The invention relates to a method for assembling a dispensing system for dispensing a fluid medium stored under pressure, the dispensing system exhibiting an improvement in sealing performance and attachment between a valve cup and a container.
Systems for dispensing a fluid medium stored under pressure are generally well-known. Many systems dispense aerosols, such as deodorant or paint, generally as a fine spray. However, any fluid medium may be stored and dispensed, e.g., shampoo, etc.
Typical systems include a container, a valve, and a valve cup, wherein the valve cup supports the valve usually at a central part thereof and also closes off an opening of the container. The inner volume of the container is usually pressurised and maintained in such a state by the valve and the seals between the valve cup and valve, and valve cup and container opening. When the valve is actuated, the pressure difference between the inner volume of the container and the outside environment causes the fluid medium to be expelled from the container. Some systems employ a two-stage container having an inner and outer container, one of which contains the propellant gas, whereas others may employ a single container with the fluid medium also acting as the propellant.
Traditionally, the containers are made from a metal, usually aluminium. Recently, there has been an increasing trend to use plastics, namely polyethylene terephthalate (PET), as the containers for these dispensing systems for various advantages such as cost and ease of manufacturing, among others. The systems should be stable and be able to withstand the internal pressures of the container while also providing an adequate seal.
Conventional systems employing PET containers also typically use a metal, e.g., aluminium, for the valve cups which ensures a suitable sealing engagement between the valve cup and valve. The valve cup may be clinched to a lip of the opening of the container. While the attachment between the valve cup and container is often sufficient at most normal operating temperatures, higher temperatures can cause the PET container to deform to a large degree such that the connection between the aluminium valve cup and container opening is no longer fluid tight. This is highly disadvantageous as the propellant gas and/or the fluid medium can escape from the container.
DE 37 37 265 A1 proposes a solution to this problem by additionally forming the valve cup from a plastic, such as PET. In this case, the valve cup can be welded, e.g., friction welded, to the container because the valve cup and container are made of the same or similar materials. At high temperatures, the weld is sufficient to maintain the seal between the valve cup and the container.
European safety requirements specify that aerosol systems should not be exposed to temperatures above 50° C. However, in practice, such dispensing systems may be subject to much higher temperatures. In the case of DE 37 37 265 A1, the disclosed device does not provide sufficient sealing performance at temperatures exceeding 50° C. because the plastic valve cup may also deform at these temperatures to the extent that the seal between the valve cup and valve is lost.
A method for assembling a dispensing system for dispensing a fluid medium and exhibiting sufficient sealing performance at temperatures greater than 50° C. is therefore required. Herein, temperatures greater than 50° C. should be understood as reasonable temperatures that the dispensing system might be exposed to, e.g., up to 100° C.
The problem is solved by a method for assembling a dispensing system for dispensing a fluid medium stored under pressure, the method including:
In the above method, a bag is attached to a valve which forms part of a valve cup. The valve cup and bag are subsequently inserted in the container and positioned adjacent to the opening of the container. In this state, the inner volume of the container may be pressurised using a propellant gas, preferably by undercup gassing. That is, the volume between the bag and container may be pressurised. Assembling the dispensing system in this way allows for the pressurised container to be attached to the valve cup in a state ready to receive a fluid medium. The pressures may typically be lower than as used in conventional containers.
Because the valve cup and the container are formed from plastic, plastic welding can be used to join the two, thereby providing a seal between the valve cup and the container. This seal is particularly advantageous when deformation of the valve cup and/or container occurs due to exposure to temperatures greater than 50° C. because the weld, and thus seal, is maintained.
In another embodiment of the method above, the valve cup is formed from the first plastic material, and the first plastic material is a semi-crystalline polyester. The valve cup is a component that supports the valve and is placed so as to cover the opening of a container suitable for containing a fluid medium to be dispensed. Semi-crystalline polyesters have a greater degree of crystallinity compared to more amorphous polyesters. As a result, semi-crystalline polyesters typically do not deform when exposed to temperatures greater than 50° C., at least as compared with amorphous polyesters. In this way, structural rigidity of the valve cup can be improved at higher temperatures meaning that the seal between the valve held by the valve cup and the valve cup is maintained.
A further embodiment of any of the methods above includes the first plastic material having a degree of crystallinity greater than 35%, preferably greater than 38%, when measured using differential scanning calorimetry.
The degree of crystallinity is one property that provides the plastic material with its rigidity at higher temperatures. Typically, plastics may have some percentage of amorphous regions and some percentage of crystallised regions. When exposed to high temperatures, the amorphous regions undergo a transition from a hard and brittle state to a more rubbery and soft state. Thus, it can be considered that the amorphous regions lead to deformation of the plastic at greater temperatures. Providing a material with a higher degree of crystallinity may reduce the degree of deformation of the plastic material at higher temperatures.
As a further note, the degree of crystallinity is generally measured with respect to a certain method—here it is given as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Generally, various methods may give slightly different results because the degree of crystallinity is essentially an average value. When using other methods, an appropriate scaling should be taken into consideration with respect to the value obtained by DSC.
In a further embodiment of any of the methods above, the first plastic material is selected from the group consisting of: crystallised PET, PBT, PEN, PEN/PET copolymers, or a blend of any of the foregoing; and the second plastic material is a polyester, preferably PET.
Crystallised PET (CPET), PBT, PEN, and PEN/PET copolymers are or can be semi-crystalline polyesters. These materials are particularly advantageous for their other properties in packaging and not just the rigidity at elevated temperatures. However, any polyester that can be semi-crystalline and does not deform to a suitable degree at large temperatures may also be used as the semi-crystalline material. Moreover, any blend of CPET, PBT, PEN, and PEN/PET may be used as the first plastic material. In a preferred embodiment, PBT is used as the first plastic material.
Forming the container from a second plastic, such as PET, can be highly beneficial. In this way, the container can retain the advantages of PET as used in packaging, while also being able to be coupled/welded to the valve cup formed of the first plastic. This means that the seal between the valve cup and container can be maintained, even if the container deforms.
In one embodiment of any of the methods above, the container is entirely formed from the second plastic material. Forming the container in this way means that the container retains the beneficial properties of the second plastic. Polyesters, and in particular PET, have many advantageous qualities in packaging applications. They can be easy to manipulate and thus forming valve cups and containers may be relatively easier and quicker. In some cases, the polyesters may also be relatively cheap. Some polyesters can also be recycled thus reducing the overall overhead cost. Finally, some polyesters can also be sterilised which is particularly advantageous for medical applications.
In another, alternative embodiment of the methods above, the second plastic material is a semi-crystalline polyester.
In an alternative to the methods above, at least a part of the container may be formed from the semi-crystalline material. Preferably, this part is adjacent or in contact with the opening of the container. This part may be a lip portion, a neck portion, and/or the entire container. In this way, when the container experiences elevated temperatures, the part adjacent or in contact with the opening does not deform. In other words, at elevated temperatures, the opening maintains its shape. In this way, any seal with the valve cup can be maintained.
A further embodiment of the methods above provides the container made from the second plastic material has a degree of crystallinity greater than 35%, preferably greater than 38%, when measured using differential scanning calorimetry.
Another embodiment of the methods above has the second plastic material selected from the group consisting of: crystallised PET, PBT, PEN, PEN/PET copolymers, or a blend of any of the foregoing; and the first plastic material is a polyester, preferably PET. Preferably, the second plastic material is PBT.
As above, reliable sealing may be achieved by ensuring that the container is suitably sealed to the valve cup. Plastic valve cups may be advantageous for various reasons such as cost and ease of manufacturing. However, some plastic valve cups may be prone to deformation at higher temperatures. Using a plastic valve cup permits welding to the plastic container. Therefore, even if the valve cup deforms, the container is fixed to the valve cup in such a way that the seal therebetween is not broken. In other words, the seal between the valve cup and container is maintained.
In some configurations, the rigid part of the container may provide a sufficient rigid basis for any deformation of the valve cup to be directed radially towards the valve supported by the valve cup. In other words, the radial forces acting against the rigid part of the container may cause a compressive force on a part of the valve at the centre of the valve cup. This means that the valve may be reliably held and sealed by the valve cup even if the valve cup is formed of a deformable plastic.
In an alternative embodiment of the methods above, the valve cup is formed from a metal or rigid material, and the valve cup includes the polyester lining provided at at least a portion of the valve cup that faces the container when assembled, wherein the polyester lining is either held by the valve cup or is coated onto the valve cup.
In an alternative valve cup, the valve cup may be formed of two materials; a metal or rigid material body, and a polyester lining. The metal or rigid material may be formed from any suitable material that does not deform or warp at temperatures greater than 50° C. That is, the rigidity of the valve cup is provided by the metal or rigid material, which thereby ensures that the valve is reliably held and sealed by the valve cup. The polyester lining preferably covers at least a part of the metal or rigid material valve cup. Preferably, this part faces the container when the valve cup is fixed to the container. In this way, the valve cup may be welded to a plastic container, thus enabling a seal between the valve cup and the container.
The polyester lining is coated or held by the valve cup and may be fixed by adhesive to the valve cup. The polyester lining may be coated directly onto a surface of the valve cup, thus providing a chemical bond between the metal or rigid material and the polyester lining. This may be advantageous should the polyester lining experience distortion when heated. Alternatively, the polyester lining may be held by a specific configuration of the valve cup, e.g., the valve cup may be shaped so as to be able to crimp or clinch the polyester lining. This provides a mechanical configuration which may be advantageous when coating is not possible because of the materials chosen, or when the chemical bonds do not sufficiently withstand deformation of the polyester lining. The polyester lining may be provided on an underside of the valve cup. The polyester lining may also be formed from any of the semi-crystalline polyesters.
In a further embodiment of the method above, welding the valve cup to the container includes welding the valve cup to the container by any one of: friction welding, ultrasonic welding, and laser welding.
These welding techniques are particularly advantageous as they can be used to weld plastic to plastic, and do not cause any propellant gas to adversely react, e.g., these techniques do not provide a source of ignition.
Another embodiment of any of the methods involves pressurising the volume of the container between the inside of the container and the outside of the bag to between 1 to 3 bar, preferably between 1.5 to 2.5 bar, by undercup gassing.
Although the pressure of 1 to 3 bar is not particularly high, the pressurisation is performed without any fluid medium to be dispensed disposed in the bag. In this way, when the dispensing system is welded and sealed, any addition of the fluid medium to the dispensing system via the valve thereof increases the pressure within the container. This may then provide the necessary pressure for dispensing the fluid medium. Performing the pressurisation in this way means that the welding process is substantially easier because the pressures involved are lower.
A further embodiment of any of the methods above involves the valve cup including an inverted U-shaped receiving portion and the container including a lip portion, wherein prior to welding the valve cup to the container, the method further includes snap fitting the inverted U-shaped receiving portion to the lip portion.
The inverted U-shaped receiving portion can be provided on an outer surface or diameter of the valve cup and is preferably shaped and sized to receive a lip portion of the container. In this manner, the valve cup can be reliably positioned with respect to the container and can be suitably attached via, for example, welding. The inverted U-shaped receiving portion may be provided with at least one protrusion to aid in fixing, at least temporarily, the valve cup to the container to thereby facilitate the welding without concern of the valve cup being displaced.
Another embodiment of the method above further comprises, before inserting the bag into the container, folding the bag so as to decrease the footprint of the bag to less than the diameter of the opening of the container. Preferably, the folding includes twisting the bag around a central axis of the valve or folding the bag into a concertina pattern.
The valve 50 is shown in detail in
The dispensing tip 54 may have any cross-sectional shape but is preferably cylindrical. The dispensing tip 54 may also include an upper channel 55 that defines a hollow inner portion of the dispensing tip 54. A through hole 56 may be provided at a lower portion of the dispensing tip 54. In
The plunger 53 may be provided so as to slide in the direction of the common central axis. The plunger 53 may be biased to a closed position by a spring (not shown) disposed in the hollow portion of the main body 52 and communicating with receiving parts, such as perpendicular flanges, of the plunger 53.
Optionally, a bag 100 (see
The valve 50 is supported by the valve cup 10. In the example of
The valve main body 52 may be supported by second inner projections 14 that, in
The seal member 60 is preferably sized so as to surround the outer diameter of the dispensing tip 54 and cover the through hole 56 in the closed position, as seen in
When assembling the valve 50 and valve cup 10, the seal member 60 may be inserted into the lower region of the valve cup 10 defined by the second inner projections 14, or the seal member 60 may be positioned on top of the valve main body 52. In any case, when the valve 50 is threaded into the valve cup 10 such that the dispensing tip 54 passes through the central opening 11, the second inner projections 14 may hold the valve main body 52 in place. In some examples, the second inner projections 14 may include raised portions 15 that snap fit into corresponding receiving portions provided in the valve main body 52.
The structure of the valve cup 10 is not particularly limited.
The inverted U-shaped receiving portions 16 may define a space wherein the inner surfaces of the inverted U-shaped receiving portions 16 may contact the lip portion 38 of the container 30 when the valve cup 10 is attached to the container 30. The innermost surface of the inner surfaces may define a diameter d3 of the valve cup 10 which may be equal to or less than the inner diameter of the opening 32. In one example configuration, the diameter d3 may be 24.8 mm, but the diameter d3 is not limited to this value. In some configurations, the outermost surface of the inner surfaces may be provided with a projection 17 extending towards the innermost surface. As seen in
The inverted U-shaped receiving portions 16 may have a height h1 than is greater than the height of the lip portion 38 such that the lip portion 38 is completely contained within the inverted U-shaped receiving portions 16. This configuration is seen in
The section may also be provided with a number of enforcing members or portions 18 that extend from the inverted U-shaped receiving portions 16 to the outer side of the inverted portions 13. This may aid in increasing the structural rigidity of the valve cup 10 while also reducing production costs and material consumption.
As mentioned above, the valve cup 10 is configured to be attached to the container 30. In
In accordance with the present invention, the valve cup 10 may be formed from a plastic material that is a semi-crystalline polyester. In this manner, the structural rigidity of the valve cup 10 can be ensured beyond the recommended 50° C. owing to the higher degree of crystallinity. In some cases, the degree of crystallinity may be greater than 35%, and preferably greater than 38% when measured using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). DSC is a well-established method for measuring thermal properties of materials and is not explained further herein.
One material that can be used for the valve cup 10 of the present invention is crystallised PET (CPET). PET can either be amorphous or semi-crystalline, depending on how it is processed. Typically, PET can be injection moulded using a suitable mould (e.g., a valve cup). When a standard cycle time is used, the resulting PET product is completely amorphous. A semi-crystalline plastic is one that displays crystalline structures but also amorphous regions. When heated, the amorphous regions can transition from a hard and brittle state to a rubbery, soft, and elastic state; the temperature at which this occurs is known as the glass transition temperature. In a semi-crystalline plastic, the rigidity of the plastic is proportional to the degree of crystallinity, which essentially defines the percentage of the plastic that exhibits crystalline structures. Because the crystalline structures do not undergo the transition from hard to rubbery states, the crystalline structures keep their shape and thus can maintain the rigidity of the semi-crystalline plastic even when the amorphous regions do make the transition at the glass transition temperature.
The approximate degree of crystallinity of PET ranges from 30% to 40%, although other percentages may be possible. CPET may be formed by heating virgin PET and allowing the heated PET to cool slowly, more slowly than prescribed by a standard cycle used in injection moulding, thus forming crystalline structures. Thus, CPET has a high degree of crystallinity. In contrast, amorphous PET (APET) is cooled much more quickly preventing the crystalline structures from forming.
CPET may also have nucleating agents added thereto in order to enhance the formation of crystalline structures in the material. Alternatively, other additives may be introduced to PET in order to increase the stiffness and/or durability, e.g., glass particles or fibres.
Typically, PET films and bottles have a limited degree of crystallinity and usually have small crystallites leading to a clear and transparent material. This is perhaps the most common form of PET. CPET requires more careful control when forming and thus can be much more costly to produce.
CPET is much less subject to deformation under stress, especially at larger temperatures, than amorphous PET (APET). This is primarily because of the rigidity of the crystalline structures therein. Because semi-crystalline polyesters include both crystalline and amorphous regions, they can be characterised by a glass transition temperature. For PET, the glass transition temperature is between 67° C. for amorphous PET to 81° C. for semi-crystalline PET. Therefore, in the case of PET, a higher glass transition temperature correlates with a larger degree of crystallinity, and thus PET having a higher glass transition temperature is desired for use as the valve cup 10, preferably over 74° C.
In a preferential embodiment, polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) is used as the plastic material of the valve cup 10. PBT is always semi-crystalline in normal commercial settings. Typically, the degree of crystallinity is always greater than 30%, and is usually in the range of 40% to 50%. Although the glass transition temperature is approximately 66° C. for PBT, PBT is generally more rigid that amorphous PET owing to the higher degree of crystallinity. This makes PBT an excellent choice of material for use as the valve cup 10.
Yet another material that is suitable is polyethylene napthalate (PEN). PEN is very stable, particularly at higher temperatures. PEN can also form a semi-crystalline structure and has a glass transition temperature of approximately 125° C. Compared to PET, PEN has higher oxygen and water vapour barrier, tensile strength and flexural modulus. In addition, moulding and blowing cycles for PEN are much shorter than for PET leading to increased productivity. However, the cost of PEN is, at present, much higher than PET.
It should also be appreciated than many other polyesters may be used provided that they display appropriate semi-crystalline properties. Blends of polyesters may also be used. In one example, a PEN/PET copolymer may be used, wherein the percentage of PEN is relatively low in comparison to the percentage of PET, e.g., between 10-20% PEN for reasons of cost. Other copolymers may be used such as PET/PBT copolymers, or even PET/PBT/PEN copolymers. However, any of PET, PBT, or PEN may also be blended with other polyesters and/or other additives, such as nucleating agents, to form semi-crystalline structures.
Moreover, when the valve cup 10 is formed from a semi-crystalline polyester, the valve cup 10 can be welded to the container 30 when the container is formed of a second plastic material. The welding can be performed using any suitable technique to weld two plastics together, but is preferably one of friction welding, ultrasonic welding, or laser welding. In this case, the container 30 may be formed of PET with any appropriate degree of crystallinity and subsequently welded to the valve cup 10. This ensures that the valve cup 10 (e.g., the inverted U-shaped receiving portion 16) does not separate from the container 30 (e.g., the lip portion 38) even when deformation of the container 30 at high temperatures occurs.
In accordance with the first valve cup 10 to be used in the method of the invention, using a semi-crystalline polyester as the material for the valve cup 10 ensures that the valve 50 is suitable held by the valve cup 10 at temperatures over 50° C. because deformation or distortion of the valve cup 10 does not occur. In addition, using a semi-crystalline polyester as the material for the valve cup 10 means that a plastic container 30 can be welded to the valve cup 10 thus ensuring that the seal between the container 30 and valve cup 10 is maintained even if deformation of the container 30 occurs. Thus, the advantageous properties of PET when used as the container 30 can be retained without compromising sealing performance at higher temperatures.
It should be appreciated, however, that the material of the container 30 is not limited to PET but may be any suitable polyester and may also be formed of any of the semi-crystalline polyesters above.
As discussed above, the rigidity of the valve cup 10 can also be improved by using the enforcing members 18. The enforcing members 18 may be formed of the same semi-crystalline polyester or may be formed of a different material, e.g., metal.
It should be appreciated that various modifications to the specific structure of the valve cup 10, container 30, and valve 50 may be made while still conforming to the principles of the first example of the invention.
As a second example of a component to be used with the method of the invention, a part of the container 30 may be formed from any of the semi-crystalline polyesters used for the valve cup 10 of the first example. Specifically, a part adjacent or in contact with the opening 32 of the container 30 may preferably be formed from the semi-crystalline polyester. In contrast, the valve cup 10 may be formed from any polyester, such as PET.
In the second example, the opening 32 of the container 30 maintains its rigidity at temperatures exceeding 50° C. by virtue of being formed from the semi-crystalline polyester. The valve cup 10 may maintain the seal with respect to the valve 50 due to the compressive forces acting radially inward from the opening 32 of the container 30 if the valve cup 10 begins to deform at higher temperatures.
Alternatively, the valve cup 10 may be structured in such a manner as to channel any deformation to areas away from the valve 50, i.e., away from inclined portion 13. For example, with reference to
In the second example, the container 30 is preferably formed from the semi-crystalline polyester only at a portion adjacent or in contact with the opening 32. This may include only the lip portion 38. Alternatively, the entire neck portion 36 and lip portion 38 may be made from the semi-crystalline polyester. In other configurations, the entire container 30 may be formed from the semi-crystalline polyester, although this may increase the costs and/or difficulty of the manufacturing processes associated with forming the container 30.
As with the first example, using a semi-crystalline polyester as the material for at least a part of the container 30 ensures that the valve cup 10 is suitably held by the container 30 at temperatures over 50° C. because deformation or distortion of the opening 32 of container 30 does not occur. This can limit or appropriately deflect any deformation of the valve cup 10 meaning that the valve 50 is stably held. In addition, using a semi-crystalline polyester as the material for a part proximate to the opening 32 of the container 30 means that a polyester valve cup 10 can be welded to the container 30 thus ensuring that the seal between the container 30 and valve cup 10 is maintained even if deformation of the valve cup 10 occurs. The advantageous properties of using PET when used as the valve cup 10 and potentially as part of the container 30 can be retained without compromising sealing performance at higher temperatures.
It should be appreciated, however, that the material of the valve cup 10 is not limited to PET but may be any suitable polyester and may also be formed of any of the semi-crystalline polyesters above.
As a third example of a component to be used in the assembly method of the present invention, the primary material of the valve cup 10 may be a metal or other rigid material. Preferably, the primary material is aluminium. The structure of the valve cup 10 may be the same as in the first example.
The polyester lining 70 may be formed from any polyester, but is preferably formed from PET. When the valve cup 10 is formed of a metal, i.e., aluminium, or other rigid material, the structural rigidity of the valve cup 10 at temperatures greater than 50° C. is ensured by the structural rigidity of the metal or rigid material. In other words, the metal or rigid material does not deform at temperatures greater than 50° C. This means that the valve cup 10 may reliably hold and seal the valve 50.
Providing the polyester lining 70 on a part of the valve cup 10 means that the polyester lining 70 can be welded using any of the aforementioned techniques to a polyester based container 30, e.g., the container 30 of the first example. In this way, the valve cup 10 can be reliably attached to the container 30 such that any deformation of the container 30 at temperatures greater than 50° C. does not cause the valve cup 10 and container 30 to separate, and thus the seal therebetween is maintained.
The advantageous effects described in both the first and second examples can therefore be realised by the third example; namely, that the seal between the valve 50 and valve cup 10 and the seal between the valve cup 10 and container 30 can be maintained at temperatures greater than 50° C.
As seen in
The polyester lining 70 does not have to be formed from the semi-crystalline polyesters as discussed in the first and second examples. However, in some cases, to prevent deformation of the polyester lining 70 that may lead to detachment from the valve cup 10, the polyester lining 70 may be formed from the semi-crystalline polyesters.
Method for Assembling Dispensing System
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method of assembling the dispensing system using valve cups 10 or container 30 as described in any of the first through third examples is now given.
A first step of the invention, as shown in
Once the bag 100 is securely attached to the valve 50, the bag 100 may be folded to reduce the footprint thereof. As shown in
The folding may be performed in any manner so as to reduce the footprint of the BOV and allow insertion into the container 30. In one embodiment, the flat bag 100 is rolled around the axis of the valve 50 and valve cup 10 such that the bag 100 is in a spiraled configuration centred on the axis of the valve 50. In another embodiment, the bag 100 may be folded in a concertina. In both cases, the BOV is preferably provided with a suitable footprint.
In contrast to known methods, the BOV may not be provided with a containing sleeve or tape to retain the BOV in the folded configuration. According to the present invention, the folded BOV is inserted directly into the container 30, as is shown in
Once partially inserted, the inner region of the container 30 may be filled with gas, preferably a propellant gas. Suitable propellant gasses are known in the art and are not discussed further herein. The method used is preferably undercup gassing, which essentially means that the gas is passed under the valve cup 10 and into the region between the bag 100 and the inner volume of the container 30. In the present invention, the inner volume of the container 30 may be pressurised to a pressure between 1 to 3 bar, preferably 1.5 to 2.5 bar.
As seen in
In a more preferably configuration, the inverted U-shaped receiving portion 16 comprises the projections 17, 77 which are adapted to engage in a snap-fit manner with the underside of the lip portion 38. In this way, when the valve cup 10 is pressed onto the lip portion of the container 30, the U-shaped receiving portion 16 may deform slightly to allow the projections 17, 77 to pass over the lip portion 38 and subsequently return to their resting state once the projections 17, 77 have passed over the lip portion 38. Securing the valve cup 10 in this way aids in ensuring that the welding process is performed with improved accuracy as the valve cup 10 can be reliably aligned with the container 30.
As seen in
Once the welding is completed, the dispensing system 1 is assembled. Further assembly steps may be possible, such as adding a protection overcap 120 to cover the exposed part of the valve 50 as in
It should be noted that some or all of the steps of the method may be performed in a sealed environment. This may aid in assembling the dispensing system 1 when the pressure is increased.
According to this method, the dispensing systems are assembled by welding the valve cup 10 to the container 30 after experiencing undercup gassing. Conventional methods generally rely on clinching the valve cup to the container, whereas the present assembly method utilises the welding of a specially modified valve cup 10 to a container 30. The welding may also be performed at lower pressures and without the presence of the fluid medium to the dispensed. This can ensure a more reliable weld and potentially prevent any contamination of the fluid medium to be dispensed.
The present invention therefore provides a method for assembling a dispensing system 1 for dispensing a fluid medium, the dispensing system 1 including a valve cup 10 or container 30 that is modified to be rigid at temperatures exceeding 50° C., while also allowing for welding between the valve cup 10 and container 30. Primarily, this can be achieved by using either a semi-crystalline polyester with a high degree of crystallinity, or by making use of a polyester layer on a metal or rigid material valve cup.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15179629.9 | Aug 2015 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/063571 | 6/14/2016 | WO | 00 |