The invention relates to a method of cleaning injectors of a direct-injection controlled-ignition engine.
The injection openings of the injectors of direct-injection controlled-ignition engines regularly suffer a reduction in their fuel flow cross section resulting from a clogging phenomenon of these injection openings caused by the deposition of carbonated material commonly referred to as soot.
The result of a clogging phenomenon of this kind is a reduction in the amounts of fuel actually injected in relation to the amounts of fuel which are calculated and controlled by the engine control unit or ECU. In order to alleviate this reduction, the vehicles are equipped with a richness controller operating on the basis of measurements supplied by an oxygen sensor, currently referred to as a lambda sensor, which is located in the exhaust line and designed to increase the injection time, so that the amount of fuel injected coincides with the amount of fuel calculated by the ECU. However, this compensation is accompanied by a worsening of the pollution situation. Moreover, beyond a certain degree of clogging, the necessary correction cannot be carried out and this results in a drop in engine performance that is noticeable to the driver (over-consumption, loss of torque). This situation is indicated by a fault light coming on triggered by the on-board diagnostics (OBD), which warns the driver of the need to call in a professional to repair the injection system, something which, in the majority of cases, requires the injectors to be removed for cleaning or replacement.
The present invention aims to overcome this disadvantage and its main aim is to provide a method for cleaning the injectors of a direct-injection controlled-ignition engine designed to be implemented both as a preventative and also as a remedial measure, and adapted to perform the cleaning of the injectors with having to remove the latter.
To this end, the object of the invention is a method for cleaning injectors of a direct-injection controlled-ignition engine comprising a cleaning procedure carried out while the engine is idling which involves:
First of all, the cleaning method according to the invention involves a cleaning procedure intended to be carried out while the engine is idling, in other words when the vehicle is at a standstill with the engine turning. Hence, this cleaning method can be carried out:
According to an advantageous embodiment of the invention, prior to the start of the cleaning procedure, a heating stage of the engine is implemented over a lap of time adapted in order to achieve stabilization of the temperature of said engine.
This preliminary stage leads to the cleaning procedure being carried out at a stabilized engine temperature which, as a result, is not liable to affect the progress and result of this procedure.
Moreover, advantageously according to the invention, before the cleaning procedure is launched and after the cleaning procedure, respectively, there is a measurement of the data, in other words the lambda coefficient, characteristic of the ratio between the air/petrol mixture available and the necessary theoretical value, and a diagnostic is provided in relation to the effectiveness of said cleaning treatment, depending on the result of these measurements.
According to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, when, for a given operating speed of the engine, at the end of the first iterative loop, the selected cleaning pressure is lower than the maximum limit pressure, a second iterative loop is executed until the value of the torque margin is equal to or greater than a calibrated torque margin value, during each lap of which second iterative loop there is an increase in the first instance by a predetermined value of the engine torque through an isotorque increase in the torque margin, and the first iterative loop is then executed in its entirety.
(It should be noted that “torque margin” is traditionally understood to mean defining, when there is a resulting change in torque, for a constant mass of injected air, of a change in the ignition advance, the relationship between the maximum torque and the torque obtained for a given value of the ignition advance. The calibrated torque margin value itself usually involves a lower torque value, below which the operating zone is dangerous to the engine).
According to this advantageous embodiment, determination of the cleaning pressure combines, for each speed, a first iterative loop for which the increased parameter involves the pressure of the injected fuel, and a second iterative loop in which the first iterative loop is integrated, and for which the increased parameter is representative of the engine load.
This combination of two iterative loops means that a greater value of the cleaning pressure is obtained, while guaranteeing “non-dangerous” operating conditions for the engine during the determination phase of the value of this cleaning pressure and during the cleaning treatment.
Moreover, advantageously according to the invention and always with the aim of obtaining the highest possible cleaning pressure, when, for a predetermined operating speed of the engine, at the end of the second iterative loop the selected cleaning pressure is lower than the maximum pressure limit, the activation of consumer loads such as heating, demisting, headlamps, air conditioning is controlled in such a manner as to generate an increase in the resistive torque of the engine, and execution of the first iterative loop then possibly of the second iterative loop is resumed.
Moreover, according to another advantageous embodiment of the invention and, particularly, with a view to obtaining the highest possible cleaning pressure, the cleaning pressure is calculated successively for a plurality of different predetermined operating speeds of the engine and, for the purpose of the cleaning treatment, an operating speed allowing a maximum cleaning pressure is selected.
Moreover, when a plurality of operating speeds allow a maximum cleaning pressure, the highest speed for the purposes of cleaning is advantageously selected according to the invention. The choice of the highest speed in fact allows the effectiveness of the treatment performed to be increased for a same treatment duration, due to the greater number of injections performed per unit of time.
According to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, the cleaning pressure for the highest predetermined operating speed of the engine is calculated first of all, then successively for operating speeds with a diminishing value, and the cleaning treatment is applied directly when, for one of said operating speeds, the chosen cleaning pressure involves the maximum limit pressure.
Moreover, for the purpose of obtaining the cleaning pressure during the cleaning treatment, when the maximum limit pressure is not reached during execution of the first iterative loop, a step-by-step increase in a predetermined value of the injected fuel pressure value is advantageously actuated according to the invention from the nominal operating point corresponding to the selected speed, then possibly, where necessary, a step-by-step increase in a predetermined value of the torque margin, until said cleaning pressure is obtained.
Other characteristic goals and advantages of the invention will emerge from the detailed description that follows with reference to the attached drawings which represent, by way of a non-limiting example, a preferred embodiment. In these drawings:
and
The method according to the invention aims at a cleaning method, whether preventative or remedial, of injectors of an engine 1 with controlled ignition and direction injection, as depicted in
According to this
This engine 1 further comprises:
The object of the invention is to allow the injectors 10 of this engine 1 to be cleaned either as a preventative or remedial measure, and, to this end, the method according to the invention particularly involves a cleaning procedure adapted to be implemented when the aforementioned engine is idling.
As shown in
Moreover, following the implementation of the cleaning procedure, this cleaning method comprises an information stage on the effectiveness of this cleaning procedure.
This information stage involves firstly measuring the lambda air coefficient Lbfin, which is characteristic of the relationship between the available air/petrol mixture and the necessary theoretical value, comparing this measured value Lbfin with the corresponding Lbini value measured when the cleaning procedure begins, and delivering either an unfavorable diagnostic in relation to the effectiveness of the cleaning procedure when the difference (Lbfin−Lbini) is below a predetermined threshold, or a successful diagnostic for the cleaning procedure when the value (Lbfin−Lbini) is greater than the predetermined threshold.
Moreover, in the event of a positive diagnostic, the issuing of this diagnostic is preceded by a reinitialization of the parameters defining the injection conditions.
The cleaning procedure described below with reference to
Another parameter used in the framework of this cleaning procedure involves a counting parameter CTR for each value for which, except for the max CTR, there is an associated engine speed value.
For purposes better understood below, the values CTR(0) and CTR(1) of the counter are linked to a same engine speed value Nmax corresponding to the preselected highest engine operating speed 1. The following values CTR(2), . . . CTR(n), . . . CTR(max−1) correspond successively to preselected decreasing engine speed values N2 . . . >Nn . . . >N(max−1).
The cleaning procedure firstly involves two preliminary stages:
The initial stage of this cleaning procedure then involves controlling the engine operation 1 at the highest preselected engine speed Nmax t/mn in operating conditions corresponding to the nominal operating point corresponding to this speed.
Based on these data, the first iteration involves an iterative loop involving a step-by-step increase in the injection pressure value PF, with a step cal, for example such that cal=10 bars, and after each increase, comparing the calculated injection time ti with the injection time timin(1) associated with the increased pressure, in such a manner:
The execution of this second iterative loop itself involves, during each lap of this second loop, and provided that the torque margin value Cres remains lower than a calibrated torque margin value Cresmax:
At the end of this second iterative loop, assuming that the value PFmax has not been reached, the following stage involves increasing the counter CTR by one unit.
Moreover, the first increase of the counter CTR, the increase from CTR=0 to CTR=1, triggers the activation of consumer loads such as heating, demisting, headlamps, air conditioning, and, consequently, causes an increase in the resistive torque of the engine 1, followed by a relaunch at the same engine speed Nmax of the execution of the first iterative loop, then possibly of the second iterative loop.
Following each of the following increases of the counter CTR (CTR>1), the first stage involves memorizing the cleaning pressure previously obtained (maximum pressure PF obtained with a value of ti>timin), as well as the conditions under which this cleaning pressure is obtained; engine speed associated with the value of the counter CTR, and load (torque) of the engine 1.
The first and second loops are then executed again for successive preselected speeds of the engine 1, while keeping the consumer loads activated:
The procedure described above for determining the maximum cleaning pressure likely to be used for the purpose of the cleaning treatment therefore results in the selection either of an injection pressure equal to the maximum limit pressure PFmax, or a pressure lower than this maximum limit pressure.
In the first case, cleaning pressure=PFmax, this pressure is reached at the end of the execution of the first iterative loop, in conditions in which the actual injection pressure is equal to PFmax. The cleaning treatment may therefore be directly used while maintaining said cleaning pressure over a predetermined treatment period greater than the operating time allowed while running under identical operating conditions.
On the other hand, when the procedure described above does not allow a cleaning pressure equal to PFmax to be reached at the end of the implementation of the two iterative loops for each of the speeds of the engine 1, the selected cleaning pressure involves the maximum pressure obtained and, assuming that this maximum pressure is identical for a plurality of engine speeds 1, this maximum pressure is associated with the highest engine speed for treatment purposes.
In this case, moreover, the cleaning treatment firstly involves controlling the engine operation 1 at the preselected engine speed in operating conditions corresponding to the nominal operating point corresponding to this speed.
Next, with a view to obtaining the cleaning pressure, a step-by-step increase in a predetermined value of the injected fuel pressure value is actuated, then possibly, where necessary, a step-by-step increase in a predetermined value of the torque margin, until said cleaning pressure is obtained.
Finally, the cleaning treatment is carried out by programming the cleaning pressure for a predetermined treatment period greater than the operating time allowed while running in identical operating conditions.
Moreover, since the cleaning pressure in this case is lower than the maximum limit pressure PFmax, the treatment duration is extended in respect of the predetermined treatment duration for treatment carried out, for a same engine speed, at said maximum limit pressure.
A method of this kind for cleaning injectors of a direct-injection controlled-ignition engine has as its essential advantages that of being designed to be implemented both preventatively and also remedially, and that of being adapted to undertake cleaning of the injectors without requiring removal of the latter.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1555835 | Jun 2015 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/001061 | 6/22/2016 | WO | 00 |