Patent Application
20120181085
This disclosure is directed to a method of cleaning naturally-occurring materials such as drill cuttings.
Non aqueous drilling fluids (NAF), including oil-based drilling fluids, synthetic drilling fluids, form a general class of materials that may minimally comprise oil soluble additives, e.g., emulsifiers, and a mixture of particulate solids in a hydrocarbon fluid. These fluids are circulated through and around the drill bit to lubricate and cool the bit, provide suspension to help support the weight of the drill pipe and casing, cover the wellbore surface with a filter cake to prevent caving in and weight to balance against undesirable fluid flow from the formation, and to carry drill cuttings to the surface. At the surface, the drill cuttings are separated from the used drilling fluid. For effective waste management the cuttings should be cleaned of contaminants, such as the oil-based drilling mud.
The present disclosure addresses the cleaning of drill cuttings, as well as other naturally occurring substances.
In aspects, the present disclosure provides a method for treating cuttings from a subsurface formation. The method may include treating the cuttings with at least one surfactant and at least one stabilizing agent. The method may include contacting the cuttings with the stabilizing agent(s) before contacting the cuttings with the surfactant(s).
In aspects, the present disclosure also provides a method for treating drill cuttings that includes returning the drill cuttings to a substantially water-wet condition by using at least one stabilizing agent to remove at least a portion of a hydrocarbon from the drill cuttings.
In variants, the method(s) may include applying the surfactant(s) after the stabilizing agent(s) is/are substantially homogenized with the cuttings. Also, water may be added with the surfactant(s). In some applications, the stabilizing agent substantially prevents interaction between water and a swellable component of the cuttings. The stabilizing agent(s) may be selected from one or more of an alcohol (e.g: n-butanol), a solvent, a mutual solvent, and a glycol. The surfactant(s) may be selected from one or more of non-ionic, anionic, cationic, and amphoteric, zwitterionic and extended surfactants. In some arrangements, the method may include mechanically removing at least a portion of the hydrocarbons from the cuttings after treating the cuttings. Also, the method may include further treating the drill cuttings with a water softening agent.
Examples of the more important features of the disclosure have been summarized (albeit rather broadly) in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood and in order that the contributions they represent to the art may be appreciated. There are, of course, additional features of the disclosure that will be described hereinafter and which will form the subject of the claims appended hereto.
For detailed understanding of the present disclosure, reference should be made to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing:
The present disclosure relates to methods and devices for processing drill cuttings entrained in oil-based drilling mud. During drilling, oil-based muds convert water-wet naturally-occurring rock and earth into oil-wet cuttings. Embodiments of the present disclosure treat oil-wet cuttings with one or more agents to return a substantial percentage of such cuttings to a water-wet condition. In certain embodiments, a method for removing oil from drilling cuttings may include a first treatment of an alcohol, glycol, solvent or mutual solvent and a second treatment with a treatment fluid having at least one surfactant. The method may also include using a water softener. The combination of pre-treatment and treatment fluids may remove a high percentage of the oily material from the drilling cuttings and water-wet the solids.
Referring now to
In one embodiment, the stabilizing agent(s) used during the stabilizing treatment 12 may be selected to interact with the contaminant oil and/or cuttings to enhance the effectiveness of the surfactant. For example, the stabilizing agent(s) may be selected to reduce the overall viscosity of the contaminant oil on the cuttings. Also, the stabilizing agent(s) may be selected to decrease the hydrophobicity of the contaminant to be removed. In other situations, the stabilizing agent(s) may be selected to inhibit or prevent water used during the second treatment 14 from unfavorably reacting with the materials in the drill cuttings. For example, the agents may inhibit or prevent materials such as clay particles from swelling and occluding pores in rocks. Such occlusions may trap oil within the pores and render them inaccessible to the cleaning agents applied during the second treatment 12. A stabilizing agent may be used to isolate materials such as clay particles from interacting with water or other selected substances. As used herein, the term “water” refers to any liquid wherein water is at least a component (e.g., brine, salt water, aqueous solutions, etc.). Suitable stabilizing agents include, but are not limited to, an alcohol, solvent, mutual solvent, glycols, polyglycols and polyglycerols.
In one embodiment, the second treatment 14 may use one or more cleaning agents formulated to remove unwanted materials (e.g., hydrocarbons) from the drill cuttings in order to render the drill cuttings water-wet. The removal does not need to be a complete removal of all oil contaminants from the cuttings. Rather, the removal may be of a portion of the oil contaminants on or in the cuttings. Also, the removal need not be of a specific hydrocarbon, but generally the removal of any substance considered a hydrocarbon or oil soluble compound such as NAF emulsifiers and wetting agents. In some non-limiting embodiments, the cleaning agent(s) may be a surface active agent or surfactant. In embodiments, the second treatment may also include agents such as water softeners.
Suitable surfactants include, but are not limited to, anionic, nonionic, cationic, amphoteric, zwitterionic, extended surfactants and blends thereof. Still other suitable nonionic surfactants include, but are not necessarily limited to, alkyl polyglycosides, sorbitan esters, methyl glucoside esters, amine ethoxylates, diamine ethoxylates, polyglycerol esters, alkyl ethoxylates, alcohols that have been polypropoxylated and/or polyethoxylated or both.
Suitable anionic surfactants selected from the group consisting of alkali metal alkyl sulfates, alkyl ether sulfonates, alkyl sulfonates, alkyl aryl sulfonates, linear and branched alkyl ether sulfates and sulfonates, alcohol polypropoxylated sulfates, alcohol polyethoxylated sulfates, alcohol polypropoxylated polyethoxylated sulfates, alkyl disulfonates, alkylaryl disulfonates, alkyl disulfates, alkyl sulfosuccinates, alkyl ether sulfates, linear and branched ether sulfates, alkali metal carboxylates, fatty acid carboxylates, and phosphate esters; suitable cationic surfactants include, but are not necessarily limited to, arginine methyl esters, alkanolamines and alkylenediamides. Suitable surfactants may also include surfactants containing a non-ionic spacer-arm central extension and an ionic or nonionic polar group. Other suitable surfactants are dimeric or gemini surfactants and cleavable surfactants. Suitable zwitterionic surfactants include, but are not necessarily limited to, phospholipids, alkyl betaines, alkyl sultaines, alkyl amidopropyl betaine, alkyl sulfobetaines, dihydroxyl alkyl glycinate, alkyl ampho acetate, alkyl aminopropionic acids, alkyl amino monopropionic acid, alkyl amino dipropionic acids, alkyl amino acids, or alkyl amine oxides. In certain applications, a pH control agent may be used to improve the efficiency of the cleaning agent(s). Suitable pH control agents include, but are not necessarily limited to, sodium bicarbonate, sodium hydroxide, ethanolamines, or buffered systems.
Suitable classes of water softeners/builders include, but are not limited to, coordination compounds, phosphates (complex phosphates, polyphosphates), silicates, zeolites, carbonates, and citrates. Illustrative coordination compounds include, but are not limited to, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); Illustrative Phosphates include, but are not limited to, trisodium phosphate, disodium phosphate, tetrasodium pyrophosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate, sodium tetraphosphate, Sodium hexametaphosphate; Illustrative silicates include, but are not limited to, sodium silicate; Illustrative carbonates include, but are not limited to, sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, sodium percarbonate; Illustrative citrates include, but are not limited to, sodium citrate, calcium citrate, citric acid.
One factor in the selection of a suitable cleaning agent is the effectiveness of that agent in reducing interfacial tension (IFT). Generally speaking, IFT is the surface tension at the surface (interface) separating two non-miscible liquids. In embodiments, an effective cleaning agent is an agent that reduces the IFT below 1.0 mN/m, preferably less than 0.1 mN/m. In one test, different concentrations of surfactant in solutions were applied to a series of base oils. The tested surfactant was DFE-1621 a surfactant available from BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED. The base oils included Carbosea 2 and CarboSea 1, which were taken by centrifuging field cuttings contaminated with oil-based mud, Total DF1, Clairsol 370, Clairsol NS, Diesel, EDC95-11, n-Paraffin, and GT-3000. As shown in
One factor related to the efficiency of the applied cleaning agent(s) is the variations in the rock formations and oil-based mud systems. As discussed previously, one or more stabilizing agents may be used to inhibit undesirable reactions such as the swelling of clay particles that may interfere with the cleaning process. In
While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the preferred embodiments of the disclosure, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all variations within the scope of the appended claims be embraced by the foregoing disclosure.
This application claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application no. 61/432,929, filed Jan. 14, 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61432929 | Jan 2011 | US |
