The present invention relates generally to systems for making renewable fuels, and more particularly to the conversion of biomass into useful volatile and non-volatile compounds via the use of inherent compressional features of carbon.
In the early 21st century, global warming and its interrelationship with the widespread use of fossil fuels has become one of the major technological challenges of our time. Finding ways to more effectively use renewable biomass is a very important avenue for addressing these issues. Prior to the beginning of the industrial revolution, wood and plant oils were the primary source of energy for pre-industrial civilizations, which used this energy mainly for heating, cooking, and light. During this early period, biomass was simply burned in open air to produce heat and light. Several thousand years ago, mankind discovered that if the air supply was restricted during the burning process, a dense black residual (which we now call coke) could be extracted from burning wood. This hot coke could be quenched with water, dried, and re-burnt to produce a much hotter, denser fire. The emergence of coke proceeds in parallel with the development of metallurgy, which is dependent upon its hotter and cleaner fire along with its reducing capabilities to both extract metals from ore and form them into useful products.
The process of roasting a combustible material in either a reduced oxygen environment or oxygen-free environment is now called pyrolysis. Pyrolyzing wood and other forms of mixed bio as produces coke (which is sometimes called biochar) and a mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, sometimes referred to as synthesis gas (syngas). Roasting fossil fuel hydrocarbons in an oxygen-free environment first causes a breakdown of longer chain hydrocarbons into shorter chain hydrocarbons, ultimately resulting in more elemental forms such as methane (CH4), hydrogen, and elemental carbon.
Likewise, biomass (which is made up of cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin, starches, and lipids) proceeds through multiple steps of decomposition when subject to the pyrolysis process. In general, when subject to high temperatures 800° C.) for prolonged periods of time, pyrolysis ultimately yields syngas. As the temperature and exposure time interval is reduced, an increasing amount of biochar residue remains. At still lower temperatures and time intervals, increasingly complex hydrocarbons and oxygenated hydrocarbons are present in the gas stream from the pyrolyzed biomass. At the low extreme, simple everyday cooking typically drives off water and starts to de-hydrolyze the biomass, causing the darkening and carmelization that we all associate with cooked foods.
Various forms of laboratory and small scale commercial biomass pyrolyzers have been developed to generate useful chemical products from the controlled pyrolysis of biomaterials ranging from wood chips to sewage sludge. Although some pyrolyzers are focused simply on producing syngas, there is considerable effort in the development of milder pyrolyzing conditions, which typically results in a condensed liquid commonly called bio-oil. Many forms of pyrolyzers have been developed at the laboratory level to produce these intermediate compounds, which are collectively referred to as bio-oil or pyrolysis oil. Configurations include simple tube furnaces where the biomass is roasted in ceramic boats, ablative pyrolyzers where wood is rubbed against a hot surface, various forms of fluidized bed pyrolyzers where biomass is mixed with hot sand, and various simpler configurations that are based on earlier coking oven designs.
The fundamental problem with the resultant pyrolysis oil is that it is made up of hundreds to thousands of compounds, which are the result of subjecting the raw biomass to a wide range of temperature, time, and pressure profiles in bulk. When this process is complicated by the thousands of major bio-compounds in the original bio-feedstock, the result is a nearly intractable array of resultant compounds all mixed together. Pyrolysis oils from such processes are typically not thermodynamically stable. They contain active oxygenated free radicals that are catalyzed by organic acids and bases such that these oils typically evolve over a period of a few days from light colored liquids to dark mixtures with tar and resinous substances entrained in the mix. Also, attempts to re-gasify pyrolysis oil typically result in additional chemical reactions, which produce additional biochar and a shift to lower molecular weight components in the resulting gas stream. Although fairly high yields of pyrolysis oil can be achieved in laboratory scale experiments, larger industrial scale demonstration projects typically produce much lower yield. This is presumably due to the wider range of temperatures, hold times, and localized pressures within the much larger heated three dimensional volumes of such scale-up architectures.
Prior art illustrating the use of pressure in biomass conversion includes U.S. Pat. No. 6,227,473, which discloses an apparatus used to pulverize material composed of dry or wet pieces with shock waves created by alternating rotors and orifice plates. U.S. Pat. No. 6,339,031 describes the formation of a microcellular carbon foam that comprises saturating a carbon fiber precursor at high temperature and pressure, then releasing the pressure suddenly, followed by a quenching, oxygen stabilization and carbonization. U.S. Patent Application No. 2009/0308787 teaches the conversion of solid or highly viscous energy carrier material such as biomass, tar or heavy crude to liquid or gaseous reaction products. The carrier material is contacted with a catalyst material such as metal oxide and clays, and both are heated to a temperature between 200 and 450° C. to form vapor phase reaction products. The latter are said to be separated from the catalyst 110 seconds after they are formed.
The present invention describes a process for generating mild pyrolysis conditions within a pyrolyzer that entrains thin sheets of biomass, and subjects the biomass to sequential or concurrent temperature ramps and pressure shocks. These temperature ramps and pressure shocks enable a high-yield release of useful volatile bio intermediary compounds. The biomass treatment relies in part on peculiarities of the inherent compressional properties of carbon which is generated during biomass decomposition.
In various embodiments of the invention, biomass is subjected to sequential or concurrent temperature ramps and pressure shocks to produce useful volatile chemical compounds and a novel type of char (referred as BMF char). The temperature ramps are sufficient to volatilize and selectively create different biomass-derived components, while the pressure shocks aid the selective decomposition of the biomass during compression and pulverization.
One embodiment of the invention involves a method for producing a volatile biomass product, comprising: grinding a biomass feedstock to produce ground biomass particles; dispensing the ground biomass particles into thin sheets; subjecting the ground biomass to sequential or concurrent ramps of temperature and pressure shocks; selectively collecting at least one group of volatile compounds as it is released from the biomass.
A system for converting biomass to biofuel, comprising: means for grinding biomass into particles; means for dispensing the ground biomass particles into thin sheets; means for applying pressure shocks to the ground biomass; means for applying temperature ramps to the ground biomass; and means for collecting at least one group of volatile components as it is released from the biomass.
Further embodiments of the invention set forth a process and system that leads to the decomposition of biomass to produce useful volatile and nonvolatile chemical compounds.
Additional embodiments of this invention involve a process and method for the mild pyrolysis of biomass
Still further embodiments of this invention involve a system and algorithm for the decomposition of biomass that utilizes the special compressional features of carbon.
Other features and aspects of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the features in accordance with embodiments of the invention. The summary is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined solely by the claims attached hereto.
The present invention, in accordance with one or more various embodiments, is described in detail with reference to the following figures. The drawings are provided for purposes of illustration only and merely depict typical or example embodiments of the invention. These drawings are provided to facilitate the reader's understanding of the invention and shall not be considered limiting of the breadth, scope, or applicability of the invention. It should be noted that for clarity and ease of illustration these drawings are not necessarily made to scale.
The figures are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. It Should be understood that the invention can be practiced with modification and alteration, and that the invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
The present invention is directed toward biomass fractioning, whereby biomass is processed through a biomass fractioning system that creates a series of useful volatile components and BMF char through the application of selective temperature ramps and pressure shocks. The volatile components may be upgraded to diesel, gasoline or jet fuel. The BMF char may be reacted with any one stream of methane, carbon dioxide, steam or oxygen to create highly pure synthesis gas with a controllable range of compositions. The resulting synthesis gas may be used in any desired manner, including conversion to alcohols such as methanol, oxygenates such as dimethyl ether, and to Fischer-Tropsch products such as gasoline, diesel, lubricants and naptha.
BMF CHAR Generation
Referring now to
As used herein, the term ‘biomass’ includes material derived or readily obtained from plant sources. Such material can include without limitation: (i) plant products such as bark, leaves, tree branches, tree stumps, hardwood chips, softwood chips, grape pumice, sugarcane bagasse, switchgrass; and (ii) pellet material such as grass, wood and hay pellets, crop products well as corn, wheat and kenaf. This term may also include seeds such as vegetable seeds, fruit seeds, and legume seeds.
The term ‘biomass’ can also include: (i) waste products including animal manure such as poultry derived waste; (ii) commercial or recycled material including plastic, paper, paper pulp, cardboard, sawdust, timber residue, wood shavings and cloth; (iii) municipal waste including sewage waste; (iv) agricultural waste such as coconut shells, pecan shells, almond shells, coffee grounds; and (v) agricultural feed products such as rice straw, wheat straw, rice hulls, corn stover, corn straw, and corn cobs.
With further reference to
Embodiments of the invention feature a biomass chamber 51 that is much wider and longer than it is thick. In some cases, biomass is dispensed into thin sheets whose total thickness is 1 to 30 times the biomass particle size. A preferred thickness for the chamber for uncompressed biomass (which is ground or chopped to ⅛″ or smaller) is approximately ¾″ in thickness. As the biomass is heated and further pulverized (as discussed below), the emerging BMF char quickly condenses to a layer about 1/10″ thick. This aspect ratio ensures mild pyrolyzing conditions that allow the collection of useful chemical compounds known as bio-intermediary compounds as well as the production of BMF char. A person of skill in the art will appreciate that these biomass chambers can be sized in width and length along with the diameter of their corresponding drive disc to any such size as appropriate for the desired throughput for the biomass fractionator, without departing from the scope if the invention.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the temperature profiles are linear ramps ranging from 0.001° C./sec to 1000° C./sec, and preferably from 1° C./sec to 100° C./sec. Processing heating station 58 may be heated by electrical heating elements, direct flame combustion, or by directed jets of heated working gas or supercritical fluid. The heating profile and the pressure compaction profile may be linked via a feedback loop and may be applied by the same agent simultaneously. Compacting station 59 may be controlled by electrically driven devices, air compressed devices, or any other form of energy that serves to impact load the biomass. BMF char 52 remains after these processing steps.
The selective pyrolysis of the biomass arises out of the interplay between the applied pressure pulses, applied temperature and resultant pressures and temperatures experienced by the biomass. The process is illustrated diagrammatically in
With continued reference to
The compressional memory of carbon has been indirectly demonstrated in studies of commercial carbon resistors as low pressure gauges. See Rosenberg, Z. et al International Journal of Impact Engineering 34 (2007) 732-742. In these studies, metal discs were launched from a gas gun at high velocity and impact an epoxy or Plexiglas target in which a carbon resistor is embedded. Resistance changes were measured as a function of time after impact. It was noted that the resistance decreased rather rapidly in less than a microsecond, and stayed low for several microseconds, in some cases over 10 microseconds, until it began to increase gradually to pre-impact levels. There is essentially a memory effect or a slow relaxation after the impact. As electrical resistance and thermal conductivity are inversely correlated for carbon as for metals (See, for example, Buerschaper, R. A. in Journal of Applied Physics 15 (1944) 452-454 and Encyclopedia of Chemical Technolog, 5th edition), these studies reveal a compression memory on the part of the carbon. This compression memory is at least partly utilized in embodiments of the invention.
Embodiments of the invention also utilize the increase in thermal conductivity as carbon is compressed. The change in electrical resistance with pressure in carbon microphones is a well-known effect utilized by carbon telephones and carbon amplifiers. U.S. Pat. No. 203,216, U.S. Pat. No. 2,222,390 and U.S. Pat. No. 474,230 to Thomas Edison, describe apparatus that transform sound compressions (vibrations) to changes in electrical resistance of carbon granules. Carbon is even more sensitive than most metals in its inverse relationship between electrical resistance and thermal conductivity. Below are data indicating the thermal conductivity of various substances (CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 87th edition) in comparison to the measured thermal conductivity of BMF char:
As the thermal conductivity of the formed carbon within the biomass increases due to pressure shocks, it becomes consequently easier to attain mild pyrolysis conditions within the biomass. As higher temperatures are reached, the fact that carbon is a better heat transfer agent than water enables higher boiling compounds to become volatile. Pressure shocks serve to compress these higher boiling compounds and contribute to fracturing cell walls within the biomass. The process is illustrated by
A variety of pressure profiles ΔPn are effective in increasing the carbon thermal conductivity. The magnitude of the pressure can vary from 0.2 MPa to 10 GPa and may be applied via a number of different technologies, including air driven pistons, hydraulically driven pistons, and explosive driven devices. The duration of the pressure application can vary from 1 microsecond to 1 week. It is understood that pressure pulses of different magnitudes and different time durations may be admixed to yield optimum results.
The efficient heat energy transfer executed by embodiments of the present invention can be enhanced by the addition of supercritical fluids in the reaction chamber. It is known that supercritical fluids can improve heat transfer as well as accelerate reaction rates. Certain embodiments can operate with supercritical carbon dioxide, supercritical water, supercritical methane, supercritical methanol, or mixtures of the above. It is possible that supercritical conditions are created internally with some pressure and temperature profiles.
A system capable of embodying the methods of the present invention is described in co-owned, co-pending U.S. Patent Application No. 2010/0180805 entitled “System and Method for Biomass Fractioning,” the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This system comprises a biomass load and dump station, a heated pulverizing processing station for compressing the biomass, a biochar dumping station for removing residual biochar, and a plurality of biomass reaction compartments able to carry the biomass from station to station.
Referring to
Referring to
In addition to showing devolatilized components,
Referring to
Modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without affecting the scope of the invention.
Although the invention is described above in terms of various exemplary embodiments and implementations, it should be understood that the various features, aspects and functionality described in one or more of the individual embodiments are not limited in their applicability to the particular embodiment with which they are described, but instead can be applied, alone or in various combinations, to one or more of the other embodiments of the invention, whether or not such embodiments are described and whether or not such features are presented as being a part of a described embodiment. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments.
Terms and phrases used in this document, and variations thereof, unless otherwise expressly stated, should be construed as open ended as opposed to limiting. As examples of the foregoing: the term “including” should be read as meaning “including, without limitation” or the like; the term “example” is used to provide exemplary instances of the item in discussion, not an exhaustive or limiting list thereof; the terms “a” or “an” should be read as meaning “at least one,” “one or more” or the like; and adjectives such as “conventional,” “traditional,” “normal,” “standard,” “known” and terms of similar meaning should not be construed as limiting the item described to a given time period or to an item available as of a given time, but instead should be read to encompass conventional, traditional, normal, or standard technologies that may be available or known now or at any time in the future. Likewise, where this document refers to technologies that would be apparent or known to one of ordinary skill in the art, such technologies encompass those apparent or known to the skilled artisan now or at any time in the future.
The presence of broadening words and phrases such as “one or more,” “at least,” “but not limited to” or other like phrases in some instances shall not be read to mean that the narrower case is intended or required in instances where such broadening phrases may be absent. Additionally, the various embodiments set forth herein are described in terms of exemplary block diagrams, flow charts and other illustrations. As will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after reading this document, the illustrated embodiments and their various alternatives can be implemented without confinement to the illustrated examples. These illustrations and their accompanying description should not be construed as mandating a particular architecture or configuration.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/732,099, filed Dec. 31, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/103,905, filed May 9, 2011, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
203016 | Edison | Apr 1878 | A |
222390 | Edison | Dec 1879 | A |
260666 | Cheiky et al. | Jul 1882 | A |
474230 | Edison | May 1892 | A |
1369428 | Hawley | Feb 1921 | A |
3841974 | Osborne | Oct 1974 | A |
4153514 | Garrett et al. | May 1979 | A |
4268275 | Chittick | May 1981 | A |
4383391 | Thomas et al. | May 1983 | A |
4421524 | Chittick | Dec 1983 | A |
4487958 | Ream et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4495165 | Gurza | Jan 1985 | A |
4497637 | Purdy et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4501644 | Thomas | Feb 1985 | A |
4530702 | Fetters et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4618735 | Bridle et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4861351 | Nicholas et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4992480 | Mahajan et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5015423 | Eguchi et al. | May 1991 | A |
5032618 | Marchionna et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5087786 | Nubel et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5204102 | Coles et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5221290 | Dell | Jun 1993 | A |
5462908 | Liang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5504259 | Diebold et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5756194 | Shogren et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758194 | Kuzma | May 1998 | A |
5820640 | Ikura et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5857807 | Longo, Sr. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863467 | Mariner et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6133328 | Lightner | Oct 2000 | A |
6227473 | Arnold | May 2001 | B1 |
6228806 | Mehta | May 2001 | B1 |
6339031 | Tan | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6548026 | Dales et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6747067 | Melnichuk et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6811703 | Elliott | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6841085 | Werpy et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6923838 | Maubert et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6994827 | Safir et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7033972 | Shikada et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7226566 | Beierle | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7282189 | Zauderer | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7458999 | Schenck et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7846979 | Rojey et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7888540 | Deluga et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8137628 | Cheiky et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8143464 | Cheiky et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8173044 | Cheiky et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8197573 | Scharf | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8216430 | Cheiky | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236085 | Cheiky | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8293958 | Cheiky | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8317891 | Cheiky | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8317892 | Cheiky | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8318997 | McAlister | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8361186 | Shearer et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8367881 | Cheiky | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8430937 | Cheiky et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8431757 | Cheiky et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8449631 | Paoluccio | May 2013 | B2 |
8568493 | Cheiky et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8747797 | Shearer et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9216916 | Traxler et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9333474 | Cheiky | May 2016 | B2 |
9464234 | Tharpe, Jr. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9478324 | Favetta et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9493379 | Cheiky et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9493380 | Cheiky | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20020012725 | Carlson | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030119952 | Werpy et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040111968 | Day et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128909 | Smiley | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060169572 | Meier et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060225345 | Westrate | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070123420 | Hayashi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080006519 | Badger | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016769 | Pearson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080093209 | Noto | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080216391 | Cortright et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080223269 | Paoluccio | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080300435 | Cortright et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317657 | Hall et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317907 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007484 | Smith | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090081292 | Otomo et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090126433 | Piskorz et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090139139 | Tilman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090151251 | Manzer et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090183430 | Schubert et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090217575 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217584 | Raman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253947 | Brandvold et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090308787 | O'Connor et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100040510 | Randhava et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100162780 | Scharf | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179057 | Bool, III et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180805 | Cheiky | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100218417 | Bauldreay et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100223839 | Garcia-Perez et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228062 | Babicki et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236309 | Celia | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236987 | Kreis | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257775 | Cheiky | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100270505 | Gallaspy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100300866 | van Aardt et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100310447 | Yaniv et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100311157 | Van Alstyne et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110003693 | Spittle | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110023566 | Lodwig et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110081336 | Medoff | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110092726 | Clarke | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110100359 | North | May 2011 | A1 |
20110114144 | Green et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110172092 | Lee et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110177466 | Cheiky | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110209386 | Cheiky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110212004 | Cheiky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258912 | O'Connor et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120095272 | El-Halwagi et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120103040 | Wolf et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125064 | Joseph et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120151827 | Powell et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120208254 | Smith et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220454 | Chen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237994 | Das et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120283493 | Olson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286209 | Cheiky et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304718 | Cheiky et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120304719 | Cheiky et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120322130 | Garcia-Perez et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130025188 | Cheiky et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025190 | Cheiky et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130123103 | Anderson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130213101 | Shearer et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140024528 | Smith et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140037536 | Reimerink-Schats et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140161709 | Karthikeyan | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177136 | Kim et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140345341 | Fiato et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140345343 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140349847 | Schrader | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140352378 | Shearer et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150101372 | Cheiky et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150128672 | Shearer et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150136581 | Aupperle et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150140585 | Silberg et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150157661 | Eddy et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150361369 | Tait et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160023959 | Bontchev et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160102024 | Schrader et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160199811 | McLaughlin | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160362607 | Weaver et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160368831 | Bontchev et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1997590 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101805224 | Aug 2010 | CN |
103053244 | Dec 2014 | CN |
0140811 | May 1985 | EP |
2479469 | Oct 2011 | GB |
100819505 | Apr 2008 | KR |
WO-1982004223 | Dec 1982 | WO |
WO-2004037747 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2009004652 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2010084230 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2010129988 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO-2011006717 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO-2011014916 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO-2011097183 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO-2011143380 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2011143718 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2014091279 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2014146205 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2016054431 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO-2016187161 | Nov 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Buerschaper, R., “Thermal and Electrical Conductivity of Graphite and Carbon at Low Temperatures,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 15, pp. 452-454 (1994). |
Cheng, C., “Stability of Black Carbon in Soils Across a Climatic Gradient,” Jour. of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, vol. 113, G02027, pp. 1-10 (2008). |
Chew, T.L., “Catalytic Processes Towards the Production of Biofuels in a Palm Oil and Oil Palm Biomass-based Biorefinery,” Bioresource Tech., vol. 99, pp. 7911-8922 (2008). |
Demirbas, A., “Effects of Temperature & Particle Size on Bio-Char Yield from Pyrolysis of Agricultural Residues,” J. Anal. Pyrolysis, vol. 72, pp. 243-248 (2004). |
Elliott, D.C., “Liquid Fuels by Low-Severity Hydrotreating of Biocrude,” Dev. in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, vol. 1, pp. 611-621 (1996). |
Faludi, J., “World Changing Change Your Thinking a Carbon-Negative Fuels;” www.worldchanging.com, 2 pgs. (Oct. 16, 2007). |
Gegver, E. & Hayek, K., “A Fully Programmable System for the Study of Catalytic Gas Reactions,” J. Physc. E: Sci. Instrum., vol. 18, pp. 836-838 (1985). |
Kim, et al.; Characteristics of Crosslinked Potato Starch & Starch-Filled Linear Low-Density Polyethylene Films, Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 50, pp. 331-337 (2002). |
Laird, D., “The Charcoal Vision; A Win Win Scenario,” Agron, J., vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 178-181 (2008). |
Lehmann, J., “Nutrient Avail. & Leaching in an Archaeological Anthrosol & Ferraisol of the Central Amazon Basin,” Fertilizer, Manure.; Plant Soil, vol. 249, pp. 343-357 (2003). |
Lima, I.M., “Physiochemical & Adsorption Properties of Fast-Pyrolysis Bio-Chars & Their Steam Activated Counterparts,” J. Chem. Biotechnical, vol. 85, pp. 1515-1521 (2010). |
Mohan, D., “Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-Oil: A Critical Review,” Energy & Fuels , vol. 20, pp. 848-889 (2006). |
Norman, et al.; “Best Management Practices for Reclaiming Surface Mines in Washington and Oregon,” Open-File Report 0-92-2, revised ed. Dec. 1997; www.oregongeology.org, 130 pgs. (Feb. 9, 2010). |
Ogawa, et al., “Carbon Sequestration by Carbonization of Biomass & Forestation; 3 Case Studies,” Mitigation & Adaption Strategies for Global Change, vol. 11, pp. 429-444 (2006). |
Omata, K., “Optimization of Cu Oxide Catalyst for Methanol Synthesis under High CO2 Partial Pressure Using Combinatorial Tools,” App.Catalyst A: General, vol. 262, pp. 207-214 (2004). |
Preston, C.M., “Black (Pyrogenic) Carbon: a Synthesis of Current Knowledge & Uncertainities w/Special Consideration of Boreal Regions,” Biogeosciences, vol. 3, pp. 397-420 (2006). |
Rosenberg, Z., “More on Commercial Carbon Resistors as Low Pressure Gauges,” Intl. Jour. of Impat Eng., vol. 34, pp. 732-742 (2007). |
Sharma, R.K., “Catalytic Upgrading of Pyrolysis Oil,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 7, pp. 306-314 (1993). |
Takeishi, K., “Dimethy Ether & Catalyst Development for Production of Syngas,” Biofuels, vol. 1(1), pp. 217, 226 (2010). |
Tryon, E.H., “Effect of Charcoal on Certain Physical, Chemical, & Biological Properties of Forest Soils,” Ecological Monoraphs, vol. 18, No. 1pp. 81-115 (Jan. 1948). |
Ahmad, et al., “Biochar as a Sorbent for Contaminant Management in Soil and Water: A Review,” Chemosphere, vol. 99, pp. 19-33 (Nov. 27, 2013). |
Beesley, et al., “A review of Biochars' Potential Role in the Remediation, Revegetation and Restoration of Contaminated Soils,” Environmental Pollution 159, pp. 3269-3282 (Jul. 23, 2011). |
Berek, et al., “Improving Soil Productivity with Biochars,” ICGAI, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 23 pgs. (Nov. 11-14, 2013). |
Bucheli, et al., “Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Aromatic Compounds in Biochar,” Biochar for Environmental Management, Ch. 21, pp. 593-622 (Jan. 2015). |
Downie, “Biochar Production and Use: Environmental Risks and Rewards”, PhD Thesis, The University of New South Wales; Sydney, Australia, p. 1-8, p. 155-168 (2011) (23 pages). |
Extended European Search Report issued by the European Patent Office for European Patent Application No. 12797129.9 dated Mar. 6, 2015 (7 pgs.). |
Extended European Search Report issued by the European Patent Office for European Patent Application No. 12817137.8 dated Jul. 13, 2015 (8 pgs.). |
Forssell, “Chapter 16: Potential Use of Carbohydrates as Stabilizers and Delivery Vehicles of Bioactive Substance in Foods”, in Functional Food Carbohydrates, (Biliaderis, et al., EDs), CRC Press 2006, pp. 511-525 (18 pages). |
Gray, et al., “Water Uptake in Biochars: The Roles of Porosity and Hydrophobicity;” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 196-205 (Jan. 23, 2014). |
Greenfacts: Facts on Health and the Environment, “Scientific Facts on Dioxins”, Apr. 13, 2017, 3 pp.; retrieved from https://www.greenfacts.org/en/dioxins/ on Aug. 15, 2004. |
Hadjittofi, et al., “Activated Biochar Derived from Cactus Fibres—Preparation, Characterization and Application on Cu(II) Removal from Aqueous Solutions,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 159, pp. 460-464 (Mar. 25, 2014). |
Hua, et al., “Impacts Upon Soil Quality and Plant Growth of Bamboo Charcoal Addition to Composted Sludge,” Environmental Technology, vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 61-68 (Jan. 1, 2012). |
Innovation Fluides Supercritiques, “Explore, Use, Make the Most of Supercritical Fluids,” Nov. 27, 2015. Online, retrieved from the Internet on Mar. 7, 2017; <http://web/archive.org/web/20151127045828/http://www.supercritical-fluid.org/supercritical-fluids.146.0>html; 2 pp. |
Jindo, et al., “Biochar Influences the Microbial Community Structure During Manure Composting with Agricultural Wastes,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 416, pp. 476-481 (Jan. 5, 2012). |
Karmakar, et al., “Plant Defence Activators Inducing Systemic Resistance in Zingiber officinale Rosc. Against Pythium Aphanidermatum (Edson) Fitz.,” Indian Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 2, pp. 591-595 (Oct. 2003). |
Kolton, et al., “Impact of Biochar Application to Soil on the Root-Associated Bacterial Community Structure of Fully Developed Greenhouse Pepper Plants,” Appl. And Env. Microbiology, vol. 77, No. 14, pp. 4924-4930, (Jul. 2011). |
Lashari, et al., “Effects of Amendment of Biochar-Manure Compost in Conjunction with Pyroligneous Solution on Soil Quality and Wheat Yield of a Salt-Stressed Cropland from Central China Great Plain,” Field Crops Research, vol. 144, pp. 113-118 (Mar. 20, 2013). |
Liu, et al., “An Experimental Study of Rheological Properties and Stability Characteristics of Biochar-Glycerol-Water Slurry Fuels,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 153, Issue 1, pp. 37-42 (Aug. 5, 2016). |
Mathews, J.A., “Carbon-Negative Biofuels”, Energy Policy, vol. 36, pp. 940-945 (2008). |
McHenry, Mark P., “Agricultural Bio-Char Production, Renewable Energy Generation and Farm Carbon Sequestration in Western Australia: Certainty, Uncertainty and Risk,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environments, vol. 129, pp. 1-7 (Sep. 25, 2008). |
Oh, et al., “Utilization of Biochar Impregnated with Anaerobically Digested Slurry as Slow-Release Fertilizer,” Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, vol. 177, Issue 1, pp. 97-103 (2014). |
Schmidt, et al., “Biochar and Biochar-Compost as Soil Amendments to a Vineyard Soil: Influences on Plant Growth, Nutrient Uptake, Plant Health and Grape Quality,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 191, Issue 15, pp. 117-123 (Apr. 25, 2014). |
Shivaram, et al., “Flow and Yield Stress Behaviour of Ultrafine Mallee Biochar Slurry Fuels: The Effect of Particle Size Distribution and Additives,” Fuel, vol. 104, pp. 326-332 (Sep. 27, 2012). |
Sorrenti, G. (Doctoral Thesis): “Biochar in Perennial Crops: Nutritional, Agronomical and Environmental Implications,” University of Bologna, Abstract, Chs. 4, 5, 7, p. 101 Table 4.2 (Mar. 1, 2015) (115 pages). |
Wikipedia; Bacillus Thuringiensis; Dec. 27, 2015; online, retrieved from the Internet on Mar. 6, 2017; <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bacillus+thuringiensis&oldid=696970111>; 6 pages. |
Xusheng, et al., “Implications of Production and Agricultural Utilization of Biochar and its International Dynamic,” Transactions of the CSAE, vol. 27, No. 2, 7 pgs. (Feb. 2011) with English Abstract (7 pages). |
Ziqiang Meng, “Basis of Environmental Toxicology (Second Edition)”, Higher Education Press, pp. 274-276, Dec. 2010—Chinese language. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170037319 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13732099 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 15149681 | US | |
Parent | 13103905 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 13732099 | US |