The present invention relates to a method for controlling a hybrid drive of a vehicle.
A hybrid drive generally includes at least one internal combustion engine, at least one electric machine, and at least one clutch between the internal combustion engine and the electric machine, as well as between the electric machine and the downstream drive train of the vehicle. As the existing drive concepts in the automobile industry regarding consumption optimization, emission reduction, and improvement of the subjective driving experience are being refined, hybrid drives are becoming more and more important. They have, in addition to the internal combustion engine, at least one additional drive source which is not operated using fossil fuels. Using an appropriate operating strategy, the advantages of the different drive sources may be made optimum use of, while compensating for their disadvantages. The combination of an internal combustion engine with electric machines as alternative drive sources is a dominant variant within the automobile industry. A series of different hybrid vehicles have already been designed for mass production or almost-mass production. The common feature of all is that, compared to vehicles driven conventionally by internal combustion engines, they consume less fuel. The consumption savings is due to the hybrid-specific options of energy recovery during braking and to the implementation of start-stop functions. In hybrid drives a distinction is made between parallel, series, and split hybrids. The common feature of all is the use of two energy accumulators, a battery and a fuel tank. Capacitors may also be considered as energy accumulators as an alternative to batteries. Another distinctive feature of hybrid drives is the performance of the electric machines. A distinction is made between mild and full hybrid variants, a so-called full hybrid being understood as a vehicle which is capable of being driven by the electric drive alone. So-called power-branching hybrid drives will not be discussed for purposes of the present invention because these drives are started differently and therefore the underlying problem of the present invention does not exist. So-called starter-generators are also conventional. However, since in such devices the electric machine is fixedly connected to the crankshaft of the vehicle, the problem of synchronization during operation does not exist.
An object of the present invention is to improve the start operation in a vehicle having a hybrid drive designed as a parallel hybrid.
The present invention makes it possible to improve the start operation in a vehicle which is equipped with a hybrid drive designed as a parallel hybrid. An additional clutch designed as a proportional clutch is provided here between the internal combustion engine and an electric machine. A configuration of this type allows the vehicle to be driven using the electric machine in the disengaged state of this additional clutch. The problem here is that in the event of increased power requirement or decreasing charge state of the battery, the internal combustion engine must be started without causing interference in the drive train. The start of the internal combustion engine is achieved by engaging this additional clutch. This clutch should, however, be controlled in such a way that, on the one hand, the torque is sufficient for bringing the internal combustion engine to a rotational speed required for a successful start. On the other hand, the torque used for accelerating the internal combustion engine should be the lowest possible, since it must be additionally applied by the electric machine and kept in reserve. The present invention allows the hybrid drive to be controlled more conveniently by taking into account the driver's intent in starting the internal combustion engine.
Specific embodiments of the present invention are explained in greater detail below with reference to the figures.
Specific embodiments of the present invention are explained in greater detail below with reference to the figures.
In the above-described sequence, there are several opportunities for improving the start comfort. However, most of them have the disadvantage that their use lengthens the start time. The present invention may ensure that a start of the internal combustion engine is adapted to the driver's intent and/or the driving situation, so that an optimum compromise is achieved.
In accordance with the present invention, a classification and prioritization of the driver's intent and/or the driving situation is provided. In the specific embodiment described in the following, a classification into three classes is provided as an example.
Class 1 covers a start without any special torque request, which is triggered by the electrical system of vehicle 100, for example. This case occurs, for example, when the charge state of the battery drops to an excessively low level. In this start situation the instantaneous torque request is generally defined by the electric machine.
Class 2 relates to a start operation associated with a moderate torque request, when a considerably higher torque is requested than what electric machine 4 is able to deliver.
Class 3 relates to a start operation associated with a very high torque request.
The sequence of the start operation is established using different degrees of optimization for the above-mentioned classes. For a start without a special torque request according to class 1, there is usually no rush. All parameters may therefore be implemented for maximum comfort.
In the case of a start operation with a very high torque request according to class 3, usually the shortest possible response time is to be implemented. If a slight jolt occurs in the drive train of vehicle 100 due to the start operation, it is not particularly critical, since a relatively strong jolt is caused in drive train 6 of the vehicle anyway by the high torque request.
For the start operation with a moderate torque request according to class 2, a medium application may be selected. This means that a not too slow sequence may be combined with satisfactory comfort.
To carry out the desired start type and the appropriate class assignment according to the above-mentioned classification, the position of the accelerator pedal may be used according to a first embodiment variant of the present invention. A threshold value is then assigned to an angular position of accelerator pedal 9 or to a percentage of the maximum path of accelerator pedal 9. A start operation according to class 1 is then initiated, for example, when the position of accelerator pedal 9 corresponds to a value W<30% of the possible pedal path (
According to an alternative embodiment variant of the present invention, the above-mentioned class assignment may be carried out taking into account the speed of operation of accelerator pedal 9. A high rate of change of the accelerator pedal movement allows a high future torque request to be inferred, so that a start operation according to class 3 is initiated.
Similarly, a slower rate of change results in a start operation according to class 2 because a lower torque request is assumed. Furthermore, a combination of accelerator pedal position and rate of change of the accelerator pedal position is also possible.
According to another embodiment variant of the present invention, the type of driver may also be recognized and the recognized driver type (sporty, relaxed) used for the above-mentioned classification. A driver assistance system may derive the type of driver, for example, from the way he operates the accelerator pedal, the brake pedal, and the steering. If the above-mentioned operating elements are often operated highly dynamically, a particularly sporty driver is assumed.
Furthermore, threshold values may be made to depend on the selected shifting program of an automatic transmission (for example, sporty or relaxed).
In general, when a plurality of selection criteria is used, the recognition of a start class characterized by a higher torque request is prioritized in comparison with a start class characterized by a lower torque request.
In the following, the effects on the control of the hybrid drive depending on the selected class are described. A drive train having a torque converter is discussed first. In this case, the rate of disengagement of the converter bypass clutch is advantageously made to depend on the selected classification and the start type provided therewith. A lower rate of disengagement is provided for class 1. This has the disadvantage that the sequence takes longer, but the advantage that almost no interference affects drive train 6 of vehicle 100. In contrast, in the case of class 3, the rate of disengagement of the converter bypass clutch is high; however, interference in drive train 6 must be accepted.
As long as clutch 3 is designed as a proportional clutch as in the present exemplary embodiment, the slip torque using which internal combustion engine 2 of hybrid drive 1 is accelerated during start may be advantageously made to depend on the selected class. The slip torque is thus selected just of the desired magnitude for class 1. In contrast, for class 3 a maximum slip torque is provided to achieve minimum start time of internal combustion engine 2.
Either the rate of engagement or the time of engagement may be selected as a function of the class for engaging the converter bypass clutch after the start. This is not necessarily the same class as during the disengagement operation, since the driver's intent may have changed in the meantime. In the interest of high flexibility, a class change may always take place due to a change in the driver's intent.
During start, electric machine 4 is operated in a speed-regulated mode. As soon as internal combustion engine 2 has been accelerated to the rotational speed of electric machine 4 and is already delivering a torque by itself, a speed overshoot may easily occur since occasionally internal combustion engine 2 initially generates an excessively high torque. It is therefore advantageous to let the speed regulation run on for some time after the start to dampen the overshoot. This overshoot time of the speed regulation may also be advantageously made dependent on the class assignment. In the case of class 1, a relatively long overshoot time may be selected with good dampening of the overshoot. In the case of class 3, a short overshoot time combined with rapid response may be selected.
Normally, the throttle valve is closed when internal combustion engine 2 starts, in order to avoid speed overshoot due to a high torque. However, when there is a request for a high torque as in the case of class 3, internal combustion engine 2 is to deliver maximum torque as rapidly as possible. In this respect, the throttle valve may also be controlled as appropriate at the beginning of the start as a function of the selected class.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 049 888 | Oct 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/058817 | 8/24/2007 | WO | 00 | 8/13/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/049662 | 5/2/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3791473 | Rosen | Feb 1974 | A |
4533011 | Heidemeyer et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
5176213 | Kawai et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5697466 | Moroto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5720690 | Hara et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5841201 | Tabata et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842534 | Frank | Dec 1998 | A |
5934396 | Kurita | Aug 1999 | A |
5939794 | Sakai et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6018198 | Tsuzuki et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6315068 | Hoshiya et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350217 | Unterforsthuber | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6421596 | Lee | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6488608 | Yamaguchi et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6808470 | Boll | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6966868 | Stork et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6997275 | Mesiti et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7017692 | Grassl et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7131510 | Mesiti et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143851 | Masterson | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160225 | Berger et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188546 | Olofsson | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7347803 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351182 | Kobayashi | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360616 | Schiele | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377344 | Barske | May 2008 | B2 |
7463962 | Brunemann et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7472769 | Yamanaka et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7644790 | Roske et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7645209 | Dreibholz et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7654932 | Gohring et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7678005 | Tuckfield | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693637 | Mensler et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7753150 | Tamor | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762922 | Dreibholz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766107 | Joe et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7770678 | Nozaki et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784575 | Yamanaka et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7869926 | Tuckfield et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7878281 | Tanishima | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885737 | Hirata et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7954581 | Tanishima | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967397 | Zillmer et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7975791 | Nozaki et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002059 | Tanishima | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007401 | Saito et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8132635 | Fujimoto et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20030065433 | Homeyer | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20060006008 | Brunemann et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1659054 | Aug 2005 | CN |
10161900 | Aug 2002 | DE |
10316422 | Dec 2003 | DE |
1052135 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1785305 | May 2007 | EP |
2000-120858 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-145946 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-179678 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2003-200758 | Jul 2003 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2007/058817, dated Jan. 22, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100304923 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |