Method for biofilm dispersal

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11707065
  • Patent Number
    11,707,065
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 15, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 25, 2023
    10 months ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method for dispersing biofilm using mannose and its analogs.
Description

The present invention relates to a method for dispersing biofilm using mannose and its analogs.


Sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRPs) are notorious for their detrimental effects on the vast infrastructure required to produce and transport oil and gas. These organisms, known for growing in both planktonic and sessile communities, are some of the major contributors to reservoir souring, microbially influenced corrosion (MIC) of equipment and other mild steel components, and biofilm-induced clogging and restriction of flow. The negative impact of SRPs on both oil production costs and product quality has made these organisms attractive targets for advanced microbial control strategies.


Within the SRPs, bacteria in the genus Desulfovibrio have been demonstrated to be prevalent in oil and gas applications. In particular, Desulfovibrio vulgaris (D. vulgaris) forms robust biofilms that are able to induce pitting corrosion in mild steel. U.S. Pat. No. 7,060,486 discloses that forming bioflim of non-native aerobic bacteria which secrete antimicrobial agents in a system containing SRB may inhibit the growth of SRB in aqueous systems. Although biocidal efficacy and inhibition has been positively demonstrated against SRB, a demand exists for biocide alternatives that are less toxic, more sustainable and demonstrate the ability to disperse existing biofilm.


US2016/0000680A1 demonstrates that 2-Deoxy-D-glucose is able to inhibit biofilm formation in aerobic and facultative bacteria such as Escherichia coli and oral bacteria; however there is no teaching of biofilm formation inhibition in obligate anaerobic SRB. Additionally, no biofilm dispersal of formed biofilm was discussed. Because biofilm inhibition and dispersal involve two different processes and mechanisms, a need remains for an effective method to disperse existing biofilm.


The present invention seeks to solve the problems of the art by providing a method to disperse existing biofilm comprising providing a biofilm; and contacting the biofilm with a compound selected from the group consisting of mannose, 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG), methyl α-D-mannopyranoside (αMM), methyl α-D-glucopyranoside (αMG), and mixtures thereof to disperse the biofilm.


As used herein, “biofilm” is defined as a multicellular bacterial community composed of surface-associated microbial cells that are held together by a self-developed matrix of extracellular polymeric substance.


As used herein “biofilm dispersal” is defined as the detachment of all or partial sessile cells from the biofilm. Biofilm dispersal is the final stage of the biofilm life cycle and could involve numerous signaling and regulating processes.


Biofilms of the present invention are found in aqueous systems such as, for example, industrial wastewater systems and waters resulting from oil and gas operations.


Biofilms of the present invention comprise prokaryotes. Suitable prokaryotes are bacteria, preferably anaerobic bacteria. The biofilms of the present invention may comprise sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRPs), suitably sulfate reducing bacteria. Such sulfate reducing bacteria may be of the Desulfovibrio genus and in particular, Desulfovibrio vulgaris (ATCC 29579), Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (DSM 12129) or mixtures thereof.


To disperse the biofilms, the biofilms are contacted with a compound selected from the group consisting of mannose, 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG), methyl α-D-mannopyranoside (αMM), methyl α-D-glucopyranoside (αMG), and mixtures thereof. Useful concentrations of mannose and its derivatives range from 1 to 500 mM, alternatively 5 to 500 mM, alternatively 30 to 500 mM, and alternatively 100 to 500 mM.


The following examples are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are in no way intended to limit the scope of the present invention beyond the scope aforementioned in the specification.







EXAMPLES

Cultures of Desulfovibrio vulgaris (ATCC 29579) and Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (DSM 12129) were prepared in Modified Baar's medium at 30 C under anaerobic conditions. The bacterial cultures were then used to prepare bacterial suspensions in fresh Modified Baar's medium to a cell density of 0.1 (Table 2 to 6) or 0.05 (Table 1) at 600 nm. The appropriate bacterial suspension was used to fill 96-well plates and the plates were incubated in an anaerobic glove box for 24 h (Table 2 to 6) or 48 h (Table 1) at 30° C. to develop biofilms. Stocks of D-mannose (2.85 M, Alfa Aesar, Cat #A10842), 2DG (1.22 M, Alfa Aesar, Cat #AAAL07338-06), αMM (1.22 M, Acros Organics, Cat #AC229251000), and αMG (1.22 M, Alfa Aesar, Cat #AAA12484-22) were prepared in sterile distilled water and filtered through a 0.22 μm filter. For biofilm dispersal assay, the planktonic cells were removed, and the plates were washed with 150 μL of 1× of phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4); D-mannose, 2DG, αMM, and αMG were added, the volume was adjusted with 1×PBS, pH 7.4 to 150 μL, and the plates were incubated in the anaerobic glove box for 2 h (Table 1, 2, 4, 5, 6) or 14 h (Table 3) for biofilm dispersal studies. After the treatment, supernatants were discarded; the wells were washed three times with deionized water (DW) by dipping the plates into a 1 L solution of DW, and the plates were dried via a piece of paper towel by patting. 300 μL of 0.1% crystal violet was added to each well, the plates were incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature (25° C.), and the staining solution was discarded. The plates were washed three times with DW by dipping the plates into a 1 L solution of DW, then 300 μL of 95% ethanol was added to each well, and the plates were soaked for 5 min to dissolve the crystal violet. Total biofilm was measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm using a Sunrise microplate reader (Tecan, Austria Gesellschaft, Salzburg, Austria). Total biofilm remaining after the treatments were summarized in Table 1 to 6.









TABLE 1







Remaining biofilm of D. vulgaris after 2 h mannose treatment









Concentration
OD540
Standard deviation












500 mM
0.46
0.04


100 mM
0.48
0.06


 30 mM
0.52
0.01


Negative control
0.92
0.02
















TABLE 2







Remaining biofilm of D. vulgaris after 2 h 2DG treatment









Concentration
OD540
Standard deviation












500 mM
0.18
0.07


100 mM
0.17
0.04


 30 mM
0.24
0.06


Negative control
0.35
0.10
















TABLE 3







Remaining biofilm of D. vulgaris after 14 h 2DG treatment









Concentration
OD540
Standard deviation












10 mM 
0.16
0.06


5 mM
0.21
0.01


1 mM
0.24
0.05


Negative control
0.26
0.03
















TABLE 4







Remaining biofilm of D. vulgaris after 2 h αMM treatment









Concentration
OD540
Standard deviation












500 mM
0.23
0.01


100 mM
0.40
0.11


 30 mM
0.42
0.09


Negative control
0.46
0.11
















TABLE 5







Remaining biofilm of D. vulgaris after 2 h αMG treatment









Concentration
OD540
Standard deviation












500 mM
0.45
0.05


100 mM
0.33
0.05


 30 mM
0.39
0.03


Negative control
0.52
0.12
















TABLE 6







Remaining biofilm of D. desulfuricans after


2 h treatment with mannose and its analogs









Concentration of treatment
OD540 (average)
Standard deviation














Mannose
500
mM
0.39
0.02



100
mM
0.43
0.02



30
mM
0.49
0.01


2DG
500
mM
0.41
0.02



100
mM
0.49
0.05



30
mM
0.59
0.13


αMM
500
mM
0.50
0.02



100
mM
0.53
0.03



30
mM
0.60
0.12


αMG
500
mM
0.55
0.06



100
mM
0.62
0.06



30
mM
0.75
0.15









Negative control
0.88
0.17








Claims
  • 1. A method to disperse existing biofilm comprising: i. providing a biofilm wherein the biofilm comprises sulfate-reducing prokaryotes; andii. contacting the biofilm with a compound selected from the group consisting of mannose, 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG), methyl α-D-mannopyranoside (αMM), methyl α-D-glucopyranoside (αMG), and mixtures thereof to disperse the biofilm.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein biofilm comprises anaerobic bacteria.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein biofilm comprises sulfate reducing bacteria.
  • 4. The method of claim 2 wherein the biofilm comprises Desulfovibrio vulgaris (ATCC 29579).
  • 5. The method of claim 2 wherein the biofilm comprises Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (DSM 12129).
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2018/037690 6/15/2018 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2019/018087 1/24/2019 WO A
US Referenced Citations (8)
Number Name Date Kind
7060486 Wood et al. Jun 2006 B2
20120087993 Martin Apr 2012 A1
20130136782 Blackwell May 2013 A1
20140349975 Yin et al. Nov 2014 A1
20160000680 Schaeffer-Korbylo et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160082023 Choi Mar 2016 A1
20160280570 Frail et al. Sep 2016 A1
20170191357 Nguyen Jul 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
9636569 Nov 1996 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Sutrina, S. L., Griffith, M. S., & Lafeuillee, C. (2016). 2-Deoxy-d-glucose is a potent inhibitor of biofilm growth in Escherichia coli. Microbiology, 162(6), 1037-1046. (Year: 2016).
Purish, et al., “Role of Polymer Complexes in the Formation of Biofilms by Corrosive Bacteria on Steel Surfaces”, App. Bio. and Micro., vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 262-269 (2012).
Poosaria, et al., “Dispersal and inhibitory foles of mannose, 2-deoxy-d-glucose and N-acetylgalactosaminidase on the biofilm of Desulfovibrio vulgaris”, Env. Micro. Rpts., vol. 9, No. 6 pp. 779-787 (2017).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200138024 A1 May 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62533907 Jul 2017 US