This application is a United States national stage entry of an International Application serial no. PCT/EP2017/052273 filed Feb. 2, 2017 which claims priority to German Patent Application serial no. 10 2016 106 403.3 filed Apr. 7, 2016. The contents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety as if set forth verbatim.
The invention concerns a method for calibration of at least one scanning system of a laser sintering or laser melt facility with the further characteristics of the preamble of Claim 1.
Laser sinter or laser melt systems are provided to manufacture three-dimensional objects by means of a rapid manufacturing process especially through solidification of powdered construction material. In the process, the beam of a light source, usually a laser, is directed by a scanning system onto a construction surface on which there is a thin layer of the construction material. The focused laser beam is suitable for melting and fusing the construction material. The construction material solidifies after the formed melt pool or melt site cools in this location and forms the three-dimensional object by successive adhesion and selective solidification of further layers.
It is of highest importance for the precision and reproducibility of the construction process that the scanning system(s) of a such laser sinter or laser melt facility exactly reproduce what is stored in a construction program that guides the construction process, in other words the alignment of the laser beam in the area of the construction field level does not deviate from a stored specified line that is mapped by the scanning system(s).
It is recognized as the state of the art that the scanner must be exactly aligned manually and this manual alignment then technically checked by software. This is time-consuming, so such an adjustment of the scanning systems is usually done at most only once or twice annually. Besides the high expenditure of time for a manual adjustment, it is also subject to error.
The object of the invention is to form a procedure for calibration of at least one scanning system of a laser sinter or laser melt facility so that the procedure can be carried out in a short time, can take place automatically, and thereby can be carried out before each individual construction process. The object is fulfilled through the characteristic features of claim 1. Advantageous further development, especially also in regard to several scanning systems, can be seen from the dependent claims. In detail, the process provides the following steps for carrying out calibration.
A line pattern, particularly a line grid in the form of a scanning grid, is first produced through at least one scanning system on a surface at the level of the construction field. There are two alternatives here: The first alternative is to project onto a surface unit indicating the line pattern, whereby the display on the surface unit is either temporarily or constantly visible. A temporary display like a constant display of the line pattern can also be recorded by a calibrated cell configured over the construction field and read into a memory.
It is alternately in the scope of the invention to project the line pattern produced by the scanner onto the surface of a calibration plate that already has a specified line pattern on its surface. The deviation of the line pattern produced from the specified line pattern by at least one scanning system can be captured by a camera configured over the construction field and also be read into a memory. The stored data are analyzed according to the first alternative or the deviating data according to the second alternative. A field correction of the line pattern is made by calculation of the correction data that contain the required information for correction of any distortion of the line pattern, especially of the scan grid. In particular, especially pillow-shaped, barrel-shaped, rhomboid, or square-shaped distortions of a, for example, quadratic or other target sample are affected. Correction is in every respective conceivable.
Up to now, the depicted process was based on the calibration of only one scanner, whereby naturally two scanners respectively for themselves and in a given case independently of each other can be corrected in the way described. It is possible now in further development of the procedure after correction of any distortions of the line pattern by means of a number of scanning systems to undertake illumination over one and the same construction field and thereby produce position line patterns and then an adjustment of these position line patterns, especially position grids of the given number of scanning systems to each other, which, as regards any distortions, are already corrected internally in the scanning systems. A calculation is then made of further correction data regarding possible required rotation, offset, scaling, and/or displacement of the systems with each other. By use of further correction data on several scanning systems a mutual alignment and accommodation of several scanning systems is achieved. In this way, for example, the line patterns of several scanning systems can be brought exactly into overlap position or lying exactly beside each other.
If the calculation of the further correction data is separate for every scanning system, then every scanning system can individually be accessed by means of correction data so that adjacent scanning systems or a boundary of the construction field can be precisely aligned. It is, however, also possible to consolidate the correction data ascertained for each scanning system into a total correction data set. Use of this total correction data set for all scanning systems consequently leads to an exact alignment of the various scanning systems with each other. Calculation of further correction data can also be carried out separately related to the outer boundaries of the construction field, so that, for example, the edges of the position line patterns are made parallel with the edges of the construction field.
As already noted, the position line patterns can partially overlap the scanning systems configured next to each other. Mutual correction and alignment can be carried out in that, for example, the edge lines of position line patterns produced by different scanning systems can be positioned congruently over each other or at least partially congruently.
It is also basically in the scope of the invention to indicate deviation data of position line patterns next to or intersecting each other in areas as regards mutual rotation, mutual offsets, and similar parameters numerically on a display of laser sinter or laser melt equipment. “Angular deviation 3°” can, for example, be indicated. A display of this kind gives the user of the facility information that a correction is not yet finished and a manual or partly automated correction is required in order actually to be able to coordinate side-by-side scanning systems so that they produce the same image on the construction field.
The surface unit that is illuminated with a laser beam can be layered. The coating can be configured so that a constantly visible image is burned into the coating by the laser beam.
It is also possible in further development of the invention to integrate the calibration procedure as a subprogram in a construction program for a three-dimensional object and let this subprogram run from the beginning of a construction job so that at the beginning of the actual construction job it is automatically assured that the scanners of the facility carrying out the construction job are coordinated with each other.
The invention is explained in more detail in the exemplary embodiments in the drawings. The following are shown:
Reference will first be made to drawing
It is basically conceivable to display the correction data or measured distortions, angles, and similar on a display 15 of the device 1 and in a given case to intervene in the correction procedure by means of an input device in the form of a keyboard 16.
The flow diagram according to
If several laser systems are provided, as in the schematic depiction according to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102016106403.3 | Apr 2016 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/052273 | 2/2/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/174226 | 10/12/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5430666 | DeAngelis | Jul 1995 | A |
5832415 | Wilkening | Nov 1998 | A |
6369814 | Dorbie | Apr 2002 | B1 |
8233207 | Hastings | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8666142 | Shkolnik | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9025136 | Chen | May 2015 | B2 |
10569470 | Donovan | Feb 2020 | B2 |
20050186692 | Olsson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20100125356 | Shkolnik et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20150255105 | Chi | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160054115 | Snis | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160082668 | Perret | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160303797 | Moran | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4437284 | Apr 1996 | DE |
102013208651 | Nov 2014 | DE |
2186625 | May 2010 | EP |
H09511854 | Nov 1997 | JP |
2005133120 | May 2005 | JP |
2009018857 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hofmann et al. , DE102009036153 (Year: 2009). |
International Search Report Corresponding to Application No. PCT/EP2017/052273 dated May 24, 2017. |
Machine Translated Japanese Office Action Corresponding to Application No. 2018524556 dated Jan. 25, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190134747 A1 | May 2019 | US |