The present invention relates to a method for checking the operativeness of a tank-ventilation valve of a tank-ventilation system of a motor vehicle.
The tank-ventilation valve of a tank-ventilation system of a motor vehicle, constituting a component that influences the exhaust gas, must be checked for its operativeness within the framework of the on-board diagnosis (OBD). From the German Published Patent Application No. 41 22 975 a method for ascertaining the operativeness of a tank-ventilation system can be gathered in which the signals for the volume flow of the tank-ventilation valve and the signals for the pressure differential between the tank interior and the ambient pressure are subjected to a cross-covariance analysis. The mentioned signals are formed by a high pass prior to the generation of the cross-covariance function, and the maximum or the averaged value of the cross-covariance function with respect to the product of the two input variables is calculated. A variance measure is generated for the signal of the volume flow through the tank-ventilation valve and a transmission coefficient calculated from the variance measure and the averaged value or maximum. If the transmission range is within a predefined range, the tank-ventilation system is considered operative. One advantage of this method is its independence from tank-pressure variations that are not due to changes in the volume flow through the tank-ventilation valve. Specifically, these are changes that are attributable to sudden gas formation in the tank, such as may be caused by sloshing fuel.
It is also known to implement the check of the tank-ventilation valve by controlling the tank-ventilation valve in idling in a sufficiently stable working point. Simultaneously, the change in the mixture composition and the change in the energy flow via the throttle valve, which represents the product of the air-mass flow via the throttle valve and the ignition-angle efficiency factor, are observed. Conclusions concerning an operative tank-ventilation valve are drawn as a function of this observation. It is problematic here that the check may be registered as a distraction by the driver of the vehicle, for example when a change in the rotational speed occurs.
It is an object of the present invention to further develop a method for checking the operativeness of a tank-ventilation valve of the type mentioned in the introduction, in such a way that the check procedure is not noticed by the driver of a motor vehicle and, in particular, that the check may also be implemented outside of idling.
To solve this objective, the method of the present invention for checking the operativeness of a tank-ventilation system of a motor vehicle is characterized by the following steps:
Due to the pulsed triggering of the tank-ventilation valve, there is very low interference potential, which is virtually undetectable by the driver. Moreover, in contrast to other known methods for checking the operativeness of the tank-ventilation valve, a check of the tank-ventilation valve is also possible outside of idling.
A frequency analysis of the measured and modeled intake-manifold pressures is preferably implemented to compare the measured and modeled intake-manifold pressures.
The pulsed triggering is preferably carried out using preselectable values of the frequency and the pulse duty factor with short opening durations.
The working point is selected such that it is stable within predefinable limits. The working point may lie either within idling operation or also outside of it.
In an advantageous embodiment of the method, the method steps are implemented during triggering of the tank-ventilation value in active tank ventilation. Tank ventilation is used to desorb hydrocarbons previously adsorbed in the activated charcoal filter and must be carried out at regular intervals due to the limited storage capacity of the activated charcoal filter. Tank-ventilation is active for the predominant part of engine operation. Utilizing phases of active tank ventilation is advantageous insofar as no additional time must be expended during engine operation for the diagnosis of the tank-ventilation valve, so that more time is available for other diagnostic functions.
A tank-ventilation system, shown in
Due to evaporation, hydrocarbons form in tank 10, which deposit in adsorption filter 20. To regenerate adsorption filter 20, tank-ventilation valve 30 is opened, so that air from the atmosphere is drawn in through adsorption filter 20, because of the vacuum pressure prevailing in intake manifold 40, drawing the hydrocarbons deposited in adsorption filter 20 into intake manifold 40 and conveying them to internal combustion engine 50.
A device 100, which is described in greater detail in connection with
Device 100 includes a first means 110 to determine the activation conditions as a function of rotational speed nmot of the internal combustion engine, which is detected by a sensor 52, of load signal r1 as well as additional variables, such as engine temperature tmot.
As soon as the activation conditions have been met, a trigger means 120 triggers tank-ventilation valve 30 in a pulsed manner using a frequency to be preselected and a pulse duty factor to be predefined. In the process, the intake-manifold pressure is both measured and modeled. Then, a frequency analysis both of the measured intake-manifold pressure as well as the modeled intake-manifold pressure is implemented in an analysis means 130, the frequency analysis being implemented as a function of the pulse frequency using which tank-ventilation valve 30 was triggered.
In another analysis means 140, a mixture analysis as a function of the lambda value is carried out. In an evaluation circuit part 150, the frequency analysis of the measured intake-manifold pressure is then compared to the frequency analysis of the modeled intake-manifold pressure, taking the implemented mixture analysis into account. If there is sufficient correlation of the two variables within preselectable limits, it is assumed that tank-ventilation valve 30 operates properly. In this case, an evaluation signal ES One is output, for example. If correlation is lacking, an evaluation signal zero is emitted, which may lead to the conclusion that tank-ventilation valve 30 is not working correctly.
The described method may also be implemented outside of idle operation. It must merely be carried out in a sufficiently stable working point. Since the method, unlike the known methods for checking the operativeness of the tank-ventilation valve, does not require successive triggering of the tank-ventilation over a relatively long interval up to its full opening, but uses a pulsed triggering at short opening times instead, the interference potential, such as a change in the rotational speed, able to be registered by the driver is only negligible.
The pulsed triggering is preferably carried out using preselectable values of the frequency and the pulse duty factor with short opening durations. In this way, a partial opening of the tank-ventilation valve may be simulated. For instance, the method may also be implemented very advantageously during triggering of tank-ventilation valve 30, which occurs anyway when tank ventilation is active.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101 50 420 | Oct 2001 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE02/03489 | 9/18/2002 | WO | 00 | 10/21/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/033901 | 4/24/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6082189 | Bayerle et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6755185 | Esteghlal et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6886397 | Esteghlal et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6889667 | Fritz et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
20020157456 | Fritz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030061871 | Oki et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030213478 | Fritz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040040537 | Esteghlal et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050022795 | Beyer et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
41 22 975 | Jan 1993 | DE |
44 18 010 | Nov 1995 | DE |
199 08 138 | Jun 2000 | DE |
100 65 122 | Aug 2002 | DE |
1 013 917 | Jun 2000 | EP |
09 021 359 | Jan 1997 | JP |
2000 45885 | Feb 2000 | JP |
505 088 | Jun 1997 | SE |
91 16216 | Oct 1991 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050050949 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |