Patent Grant
10906262
Ceramic and/or metal powder presses are known where so-called floating of individual axes, i.e. in particular of the punch and its supporting components, is required during the shaping process of a pressing method. The term floating means that the axis can be displaced from its position by at least one other axis, in particular an opposing axis. However, it resists the displacement force exerted by the other axis with a force programmed for this axis in the tool program, which, for illustrative purposes, is comparable to a spring action. A further case of application is in a force-controlled reduction in the pressing force, in particular at the top force-exerting axis. The term floating can therefore also be described as yielding or readjusting in a controlled manner.
With servo-motive powder presses, in particular, especially multi-plate presses, there is a particular problem in the case of spindle presses, which have a spindle drive, compared to hydraulic powder presses, for example. Classic torque limitation provided in spindle drives by means of a drive control, open-loop or closed-loop, as an operating function of the servo controller, is not able to limit the force applied to such axes in an absolutely precise manner. The reason for this is that the rotary movement of the servo motor is transformed into a translatory movement with the aid of a spindle. The efficiency of this spindle depends on a plurality of physical quantities, including the temperature, and must therefore be regarded as a quasi-unknown quantity. If a dual drive is used for such a tool axis, torque limitation is useless. In a dual drive, two servo motors each having a spindle, drive a tool axis. Due to the efficiency problem of the spindles, synchronous driving of the two servo axes cannot be guaranteed. From the point of view of process engineering, the tolerance for the synchronicity deviation is less than 0.01 mm, in particular.
Servo controllers usable in such spindle presses consist of electric current, speed and position controllers. With these controllers, force control is basically not possible.
It is the object of the present invention to improve a ceramic and/or metal powder press and a method of controlling a ceramic and/or metal powder press for pressing a compressible material by using at least one electromotive drive in such a way that more reliable operation, in particular force control on at least one floating axis, or a floating punch, is possible. In particular, the method is to be applicable with presses provided with a servo spindle drive.
A particularly preferred embodiment provides a method of controlling a ceramic and/or metal powder press for pressing a compressible material, wherein at least one electromotive drive, which adjusts at least one punch along the pressing direction, is controlled in such a manner that the drive moves the punch along a setpoint positioning path, in particular to each momentary setpoint position of the punch and the drive is readjusted if it deviates from the setpoint positioning path, wherein a measured force acting on the compressible material, the punch or its supporting components is used as at least one control variable for readjustment.
In other words, control of setpoint positions of at least the one punch is achieved via its at least one electromotive drive as a function of a measured force. Control can also be realized by means of readjustment using various interconnected open-loop and closed-loop control and regulating devices.
The force of the tool axis, that is, in particular, the measured force acting on one of the components in the range extending from the punch to its point of fixing relative to a frame and relative to further tool axes, as the case may be, is measured by means of suitable sensors, or a suitable force-measuring device, in the translatory movement during a running process cycle.
Such control is implementable for only one punch of a plurality of punches of such a press, or a corresponding tool used in such a press. Such control can also be implemented, however, for a plurality, or all, punches of such a press, or such a tool.
A further embodiment provides that the readjustment is carried out with respect to the setpoint positioning path as a function of the at least one measured force wherein, according to a further development, the setpoint positioning path is predefined as a function of a setpoint force, in particular.
Again, force values are transposed into position values. A further development is that each axis evaluates the applicable force for itself independently of the overall combination, and can initiate readjustment.
A further embodiment provides calculating and/or controlling setpoint positions of at least one punch as a function of at least one such measured force.
A further embodiment provides that the setpoint positioning path, in particular of a servo axis or a plurality of servo axes, is calculated as a function of the measured force, in particular calculated in such a manner that a tool axis, or its punch, in particular, follows the programmed force.
By these means, in particular, the position is not controlled via a direct control variable of a drive, for example a voltage applied to the drive, an applied current or an oil pressure applied to the hydraulic cylinder. Instead, the setpoint position itself is changed, so that a controlled setpoint quantity, or setpoint position, is applied to a drive control, and in response the drive control in turn carries out control, or preferably closed-loop control, of the control variables of the drive as a function of the applied controlled setpoint position. Preferably, a dual control loop comprising two series-connected open-loop control systems or, in particular, closed-loop control systems, is used.
In a further preferred embodiment, as the deviation, a force control deviation between the measured force and the setpoint force is transformed into a setpoint control variable transformable for position control of the controller of the at least one drive.
In other words, a force control deviation is determined and the setpoint position control variable determined therefrom, which is used for controlling the electromotive drive.
In a further preferred embodiment, a spindle pitch of the drive and/or machine-specific modulus of elasticity are additionally transformed to the setpoint position control variable usable for the position controller.
Further quantities may also be considered, which depend on prevailing temperatures or variable or model-specific geometric and structural or material-dependent quantities, in particular of the press and in its environment. In particular, the machine-specific modulus of elasticity can relate to individual or all components in the force flow between the side of the punch facing the compressible material and the drive or frame elements supporting the drive. Different moduli of elasticity may also be provided for different axes or force flows.
According to a preferred embodiment, the at least one punch is adjusted as part of a floating axis, which means, in particular, an axis which floats, which yields in a controlled manner or which is readjusted.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment, a ceramic and/or metal powder press for pressing a compressible material is provided, comprising at least one electromotive drive, which adjusts at least one punch along a pressing direction, one controller, which is configured to control the drive in such a manner that the drive moves the punch along a setpoint positioning path to each momentary setpoint position of the punch, and the drive readjusts if it deviates from the setpoint positioning path, wherein at least one force-measuring device is arranged in the press for measuring a pressing force acting on the compressible material, the punch or its supporting components, and wherein the measured force is at least one control variable for the controller for readjustment.
The controller can be an independent component or can be a controller entirely or partially integrated in each drive, or its motor, such as in a servo drive.
The drive or drives and the force-measuring devices can be associated with one or more punches or axes, arranged on a side of the die opening opposite the main pressing force. A main pressing force can also be applied by means of an electromotive drive or, optionally, by means of a mechanical, pneumatic or hydraulic drive. The main pressing force is exerted, in particular, by means of one or more punches, which are arranged on the side of the compressible material opposite the thus controlled punch and act on the compressible material. However, a punch, which alone or together with other punches is entirely or partially subject to the main pressing force, can also be controlled in this manner, in particular if a plurality of punches, which are adjustable relative to each other by means of electromotive drives, are arranged on the side of the main pressing force. This also requires that in the case of an electromotive main pressing force, the axis transmitting the force is also configured with servo-motive means and with a spindle drive and thus controllable in a floating manner.
One embodiment of the press provides that the punch is part of a floating axis.
A further embodiment of the press provides that the drive moves a punch relative to at least one punch arranged laterally thereto at least in the pressing position.
In other words, a plurality of punches is arranged on one side of the die opening, wherein this plurality of punches is adjustable independently of each other along the pressing direction. In particular, in such an arrangement, only one, a plurality or all of the punches may be controllable in such a manner.
According to another embodiment of the press, a single such punch is arranged to be adjustable by two or more drives simultaneously, wherein a correction value, in particular a single correction value, determined from the measured force is applied to the drives.
For example, such a punch is arranged on a so-called plate, acting as a punch carrier, wherein the plate is adjustable within the framework or tool along the pressing direction by means of two or more drives. A control deviation determined from one or more measured force values can be used for determining a common setpoint position control variable for all the drives involved. According to a further development, the drives are also independently controllable, in particular controllable as a function of individually determined measured forces, to prevent tilting of the plate, or the punch carrier, by means of suitable control.
Another preferred embodiment provides such a press, wherein the controller is adapted to control the at least one drive by means of a method as described above. In other words, a press equipped with the above-described components is operated using the method for controlling the setpoint positions of at least one punch as a function of at least one measured force.
Another embodiment provides such a press, or such a method, wherein the drive is configured as a servo-motive drive and/or drives a spindle upstream of the punch.
It is thus provided that punches, adjustable as a function of position, are controllable as a function of measured force values also with the aid of electromotive servo spindle drives, in particular.
According to a further development, a setpoint position path of one servo axis or a plurality of servo axes is calculated as a function of a measured force in such a way, that the tool axis, or its punch in particular, follows the programmed force.
An exemplary embodiment will be described in the following with reference to the drawings, wherein:
As shown in
A central component is a die 3, having a die opening, in which one or more punches 4, 5 are inserted, in particular from below. Compressible material 6 is able to be filled into the die opening above the punches 4, 5, in particular. One or more further punches 7 are insertable from above into the die opening filled with the compressible material 6, in order to shape the compressible material 6 to a compact. The compressible material 6 is a metallic and/or ceramic powdery and/or granular material, in particular.
The for example only one top punch 7 is attached at the bottom to a punch carrier 8, in particular in the shape of a plate. The punch carrier 8 and the punch 7 are adjustable in and against the pressing direction by means of an electromotive drive 10, which comprises, in particular, a servo motor and a spindle 9.
A force-measuring device 11 is arranged in the area of the top frame 2 shown in the FIGURE, on which the drive 10 and the punch 7 are mounted or arranged. The force-measuring device 11 can be installed, for example, as a load cell, between two of the components arranged between the frame 2 and the punch 7. The force-measuring device 11 is used to measure a compressive force exerted between these components and/or exerted on the compressible material 6 by means of the punch 7, and to output it as a measured force F3.
A central punch 5, for example, and a punch for surrounding the former in an annular manner, are shown below the die 3, which enable pressing of a contoured compact.
The central second punch 5 is arranged on a punch carrier 12, in particular in the shape of a plate. The punch carrier 12 is adjustable relative to a bottom section of the frame 2, for example, by means of two electromotive drives 15, 16 along the pressing direction. The two drives 15, 16 in turn each comprise a motor and a spindle 13, 14 driven by the latter. In the range extending from the frame 2 to the punch 5, force-measuring devices 24, 25 are arranged to measure a current pressing force acting via the drives 15, 16 and to output corresponding measuring values as the measured forces F21 and F22, respectively.
The central lower, first punch 4 is arranged on a punch carrier 17, in particular in the shape of a plate. The punch carrier 17 is adjustable relative to a lower section of the frame 2 by means of, for example, two electromotive drives 20, 21 along the pressing direction. The two drives 20, 21 in turn each comprise a motor and a spindle 18, 19 driven by the latter. In the range extending from the frame 2 to the punch 4, force-measuring devices 22, 23 are arranged to measure a current pressing force acting via the drives 20, 21 and to output corresponding measuring values as measured forces F11 and F12, respectively.
A controller C serves to control and monitor functions of the press 1. In particular, the controller C also serves to control the drives 10, 15, 16, 20, 21. In the case of servo motors or servo drives having their own control circuits, the controller C provides the servo drives or their control circuits with control signals for the setpoint movement to be adjusted. For this purpose the controller C provides, in particular, setpoint position control variables s3, s11, s12, s21 and s22 as control signals for the drives 10, 15, 16, 20 and 21, respectively. The setpoint position control variables s3, s11, s12, s21 and s22, respectively, can be, for example, continuously applied signals or temporary difference or control values, in particular.
The measured forces F3, F11, F12, F21, F22 are thus supplied to the controller C to be considered during a current pressing method.
To carry out a preferred pressing method the controller C takes a predetermined pressing sequence into consideration. The pressing sequence is based on pressing forces which are to be exerted by the punches 4, 5, 7 during a time sequence of the pressing process on the compressible material 6.
This is shown in a position-time diagram below the illustrated components. Curves are shown above the time sequence t, which show a momentary position a. The momentary position a can be an actual position of a surface of a punch 4, 5, 7 contacting the compressible material. For reasons of easier manageability, basically any other, in particular, a sufficiently precisely measurable or determinable position a along the distance from the punch 4, 5, 7 to its drives 13, 16, 20, 21, 10, can be used, in particular also a position determinable by the drive itself.
For simplification, only one setpoint positioning path as3 of the top punch 7 and the setpoint positioning path as1 of the first, bottom punch 5 are shown. For a press having a greater number of punches above and/or below the die opening, a greater number of such setpoint positioning paths are suitably used. In particular, the number of such setpoint positioning paths will depend on the number of axes or punches 4, 5, 7, which are to be controlled.
The setpoint positioning paths as1, as3 are determined as a function of pressing forces required by each of the punches 4, 5, 7 over the time sequence t.
It is shown, for example, during continuous lowering of the top punch 7 that the first bottom punch 5 is initially moved upwards and then slightly lowered from a predetermined position. In particular, a so-called floating movement is to be executed by the bottom punch 5, wherein it yields when the pressing force acting on the compressible material 6 from above is too great. It can also be provided that the bottom punch 5 moves upwards in a readjusting movement if the pressing force acting on the compressible material 6 from above is too weak.
In the cycle of the pressing method shown, it is assumed that the momentary position a1m of the bottom punch 5 temporarily deviates upwards from the momentary setpoint position as1m provided at this moment. Based on the measured forces F21, F22 of the corresponding force-measuring devices 24, 25 associated with said bottom punch 5, the controller C determines a control deviation εK(21) if the measured force F21 of one of the force-measuring devices 25 deviates, for example, from a setpoint force Fs for the measured force value of this force-measuring device 25, in particular. Therefore, a control signal, or setpoint position control variable s21, which controls readjustment as a function of the control deviation εK(21), is applied to the associated drive 16.
The control deviation εK(21) and thus the setpoint position control variable s21 are thus force-dependent open- or closed-loop control variables, which depend directly on one or also on a plurality, as the case may be, of the measured forces F21.
As the setpoint positioning paths as1, as3 are determined, and also as the setpoint position control variables s3, s11, s12, s21, s22 are determined for the quantities influencing each momentary position a of the corresponding punches 4, 5, 7, preferably also further quantities influencing the pressing process, such as a machine-specific modulus of elasticity E, a spindle pitch and also momentary positions of further punches 4, 5, 7, as the case may be, are also taken into consideration.
During the execution of a pressing method each control deviation εK(21) and/or the momentary setpoint position control variables s3, s11, s12, s21, s22 can be determined in various ways. Basically, a table look-up or a calculation are possible.
In the case of a table look-up, in a table comprising setpoint positions to be reached over time as a function of setpoint forces, the knowledge of a person skilled in the art or a person operating the plant, on a stiffness of the structure, contours and material properties of the compact could also be considered.
Since it is very cumbersome to model all components in the force flow of each of the axes, to obtain the best possible model as a basis for determining correct data for the table, calculation is preferred. In particular, a simplified model can be the basis of calculation. The deviations of the real object from the model are considered in the calculation via the setpoint-actual force difference.
To this end, in the controller C governing the servo controllers, in particular, a setpoint path is calculated using the force, according to the controller clock. If the setpoint force is set in relation to the actual force in operation, this will result in the control deviation EK of the measured force under consideration. This control deviation, together with the spindle pitch and a machine-specific modulus of elasticity is converted to a setpoint position controllable by the position controller of the servo axis, or the drive. If the tool axis or its drive control now follows the calculated path, the provided force profile will automatically be realized on the axis.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2012 019 312 | Oct 2012 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/DE2013/100346 | 9/30/2013 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2014/053120 | 4/10/2014 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4447198 | Long et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 5087398 | Le Molaire | Feb 1992 | A |
| 6074584 | Hinzpeter | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6562291 | Hinzpeter | May 2003 | B2 |
| 7018194 | Kitamura | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7351048 | Hinzpeter | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 10 2009 004620 | Jul 2010 | DE |
| 10 2010 033998 | Feb 2012 | DE |
| 102010051513 | May 2012 | DE |
| 2311587 | Apr 2011 | EP |
| 2 361 758 | Aug 2011 | EP |
| S57-209797 | Dec 1982 | JP |
| 2004-141916 | May 2004 | JP |
| 2008-266752 | Nov 2008 | JP |
| WO 03091012 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2008104969 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action dated May 24, 2016 in Chinese Application No. 201380062811.8. |
| International Search Report dated Feb. 17, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/DE2013/100346 filed Sep. 30, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Examination Report for European Application No. 13798548.7 dated Jul. 12, 2018. |
| Priority Search Report to German Application No. 2012019312.2 dated Jun. 19, 2013. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150314547 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
