Method for cleaning thin metal strip material

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6379468
  • Patent Number
    6,379,468
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 25, 2000
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 30, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A method for cleaning thin gauge metal foil strip material using a plurality of wiper (12, 16, 20) and solvent application (14, 18) stages. The solvent used in the solvent application stages is an aliphatic petroleum type which is applied using low pressure to avoid atomization or separation of solvent components. The wipers of a first wiping station are made of a solid bar of polymer impregnated fiber material. The wipers of the second wiping station are spaced apart blades of urethane-based elastomer material.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This application relates generally to the manufacture of metal foil material and more particularly to apparatus and methods for cleaning such material while in process or after completion of the manufacturing process.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Cleaning of metal strips while in the manufacturing process or after the final cold finish is an indispensable operation in metal processing. The goal of cleaning is to remove contaminants from the strip surface with minimum damage to the strip and maximum throughput. Contaminants which can be removed from the surface of metals include oil, grease, waxy solids, metallic particles, dust, carbon particles and silica. Many factors need to be considered in developing and selecting a cleaning method including: (1) type of soil to be removed, (2) type of strip to be cleaned and the conditions of the surface or structure of the end use, (3) degree of cleanness required, (4) capability of the processes available, (5) environmental impact of the process, (6) overall cost of the process and (7) any subsequent processes to be applied.




Alkaline-based cleaning is a mainstay in the metal industry to remove surface contaminants and may employ both physical and chemical actions. Such processes have proven to be reliable and readily available from various equipment suppliers. However, for surface chemistry sensitive materials, the possibility of alkaline ions being left on the strip surface makes the use of alkaline based cleaning risky. For example, premature failure can occur when alkaline metal contaminated strips are exposed to elevated temperature. Other conventional cleaning processes such as vapor degreasing are not suitable either since environmental regulations are becoming ever more stringent.




Solvent cleaning, particularly cold cleaning using aliphatic petroleum based cleaning solvent, has an advantage over alkaline cleaning and vapor degreasing because of its non-toxic, environmental friendly nature. While conventional alkaline cleaning requires large quantity of water usage and disposal; solvents such as aliphatic petroleum based solutions, in general, carry significantly more contaminants than water. A significant advantage of solvent cleaning over the alkaline process is that less waste has to be disposed. Furthermore, used solvent can be recycled by treating with a scrubbing process such as vacuum assisted distillation or filtration to remove contaminants.




The cleaning of thin gauge materials usually requires the processing of long coil lengths. The line speed has to be maximized in order to obtain adequate throughput. Two process constraints limit the line speed of alkaline cleaning. The alkaline solution generally requires ½ to 3 minutes of dwell time to promote contaminant removal. Thus, in a high speed alkaline cleaning line, the length of the alkaline tank can become significant. The alkaline cleaning process uses water rinse at the end to remove the chemicals. The rinsed foil has to be dried to avoid staining of the foil surface. The drying of rinsing water requires either a slow line speed or a long drying section. These constraints pose several problems: (1) the need to reduce the line speed, (2) the need to increase the cleaning line length and (3) the need to complicate the design for thin gauge material handling.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An object of the invention is to provide a cleaning method and apparatus for metal strips which is effective to remove contaminants, is environmentally friendly and one which does not have harmful residuals. Another object of the invention is the provision of a cleaning method for thin gauge metal foils in which the apparatus used therewith is compact in size requiring less floor space than prior art procedures. Yet another object of the invention is the provision of a method and apparatus for cleaning metal strip material which minimizes space, has a fast line speed with less waste disposal than prior art methods and one which provides an improved cleansed strip surface.




Briefly, in accordance with the invention, a petroleum-based solvent is used as a cleaning agent. The solvent is sprayed onto the foil surface to remove a major portion of the contaminants. Multiple spraying chambers are used to provide a consistent cleaning result. Wipers sets, in opposing pairs, are used to remove the solvent and any remaining contaminants from the foil surfaces. The wiper sets (top and bottom) are incorporated by a coupled mechanism that applies an even, offsetting, pressure to the foil to avoid damaging the strip material. High or low pressure air blowers are used to remove any remaining solvent to achieve optimal cleanness. The solvent cleaning process according to the invention has the advantage of high line speed and compactness.




Although useful with various metal strips, the invention is particularly useful with metal foil material of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,980,658, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, the disclosure of which is included herein by this reference.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Other objects, advantages and details of the novel cleaning method and apparatus of this invention appears in the detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, the detailed description referring to the drawings in which:





FIG. 1

is a schematic side elevational view of a metal foil cleaning line made in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 2

is an enlarged cross sectional schematic view of a wiper used in the

FIG. 1

embodiment;





FIG. 3

is a chart showing optical sensor readings vs. data points, taken at 10 second intervals, of the surface of several coils of foil material following cleansing by a prior art alkaline method as well as by a solvent method according to the invention; and





FIG. 4

is a graph of surface carbon vs. optical emission values of prior art alkaline cleaned strip material and strip material cleaned according to the solvent method of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




With reference to

FIG. 1

, a metal foil strip material cleaning line


10


made in accordance with the invention comprises a first wiper stage


12


, a first spray stage


14


, an intermediate or second wiper stage


16


, a second spray stage


18


and a finish or third wiper stage


20


followed by an air blower stage


22


.




The strip material to be cleaned is typically thin, for example, a layer of stainless steel 434 bonded to top and bottom aluminum layers having a bonded thickness, in an intermediate manufacturing stage, of between 0.0015 inch to 0.040 inch as well as a finished gauge as small as 0.001 inch. In order to avoid damaging the thin foil material, the invention employs wiper mechanisms in which wiping pressure is applied to opposite face surfaces of the foil simultaneously and in an even manner squeezing the foil. With reference to

FIG. 2

which shows a cross sectional view of a wiper assembly


24


, numeral


2


represents the pass line of the foil material. Wiper assembly


24


comprises an outer cage


26


formed of suitable material in which is contained a wiper box


28


formed of stainless steel or other suitable material which floats inside cage


26


. The wiper box


28


is fixedly attached to air cylinder


30


at


32


by any suitable means such as by using a threaded nut or the like so that the wiper box and air cylinder float as a unit. Suitable guiding means are provided in cage


26


for wiper box


28


such as nylon tip screws


34


which cooperate with a compliant member


36


disposed at the bottom of the cage. Compliant member


36


permits even seating of the floating wiper box and is shown to be a spring but could also be selected foam material, a bladder, etc., as desired. Piston rod


38


is attached to the upper half of a generally U-shaped wiper holder


40


while a similar U-shaped holder


42


is disposed in the bottom of wiper box


28


. As shown in

FIG. 2

, one form of wipers


44


particularly useful in stages


16


and


20


are generally H-shaped in configuration formed of suitable elastomer material providing a combination of properties including rigidity and minimization of contact area. Although the H-configured wipers


44


are preferred for stages


16


and


20


, a solid bar of fibrous material has been found to be more practical at initial stage


12


for scrubbing and removing gross solid contaminants. Either type of wiper can be accommodated in holders


40


,


42


. It should also be noted that other wiper configurations can be employed, if desired. In order to provide a uniformly distributed load on wiper holder


40


it is preferred to employ a plurality of pneumatic cylinders. For example, in a cleaning line made in accordance with the invention which accommodates foil strips of up to approximately


24


inches in width, three laterally spaced cylinders at each wiper station were found to be satisfactory.




Turning back to

FIG. 1

, first wiper stage


12


, which comprises two wiper stations


24


each preferably using wipers in the form of a solid bar of fibrous material, scrub the strip for removal of, as much as possible, gross solid contaminants. Suitable wiper material for stage


12


is a polymer impregnated fiber selected to provide extended longevity. Following stage


12


, a solvent spray stage


14


, comprising two pairs of opposing upper and lower spray heads


48


, apply solvent to opposing face surfaces of the strip for rinsing off solid and liquid contaminants. The upper spray heads are moved into position by pneumatic means indicated at


30


. Suitable cleaning solvents of the aliphatic petroleum type comprise multiple components and in order to prevent separation of the components, a lower pressure, i.e., less than approximately 100 psi, non-atomized, linear spray pattern is used, in contradistinction to conventional high pressure spray nozzles. The solvent is applied essentially as a laminar sheet of liquid to the surfaces of the strip. The second, or downstream pair of spray heads are oriented so that the liquid flow, as noted by arrows


50


, is in a direction opposed to the direction of liquid flow in the upstream pair of spray heads which helps to contain the liquid within the area of spray stage


14


and away from second stage wiper stage


16


. A tub


52


is positioned below the cleaning line and is separated to form separate compartments


52




a


,


52




b


for the first and second spray stages


14


,


18


. Spray stage


14


is provided with a drainage duct


54


while spray stage


18


, to be discussed, is provided with a drainage duct


56


.




Wiper stage


16


serves to prevent contaminated solvent from being carried over to the subsequent cleaning stage


18


which applies liquid solvent, again using low pressure, from a separate solvent tank (not shown) to facilitate further contaminant removal. Cleaning stage


18


rinses the foil with clean solvent which is then wiped dry by third wiper stage


20


. The preferred wiper material for stages


16


and


20


is a urethane-based elastomer for its abrasion resistance, mechanical strength and surface finish and, as stated above, is preferably shaped in an H configuration to provide closely spaced twin wiper blades.




A further drying stage


22


comprises opposed heads


58


for blowing air, as indicated by arrows


60


, to remove any moisture or volatile solvent.




The first and second wiper stages


12


,


16


, typically employ wiping pressures in the range of approximately 30-50 psi while the third wiper stage


20


typically employs a wiping pressure in the range of approximately 70-80 psi. According to a cleaning line made in accordance with the invention, stages


12


,


14


,


16


,


18


and


20


take up only approximately 24 inches in length in contradistinction to typical prior art lines of up to 100 or more feet, and as shown comprises two spray and three wiper stages. Using this line as described, a line speed of more than


300


feet/minute can be maintained while providing sufficient cleanness.




Process control is provided by an in-line optical emission sensor


62


which monitors the foil surface in response to a UV light source. The optical emission sensor


62


emits UV light on the foil and receives the optically excited electrons generated from the surface of the foil and at meter


64


provides an output signal which reflects the level of electrons generated. The fewer the surface contaminants, the more optically excited electrons are generated and thus the higher the electric current produced.




Optical emission readings were used to illustrate the surface cleanness of coils of aluminum clad metal foils at 4 mil gauge subjected to alkaline and solvent cleaning processes.

FIG. 3

shows optical sensor readings from two coils throughout their lengths. The solvent cleaned coil processed according to the invention (at a line speed of 200 feet/minute) shows significantly higher and more consistent readings than those from prior art alkaline cleaned coils (at a line speed of 100 feet/minute). The correlation of optical emission readings with residual surface carbon measurements is shown in FIG.


4


. The quasi linear dependence of optical emission readings and residual carbon values provides a process control reference. It is important to note that the solvent cleaning line speed was at 200 feet/minute as compared to the 100 feet/minute of the alkaline cleaning line. Table


1


lists typical surface carbon values for samples taken from as-rolled and solvent cleaned at 200 feet/minute 2 mil stainless steel materials. The surface carbon test results show that the solvent cleaning process removed significant amounts of contaminants from the materials.












TABLE 1











Surface Carbon of 2 mil Stainless Steel Coils Subjected to Solvent






Cleaning Process (at 200 feet/minute)













Sample No.




Condition




Surface Carbon (μg/g)
















A




as-rolled




745






B




after clean




18






C




after clean




20






D




after clean




17






E




after clean




16






F




after clean




16














Thus, the improved method and apparatus of the invention provides a novel and improved high speed cleaning system particularly suitable for thin gauge foil strip metal material. While the invention has been described in combination with the preferred embodiment thereof, many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. By way of example, the particular member of stations within the respective stages


12


,


14


,


16


,


18


and


20


can be varied, as desired, as can be the material selected for the wipers. Further, the solvent composition can be varied to said particulars during requirements. Such modifications and variations can be carried out without departing from the scope of the invention which is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for cleaning strip metal foil having opposing face surfaces comprising the steps ofdirecting the foil along a pass-line from upstream to downstream locations, at a first wiping station biasing a pair of wipers in alignment with each other against the opposing surfaces of the foil to dislodge gross contaminants, at a first rinsing station applying laminar sheets of liquid solvent to the opposing face surfaces of the foil, and at a second wiping station biasing a pair of wipers in alignment with each other against the opposing face surfaces with at least two parallel blades of wiper material.
  • 2. A method for cleaning strip metal foil according to claim 1 in which the liquid solvent is an aliphatic petroleum applied using a pressure of less than that which causes atomization.
  • 3. A method for cleaning strip metal foil according to claim 2 in which the wipers of the first wiping station comprise a solid bar of polymer impregnated fiber material.
  • 4. A method for cleaning strip metal foil according to claim 2 in which the wipers of the second wiping station comprise spaced apart blades of urethane-based elastomer material.
  • 5. A method for cleaning strip metal foil according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of applying laminar sheets of liquid solvent to the opposing face surfaces of the foil at a second rinsing station downstream of the second wiping station, and biasing a pair of wipers in alignment with each other against the opposing face surfaces with at least two parallel blades of wiper material at a third wiping station downstream of the second rinsing station. of biasing a pair of wipers in alignment with each other against the opposing face surfaces with at least two parallel blades of wiper material.
  • 6. A method for cleaning metal foil according to claim 5 in which approximately 30-50 psi is applied to the foil at the first and second wiper stations and approximately 70-80 psi is applied to the foil at the third wiper station. Apparatus for cleaning strip metal foil comprising a first wiping station having a pair of opposed wipers disposed on opposite sides of a pass-line, the wipers being in alignment with and movable toward and away from one another, a first rinsing station having a pair of liquid application heads disposed on opposite sides of the pass-line, and a second wiper station having a pair of opposed, wipers disposed on opposite sides of the pass-line, the wipers of the second wiping station being in alignment with and movable toward and away from one another.
  • 7. A method according to claim 1, wherein said pair of aligned wipers at said second wiping station are biased against said opposing face surfaces to withdraw contaminated solvent therefrom.
Parent Case Info

This application claims priority under 35 USC Section 119 (e) (1) of provisional application No. 60/172,728 filed Dec. 20, 1999.

US Referenced Citations (2)
Number Name Date Kind
2372599 Nachtman Mar 1945 A
4458376 Sitko Jul 1984 A
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/172728 Dec 1999 US