This application is the national stage of PCT/DE 01/04920, filed Dec. 22, 2001, designating the United States and claiming priority from German patent application no. 100 65 123.2, filed Dec. 28, 2000, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a method for diagnosing catalytic converters which are used to convert toxic substances in the exhaust gas of internal combustion engines.
Statutory requirements provide an on-board diagnosis of toxic-emission relevant vehicle components such as catalytic converters.
Such an on-board diagnosis is known, for example, from U.S. Pat. No. 5,987,883. A correction of the conversion capability, which is determined with on-board means, for considering temperature influences on the diagnostic result is known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,526,643. Here, a diagnosis takes place only above a minimum temperature threshold.
There is further an interest to increase the quality and therewith the reliability of the diagnostic statements.
The subject matter of the present invention increases the reliability of the diagnostic statements in that only such diagnostic results are evaluated where the temperature of the catalytic converter was below a highest temperature threshold for the determination of these diagnostic results.
This technical teaching is based on the observation that a deteriorated catalytic converter can effect the same toxic substance conversion at very high temperatures of, for example, 800° C. as can a new catalytic converter at 400° C. By limiting the diagnosis to catalytic converter temperatures below a highest temperature threshold, the situation is precluded that a deteriorated catalytic converter is evaluated as being operational based only on a high diagnostic temperature.
An advantageous configuration results in that, during the drop of the catalytic converter temperature below the highest temperature threshold, a waiting time must elapse before a catalytic converter diagnosis takes place or before results are determined which are evaluated in a diagnosis. This waiting time can be dependent upon the speed with which the catalytic converter temperature drops. The waiting time for higher rates of change of the catalytic converter temperature are selected longer than for lower rates of change.
In this way, the especially significant advantage results that a diagnosis for a steep drop of the catalytic converter temperature from a very high level is delayed longer than in a flat temperature course. The longer delay with a steep course allows the catalytic converter more time for reaching a thermal steady state condition in the diagnostic temperature range between lowest and highest temperatures. For a flat temperature course, a long wait is not required and the diagnosis can begin earlier.
The invention will now be described with reference to the drawings wherein:
The control apparatus 10 receives the signals ML of the load detecting means, (n) of the rpm sensor and the signals USVK and USHK of the two exhaust-gas probes and forms therefrom, inter alia, a fuel-metering signal ti, for example, an injection pulse width for driving injection valves 4 as fuel-metering means. For this purpose, a base value t1 of the drive signal ti is determined for the fuel-metering means as a function of the inducted air mass ML and the engine speed (n). This base value is multiplicatively corrected in a closed control loop by a control actuating quantity FR. This control actuating quantity FR is generated in a manner known per se by applying a PI control strategy to the deviation of the probe signal USVK from a desired value. In the formation of the fuel-metering signal, the signal USHK can be included in the computation additionally, for example, for forming the desired value. A temperature sensor 12 supplies a signal as to the catalytic converter temperature TKAT to the control apparatus. Alternatively, the catalytic converter temperature TKAT can also be determined in the control apparatus 10 from other measurement quantities, especially, from the air quantity ML and the rpm (n) utilizing a computer model. One such temperature modeling is, for example, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,590,521.
In this technical background, the method of the invention can be carried in the embodiment shown in
Step 2.1 in
In this way, only such results are used for diagnosis where these results were determined with the catalytic converter temperature lying below the threshold value TMAX.
When the diagnosis, for example, is based on a quotient of the signals of the exhaust-gas probes forward and rearward of the catalytic converter, then this can mean that the quotient is formed only for a permitted diagnosis. Alternatively, the quotient can be formed continuously but the quotient can be evaluated only for permitted diagnoses.
This distinction applies in the same manner for other diagnostic methods.
b shows a supplement of
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 65 123 | Dec 2002 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE01/04920 | 12/22/2001 | WO | 00 | 4/2/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/053892 | 7/11/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5325664 | Chikamatsu | Jul 1994 | A |
5526643 | Mukaihira et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5590521 | Schnaibel et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5675967 | Ries-Mueller | Oct 1997 | A |
5743083 | Schnaibel et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5896743 | Griffin | Apr 1999 | A |
5930993 | Kammann et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5987883 | Schneider | Nov 1999 | A |
6092369 | Hidal | Jul 2000 | A |
6195986 | Davey et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202406 | Griffin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0626507 | Nov 1994 | EP |
2349226 | Oct 2000 | GB |
07 180534 | Jul 1995 | JP |
11 132031 | May 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050022507 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |