The present invention relates generally to a method for controlling a pump arrangement comprising a pump and a control unit, the pump comprising a motor and the control unit being arranged to drive said motor. In particular, the present invention relates to a method for controlling a pump arrangement, said motor, at each individual instant of time, when the pump is in an active state and the motor is driven in a first direction, being associated with a load factor that corresponds to an instantaneous operating condition of the pump arrangement, the pump arrangement furthermore comprising means for monitoring at least one operating parameter from which the load factor of the motor can be derived.
In the pumping of liquid, such as waste water comprising solid matter, by means of, for instance, a submersible pump, the solid matter will sooner or later adversely affect the capacity of the pump to transport liquid. The solid matter is caught in the hydraulic unit of the pump and adheres slowly to the impeller of the pump as well as to the inside of the pump housing of the pump, and thereby the hydraulic efficiency of the pump is adversely affected and the pump will operate in a strained operating condition as a consequence of increased rotation resistance, increased moment of inertia, and impaired hydraulic properties. At present, there are several known methods for more or less automatic cleaning of a pump when the pump, or more precisely the hydraulic unit of the pump, begins clogging. The strained operating condition is not detrimental to the pump, but a higher current consumption and inferior pump performance are obtained, which is expensive for the plant owner and which may involve adverse consequences such as flooded pump station when the available capacity of the pump is not enough for emptying the pump station.
Known cleaning methods, or methods for controlling a pump arrangement, are relatively rough and lack capacity to analyse the load factor of the motor and what consequences different load factors may have. Known cleaning methods detect that cleaning is required and then carry out a predetermined standard cleaning sequence, which at least involves that the motor of the pump is braked by the fact that the rotational speed of the motor is subjected to an extended, predetermined down-ramping driven by the control unit. It is known that it is not wanted/recommended to stop the motor of the pump abruptly, above all because of requirements to avoid so-called water hammer in the pipe system downstream the pump, but also because of the large moment of inertia and the large momentum possessed by the impeller of the pump in normal operation. If the motor is stopped abruptly, water hammer arises inevitably where the kinetic energy of the liquid and moment of inertia in the pipe conduits downstream the pump create vibrations that risk destroying the pipe conduits and other engineering components, and moreover, the risk is imminent that the impeller comes loose, the drive shaft of the pump is damaged, etc. Thus, an extended, controlled down-ramping of the rotational speed of the motor always takes place.
A direct consequence of the lack of intelligence of the cleaning method is that the standard cleaning sequence used, and which is adequate in strained operating conditions as described above, drastically increases the load factor of the pump when a large and/or hard object enters the hydraulic unit of the pump and is wedged up, i.e., when an operating condition detrimental to the pump arrangement has arisen. With detrimental operating condition, reference is made to an operating condition that immediately or in the short term will cause the pump and/or the control unit to break. When the control unit, for instance in the form of a frequency converter (VFD), carries out said down-ramping when a large and/or hard object has wedged and mechanically brakes the impeller, the extended, controlled down-ramping causes the motor to force the impeller to rotate and the object is wedged harder/more severe. This causes in turn the impeller, drive shaft, motor, etc., of the pump or the control unit to become overworked and damaged.
In order to prevent the pump and/or the control unit from being damaged, various security systems/protective equipment are used today, such as protective motor switches, fuses, etc., which are arranged to protect the equipment and be triggered before the equipment is damaged. Common to the detrimental operating conditions described above, i.e., if security systems are triggered and/or if the pump arrangement breaks, it is required that service staff makes an emergency turn-out and attends to the error/clogging. These turnouts are expensive per se and, moreover, an inoperative pump is expensive for the plant owner.
The present invention aims at obviating the above-mentioned disadvantages and failings of previously known cleaning methods and at providing an improved method for controlling a pump arrangement. A primary object of the invention is to provide an improved method for controlling a pump arrangement of the type defined by way of introduction, which analyses the load factor of the motor and acts differently depending on the instantaneous operating condition.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for controlling a pump arrangement, which almost completely prevents the need of emergency turn-outs by service staff.
According to the invention, at least the primary object is achieved by means of the method defined by way of introduction and having the features defined in the independent claims. Preferred embodiments of the present invention are furthermore defined in the depending claims.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, a method for controlling a pump arrangement of the type defined by way of introduction is provided, which is characterized in that the same comprises the steps of:
Thus, the present invention is based on the understanding that by carrying out different types of measures depending on the load factor of the motor, the pump arrangement is spared and the number of emergency service turn-outs can more or less be entirely eliminated.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the method also comprises the steps of:
In this way, the pump arrangement will be differently controlled depending on if the character of clogging corresponds to a detrimental operating condition and a strained operating condition, respectively.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the method also comprises the step of:
In this way, a cleaning is obtained for removing clogging that is not sufficiently severe for a strained operating condition to be detected, but none the less affects the hydraulic properties of the pump adversely.
Additional advantages and features of the invention are seen in the other dependent claims as well as in the following, detailed description of preferred embodiments.
A more complete understanding of the above-mentioned and other features and advantages of the present invention will be evident from the following, detailed description of preferred embodiments, reference being made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In
Together, the pump 2 and the control unit 6 form at least one part of a pump arrangement, wherein the pump 2 comprises an electric motor 7, which is arranged to be driven by said control unit 6, and an impeller 8, which is connected to the motor 7 via a drive shaft 9 in a conventional way.
With the wording “speed controlled”, all feasible ways to change the rotational speed of a pump, or more precisely the rotational speed of the motor 7, are embraced, above all, reference is made to current feed frequency control by means of a frequency converter (VFD), which is built-in in a pump or which is external, and which is an example of said control unit 6, the rotational speed being proportionate to the current feed frequency. However, internally or externally controlled supply voltage control, internal mechanical brake that preferably acts on the drive shaft of the pump, etc., is also intended. Thus, on a comprehensive level of the invention, it is not central how the rotational speed of the pump is regulated, only that the rotational speed of the pump 2 can be regulated/controlled.
The method according to the invention is aimed at controlling a pump arrangement that comprises a pump 2 having a motor 7 and a control unit 6, with the purpose of obtaining adapted cleaning based on the instantaneous operating condition of the pump 2. In this connection, the pump station 1 should be seen as a delimited plant to which incoming liquid arrives and from which outgoing liquid is pumped. The pump station should, as regards the present invention, be regarded irrespective of the type of liquid and irrespective from where the liquid comes and where the liquid should be pumped. In the case when the pump station comprises a plurality of pumps 2, a suitable alternation may take place between them, which however is not handled herein.
In
The method 10 according to the invention for controlling a pump arrangement is in practice a cleaning method for a pump, which is entirely or partly clogged. The extent of clogging and/or the character of clogging create a load on the motor 7 of the pump 2 and indicate an operating condition of the pump arrangement. Thus, at each individual instant of time, when the pump 2 is in an active state and the motor 7 is driven in a first direction by the control unit 6, the motor 7 is associated with a load factor that corresponds to an operating condition of the pump arrangement. The pump arrangement also comprises means for, intermittently or continuously, monitoring at least one operating parameter (OP) from which the load factor, torque, and rotational speed of the motor 7 can be derived, either by direct measurement or by derivation from a measurement of another operating parameter/quantity. Said operating parameter (OP) is, for instance, current consumption (I), power consumption (P), torque (M), rotational speed (RPM), etc., or combinations thereof. In reality, the load factor of the motor 7 will be changed, which means that torque and rotational speed are changed, when the hydraulic unit of the pump 2 is entirely or partly clogged. A direct effect of this is that the current consumption, power consumption etc., of the pump are changed to the corresponding extent, wherein the load factor of the motor 7 can be derived from, for instance, the current consumption of the motor. Preferably, the real current consumption IR of the pump 2, or more precisely of the motor 7, is monitored when the pump 2 is in the above-mentioned active state, and hereinbelow, the invention will be described using this as a starting point. However, it will be appreciated that the invention is not limited to the measurement of current consumption as operating parameter.
Now, the method 10 according to the invention in its most fundamental form will be described in connection with
The method 10 presupposes that the pump 2 is in its active state and the motor 7 is driven in a first direction by the control unit 6. In this connection and in normal operation, said first direction is the direction that makes the impeller 8 to transport liquid from the sump 3 to the outlet pipe 4, i.e., the motor 7 is driven in the forward direction. In the start of the pump 2, i.e., originating from an inactive state of the pump 2, the control unit 6 provides for a controlled, for instance linear, up-ramping of the nominal rotational speed (VN) of the motor 7 from 0 to a predetermined operating speed (VD) that, for instance, is approximately 75-85% of the so-called maximum rotational speed (VMAX) of the motor 7. The maximum rotational speed of the motor 7 is the rotational speed the motor 7 has if the pump 2 would be directly connected to a grid (i.e., usually a current feed frequency of 50 Hz or 60 Hz). The operating speed (VD) may, for instance, be a manually set value or an automatically optimized value based on instantaneous energy consumption, etc.
When the pump 2 is in said active state, the method 10 comprises the step of determining a real value of said at least one operating parameter; in the described embodiment, real current consumption (IR) is determined. The real current consumption (IR) varies during normal operation around a nominal value of the current consumption (IN) because of solid material found in the pumped liquid entering, affecting and being transported through the hydraulic unit of the pump 2 and thereby instantaneously impacting the load factor of the motor 7.
Next, the step occurs of determining, based on said real value of said at least one operating parameter, if an externally applied force is acting on the motor 7 to such an extent that an operating condition detrimental to the pump arrangement is initiated, which is true when the load factor of the motor 7 exceeds a level detrimental to the pump arrangement 7. With detrimental operating condition, reference is made to an operating condition that immediately or in the short term will cause the pump 2 and/or the control unit 6 to become overworked and break down upon unaltered driving of the motor 7, alternatively will cause the security system/protective equipment to trig. A detrimental operating condition is imminent when a large and/or hard object enters the hydraulic unit of the pump 2 and is wedged between the impeller 8 and the pump housing. Examples of how the step of determining if an externally applied force is acting on the motor 7 are presented below.
Next, the step occurs of effecting a state shift from the active state of the pump 2 to an inactive state of the pump 2 if an operating condition detrimental to the pump arrangement is initiated, said state shift in turn comprising the step of the control unit 6, immediately after it is determined that an operating condition detrimental to the pump arrangement is initiated, abruptly breaking the driving of the motor 7 in said first direction. The feature to abruptly break the driving is realised by the nominal rotational speed (VN) of the motor 2 being set equal to 0 in the control unit 6, i.e., no down-ramping of the rotational speed of the motor 7 takes place, or by the nominal rotational speed (VN) of the motor 2 being set equal to 0 by disengagement of the motor 7, i.e., the motor 7 being made entirely currentless. This entails that the foreign object, which has entered the hydraulic unit of the pump 2 and been wedged, is not wedged harder/more severe.
In the preferred embodiment, shown in
According to an alternative embodiment shown in
According to a further alternative embodiment shown in
Reference is once again made primarily to
Said state shift from the active state of the pump 2 to the cleaning state of the pump 2 comprises preferably the step of decreasing the rotational speed of the motor 7 in said first direction according to a predetermined controlled, for instance linear, down-ramping of the nominal rotational speed (VN) of the motor 7 to 0.
In the preferred embodiment, shown in
According to an alternative embodiment shown in
According to a further alternative embodiment shown in
In those cases when the method 10 comprises detection of a detrimental operating condition as well as a strained operating condition, the threshold value (GS) detrimental to said at least one operating parameter should be at least 20% greater than the threshold value (GA) straining said at least one operating parameter. Alternatively, the interval (RS) detrimental to said at least one operating parameter should be greater than and include the interval (RA) straining said at least one operating parameter. Further alternatively, the difference threshold value (DS) detrimental to said at least one operating parameter should be at least two times greater than the difference threshold value (DA) straining said at least one operating parameter.
Reference is once again made primarily to
Reference is now made essentially to
The sub-method 11 comprises the steps of stopping the motor 7, and keeping the motor 7 stopped during a predetermined third period of time (T3). In this way, an automatic backwash of the hydraulic unit of the pump 2 is obtained, whereupon the solid matter possibly is flushed out of the pump 2.
Furthermore, the sub-method 11 preferably comprises the steps of increasing the nominal rotational speed (VN) of the motor 7 from 0 to a second cleaning rotational speed (V2) in a second direction opposite the first direction according to a predetermined up-ramping of the rotational speed of the motor 7, driving the motor 7 in said second direction during a predetermined fourth period of time (T4), decreasing the nominal rotational speed (VN) of the motor 7 from said second cleaning rotational speed (V2) in said second direction to 0 according to a predetermined down-ramping of the rotational speed of the motor 7, and keeping the motor 7 stopped during said predetermined third period of time (T3). In this way, an increased turbulence is obtained in the hydraulic unit of the pump 2, which causes solid matter to come loose and be pumped rearward out of the pump 2; in addition, the effect is obtained that large and/or hard objects that are caught in the hydraulic unit of the pump 2 will be worked loose.
Next, the sub-method 11 preferably comprises the steps of increasing the nominal rotational speed (VN) of the motor 7 from 0 to a first cleaning rotational speed (V1) in the first direction according to a predetermined up-ramping of the rotational speed of the motor 7, driving the motor 7 in said first direction during the predetermined fourth period of time (T4), decreasing the nominal rotational speed (VN) of the motor 7 from said first cleaning rotational speed (V1) in said first direction to 0 according to a predetermined down-ramping of the rotational speed of the motor 7, and keeping the motor 7 stopped during said predetermined third period of time (T3). In this way, a further increased turbulence in the hydraulic unit of the pump 2 is obtained, which causes solid matter to come loose and be pumped out of the pump 2; in addition, an enhanced effect is obtained in that large and/or hard objects that are caught in the hydraulic unit of the pump 2 will be worked loose.
Said up-rampings are preferably controlled, for instance linear, up-rampings of the nominal rotational speed (VN) of the motor 7 from 0 to the predetermined second cleaning rotational speed (V2) in said second direction and to the predetermined first cleaning rotational speed (V1) in said first direction, respectively. Furthermore, said down-rampings are preferably controlled, for instance linear, down-rampings of the nominal rotational speed (VN) of the motor 7 from the predetermined second cleaning rotational speed (V2) in the second direction and from the predetermined first cleaning rotational speed (V1) in the first direction, respectively, to 0. The magnitude of the first cleaning rotational speed (V1) is preferably equal to the maximal rotational speed (VMAX) of the motor 7, and the magnitude of the second cleaning rotational speed (V2) is preferably equal to 80% of the maximal rotational speed (VMAX) of the motor. Said third period of time (T3) and said fourth period of time (T4) are preferably longer than 5 s each.
Feasible Modifications of the Invention
The invention is not limited only to the embodiments described above and shown in the drawings, which only have the purpose of illustrating and exemplifying. This patent application is intended to cover all adaptations and variants of the preferred embodiments described herein, and consequently the present invention is defined by the wording of the accompanying claims and the equivalents thereof. Accordingly, the equipment may be modified in all feasible ways within the scope of the accompanying claims.
It should be pointed out that even if it is not explicitly mentioned that features from one specific embodiment can be combined with the features of another embodiment, this should be regarded as evident when possible.
Throughout this specification and in the subsequent claims, unless the context indicates something different, it will be appreciated that the word “comprise”, and variants such as “comprises” or “comprising”, means inclusion of indicated unit or step or group of units or steps but not exclusion of other units or steps or groups of units or steps.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1151254 | Dec 2011 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/071154 | 12/21/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/096726 | 6/27/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5221189 | Henningsen | Jun 1993 | A |
5488276 | Nishibe | Jan 1996 | A |
6059536 | Stingl | May 2000 | A |
6481973 | Struthers | Nov 2002 | B1 |
7348744 | Liao | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20040213676 | Phillips | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050123408 | Koehl et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060090255 | Cohen | May 2006 | A1 |
20100034665 | Zhong | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100166569 | Andy | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1693711 | Nov 2005 | CN |
2025943 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2487623 | Jan 2012 | GB |
2006029222 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006258076 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2008143859 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Examination Report dated Jan. 19, 2017 for Chilean Application No. 2014-1631. |
Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2015, in corresponding Japanese application No. 2014548933. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 31, 2016. in corresponding Chinese application No. 201280063196.8. |
Office Action for corresponding Russian Application No. 2014130007, dated Oct. 3, 2016, with English translation. |
EPC Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) dated Jun. 26, 2018, in the corresponding European application No. 12816201.3. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140369854 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |