Applicants claim priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 of German Application No. 103 30 338.3 filed on Jul. 4, 2003. Applicants also claim priority under 35 U.S.C. §365 of PCT/DE2004/001407 filed on Jul. 2, 2004. The international application under PCT article 21(2) was not published in English.
The invention relates to a method for compressive shrinking of a textile fabric web, using a compressive or rubber blanket shrinking system, in which a mechanically compressed fabric web is fixed between an endless rubber blanket and the mantle surface of a heated main cylinder or heating cylinder, and in which the region of the rubber blanket that runs off from the main cylinder, in each instance, is cooled. It furthermore relates to a rubber blanket shrinking system in which a mechanically compressed fabric web is to be fixed between an endless rubber blanket and the mantle surface of a heated main cylinder, and in which cooling means are assigned to the region of the rubber blanket that runs off the main cylinder, in each instance. The rubber blanket is also referred to as a rubber belt or rubber back cloth.
Rubber blanket shrinking systems having a so-called rubber calander are described in DE-AS 10 72 220. The main cylinder of a compressive shrinking cylinder is heated to approximately 130° C. Celsius for shrinking cotton goods, in order to fix the mechanical compression of the fabric web, in each instance. The heat provided by the main cylinder not only heats the fabric web itself, but also the rubber blanket pressing the fabric web against the main cylinder. Since the width of the fabric web varies, at least from one batch to another, the rubber blanket will generally be wider than the fabric web being treated.
Because of the heat effect of the main cylinder, the rubber blanket is heated to such an extent that plasticizers present in the rubber blanket migrate out. In order to slow down this effect, the rubber blanket in conventional shrinking systems is cooled with water over its entire width, after it runs off from the main cylinder and the fixed goods, i.e. fabric web has/have been lifted off (cf. the reference DE-AS 10 72 220, as indicated above, for example).
As they run off on the main cylinder, the (center) regions covered by the fabric web are heated less than the regions of the rubber blanket that are not touched by the fabric web, in each instance. The inventors have recognized that conventional cooling at the edge regions of the rubber blanket is not always sufficient, so that these edge regions become brittle prematurely. However, it is not possible to cool the rubber blanket more greatly in order to overcome this problem, because if the rubber blanket is too cold, proper fixation of the mechanical compression of the fabric web will not take place. In practice, it therefore had to be accepted that the rubber blanket becomes brittle due to heating of its surface, and has to be re-ground relatively frequently, approximately every two weeks if used in continuous operation. During each grinding process, the rubber blanket, which originally has a thickness of 5–8 cm, becomes thinner, and the shrinkage potential of the blanket decreases with its thickness.
The invention is based on the task of counteracting the premature wear of the regions of the rubber blanket not covered by the fabric web, in each instance, in the rubber blanket calander of a compressive shrinking system, without impermissibly cooling the active regions of the rubber blanket, i.e. the regions of the rubber blanket covered by the fabric web during operation on the main cylinder. In other words: Means are sought after to prevent the edge regions of the rubber blanket that lie outside the width of the fabric web from becoming brittle prematurely.
The solution according to the invention is indicated, for the method stated initially, in the characterizing part of claim 1. It consists, in particular, in the fact that when using a fabric web that does not completely cover the rubber blanket, the regions of the rubber blanket that are not covered by the fabric web on the main cylinder (in other words the regions that are inactive with regard to shrinking) are cooled to a greater extent after lifting off from the main cylinder than is permissible in the sense of the fixation success in the regions of the rubber blanket that are covered by the fabric web, i.e. active regions. For the rubber blanket shrinking system indicated initially, the solution consists in assigning an additional cooling device that is adaptable to the width of the edge regions to the edge regions of the rubber blanket that are not touched by the fabric web on the main cylinder. Some improvements and further embodiments of the invention are indicated in the dependent claims.
According to the invention, the inactive regions of the rubber belt that are not touched by the fabric web on the main cylinder, in other words particularly the regions at the longitudinal edges of the fabric web, are supposed to be cooled separately, specifically to a greater extent than would be permissible in the active regions of the rubber blanket, with which the fabric web is directly pressed against the main cylinder. “Greater” cooling in the sense of the invention means cooling to temperatures that are clearly below the permissible minimum temperature for the active region, on the order of 5 to 20° Celsius, in such a manner that the amount of heat transferred to the rubber blanket as it runs around the main cylinder is entirely removed again at the additional cooling device (in short: cooling unit). In this regard, the invention is based, among other things, on the recognition that a rubber blanket that has been heated up can only be cooled slowly, because of the poor heat conductivity of rubber.
The invention is therefore supposed to prevent the inactive regions from heating up at all, from one pass to the next. A penetration of the heat energy applied at the main cylinder (and removed again at the cooling unit), into the interior of the rubber blanket, is supposed to be avoided. The heat exchange between main cylinder and rubber blanket, on the one hand, and between rubber blanket and cooling unit, on the other hand, is supposed to relate only to a thin outer layer of the rubber blanket, e.g. on the order of a thickness of 2 mm. This, too, is achieved by means of the relatively strong cooling of the edge regions according to the invention.
In the invention, the poor heat conductivity of the rubber blanket is taken into consideration, i.e. utilized. The heat applied on the outside of such a blanket penetrates only slowly into the depth of the blanket. The same applies for the effect of rubber blanket cooling, the cooling effect also progresses slowly into the depth of the rubber blanket. According to a calculated example, it takes about two seconds until a layer that lies about 1 cm beneath the heated rubber blanket surface has cooled from 120 to 40° Celsius. Since rubber blankets run at a production speed on the order of 50 m/min (0.833 m/s), approximately 1.5 m of the rubber blanket would be needed for cooling. However, such a cooling length is not available in a compressive shrinking system. Therefore, without using the invention, the heat applied at the main cylinder penetrates deeper into the edge regions from one pass to the next, and the remaining temperature of the inactive edge regions rises to an equilibrium value that is disadvantageous for the useful lifetime of the rubber.
The invention counters this problem in that the inactive edge regions are cooled so intensively, right from the start (essentially starting with the first pass), that the amount of heat previously applied during the same pass is practically completely removed again. This means that the heat energy does not have any opportunity of penetrating deep into the material of the rubber blanket, at least not in a non-permissible temperature range, and accordingly only a relatively thin outer layer is alternately heated and cooled. If this heated and cooled outer layer has a thickness of 2 mm, for example, it can be cooled from 120° to 40° Celsius in on the order of 0.3 seconds (in the aforementioned arithmetical example); at the speed of 50 m/min indicated above, only approximately 25 cm are then required for cooling; cooling paths of this length can easily be handled in conventional rubber blanket shrinking systems, in terms of their design.
The cooling of the inactive edge regions of the rubber blanket preferably starts immediately after the machine has been put into operation. Preferably, in this context, the cooling output per pass should be made approximately equal to the heating output per pass.
According to a further invention, the edge regions of the rubber blanket as defined above each have a(n) (additional) cooling device that can be adapted to the width of the edge regions, in each instance, assigned to them. For example air jets or water jets can be directed at the inactive regions of the rubber blanket from nozzles. To generate the jets, pivoting nozzle bars that carry the nozzles in question can be provided. The width of the edge regions to be cooled, which depends on the width of the fabric web being treated, can be controlled by a sensor that scans the fabric web edge, in each instance. Flat-jet spray nozzles can be adapted particularly well to the measured width of the (inactive) edge region to be cooled, in each instance. Flat-jet spray nozzles whose spraying region is elongated almost in a line on the surface being treated can be switched in stages, as a function of the edge width to be cooled. They also permit a continuous adaptation to the width of the edge strip to be cooled, among other things by means of rotation of the spray region (about an axis essentially perpendicular to the rubber blanket cover), if the flat jet and therefore its spray region are rotated in accordance with the edge width, or if the distance between jets is varied.
As an alternative to a single pivoting nozzle bar, several stationary nozzle bars can also be provided for an adaptation to the width. The single nozzle bar can be assigned to a total width of the edge region that has been determined, in each instance, and can be separately controlled, for example by means of a valve. The nozzle bars can be equipped with flat-jet nozzles. When using these nozzles, it is possible to orient the spray region of the flat jet against the running direction of the rubber blanket, at a predetermined angle. The number of stationary nozzle bars required in each instance is based on the maximal size of the inactive region of the rubber blanket to be spray (to be cooled), in each instance, in other words on the ratio of the minimal material web width to the rubber blanket width.
The aforementioned spray angle, with which the spray region of the flat jet is inclined relative to the edge of the rubber blanket, is supposed to be adjusted separately for every nozzle bar, in other words with a different orientation. In a preferred exemplary embodiment, the angle at which the spray region of the flat-jet nozzles is inclined relative to the rubber blanket edge is made relatively small in a first nozzle bar that is assigned to an inactive region of the rubber blanket having a width of 100 mm, for example. At a second nozzle bar, which is provided towards the center of the rubber blanket, whose nozzles are supposed to cover a broader edge region, for example one having a width of 200 mm, the angle is selected to be greater, namely so great that the spray region that is straight, in a line shape, extends (at a slant) from one lengthwise edge of the edge region to the other. In order to obtain the same spray intensity per area unit in the lengthwise direction as with the first nozzle bar, despite this, two flat-jet nozzles (that are oriented the same way) can be provided on the second bar. Accordingly, both the angle of the flat jet (measured relative to the blanket edge) and the number of nozzles can be selected to be increasingly greater on each additional nozzle bar that lies further inward. If necessary, the same spray distance and the same intensity are achieved for every spray region.
The maximal edge width to be cooled in this manner is predetermined by the length of the flat-jet spray region. The length can be adapted to the edge width by changing the distance between nozzle and rubber blanket. However, if a particularly narrow fabric web is being treated on a particularly wide machine (with a corresponding wide rubber blanket), without damaging the rubber blanket, two or more nozzle bar groups of the aforementioned type can be provided at the edges of the rubber blanket, at intervals of the length of a spray region.
As stated, water or air (or, in general, liquid or gases) can be provided as the cooling agent. The advantage of air cooling consists in the better ability to meter it, the advantage of water cooling consists in the better effectiveness; however, the water sprayed onto the rubber blanket must be squeezed off before the blanket again runs into the region in which it is supposed to exert the compressive shrinkage.
The cooling agents assigned to the inactive edge regions, e.g. nozzles, can have a separately controlled, i.e. independent cooling agent supply system in accordance with the type of a counter-current principle. If necessary, the same cooling agent, e.g. fresh water, can first be used to cool the edge regions being treated, in each instance. The return water that occurs there is re-circulated with a pump and used for pre-cooling of the same edge region. In this connection, it is also possible to proceed in three or more stages—the re-circulated water that runs off from a cooled region is used to cool a preceding edge region, in the running direction of the rubber blanket, which is even warmer.
Details of the invention will be explained using the schematic representation of exemplary embodiments. The drawing shows:
The fabric web 9 to be shrunk runs over the contact pressure roller 4 into the so-called shrink nip 11, where mechanical shrinking takes place, in the transport direction 10 shown.
The mechanically produced shrinkage is fixed by means of the effect of the heated main cylinder 1, while simultaneously, the fabric web 9 is pressed against the mantle surface 2 by means of the rubber blanket 3. The rubber blanket 3 possesses a predetermined initial thickness in order to achieve a noteworthy shrinking effect. If the blanket becomes brittle, it must be ground down. In order to reduce the speed at which it becomes brittle, the rubber blanket 3 is cooled, over its entire width, using a water shower 12, after it runs off from the mantle, surface 2. Cooling is only allowed to take place to such an extent that the rubber blanket 3 is still warm enough to sufficiently support the fixing process on the mantle surface 2 of the main cylinder when it subsequently arrives at the shrink nip 11 again. The liquid applied with the water shower 12 must be pressed off the rubber blanket 3 again before it arrives at the contact pressure roller 4, down to a defined residual moisture, e.g. using a pair of squeezing rollers 13.
The air cooling bar 23 in the left half of
Several individual pipes 32 proceed from a collector 31 according to
According to
In operation, the nozzles 33a to e produce long, narrow spray regions 38a to e on the rubber blanket 3, according to
The stated angles w1 to w5 can be selected in such a manner, for example, that an inactive rubber belt strip of 100 mm on each side can be sprayed and cooled. If the edge region is wider, e.g. 200 mm wide, the second nozzle bar 33b is turned on, and the first nozzle bar 33a is shut off. If the edge regions are even broader, the next nozzle bars 33c to e are optionally activated. Within the scope of the invention, however, individual nozzle bars 33 can also be used at the same time to cool the inactive edge region, in each instance.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 30 338 | Jul 2003 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2004/001407 | 7/2/2004 | WO | 00 | 6/24/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/005706 | 1/20/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2721370 | Cluett et al. | Oct 1955 | A |
2870038 | MacIntyre | Jan 1959 | A |
2885763 | Schreiner | May 1959 | A |
3055496 | Dunlap | Sep 1962 | A |
3940833 | Troope | Mar 1976 | A |
4088731 | Groome | May 1978 | A |
4969243 | Strahm | Nov 1990 | A |
5791029 | Maker | Aug 1998 | A |
6279211 | Dischler | Aug 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
AS 10 72 220 | Mar 1956 | DE |
0 097 957 | Jan 1984 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060070216 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |