The present invention relates to the field of radars for search and tracking.
Currently, in radars searching and tracking the path of projectiles, successive rounds from the same gun or other trajectories will be detected and tracked with the radar using the same frequencies each time. Thus both the detection probability and the tracking errors will be correlated, since these depend on the frequency characteristics of the radar cross-section (RCS). RCS is the measure of a target's ability to reflect radar signals in the direction of the radar receiver.
Solutions are known in which the antenna orientation/position of the radar are changed. However, changing the antenna orientation/radar position will cause a period of time where the radar is not searching/tracking.
Another solution is to use two or more radars. Using several radars to get better search and tracking is expensive.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method in which a radar can obtain a better ability to detect and follow an object without having to relocate the radar or use more radar units.
This is obtained in a method as defined in the appended claims.
Briefly, the method consists of mechanically tilting the antenna and compensating for the tilting with beamsteering, said beamsteering being performed by changing the frequency of the emitted signal. For successive rounds from the same gun or other trajectories that are repeated, each round will be tracked using different frequencies. As a consequence, the detection probability will increase and the tracking error will be reduced, without the need for a break in operation time or the use more than one radar.
The invention will now be described in detail in reference to the appended drawings, in which
We want to steer the beam at the same place for search but with a different frequency to get a different RCS. This can be done by mechanically tilting the antenna and compensate the tilt by electrically steering, the beamsteering being performed by changing the frequency of the emitted signal. The compensation must be done while the antenna is moving. To be able to do this, we must measure the antenna orientation at a high rate. It is important that the compensation is done while the antenna is moving so we can search and track continuously.
When the radar is tracking a target it shall predict the trajectory of the target to be able to steer the beam so it follows the target. In addition to this prediction, we must also take the antenna orientation into account and predict the antenna orientation the next time we measure the target position.
A schematic diagram of the hardware is given in
Sequence Diagrams
Steering the antenna orientation
We want the antenna to mechanically move continuously or with pauses between the movements. This is done by commanding the turntable unit to change the antenna orientation, as shown in
Compensate for Search
The data processing unit tells the signal processing unit where the search beams shall be. Because the antenna is moving, these search beams must be adjusted in elevation. Based on the antenna orientation, the DPU either gives the SPU new search beams or a message with elevation offsets for different elevation angles. This is shown in
Compensate for Tracking
When the radar is tracking a target, we must steer the beam where it is most likely to see the target at the next measurement. When the antenna is moving, we must also take the antenna movement into consideration. To do this we can find the position of the target when we receive a track message from the SPU, and then predict where the target is at the next measurement (predicted track point), estimate the antenna orientation at the next measurement time, and finally, adjust the predicted track point based on the information on the antenna orientation. This is shown in
While the invention has been described with an antenna that is tilted in the elevation direction, the same principle can be used for adjusting the beam in any other direction.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO03/00033 | 2/3/2003 | WO | 00 | 7/28/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/070873 | 8/19/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2658277 | Davis et al. | Nov 1953 | A |
4034374 | Kruger | Jul 1977 | A |
4331958 | Lacomme | May 1982 | A |
4375641 | Josefsson et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4385298 | Josefsson et al. | May 1983 | A |
5131602 | Linick | Jul 1992 | A |
5227796 | Arvidsson | Jul 1993 | A |
5239301 | Martin | Aug 1993 | A |
5241317 | Howard | Aug 1993 | A |
5313212 | Ruzicka | May 1994 | A |
6359586 | Sviestins | Mar 2002 | B1 |
20060139205 | Raestad et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
05150038 | Jun 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060139205 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |