The present invention relates generally to determining a state of health (SOH) of a rechargeable battery in a transportation vehicle.
A vehicle's electric power supply system must support a plurality of vehicle functions that operate on electric energy. Such functions include normal vehicle operation devices and safety related devices such as rear window defogger, anti-lock braking/stability systems, lighting systems, etc. In addition to these devices, the vehicle's electric power supply system supports comfort, convenience, and entertainment devices. Some examples include air conditioning, heated seats, video/audio systems, and accessory outlet convenience devices. With the advent of new X-by-wire technologies (e.g., steer-by-wire, brake-by-wire, etc.) even more electric power is being demanded of the vehicle's electrical power system.
The increasing use of electrical devices as described above directly affects the drain on the vehicle battery, and hence, the battery's useful life. The acceleration of battery aging has a direct correlation with the frequency of use of such devices, which uses the vehicle battery as their power source.
Moreover, hybrid electric vehicle applications utilize both electric drive systems and internal combustion engines. Such systems require more energy from a vehicle battery than a typical internal combustion engine system. The operating modes of hybrid vehicles are typically described as charge depleting or charge sustaining with reference to the battery pack. Some hybrids can be charged off an electrical grid, whereas most hybrids operating in a charge sustaining mode receive the electric charging from an alternator driven by the internal combustion engine. Therefore, hybrid systems use high power rechargeable batteries to meet the power requirement. With high power output and more frequent usage of the batteries, accurate and robust capacity estimation is needed for battery SOH monitoring to ensure reliable and safe operation of hybrid systems. In addition, an accurate capacity estimate can be further utilized to enhance state of charge estimation and electric power management.
A known method used to determine battery capacity measurements is to use a time-consuming full charging and discharging process in a laboratory environment which is not suitable for on-board vehicle applications.
One advantage of the invention is the ability to estimate battery capacity in an on-board vehicle system as opposed to a laboratory environment. A voltage-based state of charge (SOC) of the battery is estimated in an electronic control module using voltage and current signals measured over time intervals for determining the battery capacity, which assists in monitoring the battery state of health as well as enhancement of battery charging control and vehicle power management.
An embodiment contemplates a method for estimating a capacity of a battery. A state of charge is determined at a first instant of time and at a second instant of time. A difference in the state of charge is determined between the first instant of time and the second instant of time. A net coulomb flow is calculated between the first instant of time and the second instant of time. The battery capacity is determined as a function of the change in the state of charge and the net coulomb flow.
An embodiment contemplates an apparatus for determining a capacity of a battery. The apparatus includes at least one sensor for monitoring a characteristic of the battery and an electronic control module. The electronic control module is coupled to the at least one sensor for receiving a sensed input signal. The electronic control module includes a processing unit for determining a difference in a state of charge between a first instance of time and a second instance of time. The processing unit determines a net coulomb flow between the first instance of time and the second instance of time. The processing unit further determines the battery capacity as a function of the difference in the state of charge and the net coulomb flow.
The vehicle battery 12 is coupled to a plurality of devices 14 which utilize the battery as a power source. Such devices may include power outlets adapted to an external plug in device, accessories, components, subsystems, and systems associated with an internal combustion vehicle, a hybrid vehicle, or an electric vehicle. The vehicle 10 may further include a control module 16, or like module, which obtains, derives, monitors, and/or processes a set of parameters associated with vehicle battery 12. These parameters may include, without limitation, current, voltage, state of charge (SOC), state of health (SOH), battery internal resistances, battery internal reactances, battery temperature, and power output of the vehicle battery. The control module includes an algorithm, or like, for executing a vehicle battery capacity estimation technique. A current sensor 18 may also be used to monitor a supply current leaving the vehicle battery 12. In a hybrid vehicle or electric vehicle, it is typical that a current sensor 18 is integral to the control module 16. The system may also include a voltmeter (not shown) for measuring a voltage so that an open circuit voltage may be determined.
To enhance battery charging control and vehicle power management, the battery capacity estimation system uses the SOC which is an index associated with the battery state to determine the battery capacity. In a first embodiment, an open circuit voltage Voc is used to estimate the SOC. The open circuit voltage Voc can be determined when the battery is at rest for at least a predetermined period of time. The open circuit voltage Voc can also be estimated when the vehicle is operating. Various techniques may be used to determine the SOC using the open circuit voltage Voc. Examples of such techniques used for determining the SOC based on the open circuit voltage Voc directly measured and/or indirectly estimated from battery parameters may include, but are not limited to, those techniques described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,639,385 to Verbrugge and U.S. Publication 2004/0162683 to Verbrugge which describe techniques for estimating the open circuit voltage Voc and correlating it to the SOC. Pending application having Ser. No. 11/867,497 having a filing date of Oct. 4, 2007 describes a technique of sampling the terminal voltage data and current data to calculate an open circuit voltage Voc which may then be used to generate a SOC value. The relevant content of these patent documents and pending applications are incorporated herein by reference. In alternative embodiments, the SOC may be derived using other known techniques that do not require the open circuit voltage Voc.
In one embodiment, a first state of charge (SOC1) is determined at a first instance of time T1 and a second state of charge (SOC2) is determined at a second instance of time T2. The time instances at which SOC1 and SOC2 are determined may be fixed instances of time. Alternatively, the time instances may be variable dependent upon the validity of the SOC. That is, when SOC1 and SOC2 may be sampled at various time instances, the validity of SOC1 and SOC2 are made based on whether the change in a state of charge (ΔSOC) has the same sign as the change in a current-based SOC and is within a respective range compared with the change in the current-based SOC. For example, in a hybrid vehicle, a change within a predetermined percentage deviation (e.g., 5%) from the current-based SOC change would be considered valid. If the change has a different sign or is outside of respective range compared with the current-based SOC change, then SOC1 and SOC2 determined at the respective time instances are considered invalid. Sampling for new values of SOC1 and SOC2 may be made at a new time instances. Additionally, performance indices of the voltage-based SOC estimation method can also be used to determine the validity of SOC1 and SOC2 (e.g., signal richness, estimation error of parameter estimation methods). Once a determination is made that the change in the state of charge (ΔSOC) is valid, the difference ΔSOC is used to estimate the battery capacity.
The difference in the state of charge (ΔSOC) is represented by the formula:
ΔSOC=SOC1−SOC2
Since SOC1 and SOC2 are voltage-based, the difference in the state of charge (ΔSOC) is computed without using the vehicle battery capacity. As a result, the ΔSOC may be used as a comparative reference to derive the battery capacity. It should be noted that SOC1 and SOC2 may be derived as voltage based SOC or a non-voltage based SOC. Moreover, the methods used for determining SOC1 and SOC2 may be methods that are independent of battery capacity.
The electrical control unit 14 further determines a net coulomb flow ΔQ for battery capacity estimation. The net coulomb flow ΔQ is a function of the coulomb flow computed between the first instance of the time T1 and the second instance of time T2. The net coulomb flow ΔQ is represented by the formula:
where T1 is the first instance of time, T2 is the second instant of time, η represents the charging and discharging efficiency, and I is the current.
In a hybrid vehicle the net coulomb flow is computed at a battery control module. The battery control module in a hybrid vehicle performs battery charging control and enhances vehicle power management. In a vehicle having an internal combustion engine, a current sensor is used to monitor the current flow from the vehicle battery and is provided to a body control module for determining the net coulomb flow ΔQ.
The battery capacity is then determined as a function of the ΔSOC, as determined by the difference between SOC1 and SOC2, and the net coulomb flow ΔQ. The battery capacity which is indication of the battery state of health (SOH) may be represented by the following formula:
In step 22, SOC1 is determined at T1. In step 23, SOC2 is determined at T2. SOC1 and SOC2 are determined as a function of the open circuit voltage Voc. T1 and T2 may be instances of time that are fixed or may be variable.
In step 24, a difference in the state of charge ΔSOC is determined by subtracting SOC2 from SOC1. If T1 and T2 are variable (i.e., taken during a sampling), then a validity check is made to determine if the ΔSOC is valid. This determination may be made by comparing the ΔSOC to a change in the current-based SOC and determining if the ΔSOC is within an expected range. If the determination is made that ΔSOC is invalid, then new sampling values are taken at different time instances for the open circuit voltage Voc to obtain new state of charge values for SOC1 and SOC2. In addition, the open circuit voltage Voc may be recorded for multiple sampling times to derive multiple ΔSOC values and in turn multiple battery capacity estimates Cn which may be filtered to generate an average battery capacity to improve robustness and accuracy.
In step 25, the net coulomb flow ΔQ is determined between the first instance of time T1 and the second instance of time T2. The net coulomb flow ΔQ is amp hour change between the first instance of time T1 and the second instance of time T2. The coulomb flow is typically calculated by accumulating sampled current over the sampling time interval.
In step 26, the battery capacity is derived as a function of the difference in the state of charge ΔSOC and the net coulomb flow ΔQ. The battery capacity is then combined with other parameters such as battery resistance to offer on-board vehicle state of health (SOH). The SOH value can be used to more appropriately manage power utilization and/or to report the SOH to a driver of the vehicle.
While the above embodiment describes a method of on-board vehicle SOH monitoring, the above methods and techniques may be applied to testing the battery off the vehicle.
While certain embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention as defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4937528 | Palanisamy | Jun 1990 | A |
6356083 | Ying | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6501250 | Bito et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
7554297 | Sada et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7649338 | Seo et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7679329 | Lim et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7928735 | Huang et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20030184307 | Kozlowski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20080054848 | Yun et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090037124 | Majima | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1632781 | Mar 2006 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090322283 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |