1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a method for controlling a single-phase linear motor with salient poles for driving a striking mechanism with a loose coupling between the runner of the linear motor and the striker of the striking mechanism which is preferably part of an at least partially percussive hand-held electric power tool.
2. Description of the Prior Art
According to British Publication GB 1396812, the soft-magnetic runner in a linear motor, which is designed to drive a striking mechanism, is constructed directly as a striker which directly strikes the power tool-side end surface of the working tool or anvil.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,553,074 discloses an associated method for controlling the linear motor.
According to European Publication EP0718075, a permanently-magnetic runner of a linear motor without salient poles is connected to the striker by a loose coupling with exactly two contact sides between which a contactless gap is formed. Over the course of a driving cycle, the runner which is controlled by a control unit is moved exactly once against the striker by one of the two contact sides of the loose coupling, and the striker is accordingly captured in the one-sided constrained contact. The impact of the striker on the tool is carried out in the disengaged state of the runner so that the impact movement of the striker does not recoil on the runner.
According to International Publication WO 2006108524, the striker is connected by a loose coupling of the type mentioned above to the permanently-magnetic runner of a single-phase linear motor with salient poles, which is more powerful than a linear motor without salient poles. Owing to the fact that the force acting on the runner in a single-phase linear motor with salient poles is locally periodically depended on the pole separation and, further, that a locking force which securely holds the runner, is formed in the neutral positions of the runner, a conventional control unit of a linear motor without salient poles is unsuitable for the runner.
The object of the invention is a method for controlling a linear motor with salient poles and which drives a striking mechanism which method prevents the runner from hanging on the salient poles.
A further object of the invention consists in capturing the striker that is connected by a loose coupling in a fatigue-reducing manner, i.e., without high stresses, in spite of the locally periodic force progression.
These and other objects of the present invention, which will become apparent hereinafter, are achieved by providing a method of controlling a single-phase linear motor for driving a striking mechanism having a loose coupling between a runner of the linear motor, which runner is driven in a regulated manner, and a striker of the striking mechanism, includes within a striking period in which exactly one force impact of the striker is carried out on a working tool or an anvil, a pull phase in which the loose coupling contacts a runner-side contact surface with a one-sided constrained contact, and a push phase in which the loose coupling contacts a striker-side contact surface with a one-sided constrained contact. Between the pull phase and the push phase, there is provided a change phase in which the one-sided constrained contact changes between the two contact surfaces along a contactless reciprocating gap. During the change phase, the runner releases the one-sided constrained contact with one contact surface in a regulated manner and produces the one-sided constrained contact with the other contact surface. At least the change phase from the pull phase to the push phase is discretely triggered by the local position of the runner relative to the pole period of salient poles of the linear motor.
The discrete triggering of the change phase by the local position of the runner relative to the pole period of the salient poles of the linear motor results in a most possible reproduction of starting conditions for the control loop even when this takes place with locally different periods of the runner in which a speed criterion is also met as an additional, secondary condition.
The one-sided constrained contact advantageously changes during the change phase during which the one-sided constrained contact of the loose coupling with one contact surface is released in a braking phase by braking of the runner, and the one-sided constrained contact of the loose coupling with the other contact surface is restored in a capture phase by a regulated approach of the runner. Thereby, the capture phase can also be discretely triggered with the local position of the runner relative to the pole period of salient poles of the linear motor.
The control loop, in use during the change phase, advantageously comprises a differential position control with a subordinated differential speed control. Both controls are advantageously designed as proportional-integral-differential (PID) controls, whereby overshooting, which leads to repeated contact shocks within the loose coupling and which impairs the permanent magnetization and durability of the runner, is prevented.
The capture phase advantageously takes place only after a speed difference between the striker and the runner falls below a speed difference limit as an additional, secondary condition, whereby a smooth contact is always effected and always lies well below the durability limit for compression threshold stresses of the loose coupling. Also in an advantageous manner, a regulated approach is switched to a controlled approach in the capture phase when a position difference between the striker and the runner falls below a position difference limit which serves as triggering condition. Thereby, a slow approach is prevented, and the two bodies come into contact substantially faster.
The change phase, which follows the pull phase, advantageously occurs only when a predetermined set energy is reached in the subsequent compression phase by the speed of the striker and runner (optionally while taking into account additional friction losses), whereby the impact power can be controlled.
The change phase, which follows the push phase, advantageously occurs precisely when a braking energy, which is necessitated by the runner speed and runner position and with which the runner (optionally while taking into account additional friction losses) can be braked before a working tool-side reversal point (which is optionally dependent on the position of the working tool or anvil) precisely for reversing the movement direction, reaches a limiting energy which is determined by the electrodynamically available driving energy. Thereby, the maximum impact power can be achieved.
With the positions and speeds of the striker and runner being determined by sensors, at least one storage array (addressable in multiple dimensions) with reference values, which are determined empirically or by means of a simulated model and which are advantageously interpolated in multiple dimensions, advantageously serves to determine the different kinetic energies and the available driving energy (braking energy) or the use positions of the change phases directly. Thereby, the necessary regulating steps can be carried out very quickly in order to achieve impact frequencies between 10 Hz and 100 Hz.
In an advantageous manner, a rest phase is available during the compression phase at the rear dead center of the movement of the runner and striker, whereby the impact frequency can be controlled over its duration.
The novel features of the present invention which are considered as characteristic for the invention, are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, both as to its construction and its mode of operation, together with additional advantages and objects thereof, will be best understood from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, when read with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The drawings show:
According to
According to
Though the present invention was shown and described with references to the preferred embodiments, such are merely illustrative of the present invention and are not to be construed as a limitation thereof, and various modifications of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore not intended that the present invention be limited to the disclosed embodiments or details thereof, and the present invention includes all variations and/or alternative embodiments within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 000 085.7 | Feb 2007 | DE | national |