1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method for controlling a refrigeration unit in order to carry out a so-called fast freezing of food items. With the term “refrigeration unit” we mean every kind of refrigeration appliance having a freezer compartment, either alone (chest freezer, vertical freezer) or in combination with a fresh food compartment (double door, side by side etc.). An example of method for controlling fast freezing is disclosed by EP-A-288967 where the duration of the fast freezing is automatically determined by measuring and comparing fast freezing cycle lengths.
2. Background
Existing products for food conservation in households allow freezing food items during their normal operations. These refrigerators can be divided into two categories: products with natural air convection and with forced air convection. So-called “no-frost” products use forced air convection and are able to remove moisture from the air in order to avoid manual defrosting.
According to present standards, food is considered frozen when its core temperature reaches about −18° C. within 24 hours after loading in the freezer. In general, this is a slow process that usually takes about 12 hours even when there's a dedicated compartment and/or operative mode for fast or quick-freezing. A well known consumer need is to have a freezing process as fast as possible.
According to the invention, this strategy first identifies which phase of freezing is occurring, and then creates the best freezing process condition during each phase. Preferably the control method according to the invention identifies which one of three phases of freezing is occurring. The freezing process can be divided into three consecutive steps.
In a first step, when a food item at normal ambient temperature is introduced in the freezer compartment, its temperature is decreased until about 0° C. when the phase change of water inside the food begins.
In a second step the phase change proceeds until the temperature reach a value for which about ¾ of the freezable water is converted to ice. This is the longest step because it needs the highest amount of heat transfer.
In a third step, the food item temperature is lowered until it reaches the standard temperature setting of the freezer, or colder temperature which is about −18° C. or 0° F.
The freezing of foodstuffs (heterogeneous system) is more complex than the freezing of pure water (homogeneous system). The different freezing point and freezing process depend on the molar concentration of the dissolved substances in food matrix, as it is clearly shown in the attached
The water freezing process can be divided into two main stages.
In a first stage ice crystals formation happens. This stage is usually called “nucleation phase”. Starting from water molecules, water changes its physical state to solid and small ice crystals are formed.
In a second stage these small ice crystals gather to form larger crystals. This stage is called “ice crystals growth phase”. Crystal size varies inversely with the number of nuclei formed.
As it can be seen in the attached
During these two stages of water freezing, food items' tissues are affected by the size of ice crystals. Small crystals (from 20 to 65 micrometers) will not damage the tissues' cell walls, while large crystals (up to 170 micrometers) will break cells' walls and after thawing these damaged cells will loose all their content.
This causes several disadvantages for consumers after food thawing: loss of weight, loss of nutritional compounds (hydro-soluble vitamins, minerals etc.), loss of structural consistency, reduced quality and appeal. The original quality of the food is thus greatly reduced.
To avoid this cellular damage, the applicant has implemented a strategy to control ice crystals nucleation and growth in order to ensure that only small ice crystals will be present inside the food at the end of the freezing process.
Another issue related to the fast freezing process is the so-called freezing burns. This damage involves the external food tissues and it is due to a violent loss of water from the most external layers of tissues. It appears in the form of browning and dehydration of the external surface.
This loss of water occurs mainly as a consequence of the high temperature difference between air and food that is needed for the freezing process. Air at different temperatures has different partial pressure of water: during the freezing process the partial pressure of water vapour in cold air is much lower than that inside the food item. This creates a gradient of pressure that drives water out of the food tissues, starting from the most external layers.
In this regard forced air convection is more critical than static convection. On the contrary, in case of heat transfer by conduction, there's no risk of freezing burns because food is in contact with a cold solid surface and no water extraction can happen.
To avoid freezing burns damage when using a no-frost system based on forced air convection, it is necessary to reduce air velocity and control the temperature difference to avoid a large vapour pressure gradient during freezing process. In order to avoid freezing burns during storage, food items should be wrapped and large temperature swings should be avoided.
However this solution slows the overall freezing process. Another solution to avoid freezing burns is to adopt a proper packaging for the food item, as vacuum packaging or plastic film wrapping in full contact with the food. However domestic appliances cannot detect the presence of a proper packaging around the food, and this often leads to the issue of freezing burns.
Thus, to allow for the best quality of food after freezing and thawing, in case of any kind of packaging, a compromise is needed between high amounts of cold air and a slow, gradual freezing process with static air. For the purpose of cooling the food in the quickest time, in order to create only small ice crystals and thus preserve the food quality after thawing, it is necessary to use very fast heat transfers that can be done with fast and very cool flowing air. For the purposes of avoiding freezing burns and preserve the food quality after freezing, it is necessary to avoid fast and very cool airflow hitting the food or switching to a conductive heat transfer process.
The applicant discovered a solution that is a control strategy for a household freezer appliance that is able to provide at the same time.
This control strategy can accomplish improved freezing of food, and various embodiments may accomplish one or more of the following:
The overall algorithm implementing the method according to the invention can be divided into two main parts, i.e. an estimation part and an actuation part.
The estimation part has the objective of converting the measured air temperature inside the cavity into an estimation of the temperature of the food item or items under freezing. This part is continuously running during the entire freezing process and will periodically update the estimation of the food temperature. The estimation part of the method/algorithm has been already disclosed by the applicant in the European patent application 05109380.5, EP 1 772 691 A1 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/539,190 with reference to a method for cooling a container or bottle in a freezer. According to such estimation technique, the temperature of the container, bottle or (in the present case) food item is estimated on the basis of the compressor status and of the sensed temperature of the zone in which the food item is placed.
The control part will receive as input the estimated food temperature (Tfood) provided by the estimation part and will decide the correct actuation part by consequence, according to the food preservation constraints previously described.
The actions taken by the control part are here briefly summarised.
In the first phase food temperature starts from external ambient T and must reach the freezing temperature. In this phase the most freezing burns happen, due to the high temperature difference. Thus, in this phase the strategy according to the present invention will control air temperature and velocity, plus the possibility to activate a cold surface in contact with food to implement conductive heat transfer. This phase will be active until the estimated temperature of the food item is lower than a predetermined value T1 (Tfood<T1). T1 is predetermined parameter of the control and its value will depend on the application, anyway its value will be “close enough” to the freezing temperature of 0° C. The analysis of the probe temperature derivative can be used in support to the above mentioned estimation techniques to “refine” the estimation of the food temperature (Tfood) during this phase.
In the second phase, the highest amount of heat transfer is needed to provide the fast freezing associated with the formation of only small crystals. In this phase all the possible means for heat transfer are operated at maximum capacity.
This phase will be active until the estimated temperature of the food item is lower than a predetermined value T2 (Tfood<T2). T2 will be a parameter of the control algorithm, and a typical value thereof is comprised in the range about −10° C. and −4° C., a preferred value being around −7° C. In case of a multi-compartment appliance this phase could require the total (or partial) suspension of the cooling action of the other compartments. This would provide the maximum cooling capacity to the shock-freezing compartment, being the time duration of this phase very critical for the effectiveness of the overall shock freezing process. The food temperature estimation, in this phase can be “refined” by signal processing of the well known “plateau effect” presented by the measured probe temperature during the ice formation phase.
In the third phase it is necessary to maintain the fastest heat transfer to reach the desired short overall process duration.
Such a strategy is able to overcome all the food preservation issues while at the same time providing the desired consumer benefit of the shortest freezing time.
Further features and advantages of a method and of a freezer according to the present invention will be clear from the following detailed description of an example, with reference to the attached drawings in which:
With reference to
An embodiment of invention may be better understood with an understanding of the heat exchange process in term of mathematical equations. This may be referred to as a “model based” solution. Alternatively, other solutions, based on “black box” approaches, can be used in describing the phenomenon and designing the estimation. In this case, the estimation algorithm would be based on a set of empirical relations (instead of a mathematical model) between the measured variable (i.e. the real sensor measure and the compressor speed or its ON/OFF state) and the estimated variables (food item thermal mass, food temperature). In general, such kind of solutions can be based on fuzzy logic and/or neural network techniques.
Alternatively the usage of advanced techniques (Kalman filtering, fuzzy logic, neural networks) can provide precise food item temperature estimation without particular constraints in the location of the real temperature sensor 18. For this reason, it may be preferable as a very cost-effective solution to use of the standard temperature sensor (normally used for the temperature control of the cavity) as actual sensor 18 for the above estimation.
In
With reference to
The algorithm shown in
The refrigerator 10 comprises also a user interface 28 that is designed to provide visual and/or acoustic feedback to the user about the status of the fast freezing process or the remaining time to complete the fast freezing process.
The user interface 28 of the refrigerator 10 is positioned on the external surface of the appliance 10 or outside the compartment 11 but preferably integral to the appliance 10. According to the present invention, it is possible to obtain a frozen food quality enhancement by controlling the gradient of partial pressure of water vapour between cold air and food surface, in order to provide the optimal quality after freezing.
Moreover it is also obtained a frozen food quality enhancement by controlling the size of ice crystals inside food tissues, in order to provide the optimal quality after thawing.
The method according to the invention yields also a maximum convenience in terms of duration of the process, by means of an increased availability of the freezing function compared to existing domestic appliances.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06125087 | Nov 2006 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2649702 | Kellie | Aug 1953 | A |
2983619 | Shaw, Jr. et al. | May 1961 | A |
3339377 | Fellwock | Sep 1967 | A |
3494138 | Bird | Feb 1970 | A |
3733848 | Duron et al. | May 1973 | A |
3868827 | Linhardt et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3958428 | Kelso | May 1976 | A |
4315409 | Prentice et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4697429 | Chandler et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4726195 | Klee | Feb 1988 | A |
5033272 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5267449 | Kiczek et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5762119 | Platz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5787718 | Jeong | Aug 1998 | A |
6158227 | Seeley | Dec 2000 | A |
6233966 | Delpuech et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6299920 | Saksena | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6637932 | Badeer | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6681582 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6779918 | Gatling et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789391 | Graham et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7150156 | Gatling et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7318673 | Biscotti et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7596432 | Boer et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601053 | Brandt et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7634918 | Kawaguchi et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20040050094 | Thonnelier et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040237547 | Delpuech et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050028534 | Li et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050217287 | Jeong et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060086107 | Voglewede et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060144053 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060162351 | Yahia | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060207268 | Kelso et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070186562 | Kwon et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080115511 | Barone et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080202133 | Boer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221740 | Boer et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0288967 | Nov 1988 | EP |
1772691 | Apr 2007 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080115511 A1 | May 2008 | US |