The present disclosure relates to internal combustion engines used to power marine propulsion devices on marine vessels.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,848,582 discloses a control system for a fuel injector system for an internal combustion engine that is provided with a method by which the magnitude of the start of air point for the injector system is modified according to the barometric pressure measured in a region surrounding the engine. This offset, or modification, of the start of air point adjusts the timing of the fuel injector system to suit different altitudes at which the engine may be operating.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,924,404 discloses a direct fuel injected two-stroke engine that controls spark ignition timing and/or ignition coil dwell time on a cylinder-specific basis. The engine also preferably controls fuel injection timing and amount and injection/delivery duration on a cylinder-specific basis. Cylinder-specific customization of spark ignition and fuel injection allows better coordination of spark with fuel injection which results in better running quality, lower emissions, etc. Memory in the electronic control unit for the engine preferably includes a high resolution global look-up table that determines global values for spark ignition and fuel injection control based on engine load (e.g. operator torque demand, throttle position, manifold air pressure, etc.) and engine speed. Memory in the electronic control unit also includes a plurality of low resolution, cylinder-specific offset value look-up tables from which cylinder-specific offset values for spark ignition and fuel injection can be determined, preferably depending on engine load and engine speed. The offset values are combined with the global values to generate cylinder-specific control signals for spark ignition and fuel injection.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,988,139 discloses an engine control system that digitally stores corresponding values of timing angles and engine speeds and selects the timing angles based on the operating speed of the engine. In the engine speed range near idle speed, the timing angle is set to a pre-selected angle after top dead center (ATDC) and the relationship between engine speed and timing angle calls for the timing angle to be advanced from the pre-selected angle after top dead center (ATDC) to successively advancing angles which subsequently increase angles before top dead center (BTDC) as the engine increases in speed. In one application, a timing angle of 10 degrees after top dead center (ATDC) is selected for a engine idle speed of approximately 800 RPM. This relationship, which is controlled by the engine control unit, avoids stalling the engine when an operator suddenly decreases the engine speed.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,292 discloses a method which allows a pseudo throttle position sensor value to be calculated as a function of volumetric efficiency, pressure, volume, temperature, and the ideal gas constant in the event that a throttle position sensor fails. This is accomplished by first determining an air per cylinder (APC) value and then calculating the mass air flow into the engine as a function of the air per cylinder (APC) value. The mass air flow is then used, as a ratio of the maximum mass air flow at maximum power at sea level for the engine, to calculate a pseudo throttle position sensor value. That pseudo TPS (BARO) value is then used to select an air/fuel target ratio that allows the control system to calculate the fuel per cycle (FPC) for the engine.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,298,824 discloses a control system for a fuel injected engine including an engine control unit that receives signals from a throttle handle that is manually manipulated by an operator of a marine vessel. The engine control unit also measures engine speed and various other parameters, such as manifold absolute pressure, temperature, barometric pressure, and throttle position. The engine control unit controls the timing of fuel injectors and the injection system and also controls the position of a throttle plate. No direct connection is provided between a manually manipulated throttle handle and the throttle plate. All operating parameters are either calculated as a function of ambient conditions or determined by selecting parameters from matrices which allow the engine control unit to set the operating parameters as a function of engine speed and torque demand, as represented by the position of the throttle handle.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,757,606 discloses a method for controlling the operation of an internal combustion engine that includes the storing of two or more sets of operational relationships which are determined and preselected by calibrating the engine to achieve predetermined characteristics under predetermined operating conditions. The plurality of sets of operational relationships are then stored in a memory device of a microprocessor and later selected in response to a manually entered parameter. The chosen set of operational relationships is selected as a function of the selectable parameter entered by the operator of the marine vessel and the operation of the internal combustion engine is controlled according to that chosen set of operational parameters. This allows two identical internal combustion engines to be operated in different manners to suit the needs of particular applications of the two internal combustion engines.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,725,390 discloses systems and methods for optimizing fuel injection in an internal combustion engine that adjust start of fuel injection by calculating whether one of advancing or retarding start of fuel injection will provide a shortest path from a source angle to a destination angle. Based on the source angle and a given injection pulse width and angle increment, it is determined whether fuel injection will overlap with a specified engine event if start of fuel injection is moved in a direction of the shortest path. A control circuit increments start fuel injection in the direction of the shortest path if it is determined that fuel injection will not overlap with the specified engine event, or increments start fuel injection in a direction opposite that of the shortest path if it is determined that fuel injection will overlap with the specified engine event.
U.S. Pat. No. 10,094,321 discloses a method for controlling a marine internal combustion engine, which is carried out by a control module and includes: operating the engine according to a initial set of mapped parameter values configured to achieve a first fuel-air equivalence ratio in a combustion chamber of the engine; measuring current values of engine operating conditions; and comparing the engine operating conditions to predetermined lean-burn mode enablement criteria. In response to the engine operating conditions meeting the lean-burn enablement criteria, the method includes: (a) automatically retrieving a subsequent set of mapped parameter values configured to achieve a second, lesser fuel-air equivalence ratio and transitioning from operating the engine according to the initial set of mapped parameter values to operating the engine according to the subsequent set of mapped parameter values; or (b) presenting an operator-selectable option to undertake such a transition, and in response to selection of the option, commencing the transition.
Unpublished U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/597,752, filed May 17, 2017, discloses a method for controlling a marine engine including operating the engine according to an initial set of mapped parameter values to achieve a first target fuel-air equivalence ratio, determining a first actual fuel-air equivalence ratio, and using a feedback controller to minimize a difference between the first target and actual ratios. Feedback controller outputs are used to populate an initial set of adapt values to adjust combustion parameter values from the initial set of mapped parameter values. The method includes transitioning to operating the engine according to a subsequent set of mapped parameter values to achieve a different target fuel-air equivalence ratio. The method includes determining a second actual fuel-air equivalence ratio, using the feedback controller to minimize a difference between the second target and actual ratios, and using feedback controller outputs to populate a subsequent set of adapt values to adjust combustion parameter values from the subsequent set of mapped parameter values.
Unpublished U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/597,760, filed May 17, 2017, discloses a marine engine operating according to first and second sets of mapped parameter values to achieve a first fuel-air equivalence ratio and maintaining a stable output torque while transitioning to operating according to third and fourth sets of mapped parameter values to achieve a different fuel-air equivalence ratio. The first and third sets of mapped parameter values correspond to a first combustion parameter. The second and fourth sets correspond to a second combustion parameter. The transition includes: (a) transitioning from operation according to a current value of the first combustion parameter to operation according to a target value thereof; (b) transitioning from operation according to a current value of the second combustion parameter to operation according to a target value thereof; and (c) timing commencement or completion of step (b) and setting a rate of step (b) to counteract torque discontinuity that would otherwise result when performing step (a) alone.
The above-noted patents and patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
A method for controlling a marine internal combustion engine is described in one example of the present disclosure. The method is carried out by a control module and comprises operating the engine according to a first set of mapped parameter values configured to achieve a first fuel/air equivalence ratio of an air-fuel mixture in a combustion chamber of the engine. In response to predetermined criteria being met, the method includes gradually transitioning to operating the engine according to a second set of mapped parameter values configured to achieve a second, different fuel-/air equivalence ratio of the air-fuel mixture in the combustion chamber. The method also includes comparing a change in operator demand to a delta demand deadband, and in response to the change in operator demand being outside the delta demand deadband during the step of transitioning, immediately thereafter operating the engine according to the second set of mapped parameter values.
Another method for controlling a marine internal combustion engine, the method being carried out by a control module, comprises operating the engine according to a first set of mapped parameter values configured to achieve a first fuel/air equivalence ratio of an air-fuel mixture in a combustion chamber of the engine. The method includes comparing a change in operator demand to a delta demand deadband; comparing a speed of the engine to an engine speed deadband; and comparing a throttle position setpoint for the engine to a throttle position threshold. In response to: (a) the change in operator demand being outside the delta demand deadband, and (b) at least one of: (i) the engine speed being outside the engine speed deadband, and (ii) the throttle position setpoint exceeding the throttle position threshold, the control module immediately thereafter operates the engine according to a second set of mapped parameter values configured to achieve a second, different fuel/air equivalence ratio of the air-fuel mixture in the combustion chamber.
Another method for controlling a marine internal combustion engine, which is carried out by a control module, comprises operating the engine in a lean-burn mode, wherein a first fuel/air equivalence ratio of an air/fuel mixture in a combustion chamber of the engine is less than 1. The method includes comparing a change in operator demand to a delta demand deadband; comparing a speed of the engine to an engine speed deadband; and comparing a throttle position setpoint for the engine to a throttle position threshold. The method also includes immediately disabling the lean-burn mode in response to: (a) the change in operator demand being outside the delta demand deadband, and (b) at least one of: (i) the engine speed being outside the engine speed deadband, and (ii) the throttle position setpoint exceeding the throttle position threshold. The control module thereafter operates the engine according to a set of mapped parameter values configured to achieve a second fuel/air equivalence ratio of at least 1.
The present disclosure is described with reference to the following Figures. The same numbers are used throughout the Figures to reference like features and like components.
In the present description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clarity and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be inferred therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes only and are intended to be broadly construed.
Within the cylinder 16, a piston 18 is disposed for reciprocating movement therein. The piston 18 is attached to a connecting rod 20 which, in turn, is attached to a crankshaft 22. The crankshaft 22 rotates about an axis within a crankcase 23, and this rotational movement causes the connecting rod 20 to move the piston 18 back and forth within the cylinder 16 between two limits of travel. The position shown in
An intake valve 30 and an exhaust valve 32 are shown, with the intake valve 30 being shown in an opened position and the exhaust valve 32 being shown in a closed position. A throttle valve 14 is shown as being pivotable about center 34 to regulate the flow of air through an air intake conduit 36 of the engine. Fuel 38 is introduced into the air intake conduit 36, in the form of a mist, through fuel injector 40. Although the engine 10 shown herein is an indirect injection engine, the present disclosure also relates to direct injection engines. It should also be understood that the location of the fuel injector 40 could be different from that shown herein, which is only for exemplary purposes. After combustion, byproducts are exhausted from combustion chamber 28 through exhaust valve 32 to exhaust conduit 33.
During operation of the engine shown in
With continued reference to
The throttle valve 14 in
With continued reference to
The ECM 48 provides certain output signals that allows it to control the operation of certain components relating to the engine 10. For example, the ECM 48 provides signals on line 70 to fuel injectors 72 to control the amount of fuel provided to each cylinder per each engine cycle. The ECM 48 also controls the ignition system 76, including the sparkplug 24, by determining the timing and spark energy of each ignition event. The output signals provided by the ECM 48 for these purposes are provided on line 78.
The ECM 48 may include a feedback controller 88 that uses the readings from the throttle lever 54, tachometer 46, oxygen sensor 71, throttle position sensor 62, and/or other sensors on the engine 10 or vessel to calculate the signals to be sent over line 80 to throttle motor 82, over line 78 to ignition system 76 (including sparkplug 24), and over line 70 to fuel injectors 72.
In the example shown, ECM 48 is programmable and includes a processor and a memory. The ECM 48 can be located anywhere in the system and/or located remote from the system and can communicate with various components of the marine vessel via a peripheral interface and wired and/or wireless links, as will be explained further herein below. Although
In some examples, the ECM 48 may include a processing system 84, storage system 86, software, and input/output (110) interfaces for communicating with peripheral devices. The systems may be implemented in hardware and/or software that carries out a programmed set of instructions. For example, the processing system 84 loads and executes software from the storage system, which directs the processing system 84 to operate as described herein below in further detail. The system may include one or more processors, which may be communicatively connected. The processing system 84 can comprise a microprocessor, including a control unit and a processing unit, and other circuitry, such as semiconductor hardware logic, that retrieves and executes software from the storage system. The processing system 84 can be implemented within a single processing device but can also be distributed across multiple processing devices or sub-systems that cooperate according to existing program instructions.
As used herein, the term “control module” may refer to, be part of, or include an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC); an electronic circuit; a combinational logic circuit; a field programmable gate array (FPGA); a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) that executes code; other suitable components that provide the described functionality; or a combination of some or all of the above, such as in a system-on-chip (SoC). A control module may include memory (shared, dedicated, or group) that stores code executed by the processing system. The term “code” may include software, firmware, and/or microcode, and may refer to programs, routines, functions, classes, and/or objects. The term “shared” means that some or all code from multiple control modules may be executed using a single (shared) processor. In addition, some or all code from multiple control modules may be stored by a single (shared) memory. The term “group” means that some or all code from a single control module may be executed using a group of processors. In addition, some or all code from a single control module may be stored using a group of memories.
The storage system 86 can comprise any storage media readable by the processing system 84 and capable of storing software. The storage system 86 can include volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, software program modules, or other data. The storage system 86 can be implemented as a single storage device or across multiple storage devices or sub-systems. The storage system 86 can include additional elements, such as a memory controller capable of communicating with the processing system. Non-limiting examples of storage media include random access memory, read-only memory, magnetic discs, optical discs, flash memory, virtual and non-virtual memory, various types of magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and that may be accessed by an instruction execution system. The storage media can be a transitory storage media or a non-transitory storage media such as a non-transitory tangible computer readable medium.
The ECM 48 communicates with one or more components of the control system via I/O interfaces and a communication link, which can be a wired or wireless link, and is shown schematically by lines 55, 47, 64, 50, 58, 78, 70, 73, 60, and 80. The ECM 48 is capable of monitoring and controlling one or more operational characteristics of the control system and its various subsystems by sending and receiving control signals via the communication link. In one example, the communication link is a controller area network (CAN) bus, but other types of links could be used. It should be noted that the extent of connections of the communication link shown herein is for schematic purposes only, and the communication link in fact provides communication between the ECM 48 and each of the peripheral devices and sensors noted herein, although not every connection is shown in the drawings for purposes of clarity.
In order to convert the input signal on line 55, which relates to the operator demand, to output signals on each of line 80 to move the throttle motor 82, line 78 to control the ignition system 76, and line 70 to control the fuel injectors 72, the ECM 48 uses a number of input-output maps saved in the storage system 86.
Continuing with this example, if the map 204 represented a fuel per cylinder (FPC) value, the value would be selected from location 210 and used for the intended purposes. It should be understood that the arrangement represented in
The use of catalytic converters using oxidizing catalysts to remove CO and HC, and reducing catalysts to remove CO and NOx, etc., or three-element catalysts, is known as method of cleansing exhaust gas emissions from internal combustion engines. These are mainly used in automobile engines. Because they have different regulatory requirements than automobile engines, non-catalyzed marine engines have the ability to run in lean-burn, during which the engine is operated at a fuel/air ratio that is less than stoichiometric (or an air/fuel ratio that is greater than stoichiometric). For a gasoline engine, the stoichiometric air/fuel ratio is 14.7:1. The stoichiometric air/fuel ratio is used to calculate a phi value (ϕ=AFRstoich/AFR), where ϕ=1 when the air-fuel mixture is at stoichiometric. In contrast, when running in lean-burn, an engine's air-fuel mixture will have a target phi value that is less than 1, and in one non-limiting example is about 0.85. Lean burn operation is therefore at a target air/fuel ratio that is at least 14.8:1, and in one non-limiting example is about 17.3:1. Operating an engine in lean-burn can have a significant impact on improving fuel economy. However, the region in which an engine can operate efficiently in lean-burn is limited by the coefficient of variation (CoV) of combustion, emissions, torque availability, and drivability. The lean region can be further limited by altitude, engine coolant temperature, fuel system issues, and other engine faults. The potential gain in fuel economy from running in lean burn can be improved by using a binary on/off type of algorithm for initiating and ending lean-burn, and by undertaking changes in engine combustion parameters between operating in the stoichiometric region and operating in lean-burn separately of one another. This allows the lean-burn operating zone of the engine to be pushed to the edges of predetermined run quality, emissions, and efficiency limits.
Although the determinations of the ECM 48 about to be described herein below will be related to the fuel/air equivalence ratio ϕ (phi), it should be understood that the relative quantities of fuel and air in the combustion chamber 28 may also or instead be expressed in terms of the air/fuel equivalence ratio λ (lambda), the air/fuel ratio (AFR), or the fuel/air ratio (FAR), depending on the programming of the ECM 48. These ratios are related to one another by way of simple mathematics and/or known stoichiometric values, and any of them can be easily determined using the reading from the oxygen sensor 71.
Referring to
Turning now to
It should be understood that the algorithm may require that all or fewer than all of the lean-burn mode enablement criteria be met before the method will continue. Additional lean-burn mode enablement criteria may be used. For example, the lean-burn mode enablement criteria may also include that the engine is operating within an enablement zone as determined by a combination of a speed of the engine 10 and an operator demand, as will be described further herein below. As shown at 1606, the method also includes doing one of the following in response to the engine operating conditions meeting the lean-burn mode enablement criteria: (a) automatically retrieving a subsequent set of mapped parameter values configured to achieve a second, lesser fuel-air equivalence ratio in the engine's combustion chamber 28 and automatically transitioning from operating the engine 10 according to the initial set of mapped parameter values to operating the engine 10 according to the subsequent set of mapped parameter values (see 1608); and (b) presenting an operator-selectable option to transition from operating the engine according to the initial set of mapped parameter values to operating the engine according to the subsequent set of mapped parameter values, and in response to selection of the option, commencing the transition (see 1610). Which one of options (a) and (b) the ECM 48 uses could be programmed into the memory upon initial calibration, or could be a selectable function upon start-up of the engine 10. Alternatively, the ECM 48 might present the operator-selectable option for a given period of time after the lean-burn mode enablement criteria have been met, and after the given period of time has elapsed, may automatically transition into lean-burn mode.
In the example in which transitioning to the lean-burn mode is presented as an operator-selectable option (see 1610), a button, keypad, touchscreen, or similar located at the vessel's helm may be used to select such feature. For example, referring to
In one example of the method, the first fuel/air equivalence ratio is greater than or equal to 1 (i.e., the fuel/air ratio is at or above the stoichiometric fuel/air ratio for gasoline), although it should be understood that other fuel/air equivalence ratios could be used. The mapped parameter values in
By way of specific example, as shown in
The current engine speed, as determined by the tachometer 46, and the current operator demand, as determined from the throttle lever 54, are input to look up a throttle position setpoint in a corresponding cell of the input-output map 700. The lighter gray cells at the left hand side of the map 700 represent pairs of conditions at which the system is operating within the lean-burn enablement zone 703. For example, cell 702 holds a value for the throttle position setpoint corresponding to an engine speed of RPM_3 and an operator demand of 56%. Assuming that the other lean-burn enablement conditions noted hereinabove with respect to box 1702 of
Each of the darker gray cells at the middle of the map 700 represents a pair of conditions at which the system will transition into or out of the lean-burn mode. For example, cell 704 contains a throttle position setpoint for the engine speed of RPM_3 and an operator demand of 58%, and represents the lower limit of the transition zone 705. If the operator were to increase demand from 56% to 58% at engine speed RPM_3, the system would begin to transition out of the lean-burn mode according to the switch from cell 702 to cell 704. Cell 706 corresponds to the engine speed of RPM_3 and an operator demand of 62%, and represents the upper limit of the transition zone 705. As operator demand increases from 58% to 62%, the algorithm ramps out the throttle position setpoint from the value in cell 704 to the value in cell 706, as will be described herein below with respect to
The white cells at the right hand side of the map 700 represent pairs of conditions at which lean-burn cannot be enabled. Cell 708, corresponding to the engine speed of RPM_3 and an operator demand of 70%, is within this non-enablement zone 707. Thus, a throttle position threshold is defined between the transition zone 705 and the non-enablement zone 707, above which throttle position threshold lean-burn cannot be enabled. The cells in the non-enablement zone 707 hold throttle position setpoints that exceed the throttle position threshold. As suggested by the stepped shape of the transition zone 705, the throttle position threshold varies with engine speed. In other words, the throttle position threshold between cells 706 and 708 is different than the throttle position threshold between cells 710 and 712.
Each of the engine speed, operator demand, and corresponding throttle position setpoint and threshold values in input-output map 700 can be calibrated for a specific vessel application. Note that values between those shown can be interpolated. Additionally, while the above example described engine load (operator demand) increasing while engine speed remained constant, in other examples, engine speed could increase with increasing operator demand, although there could be a lag between the two. It should be understood that the input-output map 700 can also be used to initiate a transition from the non-enablement zone 707, through the transition zone 705, and into the lean-burn enablement zone 703, although the example above described a transition in the opposite direction.
Returning to
According to the present disclosure, the stoichiometric set of mapped parameter values is contained in a first input-output map that is unique from a second input-output map containing the lean-burn set of mapped parameter values, both of which are saved in the storage system 86. That is, the map 400 shown in
Note that the same lean-burn enablement criteria noted at 1702 and 1704 being untrue will disable lean burn at any time during or after a transition into lean burn. Therefore, the present example also includes transitioning from operating the engine 10 according to the lean-burn set of mapped parameter values to operating the engine 10 according to the stoichiometric set of mapped parameter values in response to one or more of the engine operating conditions no longer meeting one or more of the respective lean-burn mode enablement criteria. In fact, both during the transition and while operating in lean-burn, the ECM 48 will regularly or continuously check the lean-burn enablement criteria by comparing them to measured current values of engine operating conditions. If any of the lean-burn enablement criteria becomes untrue, lean burn transition or operation is terminated, and the ECM 48 returns the system to operating in maps 400, 500, and 600 using unique disable delays and ramps, as will be described below.
The above-noted concepts are shown generally in
Because the combustion parameters are each scheduled to change during the enable or disable transition period, and because each parameter starts and ends at a unique value, each parameter also has a unique set of enable and disable rates. Continuing with reference to
In one example, the subsequent set of mapped parameter values comprises offset values to be added to the initial set of mapped parameter values or by which the initial set of mapped parameters is to be multiplied. That is, the maps 404, 504, 604 may contain offset values or multipliers to be added to or multiplied with a corresponding value from the base maps 400, 500, 600, which offset values or multipliers change the stoichiometric values from the base maps 400, 500, 600 into lean-burn values.
Note that each transition between a base map and a lean burn map (or between the base map and the base-map-plus-offset map) occurs between corresponding values in each map. That is, when transitioning from using base map 400 to lean-burn map 404, the ECM 48 will transition from using a spark timing value found at location 402 to using a spark timing value found at corresponding location 406. Before the transition, other engine speeds and operator demands might command values of spark timing from other cell locations, but once a decision to transition has been made, the current value at location 402 is used as the starting value for the transition. After the transition to the value at location 406 is completed, other engine speeds and operator demands might thereafter command values of spark timing from other cell locations. The same principle holds true for transitions between the maps for the other combustion parameters, where the exemplary current values at locations 502 and 602 are used as the starting points for transition, and the exemplary target values at locations 506 and 606 are used as the ending points. Thus, the present method includes transitioning from operating the engine 10 according to a current value of a given combustion parameter determined from the initial set of mapped parameter values to operating the engine 10 according to a target value of the given combustion parameter determined from the subsequent set of mapped parameter values.
The above-mentioned unique transition rates bring about gradual transitions from the current value of a given combustion parameter to the target value of a given combustion parameter, and may be accomplished in several ways. For example, the given combustion parameter may transition from a current value to a target value over 10 seconds or over a given number of TDCs. The changes can be smooth, such as at a rate of X units per second, or can be done in a step-wise manner, so long as the steps do not result in noticeable changes in engine performance. In general, the transition is designed to be smooth enough that the operator cannot hear or feel any changes in engine performance.
As noted above with respect to
The method also includes determining a change in operator demand from the helm, as shown at box 1104. Note that this includes an operator demand input via a remote control or a remote helm. The ECM 48 may determine the change in operator demand by comparing a current operator demand from the throttle lever 54 with a filtered operator demand, wherein the change in operator demand is calculated as the difference between the current demand and the filtered demand. Applying a filter to the operator demand filters out noise in the signal from the throttle lever 54 and allows changes in operator demand to be caught as they occur. The filter may be a type of moving average filter, which averages the current operator demand value and a predetermined number of past operator demand values. In one example, the filter applied is a first order exponential filter. The first order exponential filter operates according to the equation: y(k)=a*y(k−1)+(1−a)*x(k), where x(k) is the raw input at time step k; y(k) is the filtered output at time step k; and “a” is a constant between 0 and 1. In one example, a=exp (−T/τ), where τ is the filter time constant, and T is a fixed time step between samples.
As shown at decision 1106, the ECM 48 next determines whether the actual engine speed, measured in box 1100, is less than the RPM lower limit. The RPM lower limit is a calibrated value, and an example lower limit RPM_LOW is described hereinabove with respect to
If any of the decisions at boxes 1106, 1108, or 1110 is yes, then the system can no longer operate in the lean-burn mode because the operating conditions are not within the lean-burn enablement zone 703 described hereinabove with respect to
If the decision at 1116 is no, the method continues to box 1118, and the ECM 48 gradually transitions from using the lean-burn maps 404, 504, 604 to using the base maps 400, 500, 600, which as noted hereinabove are configured to achieve more or less of a stoichiometric fuel-air equivalence ratio in the engine's combustion chamber(s) 28. The ECM 48 uses the ramps and delays described hereinabove with respect to
If the decision at 1116 is yes, either before or after a transition back to the base maps has begun, the method continues to box 1122, and the ECM 48 immediately returns to operating the engine 10 with a more or less stoichiometric fuel-air equivalence ratio by using the base maps. In such an instance, the ECM 48 has determined that the engine 10 is not capable of providing the torque requested by the operator using the lean-burn maps 404, 504, 604, and must instead abruptly return to using the base maps 400, 500, 600. The method thereafter continues to box 1114 and returns to start.
Thus, if lean-burn operation was already beginning to be ramped out according to box 1118, but then the change in operator demand exceeded the delta demand deadband (decision 1116), the system will immediately be reset to using the base maps. Even if the system had not yet begun to ramp out the lean-burn combustion parameters, if the change in operator demand is outside the delta demand deadband, the system will nonetheless immediately bail directly back to using the base maps so long as the engine speed is outside of an engine speed deadband defined between the lower and upper RPM thresholds (e.g., RPM_LOW and RPM_HIGH), and/or the throttle position setpoint exceeds the throttle position threshold.
An example of this method being run on a vessel is provided in
As shown at 124, at about 952 seconds, the change in operator demand is outside the delta demand deadband defined between lower limit 122 and upper limit 120. However, because neither the engine speed is outside of the deadband between the upper RPM limit and the lower RPM limit, nor does the throttle position setpoint exceed the throttle position threshold, the system is allowed to continue to operate in lean-burn mode, as shown by the lean-burn control state remaining at 3 (enabled). As time continues, the throttle position threshold varies as the engine speed also varies. This is according to the calibrated threshold values in the input-output map 700 shown in
As noted hereinabove, the first and second sets of mapped parameters values correspond to at least one of the following combustion parameters: a timing of activation of a spark plug associated with the combustion chamber 28, the quantity of air to be supplied to the combustion chamber 28, and a quantity of fuel to be supplied to the combustion chamber 28. In one example, the first fuel/air equivalence ratio is less than 1, corresponding to operation in the lean-burn mode. In one example, the second fuel-air equivalence ratio is at least 1, corresponding to operation at the stoichiometric fuel/air equivalence ratio.
The step of gradually transitioning to operating the engine 10 according to the second set of mapped parameter values may include transitioning from operating the engine 10 according to an initial value of a given combustion parameter determined from the first set of mapped parameter values to operating the engine 10 according to a target value of the given combustion parameter determined from the second set of combustion parameters at a non-zero rate that is unique to the given combustion parameter. Additionally, the step of gradually transitioning to operating the engine 10 according to the second set of mapped parameter values may include transitioning from operating the engine 10 according to an initial value of a given combustion parameter determined from the first set of mapped parameter values to operating the engine 10 according to a target value of the given combustion parameter determined from the second set of combustion parameters utilizing a delay that is unique to the given combustion parameter. Such methods were described hereinabove with respect to
As shown at box 1408, in response to: (a) the change in operator demand being outside the delta demand deadband, and (b) at least one of: (i) the engine speed being outside the engine speed deadband, and (ii) the throttle position setpoint exceeding the throttle position threshold, the method includes immediately thereafter operating the engine 10 according to a second set of mapped parameter values configured to achieve a second, different fuel/air equivalence ratio of the air-fuel mixture in the combustion chamber 28. This portion of the method was described in more detail with respect to decision 1116 and box 1122 of
The method may further include gradually transitioning to operating the engine 10 according to the second set of mapped parameter values in response to: (a) the change in operator demand being inside the delta demand deadband, and (b) at least one of: (i) the engine speed being outside the engine speed deadband, and (ii) the throttle position setpoint exceeding the throttle position threshold. In other words, so long as the change in operator demand is inside the delta demand deadband, the system can gradually transition out of the lean-burn mode, as described with respect to decision 1116 and box 1118 of
The method may further include gradually transitioning out of the lean-burn mode in response to: (a) the change in operator demand being inside the delta demand deadband, and (b) at least one of: (i) the engine speed being outside the engine speed deadband, and (ii) the throttle position setpoint exceeding the throttle position threshold. See decision 1116 and box 1118 of
In another example, the method may include gradually transitioning out of the lean-burn mode in response to: (a) the change in operator demand being inside the delta demand deadband, and (b) at least one of (i) determining that the engine 10 is not running, (ii) determining that a barometric pressure of an atmosphere surrounding the engine 10 is less than a predetermined barometric pressure, (iii) determining that a predetermined engine fault is present, and (iv) determining that a temperature of the engine 10 is less than a predetermined temperature. Each of these other lean-burn enablement criteria was described hereinabove with respect to box 1702 of
In the above description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clarity, and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be inferred therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes and are intended to be broadly construed. The order of method steps or decisions shown in the Figures and described herein are not limiting on the appended claims unless logic would dictate otherwise. It should be understood that the decisions and steps can be undertaken in any logical order and/or simultaneously. The different systems and methods described herein may be used alone or in combination with other systems and methods. It is to be expected that various equivalents, alternatives and modifications are possible within the scope of the appended claims. Each limitation in the appended claims is intended to invoke interpretation under 35 U.S.C. § 112(f), only if the terms “means for” or “step for” are explicitly recited in the respective limitation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5713339 | Kishida et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5848582 | Ehlers et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5924404 | Ruman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5988139 | Wasilewski et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6167979 | Taylor | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196188 | Janic | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6250292 | Suhre | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6273771 | Buckley et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298824 | Suhre | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311679 | Druzhinina et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6726512 | Saito | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6757606 | Gonring | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758185 | Surnilla et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
8725390 | Snyder et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
9067662 | Sako et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9643698 | Andrasko | May 2017 | B1 |
10094321 | Anschuetz | Oct 2018 | B1 |
Entry |
---|
Snyder, Matthew W., “Methods and Systems for Encoder Synchronization Using Spark and Fuel Modification”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,660, filed Apr. 24, 2015. |
Attainable Adventure Cruising, “Understanding an Engine Fuel Map”, Chapter 2 of Online Book “Engines for Cruising Boats”, Jun. 2, 2015, last accessed Apr. 7, 2017, available at https://www.morganscloud.com/2015/06/02/understandinganenginefuelmap/. |
Anschuetz et al., “Method for Controlling a Marine Internal Combustion Engine”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/597,749, filed May 17, 2017. |
Anschuetz et al., “Method for Controlling a Marine Internal Combustion Engine”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/597,752, filed May 17, 2017. |
Anschuetz et al., “Method for Controlling a Marine Internal Combustion Engine”, Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 15/597,760, filed May 17, 2017. |