The present invention relates to a method of coating a paper/board web with a plane-fed curtain coater, comprising a nozzle beam provided with at least one feed chamber and a nozzle slot in connection therewith for feeding at least one layer of coating material onto a flow plane established by the nozzle beam.
The invention is aimed at providing an improvement in the control of a thickness and in the regulability of a cross-profile in the individual coating layers of a curtain coater intended for applying the coating paste of a paper/board web.
Curtain coaters can be categorized in slot-fed and plane-fed coaters. In a plane-fed coater, the coating material is fed by means of a nozzle unit onto an inclined plane, along which it flows towards a lip of the plane, resulting in a curtain as the coating trickles off the lip of the plane. The resulting curtain of coating material is controlled by means of an edge guide which is located, as suggested by its name, at the edge of a feeding lip. The present invention is particularly directed to such a plane-fed curtain coater.
A common problem with prior art curtain coaters relates to controlling in various running conditions the cross-profile of a coating material for its application to a presently coated web. There are no conventional means to provide an effective and active control over the coating profile. The problems apply both to the control of a single coating material layer and to the control of an overall cross-coating profile in the case of a multilayer coating. In multilayer coating, the coating is formed from a number of superimposed layers of coating material.
It is prior known that the overall profile of a coating can be influenced in the designing stage of a coating frame as the shape of feed channels in the nozzle beam is decided. As the properties and/or feed rate of coating materials subsequently change, the changes have a clear impact on a cross-profile that cannot be corrected any more. Likewise, inaccuracies in manufacturing have an irreversible impact on the profile.
Regulation is also possible to provide a reasonably good cross-profile for a single layer by using an experimentally or mathematically predetermined by-pass rate. The term by-pass refers to that portion of a flow of coating material fed into a feed chamber, which is returned from the other, downstream end of the feed chamber back to the supply or a storage bin. The purpose of a coating material by-pass is to ensure that a flow rate of coating material exceeding a given minimal rate be sustained in flow channels in a nozzle unit, also in its end facing the flow of coating material. The purpose of this is to avoid precipitation of a coating material and build-up of deposits on the walls of flow channels. As the properties of a coating material change, this by-pass rate must be rectified by using correction factors. These provide compensation for defects resulting, for example, from variations in viscosity and dry content. However, accuracies of measurement and regulation can be at such a modest level that a desired profile cannot be obtained in a controlled manner in all running conditions.
Finnish patent application FI 20035149 discloses an arrangement, which enables the optimization of a cross-coating profile for a precisely particular grade of coating material and feed rate. In addition, optimization can even be performed within a considerable range. Yet, when deviating from this optimized feed rate or when modifications are made to the properties of a coating material, the cross-profile becomes defective again.
The use of a multilayer coating process results in further problems in terms of the uniformity and overall profile of a coating. Each individual layer has its own specific cross-profile, which in turn depends especially on the overall feed rate of a coating layer. The use of a multilayer coating process is quite likely to develop a condition in which the cross-profiles of all layers are askew and even in the same direction and, thus, the overall profile jointly formed by the coating material layers no longer satisfies all requirements.
On the other hand, Finnish patent application FI 20045056 discloses a method for regulating the overall profile of a coating. The method enables optimization of the overall profile of a nozzle beam, i.e. the cross-profile of an entire coating, by regulating one or more individual coating material layers. However, the described method does not enable optimization of the cross-profile of a single coating material layer. Neither the thickness of a single layer nor the shape of its cross-profile can be adjusted as desired, since the regulation is performed on the basis of a measured cross-profile of the entire coating. The regulation does enable providing a cross-profile as desired explicitly for the entire coating. Hence, the cross-profiles of an individual coating material layer or layers may still remain disturbingly poor.
It should further be noted that the measurement of a coating to be performed for the regulation in a method of the cited application is effected from the surface of a paper/board web. Measuring from paper is generally a vulnerable process and all measurement-inflicted defects have a further impact on the uniformity of a coating as a result of incorrect regulation parameters caused thereby. It is very difficult, if not outright impossible to effect a reliable and accurate measurement for the thickness of a single layer from the surface of a web.
It is an objective of the present invention to provide an improved method of coating a paper/board web with a curtain coater, said method enabling the formation of individual coating material layers with desired thicknesses and cross-profiles, as well as the formation of a consistent coating over the entire length of a nozzle unit crosswise of a web to be coated, as well as also effective and quick regulability for various coating materials and feed rates while the run is in progress. In order to accomplish this objective, a method of the invention is characterized in that the method comprises determining the cross-thickness profile of at least one coating material layer on top of a flow plane downstream of a feed slot associated with the discussed layer, and that, on the basis of the thus discovered cross-thickness profile of said at least one coating material layer, the feed rate of the coating material layer from a feed chamber to a feed slot is subjected to a manipulation profiled crosswise of a web to achieve a desired cross-profile for said at least one coating material layer.
Thus, the invention is based on measuring a crosswise profile for the thicknesses of individual coating material layers directly from the plane of a nozzle beam, even prior to application. Likewise, in its preferred embodiment, the inventive method comprises both a constriction of the coating material flow between a feed chamber and a feed slot based on said measurements and thereby an automation of the regulation in a nozzle beam. The method enables regulating the thickness and cross-profile of individual coating material layers locally during the run across the entire width of a web. The local nature of regulation refers in this concept to the fact that the regulation can be performed crosswise of the web at desired intervals and, especially, independently of other intervals. Hence, in other words, the regulation of a profile in a coating material layer can be set for each of such intervals at a desired value, essentially regardless of other sections of the profile in a cross-web direction.
The method endeavours particularly to rectify relative defects in a cross-coating profile in order to shape the profile as desired. In addition to individual coating material layers, the inventive method enables simultaneously also a desired thickness and cross-profile to be obtained for the entire coating. It is a major advantage that the measurement is effected directly from the flow plane of a nozzle beam for accurate and unaffected measuring results. Thus, the measurement and measuring results cannot be affected in any way by the properties of a paper being coated. Another advantage of the invention is that the type of coating material has no significance in terms of regulation and its accuracy.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are set forth in dependent claims 2-8. A method of the invention can be applied according to the independent claim 9, especially to such a plane-fed curtain coater which comprises a nozzle beam provided with at least two feed chambers and nozzle slots in connection therewith for feeding at least two layers of coating material onto a flow plane established by the nozzle beam, said method being characterized by what is set forth in the characterizing clause of claim 9. An arrangement of the invention is turn characterized by what is set forth in the characterizing clause of the independent claim 10.
Regarding its details, features and advantages, the invention is illustrated more precisely in the following description of an exemplary embodiment and in the accompanying drawing, in which:
In reference to
In this embodiment of the invention, the coating curtain 4 is made up of three individual coating material layers 1, 2 and 3. It should be emphasized at this point that neither the number of individual coating material layers nor which ones of said layers will be regulated with a method of the invention are significant as such in terms of the present method. The number of feed chambers 12 and nozzle slots 30 connected therewith in the nozzle beam 40 can naturally be considerably more than two or three as shown in the depicted exemplary embodiment.
For the sake of clarity,
The amount of coating material, realized for the middle layer 2 and to be applied to the web W, can be calculated as a difference between the total flow rate of coating material and the by-pass flow rate adjusted therefrom. A measurement for the feed rate of a coating material is provided for each individual layer of coating material. This can be used as a basis for setting the basic total amount of coating material as desired.
Local adjustment of the middle layer in terms of its cross-profile as well as its thickness is performed in response to a local thickness of the coating material layer determined from the flow plane. Determination of the thickness of coating material layers can be effected either by measuring the thickness directly or by determining the thickness of such layers with an indirect measuring procedure.
The thickness of a coating material layer being trickled along the flow plane 35 of a nozzle beam can thus be measured directly as such from the plane. The measurement can be performed by using preferably sensors based on a non-contact measurement. The sensors measure separately a distance both from a response level, i.e. in this case from the surface of a flow plane in a nozzle beam, and from the top surface of the topmost coating material layer.
The measuring accuracy achieved in such sensors can be even less than 1 micrometer. While trickling along the flow plane 35, the coating material layer has a thickness which is typically in the order of 0,5-1 mm. Accordingly, the sensors make it possible to clearly detect variations of less than one percent in the thickness of a coating material layer upon a flow plane. What should be particularly appreciated in this context is that the thickness of coating material layers on a flow plane is generally several ten-fold with respect to the final thickness of such layers after application to a web. Thus, another advantage in performing a measurement from the flow plane of a nozzle beam is that absolute errors occurring in measuring methods do not result in major relative defects in the thickness of the layers.
It is easy to work out the thickness of individual coating material layers from measuring results obtained from the sensors. Measurement is most conveniently conducted after each feed slot 30 to discover the thickness of any individual layer as a difference between the measuring results. In reference to
According to a second embodiment of the invention, the determination of thickness profiles for coating material layers can be conducted also indirectly. It has been observed, namely, that the surface speed of a coating trickling down a flow plane is in clear correlation to the thickness and thus also to the feed rate of the coating. In this context, the surface speed represents a speed, which is parallel to the flow plane and which also essentially relates to the lengthwise direction of a paper/board machine, either in the traveling direction of a web or in the reverse direction, depending on which way the flow plane itself has been adapted to incline.
Correlations between the surface speed of a coating trickling along a flow plane and the flow rate and thickness of a coating are also supported by formulae available in literature, regarding the flow of a fluid along a smooth inclined plane. Speed variations of a slip with respect to flow rate are derivable at least for a rough estimate for example from the following formula (Kistler, S. F. and Schweizer, P. M. “Liquid Film Coating”, Chapman & Hall, 1997):
Hs=(3*μ* Q/(ρ*g* sin β))1/3, wherein
Hs=thickness of film
μ=viscosity
Q=flow rate/unit of width
g=acceleration of gravity
β=trickling angle relative to horizon
ρ=density of material
Practical measurements have revealed clear correlations between flow rate variations of a coating material and surface speeds of a coating. Another aspect to be observed in measurements is a discrepancy between the surface speed of a coating and the average speed of the coating. The flow rate or speed of a coating at the very top of coating layers is by a certain correction factor higher than the speed deeper within the coating material layers. On the basis of practical experiments, it is a general conclusion that, as the flow rate of a coating material increases, approximately a third of the relative flow rate change is applied to the thickness of the coating layer upon a flow plane and approximately two thirds are transferred to the flow rate of the coating layer, i.e. the thickness and the flow rate increase in proportion as pointed out above. The more accurate values of correlations depend e.g. on the properties of coating materials, thicknesses of coating layers, inclination of a plane, as well as other factors pertinent e.g. to running parameters.
With regard to flow-rate based determination of the cross-profile of a coating material layer, it is also essential that it is also based, above all, on discrepancies observed in a cross-web direction, hence, in this case, on differences in speed. In other words, what is even more important than precise determination of absolute thicknesses of the coating material layers determined by means of measurements is that, in order to define the cross-profiles of coating layers, it is just these relative differences in a cross-web direction that are accurately discovered with regard to flow rates and thereby local thicknesses.
Measuring the actual surface speed can be conducted preferably by means of a non-contact measurement based on laser technology. Reliable and robust laser measuring equipment of the prior art suitable for measuring is abundantly available in the marketplace. In addition to precise rate assessment, speed and economy, an advantage offered by laser measurement is also a possibility of both setting up the measuring equipment at a substantial distance from the actual object to be measured, i.e. a flow plane, and protecting the same also otherwise from nuisance factors existing in paper machine environment, such as from becoming soiled.
The measurement of surface speed is conducted basically the same way as described above in reference to the measurement effected by means of sensors according to
The data obtained in the determination of a cross-profile for coating material layers is transmitted further from the measuring apparatus to an automatic actuator 42. The actuator in turn operates elements 19, which are disposed in the nozzle beam 40 and which provide a further direct influence on the flow of a coating material. A local fine adjustment for the thickness of a middle layer 2 is in practice conducted by manipulating the flow of a coating material into the feed slot 30 in the nozzle beam 40. In the embodiment of
Each feed hole 18 is formed with a boring 19a, which merges into a vertical section of the feed hole 18. In this embodiment of the invention, the flow of a coating material is constricted by means of adjusting pin 19 functioning as control elements. Each adjusting pin 19 is adapted for a lengthwise displacement into such boring 19a. These lengthwise displaceable adjusting pin are now operated directly by said actuator 42.
The adjusting pin has its inner end 23, extending into the feed hole 18, preferably bevelled. The adjusting pin 19 is sealed in the boring 19a by means of packings 22. The feed holes 18 have a mutual distance lengthwise of the nozzle element of e.g. 50-600 mm, preferably 150-300 mm. Consequently, the thickness of a coating layer can be locally manipulated at an accuracy of sequences equal to spacing distances between said feed holes. Respectively, the cross-profile of a coating material layer is thus also adjustable by means of the method at a substantially equal accuracy.
Naturally, the feed rate of a coating material between the feed chamber 12 and the feed slot 30 can be regulated by using other regulating elements, as well.
It is an objective in a method of the invention to subject the feed rate, with regard to each individual coating material layer, to such a local regulation that the cross-profile of each coating material layer turns out as desired. A particular objective is to eliminate all deviations from a desired cross-profile. Thus, it is not absolutely necessary in the method to strive for a perfectly straight cross-profile. By means of a method of the invention, it is, for example, possible to compensate for deformations taking place in a paper web towards the end of a dryer section in a paper machine, such as, for example, warping of paper at the edges. In this case, the feed of a coating material from a feed chamber to a feed slot is regulated locally in such a way that the coating material layer shall become in its edge regions either thinner or thicker than in the middle of a web, thereby compensating for changes in the web thickness at the end of a drying process.
If a nozzle beam is provided with automated cross-profile control, it is possible, on the basis of a measurement conducted upon a flow plane of the nozzle beam, to adjust the cross-profile precisely as desired, totally without quality measuring instruments. The method enables also the cross-profile optimization for all layers, which is most of the time impossible with traditional quality measurements and nozzle beam adjustments. A cross-profile as straight and consistent as possible or generally as desired for the overall coating can be created for example in such a way that other individual coating material layers are adjusted as desired with regard to their cross-sections and the thickness-regulation of the entire coating is conducted by means of a single layer having a thickness which is considerable with respect to the overall coating thickness. Thus, no particular cross-profile is sought for in this layer, but the profile for said layer is adjusted in such a way that it is definitely the cross-profile of an entire coating which shall be obtained as desired.
For example in a three-layer coating, as in the above exemplary embodiment, the amounts of coating in top and bottom layers are small, typically in the order of 2-4 g/m2. On the other hand, the middle layer has a substantially larger thickness, for example 8-15 g/m2. As a result of this, even high-percentage changes in the cross-profiles of top and bottom layers do not call for major compensatory modifications in the middle layer to provide a consistent cross-profile for the entire coating.
According to the invention, the cross-profile regulation of each coating material layer is preferably enhanced by using a coating-layer specific control of the by-pass rate as auxiliary means. Increasing or decreasing the by-pass of a coating material can be applied for an impact on the cross-profile of a coating layer. This type of regulation occurs definitely at a rough level. The fine adjustment of a cross-profile is effected by regulating the feed-flow rate of a coating material. By using a by-pass as auxiliary regulation, it is accordingly possible to reduce the need of regulating between the feed chamber 12 and the nozzle slot 30 the flow rate specific to a given coating material layer.
Another essential advantage of the invention lies in the fact that, since the measurement of a cross-profile is conducted as early as on the flow plane 35 of a nozzle beam, the adjustment procedures necessary for regulating the cross-profile of coating material layers can be performed prior to starting the actual coating process. This makes it possible to achieve a prime-quality coating right from the start of a coating process, even if modifications had been made to feed rates or properties of the slip.
According to optional procedures in a method of the invention, the disposition and number of sensors used for a measurement conducted upon the flow plane of a nozzle beam—hence, this refers to the measuring elements of any measuring instrument based on non-contact measuring—can be implemented with a wide variety of alternatives. If the sensors are mounted on a frame 43 shown in
It is possible to make sensors movable also in the traveling direction of a web, in which case the thickness of each individual coating material layer upon the flow plane of a nozzle beam can be measured by means of one single sensor. On the other hand, sensors may also be made stationary, such that there are sensors disposed in equally spaced rows for each coating material layer across the entire width of a web. The cross-profile of a coating material layer is found out on the basis of measuring information provided by such an array of sensors. Preferably, for example, the sensors are disposed in such a way that there is at least one sensor 44 for each adjusting pin 19. Thus, the adjustment of a coating material flow rate is conducted on the basis of measuring results provided by a relevant sensor.
According to one further aspect of the invention, the use of actuators is possible not only for the regulation of a cross-coating profile but also of a machine-directed coating profile. The coating thickness can be regulated in a desired direction consistently over the entire cross-profile and, especially, concurrently with the on-going run.
According to one further aspect of the invention, it is also conceivable that, in addition to measuring the coating from a plane, another measurement is conducted from a curtain formed by the coating material layers prior to application to a fibrous web. The measurement can be carried out as a high-speed measurement, most conveniently by means of laser measuring.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20045057 | Feb 2004 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI05/50051 | 2/25/2005 | WO | 9/20/2006 |