This application is the U.S. national phase application of PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2009/050178, filed Jan. 8, 2009, which claims priority to German Patent Application No. 10 2008 006 653.2, filed Jan. 30, 2008, the contents of such applications being incorporated by reference herein.
The invention relates to a control valve conditioning method in an electrohydraulic pressure control unit having at least one electrically actuated solenoid valve which is controlled in an analog manner and is operated at a specific operating current, which is in the pressure control range of the application of the valve, during a pressure control operation.
DE 103 41 027 A1, which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a method for inter-vehicle distance control (ACC) for a motor vehicle, which method can be carried out in or with a two-circuit ABS/ESP brake control device which is commonly used with a pump. In order to meter the hydraulic brake pressure, an electrically actuable hydraulic isolating valve which is controlled in an analog manner is used, said isolating valve permitting, in contrast to control with an inlet valve which is actuated in an analog manner, pressure control throughout the brake circuits. The hydraulic valves used for pressure control are generally so-called analog/digital valves (A/D valves) which substantially correspond to conventional electromagnetic (solenoid) switching valves, but said analog/digital valves being actuated by means of a pulse-width-modulated current (PWM) in such a way that the valve tappet assumes a floating position. Pressure control is possible in this way provided that the current is actuated in a sufficiently accurate and reproducible manner. This is generally possible without major problems if the pressure to be adjusted can be adjusted by means of a pressure sensor in conjunction with a control loop. It is considerably more difficult to carry out a corresponding analog control method without a pressure sensor in the pressure circuit to be controlled. In this case, stored valve characteristic curves are usually used, these permitting, in conjunction with control methods which are known per se, the pressure to be set in the wheel without additional wheel pressure sensors.
The valve characteristic curve mentioned above therefore permits the pressure to be set by the valve in accordance with a pressure requirement which is applied to the controller, as an input variable. In this connection, DE 103 41 027 A1 mentions the problem that the dead space of the hydraulics, for example the air gap between the brake lining and brake disk, can lead to uncomfortable control during inter-vehicle distance control operation. As a solution to this problem, said application proposes applying an offset to the calibration characteristic curve.
DE 10 2004 008 796 A1, which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a method and an apparatus for controlling a hydraulic valve of a hydraulic system, in which method an opposing force is generated at a solenoid valve, which is actuated by a brake control system, in order to damp noise by the valve coil being electrically excited at a suitable frequency. The method relates to pressure control methods in which the pressure is increased and reduced by means of valves which are switched in accordance with a pulse sequence.
An object of the invention is to improve the comfort and the control accuracy of a pressure control unit.
The invention relates to a control valve conditioning method in an electrohydraulic pressure control unit having at least one electrically actuated solenoid valve which is controlled in an analog manner. The control valve is operated at a specific operating current in accordance with a functional relationship or characteristic map between the valve current and the differential pressure characteristic curve, said functional relationship or characteristic map being stored in the pressure control unit, during a pressure control operation. The method comprises the following steps:
The antihysteresis pulse preferably has a length of at most 100 ms, in some embodiments at most 50 ms.
In some embodiments, the current is at least 50%, in particular at least 80%, higher or lower than the operating current during the antihysteresis pulse.
As explained in greater detail further below, it has been found that a hysteresis effect is present when a desired pressure is set by means of the coil current which is applied to the control valve. If, for example, the valve characteristic curve is evaluated in a laboratory under suitable conditions, the result is a hysteresis effect which is limited by an upper and a lower current/pressure edge curve. The determined upper current/pressure edge curve of the hysteresis range and/or the lower edge curve of the hysteresis range are/is stored in the electronics system of the pressure control unit.
The solenoid valve which is actuated in an analog manner is preferably a brake pressure control valve in an electrohydraulic brake pressure control apparatus. The valve which is open when no current is applied and which is very particularly preferably used as an isolating valve. The valve is actuated such that control operation is possible. The solenoid control valve is preferably actuated by a pulse-width-modulated current controller. So-called analogized switching valves are preferably used as the analog valve in the field of electronic brake systems.
The brake pressure control operation which is carried out by the pressure control unit is preferably a motor vehicle distance control operation.
The pressure control unit which is used for control purposes preferably does not have any pressure sensors for measuring the controlled hydraulic pressure.
The antihysteresis pulse is applied at least shortly before a change in the differential pressure to be adjusted and/or a change in the current to be adjusted, in order to be able to select a defined position on a stored valve characteristic curve.
The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in connection with the accompanying drawings. Included in the drawings is the following figures:
In the schematic illustration in
The structure of an exemplary pressure control unit for electronic brake systems is described below with reference to
The curves 22 (upper current/pressure edge curve) and 23 (lower current/pressure edge curve) in
According to one example for carrying out the method according to aspects of the invention, the current through the valve coil is reduced to zero for a period of approximately 0.2 to 100 ms, in some embodiments 1 to 10 ms before a desired differential pressure (for example point 28 on curve 23) is set (antihysteresis pulse). Negative current values for an antihysteresis pulse would likewise be conceivable, but generally cannot be realized with the current controllers used. The current is then immediately increased to the current value which is associated with point 28 for the actual control operation. In principle, point 26 on curve 22 can also be assumed by generating a short current pulse of corresponding duration at a maximum current of 2000 mA. The application of a hysteresis pulse to the valve ensures that the characteristic curve corresponds to the curve 23 known to the control unit, for example stored in the memory. During practical operation, this leads to a considerable improvement in control accuracy. According to the first exemplary embodiment, curve 23 is stored in the brake unit. In addition or as an alternative, curve 22 can also be stored in the controller.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 006 653 | Jan 2008 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/050178 | 1/8/2009 | WO | 00 | 7/29/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/095287 | 8/6/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6962164 | Lull et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7979165 | Gotoh et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20040206155 | Sosnowski | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050082905 | Gronau et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050168061 | Scheller et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070158607 | Fey et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070215206 | Lull et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070252098 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100090521 | Loos | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100219026 | Fukasawa et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
198 48 960 | Apr 2000 | DE |
102 24 059 | Aug 2003 | DE |
103 41 027 | Mar 2004 | DE |
10 2004 008 796 | Nov 2004 | DE |
10 2007 019 732 | Dec 2007 | DE |
1 474 319 | Nov 2004 | EP |
2 545 628 | Nov 1984 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100332038 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |