Patent Application
20060257265
The present invention concerns a method for controlling a compressed air installation comprising several compressors.
Such compressed air installations comprising several compressors are already known, whereby one or two different types of compressors at the most are combined, which compressors are connected to a single compressed air network with their respective outlets and which are switched on and off in cascade, each at a different switching pressure in order to prevent that several compressors would be switched on and off simultaneously, which would result in enormous fluctuations in the compressed air network.
Such a method for controlling the compressors in a compressed air installation comprising several compressors is disadvantageous in that the overall flow and the pressure in the compressed air network may nevertheless still undergo large fluctuations.
A related disadvantage is that, due to the large pressure fluctuations in the compressed air network, the average pressure is relatively large in relation to the required minimum pressure, which results in a large consumption of energy and in larger leakage losses in the compressed air network.
Another disadvantage of the known method is that the above-mentioned control does not take the optimal working conditions of every separate compressor into account, and that the compressors often operate outside their optimal working domain, where they consume much more energy, comparatively speaking, and wear much faster.
Another disadvantage is that switching the compressors on and off each time is disadvantageous to the power consumption and to the life span of the compressors concerned.
An additional disadvantage is that such a method is not suitable for combining more than two different types of compressors in a single compressed air installation.
The present invention aims to provide a solution to the above-mentioned and other disadvantages by providing a method which makes it possible to control a compressed air installation with one, two or three different types of compressors in order to obtain a pressure adjustment around an average set value and within a very narrow margin between a set minimum pressure and a set maximum pressure, such that the average pressure is situated relatively close to the minimum pressure, which is advantageous to the energy consumption and the losses of air via leaks in the compressed air installation.
To this end, the invention concerns a method for adjusting a compressed air installation with several compressors, which compressed air installation mainly consists of two or more electrically driven compressors of what is called the ‘loaded/unloaded’ compressor type and/or of the turbo compressor type and/or of the compressor type with variable rotational speed, whereby these compressors are connected to a single compressed air network with their outlets, and whereby each compressor is provided with one or several control units, whereby the method makes use of a control box onto which is connected a pressure sensor of the above-mentioned compressed air network, which control box makes it possible to adjust the pressure in the above-mentioned compressed air network around a target pressure to be set and within a pressure interval which is limited by a minimum pressure to be set and a maximum pressure to be set, whereby the above-mentioned adjustment takes place by controlling the flow of one or several of the above-mentioned compressors, in particular in order to increase the overall flow supplied by the compressors when the pressure drops too much and in order to lower the overall supplied flow when the pressure becomes too high.
Preferably, an evaluation table is stored in the memory of the control box beforehand for every compressor or for every type of compressor of the compressed air installation, whereby for every working condition of the compressor concerned, the influence of an aforesaid control order is assessed, and whereby for every control order of the compressor concerned, a score is given which is positive when the influence of said order is advantageous to the output of the compressed air installation, and which is negative when the aforesaid influence is disadvantageous and whose absolute value is all the greater as the advantageous or disadvantageous influence is bigger.
In this manner, on the basis of said evaluation table, it is possible to check what control order has the highest score at any time as far as output of the compressed air installation is concerned, and it is possible to determine this best score by means of an algorithm, and to have the corresponding control order carried out by the control box.
The invention also concerns a control box for adjusting a compressed air installation comprising one or several compressors according to the method of the invention, which control box is mainly provided with connections to one or several control units of the compressors and with a pressure sensor of the compressed air installation; a memory in which can be stored an evaluation table with scores to be inputted by the user; an arithmetic unit with an algorithm which makes it possible to compare the aforesaid scores and to give a control order as a function of the highest selected score.
Moreover, the invention also concerns a compressed air installation applying the method according to the invention and which mainly consists of one or several compressors of what is called the ‘loaded/unloaded’ type; one or several compressors of the turbo compressor type; one or several compressors of the type with a variable rotational speed, whereby these compressors are each connected to a single compressed air network with their outlets, and whereby each compressor is provided with one or several control units and a pressure sensor; and finally a control box which is connected to one or several of the above-mentioned control units and to the above-mentioned pressure sensor.
Such a compressed air installation with three different types of compressors offers the advantage that the pressure and the output can be adjusted very precisely.
In order to better explain the characteristics of the invention, two preferred compressed air installations according to the invention are described as an example only without being limitative in any way, as well as a preferred application of the method according to the invention, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In
The compressor 2 of the ‘loaded/unloaded’ type in this case consists of a compressor element 9 which is coupled to an electric motor 10.
In the inlet of the compressor element 9 is provided a controlled inlet valve 11 with an open and a closed position, whereas a controlled exhaust valve 12 is provided in the exhaust 5 with an outlet 13 which opens into the ambient air.
The motor 10, the inlet valve 11 and the exhaust valve 12 are connected to a control element 15 by means of electric conductors 14 which can give control orders to start the motor 10 and to stop it, and to open and close the inlet valve 11 and to put the exhaust valve 12 in a specific position in order to make the compressor work in a loaded, respectively unloaded manner.
This compressor 2 has three possible operational modes, namely standstill, loaded and unloaded operation.
The control element 15 receives a number of signals 16 from certain probes and meters which are not represented in the figures for clarity's sake and which measure for example the rotational speed, the electric power absorbed by the motor 10, the pressure and the temperature at the outlet 5 and the like.
The turbo type compressor 3 consists of a compressor element 17 which is coupled to an electric motor 18.
In the inlet of the compressor 3 is provided a controlled inlet valve 19 having an open and a closed position, whereas an exhaust valve 20 is provided in the outlet 6 having a free exit 21 in the ambient air.
The compressor 3 is provided with a control element 22 which is electrically connected to the motor 18 and to the inlet valve 19 and exhaust valve 17 by means of conductors 14, whereby said control element 22 can give the necessary control orders to start and stop the motor 16, to open and close the inlet valve 19 and to put the exhaust valve 20 in a specific position.
The smaller the specific consumption SE, the better the output of the compressor will be.
As is clear from
In an analogous manner as the control element 15, the control element 22 is provided with a number of measuring signals 23 related to the rotational speed, absorbed power and the like of the compressor 3.
The compressor 4 of the variable speed type comprises a compressor element 24 which is coupled to an electric motor 25 which is connected to a control element 26 by means of electric conductors 14, provided for example with a frequency control to be able to adjust the rotational speed of the motor 25 in a continuous manner and to be able to start and to stop the motor 25.
In practice, the aim is to have the compressor work in the central working zone E-F, where the specific consumption is the lowest and in any case much lower than in the less advantageous working zones C-E and F-D.
The control element 26 receives certain measuring signals 27, such as the rotational speed of the motor 25, the absorbed power and the like.
The compressed air installation 1 is further provided with a control box 28 according to the invention, whereby this control box 28 is connected to the above-mentioned control elements 15, 22 and 2 by means of connections 28 which can be realised by means of electric conductors, by a connection in a local area network (LAN), by a wireless connection or the like.
The control box 28 has a memory 29 and an arithmetic unit 30 and is in this case connected to a computer 31 or the like, whereby this computer 31 can be connected either directly or via a communication network, such as the internet or the like.
In the compressed area network 8 is provided a pressure sensor 32 which is connected to the control box 28 via the connection 33.
The method according to the invention will be explained hereafter by means of a few theoretical examples.
When starting the compressed air installation 1, an evaluation table is established whereby, for all the above-mentioned control orders of the compressors 2-3-4, for all or for certain operational situations, a score is given which is a measure for the influence which said control order has on the output and thus on the energy consumption of the compressed air installation 1, whereby for example a positive score is given for a favourable influence, and a negative score is given for an unfavourable influence, and whereby the score is all the higher as the influence is larger.
Examples of such scores for starting the compressors 2-3-4 are as follows:
All these scores are negative, which indicates that starting a compressor always has an unfavourable influence on the output, and that starting the compressor 2 is more unfavourable than starting the compressor 3, and even more unfavourable than starting the compressor 4.
An example of a positive score is a score which corresponds to a control order which moves for example the operational point of compressor 4 with a variable rotational speed from the less favourable working zone C-E in
The above-mentioned evaluation table is either calculated on the basis of the known characteristics of the compressors 2-3-4 or it is determined in an experimental manner.
This table is stored in the memory 27 of the control box 28.
When the compressed air installation 1 is operating, as represented in
These pressures PS, PMAX and PMIN are set in the control box 28, for example via the computer 31.
The control box 25 provides for the adjustment of the pressure P within the above-mentioned limits by controlling the flow of one or several of the above-mentioned compressors 2-3-4, in particular in order to increase the overall flow supplied by the compressors 2-3-4 when the pressure P drops too much, and to reduce the overall supplied flow when the pressure P rises too much.
Preferably, when the pressure P in the compressed air network 8 rises above the set target pressure PS, the control box 28 will give a control order to increase the flow, a certain length of time X before the set maximum pressure PMAX is reached, and when the pressure in the compressed air network 8 drops below the set target pressure PS, the control box 28 will give a control order to reduce the flow, a certain length of time X before the set minimum pressure PMIN is reached.
Thus, by continuously adjusting the flows of the compressors 2-3-4 is obtained a very precise adjustment of the pressure P in the compressed air network 8.
In order to optimize the adjustment of the flows and the selection of the suitable compressor 2-3-4, an algorithm is provided in the control box 28, in particular in the arithmetic unit 30, which compares the scores of all the control orders of all the compressors 2-3-4, either periodically or continuously, which would result in an appropriate flow variation so as to bring the pressure p closer to the target value PS.
Judging by this comparison, the algorithm decides what control order is to be actually carried out on the basis of the highest score, so that the most favourable solution is at all times selected.
If, for example, a flow increase can be obtained by means of a flow adjustment, both of the compressor 3 and of the compressor 4, the compressor 3-4 having the highest score will be selected.
Preferably, the algorithm, when selecting the most favourable control order, will also take into account the overall score of combined control orders of one or several compressors 2-3-4 which can direct the overall flow in the required direction, whereby this simple or combined control order is then carried out with the highest score.
In this manner is for example also reckoned with a combined control order whereby the flow of a single compressor, for example a compressor 2, is increased, while the flow of another compressor, for example of compressor 3, is simultaneously reduced in order to obtain an overall effect which brings the pressure P closer to the target pressure PS.
In order to select the most favourable control order, the above-mentioned scores of the control orders can be increased with a value which is equal to the difference between the supplied flow before the control order and the hypothetically supplied flow following the control order, as calculated by the algorithm, multiplied by a negative weighing factor.
If the value of the above-mentioned weighing factor is for example −1, a control order which would increase the flow with 50 units will then obtain a score −50, whereas a control order which would increase the flow with 30 units will obtain a more favourable score −30, such that when selecting the appropriate control orders, also the scope of the effect of a certain control order will be taken into account.
Preferably, when selecting the best control order, also what is called the flow deviation is taken into account, which is the difference between the supplied flow and the required flow after a hypothetic implementation of the control order concerned, which flow deviation can be calculated by the control box 28.
It is clear that a small flow deviation is judged as being more favourable than a large flow deviation.
In practice, it is found that a control order which results in a negative flow deviation is more favourable than a control order which implies a positive flow deviation.
The algorithm will take these data into account by giving an additional score to the control order concerned which is equal to the flow deviation, multiplied by a negative weighing factor whose absolute value is larger in the case where the above-mentioned difference is positive than in the case where this difference is negative.
According to a special characteristic of the invention, the control box 28 can be made to take into account, when selecting the control orders, that all the compressors must wear to the same extent.
This is realised by adding a value to the scores of the control orders which is equal to the number of working hours of the compressor 2-3-4 concerned, multiplied by a negative weighing factor.
Thus, a compressor with a large number of working hours will be penalized in relation to a compressor 2-3-4 with less working hours when selecting the algorithm.
In the same manner, a certain priority can be accorded to the control box 28 for the selection of the compressors 2-3-4, whereby a higher additional priority value will be accorded to certain compressors having priority, which is all the bigger as the required priority is higher.
Also a forced priority can be imposed when starting the compressors 2-3-4, by according a starting priority to every compressor which is added to the aforesaid scores of the control orders after multiplication with a negative weighing factor.
Thus, a compressor with starting priority 1 having the biggest priority will score less negatively than a compressor having a smaller starting priority 3.
It is clear that, in this manner, also other criteria and priorities than the ones described above can be imposed on the control box 28, and that it is also possible, for example, to build in a clock in the control box 28, such that when controlling the compressed air installation 1, also the working hours, weekends and the like are taken into account.
Such criteria and priorities can also be combined by adding up the above-mentioned scores, such that the algorithm will for example reckon with the output criterion as well as the wear criterion, whereby the importance attached to one or other criterion is determined by the weighing factor.
In this manner, the use of the compressed air installation 1 can be taken advantage of in a very simple and flexible manner, whereby the user can program the control box 28 as desired.
The control box can be programmed via the computer 31 or by means of a distant computer via the internet or the like.
Naturally, the control box 28 itself can also be equipped with a keyboard and a screen, such that the programming must not necessarily be done via a separate computer 31 in this case.
Naturally, these additional control units 34-35 can be controlled by the control box 28, such that the pressure in the compressed air network 8 can be adjusted even more precisely by setting the flows of the compressors 2-3-4.
Although, in the figures, the compressed air installation 1 comprises three compressors 2-3-4 of different types, it is not excluded that only one or two types of compressors are applied in the compressed air installation comprising several compressors.
Nor is it excluded that more than three compressors are applied in any combination whatsoever as far as used compressor types are concerned.
Nor is it excluded to combine the above-mentioned compressor types with compressors of the type having a modulating inlet or outlet of the partial-load type compressor, in any combination whatsoever.
Nor must the compressors be necessarily equipped with all the above-described control units (11-12-15-19-20-22-26-34-35), and, naturally, they can also be equipped with additional control units which can be either or not operated by the control box 28.
Although the figures always represent single-stage compressors, it is also possible for multi-stage compressors to be applied with several compressor elements connected to each other in series or in parallel.
It is clear that the invention can also be applied to other compressor installations which are used to compress other gases than air.
The invention is by no means limited to the above-described method, control box and compressed air installation described as an example; on the contrary, such a method, control box and compressed air installation can be made according to several variants while still remaining within the scope of the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003/0215 | Apr 2003 | BE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/BE04/00048 | 4/1/2004 | WO | 6/30/2006 |
