | Apr 1995 | A |
5450860 | O'Connor | Sep 1995 | A |
5683417 | Cooper | Nov 1997 | A |
5697950 | Fucci | Dec 1997 | A |
5707394 | Miller | Jan 1998 | A |
6033430 | Bonutti | Mar 2000 | A |
6117139 | Shino | Sep 2000 | A |
RE36974 | Bonutti | Nov 2000 | E |
6241747 | Ruff | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264675 | Brotz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6319263 | Levinson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6599310 | Leung et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6730112 | Levinson | May 2004 | B2 |
6773450 | Leung et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7056331 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7301112 | Tsai | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7371253 | Leung et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7468068 | Kolster | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7731732 | Ken | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7850700 | Sakura | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850894 | Lindh, Sr. et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857829 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8083770 | Ruff et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8142513 | Shalon | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8267961 | Popadiuk | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8506594 | AlGhamdi | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8518078 | Sulamanidze | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8715320 | Lindh, Sr. | May 2014 | B2 |
8721664 | Ruff | May 2014 | B2 |
8747437 | Leung et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8777988 | Leung et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777989 | Leung et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9095336 | Deng | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9533446 | Rousseau | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20010044639 | Levinson | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030149447 | Morency | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040122456 | Saadat | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050004576 | Benderev | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049635 | Leiboff | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070257395 | Lindh | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080200751 | Browning | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080234731 | Leung et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080281357 | Sung et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312688 | Nawrocki et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018577 | Leung | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076547 | Sugimoto | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090248067 | Maiorino | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248070 | Kosa et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090312791 | Lindh, Sr. et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100084780 | Lindh, Sr. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100146770 | Morency et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100211098 | Hadba et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100274283 | Kirsch | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100298871 | Ruff et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298880 | Leung et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100318123 | Leung et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110054522 | Lindh, Sr. et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093010 | Genova | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106152 | Kozlowski | May 2011 | A1 |
20120016183 | Gellman | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120046525 | Russell | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130085525 | Nawrocki | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140100607 | Broom | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1857236 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1858243 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1857236 | Nov 2009 | EP |
1858243 | Nov 2009 | EP |
1867288 | Apr 2010 | EP |
1091282 | Nov 1967 | GB |
WO 2009020795 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2010051506 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2013048947 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/056858 dated Nov. 29, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160120543 A1 | May 2016 | US |